Contemporary management of frontal sinus mucoceles: a meta-analysis

A 28 years surgical experience of 398 sinusal mucoceles: how technologies, techniques and experiences have changed their treatment throughout the years

PURPOSE

Sinonasal mucoceles (SM) are benign, expansive neoformations which require surgical marsupialization to prevent severe complications. The present study reports the larger case history ever published: a 28-years expertise in the surgical management of SM.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients surgically treated for SM at the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology of Varese and Pavia, between 1994 and 2022.

RESULTS

398 patients were reported. An endoscopic endonasal marsupialization of SM was performed in 92,5% of cases. 7% of patients underwent a combined approach while 0,5% required an exclusive open surgery. The average follow-up after surgery was 10-60 months. SM overall recurrence was observed in 11,4% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Endonasal endoscopic SM marsupialization is a feasible technique which allows the preservation of the anatomy and physiology avoiding the surgical invasiveness of the external approaches. The well-established surgical expertise in the endonasal endoscopy together with technological improvements widened the indication range of the exclusive endoscopic technique over the traditional open surgery.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Post Radiation Complete Sinus Opacification in Sinonasal Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of sinonasal malignancies most often requires primary or postoperative radiation treatment. Post radiation sinonasal morbidity has been previously described; however, none addressed post-radiation sinus obstruction. Our objective was to investigate the long-term outcomes of post radiation complete isolated sinus opacification (CISO).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of sinonasal cancer patients treated with radiation therapy during the years 2002 to 2022. Clinical, imaging and treatment data were collected from patients' medical records. Only patients with at least 12 months of follow-up and available imaging for review were included.

RESULTS

Out of 109 patients, 37 patients were identified to meet the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 58 months. 35% of patients were diagnosed with persistent post radiation CISO with a mean onset of 4 months. All these patients remained asymptomatic, and their imaging remained stable during follow-up with none developing an expanding mucocele. Ethmoid sinus tumor involvement was found to be more prevalent in the CISO group (62% vs. 25%, p-value = 0.048) as well as chemotherapy/immunotherapy (54% vs. 38%, p-value = 0.046). Multivariant analysis revealed that ethmoid sinus involvement (OR = 9.516, p-value = 0.047) and adjuvant therapy, either chemotherapy/immunotherapy (OR = 10.75, p-value = 0.036) were found to be a predictive factor for complete opacification.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that a substantial number of post-radiation patients develop a stable and persistent CISO, often in the frontal and sphenoid sinuses. These patients remained asymptomatic, and none required surgical intervention during nearly 5 years of follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Combined upper lid skin crease and endoscopic approach to frontal sinus mucocoeles

PURPOSE

This case series describes the ophthalmic manifestations of frontal sinus mucoceles and reports the long-term surgical outcomes of a combined endoscopic and upper-lid skin crease drainage approach carried out jointly with otorhinolaryngology.

METHODS

We present a retrospective case review of 18 orbits and 15 patients presenting with frontal sinus mucocoeles, all of whom underwent drainage via an adapted anterior orbitotomy approach between January 2015 and July 2023. Data collection included preoperative and postoperative examination findings (visual acuity, extraocular motility, lid retraction, and lagophthalmos), mucocoele recurrence, cosmetic satisfaction, and surgical complications. Patients were followed up for an average of 22 months.

RESULTS

All patients underwent successful frontal mucocoele drainage via a modified anterior orbitotomy and simultaneous endonasal approach. At presentation, three (20%) had extraocular restriction leading to diplopia, and six (40%) had proptosis in the eye adjacent to the mucocoele. One patient presented acutely with no light perception in the affected eye due to compressive optic neuropathy. All patients who had reduced extraocular motility before surgery regained full motility post-operatively. Treatment was successful in all cases, and there was no documented mucocoele recurrence during follow-up. Satisfactory aesthetic outcomes were achieved in all cases. Reported complications included temporary forehead numbness and ptosis of the affected eyelid, which resolved without intervention.

CONCLUSION

The modified anterior orbitotomy approach to frontal mucocoeles allows optimal frontal sinus access and mucocoele treatment while preserving cosmesis.

Acellular Dermal Matrix, Osseoplastic Flap, and Transnasal Endoscopic Approach for Frontal Mucocele

PURPOUSE

The primary objective of this study is to suggest the use of acellular dermal matrix through an osteoplastic flap and transnasal endoscopic treatment for the management of frontal mucoceles. The secondary objective is to propose the characteristics to choose this approach.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out on patients with frontal mucoceles of different etiologies where an osteoplastic flap was made to address the sinus and subsequently obliterated with acellular dermal matrix.

RESULTS

A cohort of 11 patients were included in the study, 6 (67%) were female and 5 (56%) were male, with a mean age of 56 years (range 35-71). The majority of patients (73%) with a history of trauma and all the patients were treated with frontal osteoplastic flap and obliteration with acellular dermal matrix. No evidence of recurrence in a follow-up period with a mean of 18 months and a low rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The frontal osteoplastic flap and obliteration with acellular dermal matrix is a simple and safe technique to perform with low morbidity. Also, an orbital reconstruction can be performed simultaneously.

