Evaluation of voice prosthesis placement at the time of primary tracheoesophageal puncture with total laryngectomy

A NSQIP study comparing surgical outcomes between primary and non-primary TEPs after total laryngectomy

OBJECTIVE

Tracheoesophageal puncture with voice prosthesis (TEP) is considered the gold standard for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy; however, there is debate as to whether it should be inserted concurrently with removal of the larynx (primary TEP), or as a separate, additional procedure at a later date (secondary TEP). We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP) to compare postoperative complications, readmission rates, and reoperation rates among individuals who underwent total laryngectomy with or without concurrent TEP placement.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2019. Patients were categorized into primary and non-primary TEP groups using a variation of CPT codes for total laryngectomy, tracheoesophageal prosthesis, and type of reconstruction. Univariate analyses were performed and significance was determined at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 1974 patients who underwent total laryngectomy were identified from the database: 1505 (77.3 %) in the non-primary TEP group and 442 (22.7 %) in the primary TEP group. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA class greater than or equal to three (91.2 % primary vs. 84.6 % non-primary, p < 0.001). Patients in the non-primary TEP group were also more likely to require intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions within the first 72 h of surgery (20.5 % non-primary vs. 15.3 % primary, p = 0.016). Both groups had similar rates of wound breakdown and dehiscence. There remained no significant difference based on type of reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients receiving primary TEPs are not at a greater risk of developing wound complications such as pharyngocutaneous fistulas in the 30-day postoperative period. This remained true when patients were stratified by type of flap reconstruction. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA category of 3 or greater, which may explain why they experienced higher rates of complications such as blood transfusions intra-operatively or post-operatively.

A New Classification System to Predict Functional Outcome after Laryngectomy and Laryngopharyngectomy

Simple Summary

Evaluation of the long-term functional outcome after primary or salvage laryngopharyngectomy. Long term functional outcome mainly depends on extent of pharyngectomy and salvage situation, which is reflected by our new classification system.

Abstract

(1) Objective: To evaluate long-term functional outcome in patients who underwent primary or salvage total laryngectomy (TL), TL with partial (TLPP), or total pharyngectomy (TLTP), and to establish a new scoring system to predict complication rate and long-term functional outcome; (2) Material and Methods: Between 1993 and 2019, 258 patients underwent TL (n = 85), TLPP (n = 101), or TLTP (n = 72). Based on the extent of tumor resection, all patients were stratified to (i) localization I: TL; II: TLPP; III: TLTP and (ii) surgical treatment (A: primary resection; B: salvage surgery). Type and rate of complication and functional outcome, including oral nutrition, G-tube dependence, pharyngeal stenosis, and voice rehabilitation were evaluated in 163 patients with a follow-up ≥ 12 months and absence of recurrent disease; (3) Results: We found 61 IA, 24 IB, 63 IIA, 38 IIB, 37 IIIA, and 35 IIIA patients. Complications and subsequently revision surgeries occurred most frequently in IIIB cases but rarely in IA patients (57.1% vs. 18%; p = 0.001 and 51.4% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.002), respectively. Pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) was the most common complication (33%), although it did not significantly differ among cohorts (p = 0.345). Pharyngeal stenosis was found in 27% of cases, with the highest incidence in IIIA (45.5%) and IIIB (72.7%) patients (p < 0.001). Most (91.1%) IA patients achieved complete oral nutrition compared to only 41.7% in class IIIB patients (p < 0.001). Absence of PCF (odds ratio (OR) 3.29; p = 0.003), presence of complications (OR 3.47; p = 0.004), and no need for pharyngeal reconstruction (OR 4.44; p = 0.042) represented independent favorable factors for oral nutrition. Verbal communication was achieved in 69.3% of patients and was accomplished by the insertion of voice prosthesis in 37.4%. Acquisition of esophageal speech was reached in 31.9% of cases. Based on these data, we stratified patients regarding the extent of surgery and previous treatment into subgroups reflecting risk profiles and expectable functional outcome; (4) Conclusions: The extent of resection accompanied by the need for reconstruction and salvage surgery both carry a higher risk of complications and subsequently worse functional outcome. Both factors are reflected in our classification system that can be helpful to better predict patients’ functional outcome.

