Comparison of intermittent intratympanic steroid injection and near-continual transtympanic steroid perfusion as salvage treatments for sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Perfusion Steroid via Ventilation Tube as Salvage Treatments for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Objectives: Intratympanic steroid injection (ISI) for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a relatively popular and effective method, but there is no standardized method for intratympanic steroids for the treatment of SSNHL and no consensus on how to deliver steroids to the middle ear. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 means of intratympanic steroid delivery as therapy for SSNHL. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for the period from November 2018 to October 2022 at our Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Sixty patients with profound SSNHL who have failed initial steroid therapy were divided into the continuously transtympanic steroid perfusion (TSP) therapy and the intermittent ISI therapy. Results: Posttreatment pure-tone average was 60.3 ± 18.2 dB in the TSP group and 67.5 ± 22.6 dB in the ISI group, 70.0% of subjects in the TSP group, and 46.7% of subjects in the ISI group had improved by 15 dB or more after the therapy. The increased hearing threshold of the TSP group (24.6 ± 14.1 dB) was better than the ISI group (16.6 ± 14.9 dB), and the hearing recovery was significantly different (P < .05) in the 2 groups. Besides the hearing improvement was most obvious in low-frequency areas in the TSP group, the most significant hearing improvement was at 250 Hz, reaching 30.8 ± 3.3 dB. Conclusions: In SSNHL patients who have failed initial steroid therapy, TSP therapy via a ventilation tube can achieve good hearing outcomes and serve as a salvage therapy for patients with SSNHL.

Evaluation of Sudden Sensory-Neural Hearing Loss Patients Treated with Systemic Steroids with Additional Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection in Different Intervals; a Clinical Trial Study

Sudden Sensory-Neural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is one of the most important otologic emergency. Although adding intratympanic (IT) steroids to systematic steroid may be beneficial, the exact timing of the IT injections to provide the best response needs further investigations. To compare different protocols in treting sudden sensorineural hearing loss. We performed a clinical trial study on 120 patients from October 2021 to February 2022. All patients were prescribed 1 mg/Kg daily oral prednisolone. After randomization to three groups, the control group received standard twice a week IT steroid injections in 12 days (four total injections) while intervention groups 1 and 2 received once and twice a day IT injections for ten days. Audiometric study repeated 10-14 days after the last injection and assessed based on the Siegel criteria. We used the Chi-Square, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis's tests where appropriate. The most clinical improvement was found in the standard treatment group, and group-2 had the greatest number of patients with no improvement; however, no overall significant difference was observed among the three groups (p-value: 0.066; Pearson Chi-Square). Less frequent IT injections in patients already on systemic steroids provide similar results to more frequent injections.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03641-4.

Delivery of Dexamethasone to the Round Window Niche by Saturated Gelatin Sponge for Refractory Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the hearing outcome of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP) delivery to the round window niche by saturated gelatin sponge for refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients with unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss with an improvement of pure-tone average (PTA) less than 10 dB after primary systemic treatment with steroids.

INTERVENTIONS

Delivery of DSP to the round window niche via saturated sponge gelatin for 2 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pure-tone audiometry was taken at the beginning and 4 to 8 weeks after the end of the salvage treatment.

RESULTS

PTA thresholds were improved at least 10 dB in 11 of 20 patients (55%) by a mean value of 11.9 dB. The hearing threshold at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz were improved after salvage treatment, but there was no significant change at 4000 Hz. The PTAs also recovered after the salvage treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of DSP to the round window niche via saturated gelatin sponge is a simple and feasible way to treat refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss with a risk of permanent tympanic membrane perforation.

Effects of oral N-acetylcysteine combined with oral prednisolone on idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is an acute condition that presents with sudden hearing loss, for which steroids remain the main treatment. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), as a precursor of glutathione, can reduce the production of reactive oxygen species to protect hair cells in the inner ear from damage. However, data regarding the therapeutic outcomes of oral steroid combined with oral NAC for ISSNHL are still limited. This study was performed to investigate this issue.