Isolated extra-sinus subcutaneous mucocele: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Paranasal sinus mucoceles are epithelialized cystic masses formed through the accumulation of sterile mucus. Mucoceles are expansile lesions, and their symptoms change according to their extension into the surrounding structures: anteriorly to the subcutaneous tissue, laterally to the orbit, or posteriorly to the cranium. Herein, we report the case of a pediatric patient with an isolated subcutaneous mucocele with no sinus connection.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Physical examination revealed a non-tender fluctuating round mass approximately 4 cm in diameter in the right supraorbital region. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings suggested a mucocele, and the diagnosis was confirmed via histopathological examinations postoperatively. The patient underwent a combined surgical approach that included an endoscopic transseptal approach to the frontal sinus with a right sub-brow incision and drain placement. The right frontal sinus was opened, and the mucocele was marsupialized. At the 3-month follow-up visit, the frontal sinus neo-ostium appeared patent on endoscopic examination, and the frontal sinuses were clear on imaging.

DISCUSSION

The optimal treatment for frontal mucoceles is marsupialization and adequate sinus drainage. As the patient had an isolated subcutaneous extra-sinus mucocele above the orbit, a combined approach was used to ensure thorough removal of the lesion to reduce the recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

This report emphasizes the importance of using a combined approach for the removal of lesions and limiting the potential risk of recurrence in similar cases.

Orbitofrontal cholesterol granuloma masquerading as frontal sinus mucoceles: report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Two cases of orbitofrontal cholesterol granuloma masquerading as frontal sinus mucoceles were reported to understand image findings, clinical and histopathologic features of orbitofrontal cholesterol granuloma to improve its diagnosis and treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

Two East Asian patients aged 41 and 27 without personal or familial medical or trauma history presented with the common complaint of proptosis and inferomedial displacement of the eyeballs. The computed tomography (CT) of both cases showed an irregularly shaped, well-defined lesion in the left frontal bone associated with bony erosion. The lesions resulted in the bone absorption of frontal bone and orbital roof, which extended into the superior orbital space. Anterior orbitotomy through subbrow incision by drainage and curettage resulted in a curative outcome. The histopathological examination revealed inflammatory granulation tissues, fibrous capsule wall, cholesterol clefts with altered blood pigments, and calcifications, consistent with the diagnosis of cholesterol granuloma. No recurrence was observed for one year after surgery in one case and three years in the other.

CONCLUSIONS

When the following features are observed: orbital CT exhibits cystic lesion with irregular bone destruction in the superolateral orbit, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicts lesions are hyperintense signals on T1 weighted images (T1WI), and T2 weighted images (T2WI), and the contrast-enhanced imaging reveals that the most of tumor is showed a non-significant enhancement, orbitofrontal cholesterol granuloma should be considered.

Mucoceles of Paranasal Sinuses: A Single Centre Experience

Describe experience of managing paranasal sinus mucoceles, with either endoscopic endonasal approach (EESS) or combined external with EESS approach. Retrospective study done at SDMCMS&H, between 2007 and 2019, on patients undergoing surgical excision of mucocele. Results described as mean, median, mode, percentages. Twenty-one patients were included, with male to female ratio (0.75:1), mean age (42.95 years). Commonest presentation were facial pain (42.85%),visual symptoms (28.57%), headache (23.80%). Signs included, proptosis (52.38%), facial deformity (23.80%). Imaging: showed frontal mucoceles (42.85%), fronto-ethmoid (38.09%), ethmoid (14.28%), sphenoid (4.76%). Orbital extension in 42.85%, sinusitis (33.33%), skull base erosion (23.80%). EESS or combined external and EESS approach (61.90%, 38.09% respectively) were performed. Complete excision of mucocele wall done. Recurrence in two cases(average-2.5 years),revision surgery performed without further recurrences. Either EESS or combined external and EESS approach used based on site and extension of mucoceles. Complete peeling of mucocele wall without obliteration of the sinus cavity was the mode of surgical management in all cases.

Endoscopic transorbital management of frontal sinus mucocele: a case report and review of the literature

The frontal sinus is the most common site for paranasal mucoceles, resulting in potentially threatening intraorbital or intracranial complications. Surgical drainage of mucoceles is the mainstay of treatment, which can be achieved usually through open or endoscopic transnasal approaches. Transorbital endoscopic surgery is a relatively novel approach to selective skull base lesions with limited data in the literature. It could be utilized as a safe and effective alternative approach in managing frontal sinus lesions when the endoscopic transnasal access alone is insufficient or inadequate. Here, we present a case of an isolated lateral left frontal mucocele that was managed successfully using an endoscopic transorbital approach alone with complete resolution of symptoms during a 10-month follow-up period.

Burkholderia Cepacia Causes Frontal Mucopyocele with Anterior Cranial Fossa Extension: A Novel Case Report

Introduction:

Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is a group of gram-negative bacilli that have rarely been isolated in the ear, nose and throat region in immunocompetent patients. Bcc show resistance to most available antibacterial drugs.

Case Report:

We present the case of an immunocompetent 31-year-old male reporting a pulsating headache with right supraorbital swelling associated with exophthalmos. A brain CT scan showed an expansive giant cystic lesion occupying the right frontal sinus, extending to the anterior cranial fossa. Management and outcome: drainage with the resecting of the floor of the frontal sinus from the orbital plate of the ethmoid bone to the nasal septum (Draf IIb) was performed with wide marsupialization of the mucopyocele. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis was used to identify the isolate. MRI 1 and 12 months after surgery showed complete lesion removal. The patient was followed for 12 months with complete recovery of symptoms.

