Prognostic factors in sinonasal sarcomas: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology and end result database

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

Fibrosarcomas of the Paranasal Sinuses: A Systematic Review

Fibrosarcomas are rare, malignant neoplasms of mesenchymal origin. Fibrosarcomas appear to be sporadic, but cases of fibrosarcomas secondary to radiation of nasopharyngeal carcinomas have been reported. Paranasal sinus fibrosarcomas (PNFS) are even rarer with few cases being reported since the 1950s. There have been several retrospective cohort studies examining PNFS; however, to our knowledge, no comprehensive review exists. This review aims to summarize the findings of all published cases of PNFS from the 1950s to the 2020s. We hope that a comprehensive review will assist in accurate and early diagnoses of PNFS, and help guide treatment as early treatment is associated with a favorable prognosis.This systematic review reports results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies were screened using established inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of 26 studies were included for data extraction, and relevant data were collected and analyzed.In our study, the most common study type was case reports (n = 19). The most common presentation for PNFS included male gender (n = 17) with maxillary sinus (n = 57) involvement. Patients commonly presented with complaints of nasal obstruction (n = 15), epistaxis (n = 11), and facial fullness/pain (n = 9). Surgical resection was the mainstay treatment, with the use of chemotherapy or radiation depending on surgical margins and resectability. The diagnosis was commonly made with histological analysis. This review of the literature provides a summary and reference of important presenting factors, elements of diagnosis, and treatment options regarding PNFS to help bring awareness and guide the treatment of such a rare disease. Moving forward, there is a greater need for larger standardized studies that can further complement our findings, as well as more consistent reporting of cases.

The MUSES∗: a prognostic study on 1360 patients with sinonasal cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery-based treatment: ∗MUlti-institutional collaborative Study on Endoscopically treated Sinonasal cancers

BACKGROUND

Over the last 2 decades, transnasal endoscopic surgery (TES) has become the most frequently employed surgical technique to treat sinonasal malignancies. The rarity and heterogeneity of sinonasal cancers have hampered large non-population-based analyses.

METHODOLOGY

All patients receiving TES-including treatment between 1995 and 2021 in 5 referral hospitals were included. A prognostic study was performed, and multivariable models were transformed into nomograms. Training and validation sets were based on results from 3 European and 2 non-European centres, respectively.

RESULTS

The training and validation set included 940 and 420 patients, respectively. The mean age at surgery, primary-versus-recurrent presentation, histology distribution, type of surgery, T category and type of adjuvant treatment were differently distributed in the training and validation set. In the training set, 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival with a 95%-confidence interval were 72.7% (69.5-76.0%) and 66.4% (63.1-69.8%), respectively, significantly varying with histology. At multivariable analyses, age, gender, previous treatment, the extent of resection on the cranial, lateral and posterolateral axes, grade/subtype, T category, nodal status, margin status and adjuvant treatment were all associated with different prognostic outcomes, displaying a heterogeneous significance and effect size according to histology. The internal and external validation of nomograms was satisfactory (optimism-corrected C-index >0.7 and cumulative area under curve >0.7) for all histologies but mucosal melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of TES-based treatment of sinonasal cancers vary substantially with histology. This large, non-population-based study provides benchmark data on the prognosis of sinonasal cancers that are deemed suitable for treatment including TES.

Anterior Skull Base Sarcomas: Report of Characteristics and Outcomes at a Tertiary Care Cancer Center

Objective This study was aimed to describe our institutional experience on characteristics and treatment outcomes of sinonasal sarcomas invading the anterior skull base.

Design Present study is a retrospective review.

Setting The study was conducted at an academic cancer care center.

Participants Thirty-one patients with skull base sarcomas treated with primary surgery from 1979 to 2015 were identified for this study from a preexisting database.

Main Outcome Measures Survival and recurrence outcomes using the Kaplan–Meier method were the focus areas of the study.

Results The median age was 44 years (range: 13–69 years). Twenty patients were male (64.5%). Twenty-nine patients underwent open craniofacial resection (93.5%) and two patients underwent endoscopic resection (6.5%). The majority of tumors were staged pT4 (77.4%). The most common pathologies were leiomyosarcoma (19.4%), osteosarcoma (16.1%), and chondrosarcoma (12.9%). Of those with known margin status, 10 patients had positive/close margins (32.2%) and 16 patients had negative margins (51.6%). Most tumors were high grade (74.2%). Twenty-three patients (74.2%) received adjuvant radiation and four patients (12.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. There were nine postoperative complications (29%) including one mortality and three cerebrospinal fluid leaks. There were 10 local, 2 regional, and 5 distant recurrences over a median follow-up of 74 months (range: 1–300 months). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 69.8%. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free probability (RFP) was 63.2% and the 10-year distant RFP was 71.7%. The 5-year DSS for high grade tumors was 64.2 and 85.7% for low grade tumors (p = 0.117).