METHODS

Between June 2016 and October 2021, 219 patients (219 ears) diagnosed with ISSNHL and treated with oral prednisolone were enrolled in this retrospective study. Oral NAC was prescribed to 94 of these patients (NAC group) but not to the remaining 125 patients (non-NAC group). The clinical and audiological findings were assessed.

RESULTS

The NAC group showed a mean hearing level gain of 29.5 ± 21.8 dB, speech reception threshold (SRT) gain of 26.2 ± 34.4 dB, and speech discrimination score (SDS) gain of 25.5 ± 30.4%. Although the NAC group had better mean hearing level, SRT, and SDS gains than the non-NAC group, the differences were not statistically significant (all P > .05). The only significant difference between the NAC and non-NAC groups was the posttreatment pure tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds at 8 kHz, which were 54.2 ± 24.4 and 60.9 ± 34.1 dB, respectively (P = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the effect of oral steroid combined with oral NAC for ISSNHL. Both the NAC and non-NAC groups showed obvious improvement in all PTA thresholds, as well as mean hearing level, SRT, and SDS gains. The NAC group showed significantly better PTA performance at a high frequency (8 kHz) than the non-NAC group. Therefore, for oral treatment of ISSNHL, we advocate concurrent use of oral prednisolone and oral NAC.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Intratympanic Dexamethasone in Protecting Against Irreversible Hearing Loss in Patients on Cisplatin-Based Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Phase IIIB Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of long-term high-dose intratympanic dexamethasone in protecting the hearing capacity of cancer patients undergoing cisplatin-based ototoxic treatment.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled phase IIIB clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone in protecting against hearing loss in patients undergoing cisplatin treatment. The subjects participating in the clinical trial were patients with a neoplastic disease whose treatment protocol included cisplatin. The average dose of cisplatin was 444.87 mg (SD 235.2 mg). Treatment consisted of intratympanically administering dexamethasone via a passive diffusion device called Microwick (8 mg/24 h dose) from the start of treatment with cisplatin to 3 weeks after the last cycle. Patients were administered the medication to one ear, and the contralateral ear was used as the control. The treated ears were randomly chosen using a computer system (randomization). The hearing threshold was evaluated using pure tone audiometry before each cisplatin cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were recruited over a 2-year period at a reference tertiary hospital, of whom 11 were excluded. Forty-six ears were analyzed (23 treated and 23 control ears). When treatment was completed, the audiometric analysis showed a higher hearing threshold in the study group than in the control group. Differences were statistically significant at frequencies of 500, 1000, and 6000 Hz: 4.9 dB (1.1 to 8.7), 5.5 dB (0.8 to 10.3), and 16 dB (3.2 to 28.7), respectively, (p < 0.05, 95% confidence interval), but were not clinically significant according to the ASHA hearing loss criteria. Both 8.69% infection complications during treatment and 34.8% permanent perforation at 6 mo were detected after device removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term high-dose intratympanic dexamethasone treatment did not prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss.

Outcomes of transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the MicroWickTM in patients with Ménière's disease: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of a 4-week transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the Silverstein MicroWick^TM in patients with Ménière's disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A self-reported questionnaire was designed and sent to patients who underwent transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the Silverstein MicroWick^TM from January 2017 to December 2020. A retrospective chart review was conducted to gather demographic and audiological data of those who responded.

RESULTS

Forty respondents were separated into Group 1 (n = 34), who required no further procedure, and Group 2 (n = 6), who required additional procedure for Ménière's disease. In Group 1, 50% reported subjective improvement in tinnitus, 59% in aural fullness, 79% in vertigo, and 21% in hearing loss after the MicroWick^TM treatment. A statistical analysis of the scores revealed that the improvement in aural fullness and vertigo met significance (p = 0.03 and p = 0.002, respectively). In Group 2, no significant change was seen in their symptoms. Audiological data showed no significant change in the pure tone average or the word recognition score after the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the Silverstein MicroWick^TM is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with Ménière's disease. Our survey data suggest its significant efficacy in reducing aural fullness and vertigo attacks in these patients. Prospective studies will be conducted to further establish its potential role in successfully managing patients with Ménière's disease.