Conclusion:

Paranasal sinuses disease with cranial expansion and orbital complications constitutes an emergency. For the first time in the literature, Bcc was isolated in the frontal sinus, extending into the anterior cranial fossa, in an immunocompetent patient. An endoscopic surgical approach with microbiological identification and management by appropriate antibacterial drug treatment seems to be the key to success.

Unusual metachronous presentation of bilateral frontoethmoid sinus mucoceles

A case report of a patient with bilateral frontoethmoid mucoceles with no obvious predisposing factors and each side presenting three years apart, with no ongoing nasal or paranasal signs of disease in the interim.Bilateral paranasal sinus mucoceles have rarely been described in the literature; this case is unique, as it is the first description of a metachronous presentation. Additionally, the absence of any predisposing factors such as trauma, surgery or chronic sinusitis in either presentation is unusual.

Intracerebral hemorrhage after endoscopic marsupialization of huge frontal sinus mucocele

Frontal Mucocele grows gradually and unnoticed as a benign lesion but, as the frontal mucocele expands to and compresses surrounding organs like brain, orbit, etc., it can cause diverse symptoms and signs. Although the surgical approaches of mucocele include open, endoscopic and combined approach, endoscopic marsupialization has been commonly used because endoscopic marsupialization was reported with high success rates, low complication rates and better operative vision. However, recently we experienced rare complication of endoscopic marsupialization of huge frontal mucocele, large amount of intracerebral hemorrhage, immediately after successful surgery and report this rare case with short review.

Indications and Outcomes of the Osteoplastic Flap Procedure With or Without Obliteration

OBJECTIVE

To describe the osteoplastic approach and to perform a systematic review of the indications and outcomes of the osteoplastic flap procedure for frontal sinus surgeries with or without obliteration.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases.

REVIEW METHODS

All published studies in the English language on the osteoplastic flap with or without obliteration were identified from 1905 to 2018. All studies with <20 patients were excluded. The number of patients, technique, indications, follow-up period, symptom relief, revision rates, and complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A systematic review yielded 25 series containing 1374 patients for analysis. Indications for surgery included chronic frontal sinusitis, mucoceles, fractures or traumas, osteomas, neoplasms, and cerebrospinal fluid leak. The mean follow-up period ranged from 12.8 to 144 months. The percentage of patients needing revisions for frontal sinus disease was 6.2%. There was a high rate of symptomatic improvement (85.0%) and a low rate of major complications (0.7%). However, minor complications occurred in 19.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The osteoplastic flap with or without obliteration has many indications. In an era where endoscopic technique provides excellent access to the frontal sinuses, external approaches remain a useful adjunct, and/or salvage technique. In experienced hands, the osteoplastic flap can yield excellent long-term clinical results, with low rates of complications. Regardless of the surgical approach, long-term follow-up is necessary due to the recurrent nature of frontal sinus disease.

Endoscopic management of frontal sinus diseases after frontal craniotomy: a case series and review of the literature

PURPOSE

To evaluate frontal sinus complications developed after previous external craniotomies requiring frontal sinus reconstruction and their treatment with an endoscopic approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 22 patients who referred to Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital and Bellaria Hospital (Bologna, Italy) between 2005 and 2017. All patients presented with frontal sinus disease after frontal craniotomy with sinus reconstruction performed to treat various pathological conditions. We reported our experience in the endoscopic management of such complications and we reviewed the current literature concerning the endoscopic treatment of these conditions.

RESULTS

In total, 14 frontal mucoceles, 4 cases of chronic frontal sinusitis, 2 mucopyoceles and 2 fungus ball of the frontal sinus were identified. Endoscopic surgical treatment included 7 DRAF IIa, 1 DRAF IIb, 11 DRAF III and 3 DRAF IIc (modified DRAF III) approaches. The success rate of the surgical procedure was 86% (19/22 patients). Recurrence of the initial pathology occurred in three patients (14%) requiring a conversion of previous frontal sinusotomy into a DRAF III sinusotomy.

CONCLUSION

Frontal sinusopathy can be a long-term complication following craniotomies and may lead to potentially severe pathological conditions, such as mucoceles and frontal sinus inflammation. Its management is still debated and requires recovery of the patency of nasal-frontal route. Our study confirms that the endoscopic endonasal approach may offer a valid solution with low morbidity avoiding re-opening of the craniotomic access. For selected cases, endoscopic approach could also be performed simultaneously to craniotomy as a combined surgery to reduce the risk of short- and long-term complications. Long-term follow-up is mandatory in patients with a history of opened and reconstructed frontal sinus and should include imaging and endoscopic outpatient evaluation.

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals

OBJECTIVE

To assess the methodological quality of intervention-focused systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) published in high-impact otolaryngology journals.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed for SR and MA citations from 2012 to 2017 in the 10 highest impact factor otolaryngology journals. Abstracts were screened to identify published manuscripts in which the authors indicated clearly that they were performing an SR or MA. Applying a modified typology of reviews, 4 reviewers characterized the review type as SR, MA, or another review type. A simplified version of the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) tool was used to assess the reporting and methodological quality of the SRs and MAs that were focused on interventions.