Conclusion This study contributes an updated analysis of anterior skull base sarcomas. Five-year DSS is approximately 70%. Analysis of survival outcomes based on grade, tumor size, and other factors is limited by small sample size and the rarity of these tumors.

Surgical Management of Sinonasal Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

Surgery plays an important role in the treatment of sinonasal cancer. Many surgical approaches have been described, including open, endoscopic, or combined approaches. The choice is based on several criteria: general criteria related to the oncological results and morbidity of each technique, specific criteria related to the tumor (tumor extensions, tumor pathology), the patient, or the surgeon himself. The aims of this review are (i) to provide a complete overview of the surgical techniques available for the management of sinonasal malignant tumors, with a special focus on recent developments in the field of transnasal endoscopic surgery; (ii) to summarize the criteria that lead to the choice of one technique over another. In particular, the oncological outcomes, the morbidity of the different techniques, and the specificities of each histologic subtype will be discussed based on a comprehensive literature review.

Prognostic Factors in Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma Using Competing-Risks Analysis: A Study of Cases in the SEER Database

Background

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare malignant soft-tissue sarcoma characterized by a poor outcome and unclear prognostic factors. This study applied a competing-risks analysis using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to RMS patients, with the aim of identifying more accurate prognostic factors.

Methods

Data of all patients with RMS during 1986–2015 were extracted from the SEER database. We used the competing-risks approach to calculate the cumulative incidence function (CIF) for death due to rhabdomyosarcoma (DTR) and death from other causes (DOC) at each time point. The Fine–Gray subdistribution proportional-hazards model was then applied in univariate and multivariate analyses to determine how the CIF differs between groups and to identify independent prognostic factors. The potential prognostic factors were analyzed using the competing-risks analysis methods in SAS and R statistical software.

Results

This study included 3399 patients with RMS. The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of DTR and DOC after an RMS diagnosis were 39.9% and 8.7%, respectively. The multivariate analysis indicated that age, year of diagnosis, race, primary site, historic stage, tumor size, histology subtype, and surgery status significantly affected the probability of DTR and were independent prognostic factors in patients with RMS. A nomogram model was constructed based on multivariate models for DTR and DOC. The performances of the two models were validated by calibration and discrimination, with C-index values of 0.758 and 0.670, respectively.

Conclusions

A prognostic nomogram model based on the competing-risks model has been established for predicting the probability of death in patients with RMS. This validated prognostic model may be useful when choosing treatment strategies and for predicting survival.

Radiation therapy strategies for skull-base malignancies

INTRODUCTION

The management of skull base malignancies continues to evolve with improvements in surgical technique, advances in radiation delivery and novel systemic agents.

METHODS

In this review, we aim to discuss in detail the management of common skull base pathologies which typically require multimodality therapy, focusing on the radiotherapeutic aspects of care.

RESULTS

Technological advances in the administration of radiation therapy have led to a wide variety of different treatment strategies for the treatment of skull base malignances, with outcomes summarized herein.

CONCLUSION

Radiation treatment plays a key and critical role in the management of patients with skull base tumors. Recent advancements continue to improve the risk/benefit ratio for radiotherapy in this setting.

Sarcomas of the paranasal sinuses: An analysis of the SEER database

Objective

To determine the demographics, treatment modalities, and overall survival of patients with sinonasal sarcoma.

Methods

All cases of primary sinonasal sarcomas diagnosed between the years of 2009 and 2014 were extracted from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Additional variables collected included age, gender, ethnicity, tumor histological subtype, tumor size, treatment modality, vitality status, and follow-up time. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated and overall survival was calculated.

Results

One hundred and four cases of sinonasal sarcoma were identified. The majority of patients were female (55%), white (76%), and non-Hispanic (84%), and the mean age was 47 ± 22 years. The most common tumor sites were the maxillary sinus, followed by the ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus. Forty six percent of tumors were rhabdomyosarcoma type. Most patients (66%) had some type of surgery, 64% received radiation, and 58% received chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Overall 1- and 5-year survival was 79% and 31%, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival based on patient gender, age, ethnicity, radiation, or chemotherapy treatment.