The Physiologic Role of Corticosteroids in Menière's Disease: An Update on Glucocorticoid-mediated Pathophysiology and Corticosteroid Inner Ear Distribution

: There are multiple treatment options for Ménière's disease (MD), including dietary modifications, aminoglycoside therapy, and surgery. All have limitations, ranging from limited effectiveness to permanent hearing loss. Corticosteroids have long been used to manage MD due to their relative efficacy and tolerability, but the exact mechanism for disease alleviation is uncertain. Until recently, the precise distribution and role that glucocorticoid receptors play in inner ear diseases have remained largely uninvestigated. Several studies propose they influence mechanisms of fluid regulation through ion and water homeostasis. This review will provide an update on the basic science literature describing the activity of endogenous glucocorticoids and exogenous corticosteroids in the inner ear and the relevance to MD, as well as early clinical trial data pertaining to the application of novel technologies for more effective administration of corticosteroids for the treatment of MD.

N-Acetylcysteine Combined With Dexamethasone Treatment Improves Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Attenuates Hair Cell Death Caused by ROS Stress

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a common emergency in the world. Increasing evidence of imbalance of oxidant–antioxidant were found in SSNHL patients. Steroids combined with antioxidants may be a potential strategy for the treatment of SSNHL. In cochlear explant experiment, we found that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) combined with dexamethasone can effectively protect hair cells from oxidative stress when they were both at ineffective concentrations alone. A clinic trial was designed to explore whether oral NAC combined with intratympanic dexamethasone (ITD) as a salvage treatment has a better therapeutic effect. 41 patients with SSNHL were randomized to two groups. 23 patients in control group received ITD therapy alone, while 18 patient s in NAC group were treated with oral NAC and ITD. The patients were followed-up on day 1st (initiation of treatment) and day 14th. Overall, there was no statistical difference in final pure-tone threshold average (PTA) improvement between those two groups. However, a significant hearing gain at 8,000 Hz was observed in NAC group. Moreover, the hearing recovery rates of NAC group is much higher than that in control group. These results demonstrated that oral NAC in combination with ITD therapy is a more effective therapy for SSNHL than ITD alone.

Steroid Administration Approach for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A National Survey in China

OBJECTIVE

To optimize a protocol for the steroid administration approach for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) in China.

METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to otolaryngologists. The data on demographics, indications for first-line and salvage treatment, such as intratympanic administration of steroids (ITS) and postauricular steroids (PAS), and procedures were analyzed.

RESULTS

74 respondents used oral steroids, 112 used intravenous injections, 10 used ITS and 6 used PAS as a monotherapy for first-line treatment, and 135 used ITS or PAS in conjunction with oral or intravenous injection as a first-line treatment. Of the 249 respondents who used ITS, 97.19% adopted it as salvage therapy. The most commonly used steroid was 0.5 ml dexamethasone at 5 mg/ml and the most common side effect was pain. Of the 174 respondents who used PAS, 94.25% used it as salvage therapy. The most commonly used steroid was 0.5 ml methylprednisolone mixed with 0.5 ml lidocaine.

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained data suggested that intravenous injection of steroids was the most popular treatment for ISSNHL and that ITS or PAS were used as a salvage treatment in China.

Potential benefits of salvage intratympanic dexamethasone injection in profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

PURPOSES

To compare hearing recovery levels after initial treatment or salvage intratympanic dexamethasone injection (ITDI), and to find the prognostic factor on salvage ITDI therapy in profound ISSNHL.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 115 patients with profound ISSNHL. All patients were treated with combination or systemic steroid therapy as the initial treatment. Next, we used salvage ITDI therapy on patients who showed slight or no improvement according to Siegel's criteria. To find the prognostic factors for the effectiveness of salvage ITDI therapy, we analyzed clinical data, such as, age, sex, vertigo, symptom duration, diabetes, hypertension, initial PTA, pre-salvage PTA, and treatment methods, using multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