Factors influencing clinical consistency and variability in voice prosthesis management

PURPOSE

Anecdotally it is recognised that management of tracheoesophageal speech (TES) post-laryngectomy varies between speech language pathology (SLP) services and clinicians. This study reviewed patterns of practice for TES management to examine patterns of practice and explore factors influencing variability.

METHOD

A national survey was completed by SLP's from clinical services which manage TES. This online survey examined demographic and caseload information, initial voice prosthesis (VP) placement and procedures, VP cleaning and care recommendations, humidification management, equipment and service provision, and service delivery options at each site.

RESULT

Lead clinicians from 34 sites (85% response rate) responded. Most clinical practice regarding initial VP insertion and management, as well as the timing and delivery of voice rehabilitation was highly consistent. Patient use of antifungal medications, TES and associated equipment provision, humidification management immediately post-surgery and some aspects of initial VP insertion were variable between services. The nature of the clinical setting, equipment funding and level of research evidence influenced variability in practice.

CONCLUSION

Variability exists in a number of aspects of practice across Australian services offering TES management. Sources of variability need to be addressed nationally to ensure there is consistent, quality care available for all patients.

3D-printed tracheoesophageal puncture and prosthesis placement simulator

OBJECTIVES

A tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP) allows for speech after total laryngectomy. However, TEP placement is technically challenging, requiring a coordinated series of steps. Surgical simulators improve technical skills and reduce operative time. We hypothesize that a reusable 3-dimensional (3D)-printed TEP simulator will facilitate comprehension and rehearsal prior to actual procedures.

METHODS

The simulator was designed using Fusion360 (Autodesk, San Rafael, CA). Components were 3D-printed in-house using an Ultimaker 2+ (Ultimaker, Netherlands). Squid simulated the common tracheoesophageal wall. A Blom-Singer TEP (InHealth Technologies, Carpinteria, CA) replicated placement. Subjects watched an instructional video and completed pre- and post-simulation surveys.

RESULTS

The simulator comprised 3D-printed parts: the esophageal lumen and superficial stoma. Squid was placed between components. Ten trainees participated. Significant differences existed between junior and senior residents with surveys regarding anatomy knowledge(p<0.05), technical details(p<0.01), and equipment setup(p<0.01). Subjects agreed that simulation felt accurate, and rehearsal raised confidence in future procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

A 3D-printed TEP simulator is feasible for surgical training. Simulation involving multiple steps may accelerate technical skills and improve education.

Total laryngectomy with primary tracheoesophageal puncture: Intraoperative versus delayed voice prosthesis placement

BACKGROUND

Studies support using intraoperative voice prosthesis insertion performed at the time of primary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) during laryngectomy. However, none have compared intraoperative voice prosthesis insertion with delayed voice prosthesis insertion. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine patient, services, and cost benefits of intraoperative versus delayed voice prosthesis placement.

METHODS

Voice prosthesis use, duration to the first voice prosthesis change, early communication, and costs were compared between 14 patients who underwent a laryngectomy and who received intraoperative voice prosthesis placement, and 10 patients who underwent initial catheter stenting and then delayed voice prosthesis insertion.

RESULTS

Intraoperative voice prosthesis placement was associated with significantly fewer early device changes (1.4 vs 2), voice prosthesis changes because of resizing (8% vs 80%), longer durations to initial voice prosthesis change (159.7 vs 24.5 days), earlier commencement of voice rehabilitation (13.2 vs 17.6 days), reduced length of hospital stay (17.2 vs 24.5 days), and cost savings of $559.83/person.

CONCLUSION

Superior clinical and patient benefits are associated with intraoperative voice prosthesis placement during primary TEP. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1138-1144, 2017.