Conclusions

This study adds to the current literature of sinonasal sarcomas and is the first to report in detail the surgical interventions performed as well as characteristics about lymph node spread, tumor histology, and treatment outcomes since the advent of radiation and chemotherapy. As these tumors are so rare, continued study of the demographics, tumor characteristics, and long-term outcomes of this population is necessary to guide treatment modalities and strategies for otolaryngologists.

Level of Evidence

2b.

Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma-Case Report and Review of Clinicopathological Features and Diagnostic Modalities

Background  Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is a recently described malignancy showing dual differentiation with both myogenic and neural elements. Due to its histologic similarities to other sinonasal malignancies, it is a diagnostic challenge. Objective  The main purpose of this article is to report a case of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma and to consolidate data and provide a comprehensive review regarding pathological differences between biphenotypic sarcoma and other sinonasal malignancies and diagnostic modalities used for biphenotypic sarcoma. Material and Methods  A systematic review of all cases of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma was performed using electronic databases (PubMed and Medline). Data collected included age, gender, symptoms, sub-site of origin, immunophenotyping, metastasis, recurrence, treatment, duration of follow-up, and survival outcomes. Results  Ninety-five cases of biphenotypic sarcoma were found with mean age at diagnosis of 52.36 years (range, 24-87 years). Female to male ratio was 2.27:1. Extra-sinonasal extension was present in 28%. Immunophenotyping revealed that S-100 and SMA (smooth muscle actin) were consistently positive, while SOX-10 was consistently negative. PAX3-MAML3 fusion [t (2; 4) (q35; q31.1)] was the most common genetic rearrangement. Surgical excision with or without adjuvant radiotherapy was the most frequent treatment modality used. Recurrence was observed in 32% of cases with follow-up. None of the cases reported metastasis. Three patients had died at the time of publication that included one case with intracranial extension. Conclusion  Biphenotypic sarcoma is distinct sinonasal malignancy with unique clinicopathological features. Testing involving a battery of myogenic and neural immunomarkers is essential for diagnostic confirmation and is a clinically useful endeavor when clinical suspicion is high.

Prognostic factors for postoperative survival among patients with rhabdomyosarcoma of the limbs

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare malignant soft tissue sarcoma with a poor outcome and unclear prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic postoperative survival factors among patients with RMS of the limbs.

METHODS

Postoperative data on patients with RMS of the limbs from 1983 to 2013 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the US National Cancer Institute. Both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method (to obtain OS and CSS curves) and a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

In total, 385 cases were obtained from the SEER database. The 5- and 10-year OS rates of the entire group were 51.5% and 42.2%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year CSS rates were 56.7% and 50.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that age, location, tumor stage, tumor size, and radiation therapy (RT) were associated with OS. Age, tumor stage, tumor size, and RT were associated with CSS. Age, tumor stage, tumor size, and RT were also independent predictors of both OS and CSS.

CONCLUSION

Young age, no metastasis at presentation, smaller tumor size, and RT are favorable factors for prolonging survival among patients with RMS of the limbs after surgery.

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Adult Sinonasal Sarcomas: A Single-Institution Case Series

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes and evaluate the prognostic factors of adult sinonasal sarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients with adult sinonasal sarcomas treated in our institution from 2005 to 2016. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazard models were performed to determine the prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes. RESULTS A total of 49 patients were followed up for 6-122 months, with a median time of 36 months. The 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS rates of all patients were 68.3%, 62.8%, and 43.2%, respectively. The results of univariate analysis revealed that patients with an advanced stage of primary tumor and those who received incomplete surgical resection had worse LRFS (p=0.013; p=0.026). Patients with the histological type rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and existing regional lymph node metastasis had worse DMFS (p=0.000; p=0.001). The histological type RMS, advanced stage of primary tumor, existing regional lymph node metastasis, and receiving incomplete surgical resection had an unfavorable effect on OS (p=0.001; p=0.002; p=0.008; p=0.011). The results of multivariate analysis showed that histological type and degree of surgical resection were the independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the histological type RMS and receiving incomplete surgical resection are independent prognostic factors for worse OS.

Fibrosarcoma arising in the paranasal sinus: a clinicopathological and radiological analysis

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinicopathological features and the CT and MRI features of patients with paranasal sinus fibrosarcoma.