RESULTS

Search and abstract screening generated 499 manuscripts that identified themselves as performing an SR or MA. A substantial number (85/499, 17%) were review types other than SRs or MAs, including 34 (7%) that were literature reviews. In total, 236 SRs and MAs focused on interventions. Over 50% of these SRs and MAs had weaknesses in at least 3 of the 16 items in the AMSTAR 2, and over 40% had weaknesses in at least 2 of the 7 critical domains. Ninety-nine percent of SRs and MAs provided critically low confidence in the results of the reviews.

CONCLUSION

Intervention-focused SRs and MAs published in high-impact otolaryngology journals have important methodological limitations that diminish confidence in the results of these reviews.

Surgical Management of a Recurrent Orbit-Eroding Mucocele Associated With Frontal-Ethmoidal Sinus Inverted Papilloma

The development of orbit-eroding mucocele associated with inverted papilloma has been rarely reported., Here, the authors present a case and surgical management of a patient with orbit-eroding mucocele associated with inverted papilloma who declined craniotomy. A combined approach utilizing frontal endoscopic sinus surgery and external sub-brow anterior orbitotomy was used to explore, drain, and excise the mucocele and inverted papilloma. Gelatin sponges soaked in gentamicin were used to cover the exposed dura and to protect the orbital content from the frontal sinus cavity.A fronto-ethmoidal sinus inverted papilloma associated with recurrent orbit-eroding mucocele was excised by combined transnasal endoscopic and external sub-brow anterior orbitotomy approach using stereotactic navigation.

Endoscopic management of bilateral frontal mucopyoceles: A Case Report and Literature review

•

Surgery is the modality of choice to achieve complete evacuation of the mucocele and reestablishing the normal sinus outflow.

•

In determining the surgical approach to mucoceles, two main factors are considered: the patency of the ipsilateral frontal sinus outflow and the accessibility of the sinus via endoscope.

•

The endonasal endoscopic image guided approach is a safe, accurate, and reliable approach with no complications.

•

The concept behind the utility of image guidance in endoscopic marsupialization.

•

It is the approach of choice in managing large frontal mucopyocele with brain extension.

Objective

To demonstrate the effectiveness of the endonasal endoscopic approach in managing a large bilateral frontal mucopyocele causing a mass effect on the brain.

Case presentation

A 17 year old chronic sinusitis patient, presented with bilateral nasal obstruction and increasing left sided headache; was found to have a very large bilateral frontal mucopyoceles with extensive intracranial extradural brain involvement on CT scan and MRI of the sinuses and brain which was drained and evacuated completely using the endonasal endoscopic image guided approach with no complications.

Conclusion

The endonasal endoscopic image guided approach is the approach of choice in managing large frontal mucopyocele with brain extension.

It is a safe, accurate, reliable approach with no complications.

Frontal sinus "mega-trephination" in a tertiary rhinology practice

BACKGROUND

Frontal sinus trephination is traditionally performed through a small cutaneous incision and osteotomy, allowing irrigation of the frontal sinus. Utilizing the trephination osteotomy for endoscopic visualization and surgical manipulation requires a larger opening. This "mega-trephination" is thought to carry an increased risk of cosmetic deformity given the increased bony removal at the anterior table. The purpose of our study was to clarify the risks of frontal sinus mega-trephination and examine how this technique is incorporated into a modern, tertiary care rhinology practice.

METHODS

Patients were identified through billing records and confirmed by retrospective chart review. All patients underwent frontal sinus mega-trephination, which is defined as an osteotomy large enough for insertion of a 4-mm endoscope and an operative instrument simultaneously. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was complication rate, including cosmetic deformity.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients underwent frontal sinus mega-trephination from 2006 to 2016. The most common surgical indications were chronic sinusitis (34%), mucocele (19%), osteoma (17%), acute sinusitis (11%), and inverting papilloma (9%). Ten patients (16%) underwent mega-trephination alone, whereas the others had mega-trephination with endoscopic sinus surgery. Twenty-one patients (33%) had minor complications. The most common complications were self-limited paresthesia (11%), infection (8%), and epistaxis (3%). No patient complained of permanent cosmetic deformity or required revision surgery for cosmesis.

CONCLUSION

Frontal sinus mega-trephination is a useful tool to augment the rhinologist's armamentarium in complex frontal sinus anatomy and pathology. This procedure is well tolerated, safe, and not associated with long-term cosmetic deformity.

Image-guided endoscopic marsupialization technique for frontal sinus mucocele with orbital extension: A case report

•

Navigated assisted ESS is a safe treatment for FM with orbital extension.

•

A navigation support could avoid an external approach.

•

The image-guided system could be useful if bony landmarks are missing.

•

The image-guided system could be useful if orbital erosion is present.

•

Navigated assisted ESS could completely drain lateral and multi-cystic lesions.

Introduction

Frontal sinus mucocele with intra-orbital extension represents a rare benign cyst-like lesion. Surgical management could be summarized in an open approach, an endoscopic marsupialization or a combined procedure. The present study reports a case of frontal mucocele with wide intra-orbital invasion treated with endoscopic marsupialization assisted by an image-guided navigation system.

Presentation of case

A 34-year-old African male was referred to the otolaryngology clinic for unilateral supraorbital swelling and post-nasal drip. A clinical ophthalmic assessment showed normal ocular movement, the absence of diplopia and normal visual acuity. CT scan showed a large soft tissue density lesion originating from the right frontal sinus with a supero-medial orbital erosion. The mass invaded the orbital cavity compressing and dislocating the eyeball forward and laterally. An image-guided ESS was performed according to Draft type IIa. Frontal mucocele’s inferior wall was open in order to drain muco-purulent content. No complications were detected and the patient was completely recovered with open frontal sinus drainage at 4 months follow-up visit.