Proof of Concept of a Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Insufflator for Speech Production After Total Laryngectomy

IMPORTANCE

There may have a variety of reasons why patients are unable to produce tracheoesophageal speech after total laryngectomy (TL) including poor pulmonary reserve or other comorbidities that prevent adequate stoma occlusion and intratracheal pressure to voice. Other patients find it difficult, uncomfortable, or socially awkward to manually occlude the stoma with the finger or thumb.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the feasibility of achieving TE speech with a prototype TE voice prosthesis insufflator (TEVPI).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We prospectively assessed the feasibility of achieving TE speech with a commercially available continuous positive airway pressure device in six TL patients.

INTERVENTION

The intervention is the use of a prototype TEVPI.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A battery of acoustic and perceptual metrics were obtained and compared between TEVPI speech and standard tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEVP) speech.

RESULTS

Voicing was accomplished with the TEVPI in five of six participants. On average, the duration of phonation with TEVPI was shorter, not as loud, and perceived to be more difficult to produce compared to TEVP speech.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The TEVPI is a feasible, hands-free solution for restoring speech after TL. Although the current model produced inferior acoustic metrics compared with standard TEVP speech, further modification and refinement of the device has the potential to produce much improved speech.

The Effect of Initial Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Size on Postoperative Complications and Voice Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The optimal initial size of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEVP) for tracheoesophageal voice restoration (TEVR) remains unclear. As purported advantages exist favoring the placement of both 16F and 20F prostheses, this study compares complications and voicing outcomes after placement of 16 and 20 French (F) prostheses.

METHODS

All cases of TEVR at an academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed (2007-2013). Complications including dislodgement, leakage, infection, and granulation tissue were compared. Outcomes including frequency of prosthesis change, acquisition of speech, and time to fluent speech were compared.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients, 25 received 20F prostheses, and 22 received 16F. Postoperative complications were similar between groups, including leakage around the prosthesis (P = .373) and aspiration pneumonia (P = .670). There were no significant differences in timing of voicing or ability to achieve fluency. Although the 20F group appeared to undergo fewer prostheses changes per year (3.0 vs 5.3) and had a longer duration of use before first prosthesis change (76 vs 43 days), neither difference was found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Voice restoration was successfully achieved using either 16F or 20F prostheses. Prosthesis diameter did not significantly affect complications or voicing. Both prostheses may be placed with safety and efficacy, allowing the practitioner to choose based on the potential individual benefits of either device.

Placement of a 16-French voice prosthesis at the time of secondary tracheoesophageal voice restoration

PURPOSE

Tracheoesophageal voice restoration (TEVR) has traditionally been described with fistula tract creation, catheter placement, and prosthesis placement. Prosthesis placement at the time of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) utilizing 20-French prostheses has been previously described. Smaller initial prostheses may allow fluent speech with reduced long-term complications, such as widening of the fistula and peri-prosthesis leakage. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the 16-French prostheses placement at the time of secondary TEP.

METHODS

All cases of 16-French tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEVP) placement at the time of secondary TEP were reviewed from 1/2011 through 12/2013 at a large academic medical center. Perioperative complications attributable to device placement were recorded, including inability to place prosthesis, intraoperative complications, post-operative infection, prosthesis dislodgement, prosthesis leakage, and inability to obtain voice.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received placement of a 16-French TEVP at the time of secondary TEP. All prostheses were placed without intraoperative complications. The proportion of patients who had minor complications within the first postoperative month was 23.8%, including leakage through the prosthesis (3 of 21), granulation tissue near the prosthesis (1 of 21), retained sheath (1 of 21) and prosthesis displacement (1 of 21). Leakage and displacement were addressed with change and replacement, respectively. Fluent voicing was achieved in 85.7% patients, with a median time to voicing of 18.5days.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of 16-French TEVPs is effective and safe, with an acceptable rate of minor complications attributable to the prosthesis. Therefore, a smaller prosthesis may be primarily placed at the time of secondary TEP and is our preference.

