Cognitive function and delirium following sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia for valve replacement surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Current Progress on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: An Update

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) represents a significant clinical concern, particularly among elderly surgical patients. It is characterized by a decline in cognitive performance, affecting memory, attention, coordination, orientation, verbal fluency, and executive function. This decline in cognitive abilities leads to longer hospital stays and increased mortality. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current progress in understanding the relevant pathogenic factors, possible pathogenic mechanisms, diagnosing, prevention and treatment of POCD, as well as suggesting future research directions. It discusses neuronal damage, susceptible genes, central cholinergic system, central nervous system (CNS) inflammation, stress response and glucocorticoids, and oxidative stress in the development of POCD, aiming to uncover the pathological mechanism and develop effective treatment strategies for POCD.

Pharmacological Prevention of Postoperative Delirium in Adults: A Review of Recent Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication that has important implications for surgical patients, often leading to both short- and long-term cognitive deficits, worse outcomes, and increased healthcare costs. Given these implications, there may be a benefit in reducing the incidence of POD. Pharmacologic interventions may have the potential to reduce the risk of a patient developing POD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently studied therapies include dexmedetomidine, propofol, haloperidol, ketamine, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, acetaminophen, melatonin/ramelteon, corticosteroids, midazolam, physostigmine, and neostigmine. In addition, the implementation of regional anesthesia and reduction of overall anesthetic depth have been examined. Of these therapies, dexmedetomidine has been studied the most and has the most supporting evidence for prevention of POD, but current studies lack clarity on optimal dosing and timing of dexmedetomidine administration. Acetaminophen, corticosteroids, and melatonin/ramelteon are other plausible medications that have potential for reducing POD incidence, but they all require further investigation. Reduction of anesthetic depth and regional anesthetics are options for anesthetic management that show promise but still lack enough supporting evidence in recent literature to receive a strong recommendation. Future research should focus on identifying optimal strategies for the implementation of the pharmacological options listed, including doses and timing of administration. Attention should be given to dexmedetomidine given its promise demonstrated by recent literature.

Propofol total intravenous anesthesia vs. sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia: Effects on post‑operative cognitive dysfunction and inflammation in geriatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia (IA) affects post-operative cognitive dysfunction in geriatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery; however, relevant real-world clinical evidence on the matter is limited. The present study aimed to compare the effects of propofol TIVA and sevoflurane IA on post-operative cognitive dysfunction in the aforementioned type of patients. The present prospective study enrolled 197 geriatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Patients were assigned to the propofol TIVA group (n=97) and sevoflurane IA group (n=100) according to the actual anesthesia regimens. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score was assessed before surgery and on day (D)1, D3 and D7 following surgery in both groups. The MMSE score on D1 was higher in the TIVA group compared with the IA group (P=0.006). The change in the MMSE scores from before surgery to D1 (P<0.001), D3 (P=0.011) and D7 (P=0.003) was smaller in the TIVA group vs. the IA group. Multivariate linear regression analyses suggested that the anesthesia method of TIVA (vs. IA) was independently related to the increased MMSE score on D1 (b=0.803; P=0.001) and D7 (b=0.472; P=0.025). The levels of interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α on D1, D3 and D7 exhibited a slightly decreasing trend in the TIVA group vs. the IA group, although the difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Notably, the levels of IL-17A before surgery (P=0.015), on D3 (P=0.016) and D7 (P=0.002), as well as those of IL-6 on D1 (P=0.027), were negatively associated with the MMSE score at the corresponding time points. Overall, the present study demonstrates that propofol TIVA ameliorates post-operative cognitive dysfunction on D1 compared with sevoflurane IA and exerts a potentially suppressive effect on inflammation in geriatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

The role of perioperative sedative anesthetics in preventing postoperative delirium: a systematic review and network-meta analysis including 6679 patients

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative delirium is a common and debilitating complication that significantly affects patients and their families. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is an effective sedative that can prevent postoperative delirium while also examining the safety of using sedatives during the perioperative period.