Discussion

We have successfully treated a wide intra-orbital frontal mucocele with an endoscopic marsupialization thanks to image-guided navigation system support. This technology prevented an external approach with associated morbidity and longer hospitalization.

Conclusion

Navigated assisted endoscopic approach with marsupialization can be considered a safe treatment for FM with orbital extension. In particular, the image-guided system could be useful if bony landmarks are missing, if orbital erosion is present, and to completely drain lateral and multi-cystic lesions.

Transnasal frontal intersinus septum takedown for frontal sinus pyocele

INTRODUCTION

The open frontal intersinus septum takedown (FISST) technique was first described in 1976. We describe our experience with an endoscopic transnasal approach to manage a frontal sinus pyocele arising from an obstructed frontal sinus outflow tract due to anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction of a maxillectomy defect.

CASE REPORT

A 40-year-old lady experienced upper eyelid swelling and purulent nasal discharge 3 weeks after undergoing a left extended medial maxillectomy with free anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed total opacification of the left frontal sinus. There was no improvement with intravenous antibiotics and she underwent a surgery, whenshe was found intraoperatively to have a frontal sinus pyocele, which was then drained. She then underwent an endoscopic transnasal FISST to ventilate the left frontal sinus via the contralateral frontal recess with good results. A CT scan performed 3 months postoperatively showed a widely patent interfrontal sinus septal window and right frontal outflow tract with no disease recurrence.

DISCUSSION

The FISST is a useful technique to manage unilateral frontal sinus disease by taking advantage of the contralateral outflow tract when the ipsilateral frontal recess is obstructed.

Implication of frontal sinus mucocele's location and intrasinus septation

Mucocele of paranasal sinuses commonly affects frontal or frontoethmoidal air cells. With the evolution of endoscopic sinus surgery, the endoscopic marsupialisation has become the standard of care for these lesions. However, the external approach still has a role in selected cases of frontal sinus mucocele. The location of the mucocele and its communication with the natural outflow tract of the frontal sinus are some of the critical factors to be considered while choosing the surgical approach. We have discussed the management of three cases of frontal mucoceles having different locations and one of them having intervening septa. We emphasise that the successful management of far laterally located mucoceles and those with laterally situated septation require an external approach in conjunction with endoscopic marsupialisation.

Management and Surveillance of Frontal Sinus Violation following Craniotomy

Objectives  In the setting of craniotomy, complications after traversing the frontal sinus can lead to mucocele formation and frontal sinusitis. We review the etiology of frontal sinus violation, timeline to mucocele development, intraoperative management of the violated sinus, and treatment of frontal mucoceles. Design  Case series in conjunction with a literature review. Participants  A total of 35 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Nine of these patients were treated at a tertiary academic medical center between 2005 and 2014. The remaining patients were identified through a literature review for which 2,763 articles were identified, of which 4 articles met inclusion criteria. Main Outcomes Measures  Etiology of frontal violation, timeline to mucocele development, and method of management. Results  The overall interval from initial frontal sinus violation until mucocele identification was 14.5 years, with a range of 3 months to 36 years. The most common cause of mucocele formation was obstruction of the frontal recess with incomplete removal of the frontal sinus mucosa. The majority of patients were successfully managed with an endoscopic endonasal approach. Conclusions  Violation of the frontal sinus during craniotomy can result in mucocele formation as an early or late sequela. Image guidance may help avoid unnecessary frontal sinus violation. Mucoceles may develop decades after the initial frontal sinus violation, and long-term follow-up with imaging is recommended. While the endoscopic endonasal approach is usually the preferred method to treat these lesions, it may be necessary to perform obliteration or cranialization in unique situations.

Transorbital Approach for Improved Access in the Management of Paranasal Sinus Mucoceles

Introduction  Paranasal sinus mucoceles result from obstruction of mucous glands resulting in a cystic fluid collection that expands and encroaches upon surrounding structures. Transnasal endoscopic marsupialization has largely replaced open resection. However, mucoceles located in the orbital region or the lateral frontal sinus continue to be difficult to approach via the transnasal approach alone and often require additional approaches, such as the frontal trephine. This study sought to investigate the feasibility of the transorbital technique as an adjunct to traditional transnasal approaches in the management of paranasal sinus mucoceles. Methods  A retrospective case series of paranasal sinus mucoceles approached with a transorbital technique from a tertiary care center. Results  From 2008 to 2016, 17 patients were treated with a transorbital approach for 20 mucoceles. Of note, 24% of the patients in our series had undergone previous surgical management of the mucocele (nontransorbital approach), representing revision cases. Most mucoceles involved the frontal sinus (82%). The total complication rate was 6%. We observed no new or worsened diplopia, ptosis, or permanent visual loss. Recurrence rate was 6%. Conclusions  The endoscopic transorbital approach is a feasible complement to transnasal approaches for treatment of mucoceles located in technically challenging locations. We have demonstrated that transorbital approaches can be performed with no resultant orbital damage, visual change, ptosis, or permanent diplopia. While most patients can be treated with a standard transnasal approach, the transorbital approach can be used as part of a multiportal strategy for those with difficult to access mucoceles. Future prospective studies are needed to further characterize patient selection and outcomes.