Office-based tracheoesophageal puncture: updates in techniques and outcomes

PURPOSE

Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is an effective rehabilitation method for postlaryngectomy speech and has already been described as a procedure that is safely performed in the office. We review our long-term experience with office-based TEP over the past 7 years in the largest cohort published to date.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent TEP by a single surgeon from 2005 through 2012, including office-based and operating room procedures. Indications for the chosen technique (office versus operating room) and surgical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients underwent 72 TEP procedures, with 55 performed in the outpatient setting and 17 performed in the operating room, all without complication. The indications for performing TEPs in the operating room included 2 primary TEPs, 14 due to concomitant procedures requiring general anesthesia, and 1 due to failed attempt at office-based TEP. Nineteen patients with prior rotational or free flap reconstruction successfully underwent office-based TEP.

CONCLUSIONS

TEP in an office-based setting with immediate voice prosthesis placement continues to be a safe method of voice rehabilitation for postlaryngectomy patients, including those who have previously undergone free flap or rotational flap reconstruction. Office-based TEP is now our primary approach for postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation.

Primary tracheoesophageal puncture with supraclavicular artery island flap after total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is increasingly employed for laryngectomy reconstruction with excellent success. Although tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with intraoperative prosthesis placement is also positively reported, this is not described in patients following SCAIF. We review our experience with primary TEP with prosthesis placement and voice outcomes in patients after SCAIF reconstruction. Seven patients underwent SCAIF with primary TEP after laryngectomy from 2011 to 2013. Five underwent total laryngectomy (TL) and 2 underwent TL with partial pharyngectomy. All patients had 16 French Indwelling Blom-Singer prostheses placed intraoperatively without complications. Six patients achieved tracheoesophageal voice (median time = 1.5 months). Two patients required cricopharyngeal segment Botox injections. One patient remained aphonic. One patient developed prosthesis leakage addressed with prosthesis replacement. Our preliminary data demonstrate that similar to free tissue transfer reconstruction, primary TEP with intraoperative placement of the voice prosthesis at the time of SCAIF reconstruction is safe and effective.

The hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure: indications and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This report aimed to describe a novel and efficient method of tracheoesophageal puncture using a hybrid device assembled from 2 commercially available puncture kits; to demonstrate the utility of this technique in the performance of primary and secondary procedures, under general and local anesthesia, with and without flap reconstruction; and to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent puncture and valve placement.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent either primary or secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration. Charts were reviewed retrospectively for complications, time to first valve change, operative time, and blood loss.

RESULTS

Using this novel hybrid device, simultaneous puncture and valve placement was achieved in 34 consecutive patients. There was 1 major complication; blood loss was negligible; and the procedure could be accomplished in all cases. There were no cases of prosthesis failure as a result of the insertion technique.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent tracheoesophageal puncture and voice prosthesis placement is a simple and efficient method of voice restoration in the laryngectomized patient and can be more easily accomplished with a hybrid device assembled from the components of 2 commercially available puncture kits. It can be performed under local as well as general anesthesia. The procedure is adaptable to a variety of clinical situations.

Practice of laryngectomy rehabilitation interventions: a perspective from Europe/the Netherlands

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Total laryngectomy rehabilitation (TLR) in Europe is not uniform, with quite some differences in approach and infrastructure between various countries. In, for example, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Scandinavia, and more recently also in the UK, head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment and rehabilitation shows a high level of centralization in dedicated HNC centres. In other European countries, the level of centralization is lower, with more patients treated in low-volume hospitals. This article focusses on the situation in the Netherlands and, where applicable, will discuss the regional variations in Europe.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prosthetic surgical voice restoration (PSVR) presently is the method of choice in Europe, and use of oesophageal and electrolarynx voice has moved to the background. In most European countries (except the UK and Ireland), PSVR is physician driven, with an indispensable role for speech-language pathologists and increasingly for oncology nurses. Indwelling voice prostheses are mostly preferred, also because these devices can be implanted at the time of trachea-oesophageal puncture. Pulmonary rehabilitation is achieved with heat and moisture exchangers, which, based on extensive clinical and basic physiology research, are considered an obligatory therapy measure. In addition to PSVR, also issues such as smoking cessation, dysphagia/swallowing rehabilitation, and olfaction/taste rehabilitation are discussed. Especially, the latter has shown great progress over the last decade and is another example of increasing implementation of evidence-based practice in TLR.