METHODS

Seven patients with surgically and pathologically confirmed paranasal sinus fibrosarcoma were enrolled. Their CT and MRI data and imaging features were retrospectively analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

The study participants were two males and five females (median age, 43 years; range, 22-73 years). CT or MRI showed a well-defined (n = 5) or ill-defined (n = 2), irregular (n = 6) or oval (n = 1) mass, with heterogeneous (n = 7) density. The lesions were isointense (n = 4) or hypointense (n = 2) on T₁ weighted images, and showed heterogeneous (n = 6) mild hypointensity on T₂ weighted images. Expansive (n = 6) and osteolytic (n = 1) bone destruction were observed. The tumors showed marked heterogeneous delayed enhancement (n = 6) on contrast-enhanced MRI images.

CONCLUSION

Paranasal sinus fibrosarcomas should be included in the differential diagnosis when a sinonasal neoplasm appears as a well- or ill-defined unilateral large irregular mass with characteristic mild hypointensity on T₂ weighted MR images and shows expansive or osteolytic bone destruction and a marked heterogeneous delayed contrast-enhancement pattern.

Leiomyosarcoma: a rare sinonasal malignancy

Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are rare sinonasal malignant tumours with 20 cases of nasal LMS previously reported in the literature. An 81-year-old man presented with an incidental left nasal lesion associated with left nasal obstruction and occasional left-sided blood-stained rhinorrhoea. Nasendoscopic examination showed green coloured polyps filling the left nasal cavity with biopsies showing LMS. CT imaging did not show any bony erosion. No metastases were found on positron emission tomography imaging. The patient underwent endoscopic resection and all surgical margins were clear of disease. The patient was declined postoperative radiotherapy, and serial follow-up has not shown any recurrence to date. Nasal LMS are rare sinonasal smooth muscle tumours and symptoms and radiological findings are often non-specific. Therefore, diagnosis is made on histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis. Due to their invasive nature, the treatment of choice is complete surgical resection, with adjuvant therapy reserved for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease.

Sarcomas of the sinonasal tract

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous in nature. Continuously collecting data influencing the prognosis is fundamental for optimizing therapeutic assessment of this highly destructive neoplasm.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study considering 27 patients with sinonasal sarcoma.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) rates for 1 year and 5 years were calculated as 74% and 36%, respectively. Extent of the primary tumor (P = .010), nodal spread (P = .009), and age (P = .004) significantly reduced the OS. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly reduced by age (P = .003), extent of the primary (P = .006), nodal (P = .004), and hematogenous (P = .048) spread. Multimodal therapy including surgery improved the OS and DFS rates (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Prognosis is poor due to late disease recognition. However, multimodal therapeutic regimens, including surgery, may improve the outcome.

Leiomyosarcoma of the head and neck: A 17-year single institution experience and review of the National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND

Leiomyosarcoma is a rare neoplasm of the head and neck. The purpose of this study was to present our single-institution case series of head and neck leiomyosarcoma and a review of cases in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

METHODS

Patients with head and neck leiomyosarcoma at the University of Pennsylvania and in the NCDB were identified. Demographic characteristics, tumor factors, treatment paradigms, and outcomes were evaluated for prognostic significance.

RESULTS

Nine patients with head and neck leiomyosarcoma from the institution were identified; a majority had high-grade disease and cutaneous leiomyosarcoma, with a 5-year survival rate of 50%. Two hundred fifty-nine patients with leiomyosarcoma were found in the NCDB; macroscopic positive margins and high-grade disease were associated with poor prognosis (P < .01), and positive surgical margins were related to adjuvant radiation (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Head and neck leiomyosarcoma presents at a high grade and is preferentially treated with surgery. Several demographic and tumor-specific factors are associated with outcomes and prognosis.

Imaging and Outcomes for a New Entity: Low-Grade Sinonasal Sarcoma with Neural and Myogenic Features

Objectives Low-grade sinonasal sarcoma with neural and myogenic features (LGSSNMF) is a new, rare tumor. Our goal is to describe the imaging characteristics and surgical outcomes of this unique skull base malignancy.

Design Retrospective case series.

Setting Academic medical center.

Participants There were three patients who met inclusion criteria with a confirmed LGSSNMF.

Main Outcome Measures Imaging and histopathological characteristics, treatments, survival and recurrence outcomes, complications, morbidity, and mortality.