The rate of serviceable hearing recovery were 10.4% (12/115) in the initial-treatment group and 20.4% (21/103) in the salvage group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.041). Pre-salvage PTA, diabetes mellitus, and symptom duration were affective factors for the effectiveness of salvage ITDI therapy in profound ISSNHL refractory to initial treatment, with odds ratios of 1.169 (95% confidence interval, 1.088-1.256), 0.069 (95% confidence interval, 0.005-0.889), and 9.242 (95% confidence interval, 1.079-79.146).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage therapy should be considered for profound ISSNHL, which is expected to result in poor prognosis or hearing recovery: ITSI therapy might be an effective treatment as salvage therapy.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update)

OBJECTIVE

Sudden hearing loss is a frightening symptom that often prompts an urgent or emergent visit to a health care provider. It is frequently but not universally accompanied by tinnitus and/or vertigo. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss affects 5 to 27 per 100,000 people annually, with about 66,000 new cases per year in the United States. This guideline update provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients who present with sudden hearing loss. It focuses on sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adult patients aged ≥18 years and primarily on those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Prompt recognition and management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss may improve hearing recovery and patient quality of life. The guideline update is intended for all clinicians who diagnose or manage adult patients who present with sudden hearing loss.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this guideline update is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations in evaluating patients with sudden hearing loss and sudden sensorineural hearing loss, with particular emphasis on managing idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group recognized that patients enter the health care system with sudden hearing loss as a nonspecific primary complaint. Therefore, the initial recommendations of this guideline update address distinguishing sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss at the time of presentation with hearing loss. They also clarify the need to identify rare, nonidiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to help separate those patients from those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, who are the target population for the therapeutic interventions that make up the bulk of the guideline update. By focusing on opportunities for quality improvement, this guideline should improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate prompt intervention, decrease variations in management, reduce unnecessary tests and imaging procedures, and improve hearing and rehabilitative outcomes for affected patients.

METHODS

Consistent with the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's "Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition" (Rosenfeld et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148[1]:S1-S55), the guideline update group was convened with representation from the disciplines of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, otology, neurotology, family medicine, audiology, emergency medicine, neurology, radiology, advanced practice nursing, and consumer advocacy. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the prior clinical practice guideline on sudden hearing loss was reviewed in detail. Key Action Statements (KASs) were updated with new literature, and evidence profiles were brought up to the current standard. Research needs identified in the original clinical practice guideline and data addressing them were reviewed. Current research needs were identified and delineated.

RESULTS

The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following: (KAS 1) Clinicians should distinguish sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss when a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss. (KAS 7) Clinicians should educate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss about the natural history of the condition, the benefits and risks of medical interventions, and the limitations of existing evidence regarding efficacy. (KAS 13) Clinicians should counsel patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus about the possible benefits of audiologic rehabilitation and other supportive measures. These strong recommendations were modified from the initial clinical practice guideline for clarity and timing of intervention. The guideline update group made strong recommendations against the following: (KAS 3) Clinicians should not order routine computed tomography of the head in the initial evaluation of a patient with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 5) Clinicians should not obtain routine laboratory tests in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 11) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe antivirals, thrombolytics, vasodilators, or vasoactive substances to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following: (KAS 2) Clinicians should assess patients with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss through history and physical examination for bilateral sudden hearing loss, recurrent episodes of sudden hearing loss, and/or focal neurologic findings. (KAS 4) In patients with sudden hearing loss, clinicians should obtain, or refer to a clinician who can obtain, audiometry as soon as possible (within 14 days of symptom onset) to confirm the diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 6) Clinicians should evaluate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss for retrocochlear pathology by obtaining magnetic resonance imaging or auditory brainstem response. (KAS 10) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, intratympanic steroid therapy when patients have incomplete recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss 2 to 6 weeks after onset of symptoms. (KAS 12) Clinicians should obtain follow-up audiometric evaluation for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss at the conclusion of treatment and within 6 months of completion of treatment. These recommendations were clarified in terms of timing of intervention and audiometry and method of retrocochlear workup. The guideline update group offered the following KASs as options: (KAS 8) Clinicians may offer corticosteroids as initial therapy to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss within 2 weeks of symptom onset. (KAS 9a) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy within 2 weeks of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 9b) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy as salvage therapy within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