SUMMARY

TLR has shown considerable progress over the last decades, and through the intensified collaboration between all clinicians involved, significantly has improved vocal, pulmonary, and olfactory rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.

New Method for in-Office Secondary Voice Prosthesis Insertion under Local Anesthesia by Reverse Puncture from Esophageal Lumen

Objectives:

We clarify and demonstrate the utility of our new method of voice prosthesis insertion using puncture from the esophageal lumen.

Methods:

Our new reverse puncture method using a flexible endoscope can be performed in an outpatient clinic under local anesthesia. We conducted a clinical trial with patients with head and neck cancer between April 2010 and February 2012. Our study focused on the following three points: 1) the percentage of patients for whom the procedure was successful; 2) the duration of the operation; and 3) any adverse effects.

Results:

The puncture was performed successfully for 21 of 22 patients (95%). The mean duration of the operation, excluding the time for local anesthesia, was only 11.6 minutes. All patients began voice rehabilitation and attained peroral intake immediately after the operation. None of the patients suffered complications from the procedures.

Conclusions:

Most patients were treated with our new method with ease and at low risk. The high success rate and the absence of complications demonstrate the benefits of our method. We conclude that our method can be recommended for secondary reverse tracheoesophageal puncture.

[A novel puncture instrument: the Provox-Vega® puncture set. Its use in voice prosthesis insertion following laryngectomy]

BACKGROUND

The use of voice prostheses has been considered the gold standard in voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy for the last 20 years. Insertion is generally performed as a primary procedure during laryngectomy or as a secondary procedure with a re-usable trocar or rigid esophagoscope, a guidewire and anatomic hemostatic forceps. The use of these instruments requires a certain level of experience on the one hand, while on the other use of a trocar and subsequent manipulation with the hemostatic forceps can lead to tissue trauma around the membranous wall or damage to the voice prosthesis. We present the results of a phase I/II study using a novel atraumatic puncture set for primary and secondary insertion of voice prostheses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Once patients had been fully informed and given their consent, the Provox-Vega® puncture set was used in 21 patients in either a primary (16) or a secondary (5) procedure. All procedures were documented on video, while approach, complications and surgical success were recorded using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The average surgical time was 83.5 (± 19.12) s for primary voice prosthesis insertion and 212.57 (± 93.03) s in secondary procedures. The prosthesis could be inserted without complication in 19 patients, while a longer prosthesis needed to be selected intraoperatively in two patients due to a thick membranous wall. No serious complications were observed. One patient incurred a discrete injury to the mucosa of the esophageal posterior wall.

CONCLUSION

The Provox-Vega® puncture set proved itself to be a safe aid in the insertion of voice prostheses. It is significantly easier to use than other systems and tissue trauma is minimal. In most cases, no further instruments were required.

Development and (pre-) clinical assessment of a novel surgical tool for primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture with immediate voice prosthesis insertion, the Provox Vega Puncture Set

Development and (pre-) clinical assessment were performed of a novel surgical tool for primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with immediate voice prosthesis (VP) insertion in laryngectomized patients, the Provox Vega Puncture Set (PVPS). After preclinical assessment in fresh frozen cadavers, a multicenter prospective clinical feasibility study in two stages was performed. Stage-1 included 20 patients, and stage-2 had 27. Based on observations in stage-1, the PVPS was re-designed (decrease in diameter of the dilator from 23.5 to 18 Fr.) and further used in stage-2. Primary outcome measure was immediate VP insertion without requiring additional instruments. Secondary outcome measures for comparison of the new with the traditional TEP procedure were: appreciation, ease of use, time consumption, estimated surgical risks and overall preference. A mini-max two-stage study design was used to establish the required sample size. In stage-1, dilatation forces were considered too high in patients with a fibrotic TE wall. With the final thinner version of the PVPS, VPs were successfully inserted into the TEP in ‘one-go’ in 24/27 (89%) of TEPs: 20 primary and 7 secondary. Participating surgeons rated appreciation, ease of use, time consumption and estimated surgical risks as better. Related adverse events were few and minor. The new PVPS appeared to be the preferred device by all participating surgeons. This study shows that the novel, disposable PVPS is a useful TEP instrument allowing quick and easy insertion of the VP in the vast majority of cases without requiring additional instruments.

