Assessment of the ototoxicity of almond oil in a chinchilla animal model

Effects of an enrofloxacin-silver sulfadiazine emulsion in the ears of rabbits with perforated tympanic membranes

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an enrofloxacin-silver sulfadiazine emulsion (ESS) labeled for treatment of otitis externa in dogs has ototoxic effects in rabbits following myringotomy.

ANIMALS

6 healthy adult New Zealand White rabbits.

PROCEDURES

Rabbits were anesthetized for brainstem auditory-evoked response (BAER) tests on day 0. Myringotomy was performed, and BAER testing was repeated. Saline (0.9% NaCl) solution and ESS were then instilled in the left and right middle ears, respectively, and BAER testing was repeated prior to recovery of rabbits from anesthesia. Application of assigned treatments was continued every 12 hours for 7 days, and rabbits were anesthetized for BAER testing on day 8. Rabbits were euthanized, and samples were collected for histologic (6 ears/treatment) and scanning electron microscopic (1 ear/treatment) examination.

RESULTS

Most hearing thresholds (11/12 ears) were subjectively increased after myringotomy, with BAER measurements ranging from 30 to 85 dB in both ears. All day 8 hearing thresholds exceeded baseline (premyringotomy) values; results ranged from 30 to 85 dB and 80 to > 95 dB (the upper test limit) in saline solution-treated and ESS-treated ears, respectively. All ESS-treated ears had heterophilic otitis externa, epithelial hyperplasia of the external ear canal, various degrees of mucoperiosteal edema, and periosteal new bone formation on histologic examination. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that most outer hair cells in the ESS-treated ear lacked stereocilia or were absent.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results supported that ESS has ototoxic effects in the middle ear of rabbits. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. Myringotomized laboratory rabbits may be useful to study ototoxicity of drugs used in human medicine.

The Safety Pharmacology of Auditory Function

Safety pharmacology satisfies a key requirement in the process of drug development. Safety pharmacology studies are required to assess the impact of a new chemical entity (NCE) or biotechnology-derived product for human use on vital systems, such as those subserving auditory function. Safety pharmacology studies accordingly are defined as those studies that investigate the potential undesirable effects of a substance on auditory functions in relation to exposure in and above the therapeutic range. Auditory safety studies should be designed with the primary objective of determining how administration of a compound influences normal hearing. If an effect on hearing is identified, then it is necessary to determine through histopathology the underlying mechanism for the observed hearing loss. Since the auditory system contains a heterogeneous mixture of structural and cellular components that are organized in a very complex and integrated manner, it is necessary to clearly identify the underlying primary mechanism or target of the new chemical entity that produced the hearing loss. This chapter will highlight major components of auditory function with regard to potential opportunities for drug interaction. Aspects of designing ototoxicity studies will be discussed with an emphasis on standards deemed necessary by the US Food and Drug Administration. Additionally, classes of ototoxic compounds and their proposed mechanisms of action are described in depth.

Assessment of ototoxicity of tea tree oil in a chinchilla animal model

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to examine the effects of tea tree oil on hearing function and cochlear morphology after intratympanic administration in a chinchilla animal model.

METHODS

Nine chinchillas received intratympanic injection of 3% tea tree oil dissolved in olive oil in one ear, whereas the contralateral control ear received olive oil only. Outcome measures included auditory brainstem responses conducted before treatment and at 10 days and 30 days following the injection. Post-mortem cochlear morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

At 10 and 30 days following the injection, there was no significant change in auditory brain response thresholds at 8, 16, 20 or 25kHz. Scanning electron microscopy imaging showed no damage to auditory hair cells.

CONCLUSION

Tea tree oil (3%) does not appear to be ototoxic in a chinchilla animal model. Future preclinical and clinical studies are required to establish the effectiveness of TTO in treating otitis.

Earigate™ for softening ear wax: is it safe when the eardrum is perforated?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety of Earigate™ as an ear wax softening product.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, controlled animal study.

METHODS

Bilateral wide myringotomies were performed in eleven chinchillas. In each animal, Earigate™ was delivered to a randomly selected experimental ear canal as 2 puffs twice a day. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) was used to assess the hearing of the animals before, 3 days and 10 days following the local application of Earigate™. The ABR threshold shifts were compared for both experimental and control ears.

RESULTS

The mean hearing threshold shifts in the experimental animals were comparable at all frequencies and at days 3 and 10. No statistically significant differences were observed in the mean threshold shifts for all of the frequencies evaluated, between the control and experimental ears.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of Earigate™ to the middle ear of chinchillas did not cause any ototoxicity as assessed by ABR.

Ototoxicity of olive oil in a chinchilla animal model

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Olive oil is often used by patients to soften ear wax or to relieve ear canal obstruction. It is also sold in drugstores as a cerumenolytic. To date, no study has assessed the safety of ototopical olive oil on hearing in the presence of tympanic membrane perforation. The present study aimed to assess the safety of ototopic olive oil on hearing in the presence of tympanic membrane perforation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a chinchilla animal model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven chinchillas underwent bilateral myringotomy. In each animal, one ear was randomly assigned to receive olive oil (experimental ear), while the contralateral control ear received normal saline. Auditory brain response (ABR) test was performed at baseline and then 7, 14, and 30 days following the application.

RESULTS

At 30 days follow-up, there was no significant change in auditory brain response thresholds at 8, 16, 20, or 25 kHz. Scanning electron microscope imaging showed no damage to the hair cells.

CONCLUSION

Olive oil does not seem to cause hearing loss in chinchillas with perforated tympanic membranes. Future clinical studies are required.