DIFFERENCES FROM PRIOR GUIDELINE

Incorporation of new evidence profiles to include quality improvement opportunities, confidence in the evidence, and differences of opinion Included 10 clinical practice guidelines, 29 new systematic reviews, and 36 new randomized controlled trials Highlights the urgency of evaluation and initiation of treatment, if treatment is offered, by emphasizing the time from symptom occurrence Clarification of terminology by changing potentially unclear statements; use of the term sudden sensorineural hearing loss to mean idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to emphasize that >90% of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and to avoid confusion in nomenclature for the reader Changes to the KASs from the original guideline: KAS 1-When a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss, conductive hearing loss should be distinguished from sensorineural. KAS 2-The utility of history and physical examination when assessing for modifying factors is emphasized. KAS 3-The word "routine" is added to clarify that this statement addresses nontargeted head computerized tomography scan that is often ordered in the emergency room setting for patients presenting with sudden hearing loss. It does not refer to targeted scans, such as temporal bone computerized tomography scan, to assess for temporal bone pathology. KAS 4-The importance of audiometric confirmation of hearing status as soon as possible and within 14 days of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 5-New studies were added to confirm the lack of benefit of nontargeted laboratory testing in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 6-Audiometric follow-up is excluded as a reasonable workup for retrocochlear pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography scan if magnetic resonance imaging cannot be done, and, secondarily, auditory brainstem response evaluation are the modalities recommended. A time frame for such testing is not specified, nor is it specified which clinician should be ordering this workup; however, it is implied that it would be the general or subspecialty otolaryngologist. KAS 7-The importance of shared decision making is highlighted, and salient points are emphasized. KAS 8-The option for corticosteroid intervention within 2 weeks of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 9-Changed to KAS 9A and 9B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy remains an option but only when combined with steroid therapy for either initial treatment (9A) or salvage therapy (9B). The timing of initial therapy is within 2 weeks of onset, and that of salvage therapy is within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 10-Intratympanic steroid therapy for salvage is recommended within 2 to 6 weeks following onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The time to treatment is defined and emphasized. KAS 11-Antioxidants were removed from the list of interventions that the clinical practice guideline recommends against using. KAS 12-Follow-up audiometry at conclusion of treatment and also within 6 months posttreatment is added. KAS 13-This statement on audiologic rehabilitation includes patients who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus who may benefit from treatment. Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs Enhanced emphasis on patient education and shared decision making with tools provided to assist in same.

Research progress in refractory sudden hearing loss: steroid therapy

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a common condition with a rapid onset, and its worldwide frequency is increasing each year. Importantly, a significant number of patients with SSNHL do not respond to initial treatment, which is termed refractory sudden hearing loss (RSHL), and further treatment is not standardized in terms of type, duration, administration route, and concentration of topical steroid therapy. Dexamethasone and methylprednisolone are effective in treating RSHL, and salvage treatment typically consists of 2 weeks of steroid therapy followed by 3–6 months of follow-up. Near-continual steroid perfusion appears to be more effective than intermittent steroid injection. Furthermore, several novel therapeutic regimens have shown promising results in small-scale studies. However, the optimum treatment needs to be confirmed in larger randomized controlled trials.

Hearing Changes After Intratympanic Steroids for Secondary (Salvage) Therapy of Sudden Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis Using Mathematical Simulations of Drug Delivery Protocols

OBJECTIVE

The use of glucocorticoids for secondary (salvage/rescue) therapy of idiopathic sudden hearing loss (ISSHL), including controlled and uncontrolled studies with intratympanic injections or continuous, catheter mediated applications, were evaluated by means of a meta-analysis in an attempt to define optimal local drug delivery protocols for ISSHL.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 30 studies with 33 treatment groups between January 2000 and June 2014 were selected based on sufficiently detailed description of application protocols. Cochlear drug levels were calculated by a validated computer model of drug dispersion in the inner ear fluids based on the concentration and volume of glucocorticoids applied, the time drug remained in the middle ear, and on the specific timing of injections. Various factors were compared with hearing outcome, including baseline data, individual parameters of the application protocols, calculated peak concentration (Cmax), and total dose (area under the curve, AUC).