Mucocele: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in 46 Operated Patients

Introduction  Paranasal sinus mucocele is a benign, expansive lesion associated with paranasal sinus obstruction. It affects mostly adults, and is most common in the frontal and ethmoidal sinuses.

Objective  To evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for paranasal sinus mucocele.

Methods  Retrospective review of medical records of patients treated for paranasal sinus mucocele at the ENT department of a tertiary care hospital between 2005 and 2016.

Results  Forty-six patients underwent surgical treatment of paranasal sinus mucocele. The mean age was 50.1 years, and 56.5% were male. The most prevalent symptom was pain, and the frontal sinus was most commonly affected. The vast majority of patients (89.1%) underwent endoscopic sinus marsupialization; 10.9% required combined open and endoscopic access. Seven recurrences occurred.

Conclusion  Sinus mucocele is an expansive disease that primarily affects the frontal sinus of adult patients. In most cases, endoscopic surgery is an effective treatment modality.

Combined Lid Crease and Endoscopic Approach to Lateral Frontal Sinus Disease With Orbital Extension

INTRODUCTION

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery for frontal sinus disease has obviated the need for external approaches. Special circumstances such as acute infection with orbital involvement or significant lateral sinus disease frequently require adjunct access. We describe the clinical outcomes of a combined upper eyelid crease and endoscopic approach for lateral frontal sinus disease with orbital extension.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of 7 patients who underwent a combined lid crease approach for frontal sinus disease with orbital extension between April 2012 and October 2016 was performed. All patients had the presence of lateral frontal sinus disease as well as orbital extension as seen on a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, and perioperative findings were examined.

RESULTS

Six of the 7 patients were male. Mean age was 61 years, and the indication for surgery was primarily drainage of mucopyocele and inverting papilloma (IP) in 1 patient. The frontal sinus and orbit were successfully accessed, and the respective pathology was addressed in both locations. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered. There was no postoperative or cosmetic complications.

CONCLUSION

The combined lid crease and endoscopic approach is a safe and effective technique for accessing the lateral frontal sinus and orbit.

Quantifying Lateral Frontal Sinus Access: The Upper Blepharoplasty Approach

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in technology and instrumentation, access to the lateral frontal sinus remains a challenge for surgeons. We sought to quantify the reach and applicability of the upper blepharoplasty approach (UBA) to the frontal sinus.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric specimens were obtained for anatomic research and frontal sinuses divided into 3 zones. Zone 1 was defined as medial to the supraorbital neurovascular bundle (SON). The remaining orbit was then bisected to define zone 2 (centrally) and zone 3 (laterally). Twenty-four UBAs were performed followed by 12 modified endoscopic Lothrop procedures (MELP). The ability to instrument each wall of the frontal sinus was recorded for the MELP, UBA, and combined approach.

RESULTS

The UBA provided excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus in zones 2 and 3 (89% and 100%). The MELP provided poorer access in zone 3 (67%) but improved access in zone 1 (83%-100%). Access for zone 1 through the UBA was limited. The combined approach yielded 100% access to each frontal sinus boundary.

CONCLUSION

The MELP in combination with the UBA/lateral trephination provides excellent access to each frontal sinus boundary. The UBA provides excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus but is limited medially by the SON.

First results of frontal sinus obliteration with a synthetic, resorbable and osteoconductive bone graft of ß-tricalcium phosphate

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in endoscopic sinus surgery, frontal sinus obliteration is still indicated in some cases. Current options for obliteration include autologous and synthetic materials. The use of ß-tricalcium phosphate as a resorbable bone graft substitute is a good alternative for frontal sinus obliteration. This study aimed to report our experience with this material.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent frontal sinus obliteration at our clinic between 2008 and 2013 was performed. Demographic data, indications, previous surgery, and immediate and late complications were examined. Information on persisting symptoms and patient outcomes was collected using a telephone questionnaire in February 2016.

RESULTS

None of the patients underwent further surgery for frontal sinus disease. All of them reported a good cosmetic result and symptom improvement.

CONCLUSION

ß-tricalcium phosphate is a good, safe and cost-effective material for frontal sinus obliteration.

Open Frontal Sinus Surgery: A Lost Art

In this article, the historical context and current application of external frontal sinus procedures are discussed. In particular, the frontal trephine, frontoethmoidectomy, and osteoplastic flap are described.

Considerations in the management of giant frontal mucoceles with significant intracranial extension: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Giant frontal mucoceles, characterized by significant intracranial and/or intraorbital extension, can present with significant neurologic symptoms. Although typical mucoceles are managed endoscopically, giant mucoceles are often treated with an open or combined approach due to various concerns, including frontal lobe displacement, size, and rapid decompression of the intracranial component. The impact of significant intracranial extension on outcomes is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

This review studied key neurologic considerations in the management of giant frontal sinus mucoceles and analyzed outcomes of different management strategies.