Simplified technique of tracheoesophageal prosthesis placement at the time of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP)

OBJECTIVES

Secondary tracheoesophageal (TE) puncture standardly involves placement of a catheter at time of TE fistula creation. We explore the feasibility of placement of the prosthesis at the time of TE puncture (TEP) obviating the need for a subsequent procedure to place the prosthesis. We describe the technique and evaluate the success and potential advantages.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent TE prosthesis placement at the time of secondary TEP from 3/2009 to 1/2011.

METHODS

Fourteen patients underwent the primary TE prosthesis placement at the time of secondary puncture and were evaluated. Assessed outcomes included patient demographics, success of prosthesis placement, need for repeat procedure, early or late prosthesis dislodgement, complications, and specific voice outcomes.

RESULTS

Patient cohort included nine males, five females, with average age of 64 years. All TE prosthesis placements were successful. The 12-mm 20 F Blom-Singer Indwelling prosthesis was used in all cases. No complications occurred during prosthesis placement. Two perioperative complications occurred: one case of transient pulmonary edema from general anesthesia, one case of posterior tracheal wall swelling. The second was addressed with placement of a larger prosthesis. All patients successfully achieved good voice at an average of 4 days after the procedure (range: 1-9 days).

CONCLUSIONS

This initial series of 14 consecutive patients demonstrates successful TE prosthesis placement at the time of secondary TE puncture. Functional voice was achieved in all patients with no significant immediate complications. No dislodgements occurred and no repeat procedures were required. Voice acquisition was achieved at an earlier time (4 days on average) than with traditional techniques and without the necessity of a subsequent procedure. Primary prosthesis placement at the time of secondary TE puncture is a successful option for surgical voice restoration with distinct advantages and minimal complications.

Primary TEP Placement in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Free Tissue Reconstruction and Salivary Bypass Tube Placement

The authors examined the feasibility and advantages of primary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with intraoperative placement of the voice prosthesis for patients undergoing laryngopharyngectomy requiring free tissue reconstruction and salivary bypass tube placement. Six patients were identified; 4 underwent total laryngopharyngectomy, and 2 underwent total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy. All 6 required free tissue reconstruction, and a salivary bypass tube was placed in all cases. All patients had a 20F Indwelling Blom-Singer prosthesis (InHealth Technologies, Carpinteria, California) placed. No complications were noted with intraoperative prosthesis placement. No prostheses were dislodged in the postoperative period. At 6 months, 4 patients available for evaluation had successful voice outcomes, and 3 were disease free. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of voice prosthesis placement at the time of primary TEP associated with free tissue reconstruction of a laryngopharyngeal defect with salivary bypass tube placement.

Improved Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis Sizing in Office-Based Tracheoesophageal Puncture

Objectives:

Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for postlaryngectomy speech is increasingly being performed as an office-based procedure. We review our experience with office-based TEP and compare outcomes with those of operating room—based TEP. Our hypothesis was that office-based TEP results in improved prosthesis sizing, reducing the number of visits dedicated to prosthesis resizing.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent secondary TEP at our institution from 2001 to 2008. The primary dependent measure was the change in the length of the voice prosthesis. We also evaluated the number of visits made to the speech-language pathologist for resizing before a stable prosthesis length was achieved, and the number of days between voice prosthesis placement and the date a stable prosthesis length was observed.

Results:

Thirty-one patients were included in this study. There was a significant difference in prosthesis length change between patients who had office-based TEP and patients who had operating room—based TEP (p < 0.001). In addition, the office-based cohort required fewer visits to the speech-language pathologist for TEP adjustments before a stable TEP length was achieved (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Voice prosthesis sizing was better in patients who had office-based TEP than in patients who had operating room—based TEP. This outcome is likely due to the lesser degree of swelling of the tracheoesophageal party wall in the office-based procedure.