RESULTS

There was no dependence of hearing outcome on individual parameters of the application protocol, Cmax or AUC. Hearing gain and final hearing thresholds were independent of treatment delay.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available data from uncontrolled and controlled randomized and non-randomized studies no clear recommendation can be made so far for a specific application protocol for either primary or secondary (salvage) intratympanic steroid treatment in patients with ISSHL. For meta-analyses, change in pure tone average (PTA) may not be an adequate outcome parameter to assess effectiveness of the intervention especially with inhomogeneity of patient populations. Final PTA might provide a better outcome parameter.

Comparison of the Effects of Intratympanic Steroid Injection at Different Intervals in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Systemic steroid therapy (SST) and intratympanic steroid injection (ISI) have been the treatment of choice for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). We studied the effect of ISI administered at different intervals on hearing outcomes in patients with SSNHL.

Subjects and METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 427 patients diagnosed with SSNHL at Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, of whom 51 patients with SSNHL who received SST and four ISIs were included in this study. Patients were treated with four ISIs either every day for 4 days (group 1) or at intervals (mean duration of interval: 2.21 days) (group 2). Hearing outcomes were evaluated using the pure-tone test before the injection and 14 days, 1 month, and 3 months after the final injection. Recovery rates were classified based on Siegel's criteria.

RESULTS

The amount of improvement was 27.67 dB (±20.45) in group 1 and 32.79 dB (±21.42) in group 2. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p= 0.714). The recovery rates based on Siegel's criteria were 18/27 (66.7%) and 16/24 (66.7%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with no significant difference (p=1.000). Considering only complete recoveries in hearing recovery, the recovery rates were 15/27 (55.6%) and 14/24 (58.3%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.842).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in hearing outcomes or recovery rates after ISI administration every day or at intervals of 2-3 days.

Histone acetylation in refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients after intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between the therapeutic effect of intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion and histone acetylation in refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

METHODS

Thirty-four refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients were enrolled and treated with intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion. Pure tone average, acetylated histone H3, acetylated histone H4 and histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and after intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion. Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited to obtain normal reference values.

RESULTS

Pure tone average in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients improved from 84.14 ± 13.54 dB to 73.56 ± 18.45 dB after intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion. Up-regulations in HDAC2 protein level, and down-regulations in histone H3 and H4 acetylation were observed in the intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion sensitive group (pure tone average gain of 15 dB or more), while no significant changes were observed in the intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion insensitive group (pure tone average gain of less than 15 dB).

CONCLUSION

Intratympanic methylprednisolone perfusion can improve hearing in a considerable number of refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients. The therapeutic effect is closely related to reduced histone acetylation.

Intratympanic steroid therapy for refractory sudden sensory hearing loss: a 12-year experience with the Silverstein catheter

BACKGROUND

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is commonly encountered in clinical practice.

AIM/OBJECTIVE

Determine if local administration of corticosteroids to the inner ear can improve hearing and speech intelligibility after the failure of conventional treatment for SSNHL loss when administered for 10 days after the onset of the hearing loss in a large cohort of 77 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Silverstein MicroWick™ was placed under local anesthesia and endoscopic control in the round window niche, allowing self-administration of methylprednisolone twice daily for four weeks.

RESULTS

An improvement of the pure tone average was shown in 31% of patients. Speech intelligibility improved significantly in 55% of the total cohort and in 34% of the population with a stable pure tone average. Among the 77 patients, 22% used a hearing aid. Only 14% of the patients were hearing-aid users in the group with an improvement in speech intelligibility as opposed to 31% in the failure group.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

Local administration of steroids to the inner ear through the round window route improves hearing and speech intelligibility in patients after failure of conventional therapy. The use of a hearing aid was reduced by 50% when speech intelligibility was improved.

The effect of intratympanic steroid injection frequency in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of intratympanic steroid injection frequency on hearing outcomes for patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed from 2007 to 2015 at a neurotology tertiary referral center. Adults who met academy criteria for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss within two months of onset and negative imaging were grouped based on injection frequency. Injection schedules were every 1-4 (group 1), 5-10 (group 2), or 11-30 (group 3) days. All patients had at least two injections with Dexamethasone 10 mg/ml. All patients had pre- and post-injection audiograms.