METHODS

Systematic literature review by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles, which represented 85 cases, met inclusion criteria. Neurologic symptoms on presentation ranged from headache (24.7%) and vision loss (12.9%) to extremity weakness (1.2%), frontal lobe syndrome (2.4%), and seizures (4.7%). Twenty-eight patients were treated endoscopically (34.1%), and 54 (65.9%) were treated with an external approach. Twenty-five of the open procedures included a craniotomy. Indications for the open approach included subdural empyema, enucleation, or large anterior table defects. Perioperative antibiotics were not consistently used. No perioperative seizures were reported with any approach. There were six cerebrospinal fluid leaks, all in the patients who underwent open procedures. The overall recurrence rate was 3.5%, with no recurrences reported in patients treated with an open approach. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Giant frontal mucoceles often present with various neurologic symptoms. Both open and endoscopic techniques offer excellent results. Endoscopic management is effective and preferred, except in special circumstances. An interdisciplinary team approach should be used to optimize surgical planning.

Indications for open procedures in the endoscopic era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic sinus surgery became the gold standard in inflammatory disorders of the nose and paranasal sinuses, in cerebrospinal fluid leak and epistaxis management, and established its efficacy in the oncology of the region. However, there are certain limitations which make an external approach mandatory. This article reviews the recent literature describing the cases where an open procedure is still indicated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the evolution of endoscopic surgery external approaches are still indicated. Osteoplastic flap remains an option for the refractory inflammation of the frontal sinus. Benign and malignant tumours with lateral or superior extension, neurovascular involvement, and bony/soft tissue erosion usually require an external approach. Superior and lateral posterior wall defects of frontal sinus with cerebrospinal fluid leak may mandate an open procedure. Management of severe epistaxis may still necessitate in selected cases an external approach when endoscopic surgery fails and embolization setting is not available.

SUMMARY

Although advances in endoscopic instrumentation and techniques steadily decrease the indications for external approaches, they continue to have a role in the management of nasal disorders. This study summarizes the recent literature and provides a comprehensive review of the up-to-date remaining indications for open procedures in the nose and paranasal sinuses.

Endoscopic endonasal orbital transposition to expand the frontal sinus approaches

BACKGROUND

The management of frontal sinus disease still remains a challenging issue for rhinologists. Although endoscopic frontal sinus surgery has significantly advanced over the past years, there are some conditions in which the external approaches are still necessary. Recently, the increasing experience in endoscopic sinus surgery together with important technologic advancements have allowed expansion of the indications for selected lesions localized more and more lateral into the frontal sinus.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the endoscopic endonasal approach to the far lateral portion of the frontal sinus and to evaluate the outcomes of this technique.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was carried out with patients at a single institution, who, from 2004 to 2012, underwent an exclusive endoscopic transnasal approach to the far lateral portion of the frontal sinus at a single institution. The surgical technique included the Draf IIb procedure, a modified Lothrop procedure (Draf III), and endoscopic lateralization of the orbit, differently associated according to the needs of each case.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were eligible for the present study. The lesions included were mucoceles in 9 cases, fibro-osseous lesions in 10 cases, and inverted papillomas in 5 cases. The overall follow-up ranged from 12 to 120 months (mean, 40.6 months). At the time of the last follow-up, no recurrence of disease was observed in the patients treated; in one case of osteoma, a small and stable in size (1 mm) persistent lesion was observed in an asymptomatic patient. One scheduled and one accidental cerebrospinal fluid leak with immediate skull base reconstruction occurred. No intraoperative or postoperative early or late orbital complication was observed in any case.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic endonasal orbital transposition seems to facilitate the endoscopic management of selected far-lateral frontal sinus lesions. However, it is a demanding procedure that requires experience and skill to avoid intraoperative skull base and orbital complications.

Preventing and Managing Complications in Frontal Sinus Surgery

This review covers potential complications of frontal sinus surgical management and strategies for prevention of these complications. Accordingly, recent advances in frontal sinus surgical techniques are described, and the management of complications stemming both from these and traditional techniques are detailed.

Frontal Sinus Surgery: The State of the Art

Aim:

Review and describe the essential components of modern frontal sinus surgery.

Background

Frontal sinus surgery has evolved considerably over the last century, and advances in imaging, optics, and instrumentation have contributed to contemporary treatment paradigms. Outcomes assessment has had an important role in identifying indications for surgery and future areas of research.

Review results

Numerous advancements are part of modern frontal sinus surgery and the treatment of frontal sinusitis. Anatomic studies have revealed variations that are associated with disease and pose challenges for surgery. Open approaches remain relevant in situations of difficult disease or as part of combined approaches. Endoscopic surgery, however, is central to contemporary surgical management of frontal sinus disease. Evolving instrumentation and the development of new implantable devices are increasingly relevant in the endoscopic era. Outcomes research has refined indications for surgery and identifies areas for ongoing research.

Conclusion

State-of-the-art frontal sinus surgery is the product of significant evolution and advancement. Modern surgery is reflective of improved optics and new instrumentation, and the central role of endoscopic approaches in treating frontal sinus disease. Outcomes research has been essential for developing an evidenced-based approach to frontal sinus surgery.

Clinical significance

A review of the essential components of state-of-the-art frontal sinus surgery for the practicing otolaryngologist.

How to cite this article

Marino MJ, McCoul ED. Frontal Sinus Surgery: The State of the Art. Int J Head Neck Surg 2016;7(1): 5-12.

Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery

Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery is the standard procedure for surgery of most paranasal sinus diseases. Appropriate frame conditions provided, the respective procedures are safe and successful. These prerequisites encompass appropriate technical equipment, anatomical oriented surgical technique, proper patient selection, and individually adapted extent of surgery. The range of endonasal sinus operations has dramatically increased during the last 20 years and reaches from partial uncinectomy to pansinus surgery with extended surgery of the frontal (Draf type III), maxillary (grade 3-4, medial maxillectomy, prelacrimal approach) and sphenoid sinus. In addition there are operations outside and beyond the paranasal sinuses. The development of surgical technique is still constantly evolving. This article gives a comprehensive review on the most recent state of the art in endoscopic sinus surgery according to the literature with the following aspects: principles and fundamentals, surgical techniques, indications, outcome, postoperative care, nasal packing and stents, technical equipment.

Outcomes of frontal mucoceles treated with conventional endoscopic sinus surgery

CONCLUSION

Conventional endoscopic sinus surgery (CESS) is useful for frontal mucoceles. A patient with short anterior-posterior distance and bone thickening may need an axillary flap, Draf type IIb, or Draf type III procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To present outcomes of frontal mucoceles treated with CESS and predict risk factors for poor outcomes to help define surgical indications.

METHODS

A consecutive clinical series was reviewed retrospectively. The authors performed CESS without agger nasi resection (Draf type IIa) for 13 frontal sinus mucoceles in 12 patients between October 2011 and July 2013. Patient age, sex, blood eosinophil count, history of operation and co-existence of acute infection were compared. For the condition of the frontal sinus, anterior-posterior distance and width of frontal recess, bone thickening of the frontal recess, bone absorption due to continuous pressure by mucocele and anatomy of the frontal recess was noted.

RESULTS

All operations were done without a navigation system. The post-operative course was uneventful in all 12 patients, and all symptoms gradually receded. Among 13 mucoceles, one frontal sinus (7.7%) closed during follow-up.

Contemporary applications of frontal sinus trephination: A systematic review of the literature

Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature on contemporary indications and outcomes for frontal sinus trephination and present an illustrative case of an endoscopically assisted repair of a subcutaneous frontal sinus fistula by trephination technique. PubMed and Ovid databases were used as data sources. A systematic review of the English literature was completed to review reports of frontal trephination from 1980 to 2014. Articles meeting inclusion criteria for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were reviewed. Articles were systematically reviewed and graded by evidence-based medicine level. An illustrative case from our institution is then presented. The systematic review identified 2,621 published studies. Thirty-eight studies were identified for inclusion. The indications, techniques, outcomes, safety, and complications were reviewed for noninflammatory and inflammatory conditions. There were 32 retrospective case series, reports, or cohort studies (level 4), four systematic reviews (level 3), one prospective analysis (level 3), and one meta-analysis (level 2). Due to the heterogeneity of study cases and inclusion criteria, a meta-analysis was not feasible. We also present a novel closure of an anterior skull base defect resulting in a subcutaneous fistula with use of a frontal trephination approach. The frontal sinus trephination should not be regarded as a procedure of the past, as it useful in the armamentarium of the modern sinus and skull base surgeon. This approach provides access for instrumentation for hard-to-reach frontal sinus disease either purely through a trephination approach or as a supplementation to the transnasal endoscopic approach. Evidence supporting frontal sinus trephination is of levels 2, 3, and 4. Level of evidence: NA.

[Clinical analysis and surgical results of 58 paranasal sinus mucoceles]

INTRODUCTION

Mucoceles are slow-growing, benign lesions found in the paranasal sinuses that are locally destructive, causing bony resorption an displacement of adjacent structures. We present our experience in the surgical treatment of these lesions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 58 paranasal sinus mucoceles in 54 patients between 1989 and 2012. We describe patient age and sex, mucocele location, clinical features, surgical approaches employed, recurrence and complications.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in this series was 59 years; there were 31 males (57%) and 23 females (43%). Thirty-two cases (55%) were located in the frontal or ethmoid-frontal system, 8 (14%) in the ethmoid sinus, 14 (24%) in the maxillary sinus and 4 (7%) in sphenoid sinus. Predisposing factors were present in 55% of the patients and 45% cases were primary. Endoscopic treatment was given to 71% of mucocele patients, while 29% were treated with external or combined approaches. Recurrence appeared in 4 patients (7%), 2 in the endoscopic surgery group and 2 in the external surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure of choice for management of paranasal sinus mucoceles is endoscopic drainage. It is a safe approach that gives good results.

The hybrid lid crease approach to address lateral frontal sinus disease with orbital extension

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the hybrid lid crease approach in conjunction with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for lateral frontal sinus disease with orbital extension.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

METHODS

Patients undergoing hybrid lid crease approach with FESS for frontal sinus disease were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical indications consisted of inverting papilloma with extension into the frontal sinus (n = 1) and frontal sinus mucocele (n = 2). Inclusion criteria included presence of disease in the lateral frontal sinus with extension into the orbital space and erosion of the superior orbital rim. Preoperative and postoperative parameters included complete ophthalmologic exam, endoscopic exam, and computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

We were able to access the frontal sinus and orbit in all 3 cases and address sinus pathology of the lateral frontal sinus and orbit using the lid crease approach with FESS. All patients had improvement in ophthalmologic symptoms and interval disease resolution and were satisfied with their postoperative lid crease incision.

CONCLUSION

The lid crease approach offers direct access to the frontal sinus with minimal dissection through a well-hidden incision. In our case series of lateral frontal sinus pathology with orbital extension, the hybrid lid crease approach with FESS allowed complete eradication of disease without recurrence.