Results Patients presented with diplopia, facial discomfort, a supraorbital mass, and nasal obstruction. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography imaging in all cases showed an enhancing sinonasal mass with associated hyperostotic bone formation that involved the frontal sinus, invaded the lamina papyracea and anterior skull base, and had intracranial extension. One patient underwent a purely endoscopic surgical resection and the second underwent a craniofacial resection, while the last is pending treatment. All patients recovered well, without morbidity or long-term complications, and are currently without evidence of disease (mean follow-up of 2.1 years). One patient recurred after 17 months and underwent a repeat endoscopic skull base and dural resection.

Conclusions The surgical outcomes and imaging of this unique, locally aggressive skull base tumor are characterized.

Novel PAX3-NCOA1 Fusions in Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma With Focal Rhabdomyoblastic Differentiation

Sarcomas arising in the sinonasal region are uncommon and encompass a wide variety of tumor types, including the newly described biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS), which is characterized by a monomorphic spindle cell proliferation with dual neural and myogenic phenotypes. Most BSNSs harbor a pathognomonic PAX3-MAML3 fusion driven by t(2;4)(q35;q31.1), whereas the alternative fusion partner gene remains unidentified in a subset of PAX3-rearranged cases. As NCOA1 on 2p23 is a known partner in PAX3-related fusions in other tumor types (ie, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma), we investigated its status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays in 2 BSNS cases showing only PAX3 gene rearrangements. Novel PAX3-NCOA1 fusions were identified in these 2 index cases showing an inv(2)(q35p23) by FISH and confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Five additional BSNS cases with typical morphology were studied by FISH, revealing a PAX3-MAML3 fusion in 4 cases and only PAX3 rearrangement in the remaining case without abnormalities in MAML3 or NCOA1 gene. Except for 1 case with surface ulceration, all other tumors lacked increased mitotic activity or necrosis, and all cases immunohistochemically coexpressed S100 protein and actin, but lacked SOX10 reactivity. Interestingly, the 2 PAX3-NCOA1-positive cases showed desmin reactivity and displayed a small component of rhabdomyoblastic cells, which were not seen in the more common PAX3-MAML3 fusion cases. In conclusion, we report a novel PAX3-NCOA1 fusion in BSNS, which appears to be associated with focal rhabdomyoblastic differentiation and should be distinguished from PAX3-NCOA1-positive alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma or malignant Triton tumor. SOX10 immunohistochemistry is a useful marker in distinguishing BSNS from peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Advantage of Extended Craniofacial Resection for Advanced Malignant Tumors of the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses: Long-Term Outcome and Surgical Management

OBJECTIVE

Craniofacial resection (CFR) for advanced sinonasal malignant tumors (SNMTs) is mandatory for radical resection. Surgeons must be aware of perioperative complications and long-term outcome because this procedure is extremely invasive, especially when the tumor involves the anterior skull base.

METHODS

Thirty-eight consecutive surgical patients with advanced SNMT of T4 stage or Kadish stage C (31 men and 7 women; mean age, 55 years; range: 19-76 years) treated with CFR in the past 28 years were followed up for 59.4 months. In cases of unilateral orbital extension, en-bloc resection was achieved using several neurosurgical techniques (extended CFR) from 2005 onwards. Herein, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of surgery by comparing survival data between 2 time periods (first stage: 1984-2004, second stage: 2005-2012).

RESULTS

Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological type observed (65.8%), followed by esthesioneuroblastoma (15.8%). Using a combination of adjuvant radiation therapy, the 5-year overall survival and the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 55.5% and 59.4%, respectively. Sarcomatous histology was a poor prognostic factor. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 48.9% in the first stage and improved to 82.1% in the second stage (P = 0.057); this was related to improvements in local control rate.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR and postoperative radiotherapy are safe and effective for treating advanced SNMTs. Extended CFR, including radical orbital exenteration, may contribute to good long-term outcomes. A diverse surgical team may help perform radical resection and reconstruction in patients with advanced tumors.

An Update on Sinonasal Round Cell Undifferentiated Tumors

The sinonasal cavities host a wide variety of undifferentiated malignancies with round cell morphology, including neoplasms of epithelial, mesenchymal, neuroectodermal, and hematolymphoid lineage. The differential diagnosis may be difficult, especially in small biopsy material, due to overlapping morphology, but their correct classification is clinically relevant. The aim of this review is to provide practical guidelines for the differential diagnosis of these malignancies, with emphasis on recently described entities and special reference to the role of ancillary techniques.