RESULTS

Seventy patients met inclusion criteria (group 1, n = 21; group 2, n = 29; group 3, n = 20). There was no significant difference between group demographics or baseline audiometric data. Mean gains were significant and similar between groups for pure tone average (group 1 = -23.6 ± 22.0 dB; group 2 = -19.7 ± 18.4 dB; group 3 = -24.9 ± 24.7 dB; p = 0.67) and word recognition score (group 1 = +26.3 ± 34.8%; group 2 = +23.3 ± 29.9%; group 3 = +33.4 ± 28.9%; p = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of intratympanic steroid injections does not significantly affect hearing outcomes. Following injection therapy, hearing outcomes improved regardless of prior or concomitant oral steroid regimen. Earlier time to initiating injections yielded a higher rate of hearing improvement. Long term hearing outcomes >6 months did not show significant additional improvement.

Sealing of the round and oval window niches with triamcinolone-soaked fascia as salvage surgical therapy in sudden sensorineural hearing loss

CONCLUSIONS

Triamcinolone-soaked fascia seems to show better hearing improvement when added to tympanotomy for sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), compared to fascia round window occlusion without triamcinolone.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse if adding triamcinolone to sealing the round and oval window niches with fascia results in improved audiological outcome for acute SNHL.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients (27m:43 ± 12 years, 26f:45 ± 14 years) with acute SSHL ≥50dB over 3 frequencies, who failed primary therapy, underwent transcanal tympanotomy. Twenty-five patients (Group A;cortisone:14m, 11f:46 ± 9 years) received sealing of the round and oval window with fascia soaked in triamcinolone (1ml; 40mg/ml) and 28 controls (Group B;no-cortisone:13m, 15f, 42 ± 12 years) without triamcinolone. Frequency specific and pure tone average (PTA =500-1000-2000-3000Hz) results were compared between Group A and B pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

In Group A the PTA improved by ≥10dB in 21/25(83%) cases; in Group B 18/28(63%). Group A showed a statistically significantly better improvement across all frequencies, while linear regression revealed a significant decrease of posttherapeutic PTA to 94.96% of the initial PTA (p = .037). The overall PTA improved by 24dB. Group A improved from 73dB to 41dB(-32dB) PTA, Group B improved from 76dB to 56dB PTA (-20dB) (p < .05). Group A showed a significant additional decrease of 12.8dB (p < .001).

Prognostic Factors for Recovery from Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives

This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL).

Subjects and Methods

From January 2007 to December 2011, a retrospective chart review identified 494 consecutive patients with ISSNHL. Demographic, audiometric, and clinical data were analyzed using a logistic regression test.

Results

Hearing recovery from ISSNHL was significantly associated with factors such as age, duration from onset of symptoms to commencement of treatment, severity of the initial pure tone threshold, and the treatment method. Intratympanic (IT) steroid administration alone showed a comparable efficiency to oral steroid administration with or without IT steroid injection. In patients who received IT steroid injection, the duration from onset to treatment, severity of initial hearing loss, and sequential IT steroid injection following systemic steroid administration were statistically associated with hearing improvement.

Conclusions

Age, severity of initial pure tone threshold, duration from onset to treatment, initial speech discrimination, and initial pure tone threshold are statistically significant prognostic factors related to hearing improvement in ISSNHL. IT steroid injection as an initial single treatment is comparable to systemic oral steroid administration.

Intratympanic corticosteroid for sudden hearing loss: does it really work?

Introduction

Sudden deafness is characterized by an abrupt hearing loss of at least 30 dB in three sequential frequencies in the standard pure tone audiogram over three days or less. Treatment is based on its etiology, and oral corticosteroids are widely used. Intratympanic corticosteroids are included as primary or secondary treatment when there is no improvement with the use of oral corticosteroids.

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of therapy with intratympanic steroids in sudden deafness.

Methods

A systematic review was performed of publications on the topic in the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, with the keywords: sudden deafness, sudden hearing loss, and corticosteroids.