METHODS

The net-meta analysis was used to compare the incidence of postoperative delirium among four sedatives: sevoflurane, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam. Interventions were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of 41 RCT studies involving 6679 patients were analyzed. Dexmedetomidine can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium than propofol (OR 0.47 95% CI 0.25-0.90), midazolam (OR 0.42 95% CI 0.17-1.00), normal saline (OR 0.42 95% CI 0.33-0.54) and sevoflurane (OR 0.39 95% CI 0.18-0.82). The saline group showed a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia compared to the group receiving dexmedetomidine (OR 0.55 95% CI 0.37-0.80). In cardiac surgery, midazolam (OR 3.34 95%CI 2.04-5.48) and normal saline (OR 2.27 95%CI 1.17-4.39) had a higher rate of postoperative delirium than dexmedetomidine, while in non-cardiac surgery, normal saline (OR 1.98 95%CI 1.44-2.71) was more susceptible to postoperative delirium than dexmedetomidine.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine is an effective sedative in preventing postoperative delirium whether in cardiac surgery or non-cardiac surgery. The preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium becomes more apparent with longer surgical and extubation times. However, it should be administered with caution as it was found to be associated with bradycardia.

Liraglutide improves sevoflurane-induced postoperative cognitive dysfunction via activating autophagy and inhibiting apoptosis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common postoperative complication in elderly patients. Liraglutide (LRG) has high homology (97%) with natural glucagon like peptide-1, and it has been proved to be effective in some nervous system diseases. Whether LRG could regulate POCD has not been reported.

METHODS

Sevoflurane (Sev) was used to simulate postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) model. Morris water maze test was performed to evaluate the memory ability and neurological function of rats. Escape latency, swim distance, crossing platform times, average velocity, and targeting quadrant time were analyzed. The cell apoptosis, mRNA and protein expression were measured through flow cytometry, PCR, and western blotting, respectively.

RESULTS

LRG significantly improved the memory ability and neurological function of Sev-treated rats, but 3-MA reversed the effects of LRG. LRG remarkably inhibited apoptosis but up-regulated autophagy related proteins both in vivo and in vitro levels. However, knocking down AMPK could markedly reverse the influence of LRG on apoptosis, autophagy, and cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

LRG induced autophagy activation can maintain cell homeostasis and promote cell survival by blocking the apoptotic pathway. LRG could improve Sev-induced POCD via activating autophagy, inhibiting apoptosis, and regulating AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. This study provides a novel therapeutic strategy for the prevention and treatment of POCD.

α5GABAA receptor: A potential therapeutic target for perioperative neurocognitive disorders, a review of preclinical studies

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) are a common complication in elderly patients following surgery, which not only prolongs the recovery period but also affects their future quality of life and imposes a significant burden on their family and society. Multiple factors, including aging, vulnerability, anesthetic drugs, cerebral oxygen desaturation, and severe pain, have been associated with PND. Unfortunately, no effective drug is currently available to prevent PND. α5 γ-aminobutyric acid subtype A (α5GABAA) receptors have been implicated in cognitive function modulation. Positive or negative allosteric modulators of α5GABAA receptors have been found to improve cognitive impairment under different conditions. Therefore, targeting α5GABAA receptors may represent a promising treatment strategy for PND. This review focuses on preclinical studies of α5GABAA receptors and the risk factors associated with PND, primarily including aging, anesthetics, and neuroinflammation. Specifically, positive allosteric modulators of α5GABAA receptors have improved cognitive function in aged experimental animals. In contrast, negative allosteric modulators of α5GABAA receptors have been found to facilitate cognitive recovery in aged or adult experimental animals undergoing anesthesia and surgery but not in aged experimental animals under anesthesia alone. The reasons for the discordant findings have yet to be elucidated. In preclinical studies, different strategies of drug administration, as well as various behavioral tests, may influence the stability of the results. These issues need to be carefully considered in future studies.