Prognostic Indicators for Salvage Surgery of Recurrent Sinonasal Malignancy

OBJECTIVE

Identify prognostic factors after salvage surgery for recurrent sinonasal malignancy (SNM).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

SUBJECTS

Forty-two patients who underwent curative surgery for locally recurrent SNM ± adjuvant therapy from June 5, 2000, to December 19, 2012. Patients without follow-up were excluded.

METHODS

Chart review with established prognostic indicators for primary malignancies. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier log-rank test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t test, and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients met inclusion criteria: 38.5% developed a second recurrence, and 21.4% had metastases following treatment. The average disease-free interval (DFI) was 26.9 months (range, 2-90 months). DFI was significantly affected by ethmoid versus nonethmoid site (P = .049), histology (P = .012), carotid artery involvement (P = .008), perineural extension (P = .006), and clival invasion (P = .015). The overall survival rates at 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years following surgery were 83.3%, 69%, and 47.6%, respectively. Survival was affected by histology (P = .014), stratified grade (P = .042), tumor extension into the orbit (P = .019), carotid artery (P = .001), perineural space (P = .028), and clivus (P = .022). Complications occurred in 28.6% of patients and were associated with histology (P = .04). Length of hospital stay related to treatment was affected by histology (P = .009), grade (P = .013), and postoperative complication (P < .001). The median percentage of time hospitalized was 8%, and 43% of patients who died within 12 months spent >10% of their remaining days in the hospital.

CONCLUSION

High-risk histologic subtype (melanoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine cancer, sarcoma, and squamous cell carcinoma), grade, and orbital and skull base involvement negatively affect survival and/or DFI for patients with local recurrence of SNM. Improved stratification of patients can be used to guide decision making for patients with recurrent SNM and to avoid inappropriate surgery.

Sinonasal fibrosarcoma: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

BACKGROUND

Primary fibrosarcoma of the sinonasal region is an infrequently occurring malignant neoplasm. Fibrosarcomas are most commonly found in the extremities, with only 1% of fibrosarcomas reported in the head and neck region. This study analyzes the demographic, clinicopathologic, and survival characteristics of sinonasal fibrosarcoma (SNFS).

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973 to 2012) was queried for SNFS cases. Data were analyzed with respect to various demographic and clinicopathologic factors. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier model.

RESULTS

Fifty-one cases of fibrosarcoma were identified in the sinonasal region. The mean age at diagnosis was 54.5 years and the mean survival was 119.7 months. There was no gender predilection with a male-to-female ratio of 1.04:1. The maxillary sinus was the most common site of involvement (54.9%), followed by the nasal cavity (23.5%). Five-year survival analysis revealed an overall survival rate of 71.7%, disease-specific survival rate of 77.8%, and relative survival (RS) rate of 78.8%. Disease-specific survival was better among those treated with surgery (with [76.2%] or without [87.5%] adjuvant radiotherapy) than those treated with primary radiotherapy alone (33.3%) (p = 0.0069).

CONCLUSION

SNFS is a rare entity. This study represents the largest series of SNFS to date. The mainstay of treatment for this tumor is surgical resection with or without radiotherapy.

Adult sinonasal soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of 48 cases from the French Sarcoma Group database

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of primary sinonasal adult sarcoma, identify histological subtypes, and analyze prognostic factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHOD

Forty-eight adult sinonasal sarcomas included in the French Sarcoma Group database (Conticabase) were reviewed.

RESULTS

The most frequent tumor types were alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (33.3%), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (14,6%), unclassified sarcoma (14.6%), and leiomyosarcoma (12.5%). All round cell tumors were rhabdomyosarcomas. The 5-year overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 62.3%, 73%, and 88.8%, respectively. Histotype was a prognostic factor for OS, MFS, and LRFS, with the worst prognosis associated with rhabdomyosarcomas, regardless of the subtype. The tumor grade influenced the OS and MFS. Surgery was a predictive factor for a complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sinonasal tract should be considered as an unfavorable site for rhabdomyosarcoma. Moreover, surgery should always be considered in treatment.

Multifocal, recurrent sinonasal leiomyosarcoma: case report and review of literature

Leiomyosarcoma is a rare tumor encountered in the sinus and skull base, and can be difficult to control. We present a case of an 83 year old female with a recurrent sinonasal leiomyosarcoma. The tumor exhibited variable growth rates of recurrences in non-contiguous sites despite having obtained clear surgical margins and use of adjuvant therapy. This case illustrates unusual characteristics of this rare tumor that are important for clinicians to know. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, risk factors, treatment options, and prognosis are also reviewed.