Results

Thirty scientific studies were analyzed. As to the objectives of the study analyzed, 76.7% sought to evaluate the use of intratympanic therapy salvage after failure to conventional treatment, and intratympanic therapy was used as the primary treatment 23.3% of the studies.

Conclusion

Intratympanic corticosteroid therapy is prescribed primarily when there is failure of conventional therapy and when it is limited to use systemic corticosteroids, such as the diabetic patient.

Hearing outcome does not depend on the interval of intratympanic steroid administration in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

We studied the effect of intratympanic steroid administration with different intervals on hearing outcomes in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). The subjects were 197 consecutive patients (197 ears) with ISSNHL (hearing level ≥40 dB, interval between onset and treatment ≤30 days). They received systemic administration of prednisolone (100 mg followed by tapered doses) combined with intratympanic injection of dexamethasone (4 mg/ml). Intratympanic injection was performed once a week for 4 weeks in 105 patients (long-interval group), or 4 times in 1 week in 92 patients (short-interval group). The hearing outcomes were evaluated at two points of time: 1 week from the start of treatment, and 1-2 months after the completion of treatment when the hearing level reached a plateau. There was no significant difference in the cure rate, marked-recovery rate, recovery rate, hearing gain, hearing level, or percent hearing improvement between the long- and short-interval groups at either point of time. Multiple regression analysis also showed that the final hearing level did not depend on the interval of intratympanic steroid injection. These results indicate that the hearing outcome of ISSNHL does not improve even if the interval of intratympanic injection is shortened. This implies that a lower total number of intratympanic steroid injections may be as effective as the present protocol.

Controlled release dexamethasone implants in the round window niche for salvage treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and hearing outcome of a biocompatible degradable dexamethasone releasing implant for continuous drug delivery to the round window membrane in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) and insufficient recovery after systemic high dose glucocorticoid therapy.

PATIENTS

Five patients with profound or moderate-to-severe hearing loss after systemic high-dose prednisolone for ISSHL received local salvage therapy with a controlled release dexamethasone implant in the middle ear.

INTERVENTION

Pieces of a sterile rod shaped poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) PLGA polymer matrix containing a total of 0.7 mg dexamethasone, which is approved for intravitreal use were implanted into the round window niche.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Intraoperative handling and feasibility and hearing recovery as measured by change in pure tone threshold, final word recognition score, and categories of improvement were evaluated.

RESULTS

The implants were surgically placed without major difficulties. The mean hearing threshold significantly improved at follow up by 31 ± 31 dB HL (from 94 ± 27 to 63 ± 36 dB HL; p < 0.05). Two of five patients recovered completely. One patient showed partial hearing recovery with serviceable hearing.

CONCLUSION

Although no drugs are currently approved for local therapy of inner ear disorders, there is increasing evidence that intratympanic glucocorticoids are effective as salvage therapy in ISSHL. The present study has shown encouraging results with a biodegradable polymer delivery system, demonstrating the translation of preclinical studies with controlled drug delivery into clinical practice.

The role of intracochlear drug delivery devices in the management of inner ear disease

INTRODUCTION

Diseases of the inner ear include those of the auditory and vestibular systems, and frequently result in disabling hearing loss or vertigo. Despite a rapidly expanding pipeline of potential cochlear therapeutics, the inner ear remains a challenging organ for targeted drug delivery, and new technologies are required to deliver these therapies in a safe and efficacious manner. In addition to traditional approaches for direct inner ear drug delivery, novel microfluidics-based systems are under development, promising improved control over pharmacokinetics over longer periods of delivery, ultimately with application towards hair cell regeneration in humans.

AREAS COVERED

Advances in the development of intracochlear drug delivery systems are reviewed, including passive systems, active microfluidic technologies and cochlear prosthesis-mediated delivery. This article provides a description of novel delivery systems and their potential future clinical applications in treating inner ear disease.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent progresses in microfluidics and miniaturization technologies are enabling the development of wearable and ultimately implantable drug delivery microsystems. Progress in this field is being spurred by the convergence of advances in molecular biology, microfluidic flow control systems and models for drug transport in the inner ear. These advances will herald a new generation of devices, with near-term applications in preclinical models, and ultimately with human clinical use for a range of diseases of the inner ear.