Variations in the cochlear implant experience in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct

Cochlear implantation in adults and pediatrics with enlarged vestibular aqueduct: a systematic review on the surgical findings and patients' performance

PURPOSE

Cochlear implantation (CI) has been considered a safe and effective management option for patients with severe to profound hearing loss. Patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) could be challenging with some variations in surgical approaches, intraoperative surgical notes, and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to  review the surgical and clinical outcomes of cochlear implantation among patients with EVA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in five major databases. All original studies reporting cochlear implantation in patients with EVA were included for qualitative data synthesis. The risk of bias was independently assessed through the National Intuitional of Health tool. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (reference number: CRD42021225900).

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies with 4035 subjects were included. Of them, 853 (21.14%) had EVA and underwent CI. Mondini malformation was the most frequently associated anomaly (n = 78, 11.1%). Unilateral implantation was performed in 258 cases while bilateral in 119 subjects. Postoperative complications included CSF/perilymph gusher (n = 112), CSF oozing (n = 18), and partial electrode insertion (n = 6). Closing the cochleostomy with temporalis fascia, muscle, connective tissue, or fibrin glue was the most frequently reported approach to manage CSF/perilymph gusher (n = 67, 56.7%) while packing was performed in six patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with EVA demonstrated audiometric and speech performance improvement after CI. However, many patients had intra- or postoperative complications. Further research is needed as the outcomes may be affected by associated temporal bone pathology, the timing of implant, and hearing condition.

Outcomes of Acoustic and Linguistic Performances Following Cochlear Implantation in Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome (LVAS)

AIM

This study aims to collate the outcomes in acoustic and linguistic performances after cochlear implantation in LVAS.

METHODS

In a hospital-based prospective interventional study, seven prelingual children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) with LVAS were recruited. They underwent unilateral cochlear implantation between December 2013 and December 2015 in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery at a tertiary care center. Outcomes of auditory and speech performances were assessed in the form of revised categories of auditory perception (CAP), infant toddler meaningful auditory integration scale (IT-MAIS) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores preoperatively, at one and two years follow up.

RESULTS

The mean age of implantation was 4 years. The median revised CAP, IT-MAIS, and SIR scores after one and two years of follow-up were 6, 27, 3, and 11, 36, 5 respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 21.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Pre op median revised CAP, IT-MAIS, and SIR scores of 0, 1, 1 showed improvement to 11, 36, 5 at two years follow up which was statistically significant. Hence, we conclude that good functional outcomes post-operatively advocate the significance of cochlear implantation in LVAS.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Systematic Review of Surgical Implications and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated age at implantation, improvement in hearing and speech perception outcomes, as well as surgical complications in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with Pendred Syndrome (PS) or non-syndromic enlarged vestibular aqueduct (NSEVA).

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature between 1984 and 2021 was performed. Two independent reviewers performed abstract and full-text screening using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The inclusion criteria were: English language, cochlear implant, age at implantation available, age <18 years, PS, Mondini malformation, and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Full-text analysis was completed using the National Institute of Health assessment tool for case series and case-control studies. Studies were also graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine grading system.

RESULTS

In total, 198 studies were identified and screened, and 55 studies were included for analysis. Audiological outcomes were available in 46 studies, and the four-frequency pure-tone audiogram average improved by 60 to 78 dB HL due to cochlear implantation. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility scores increased by 44%. The overall average implantation age was 60 months. The implantation age was 21 months lower in the studies where individuals were implanted after the year 2000 compared with those implanted before the year 2000. Perilymph gusher/oozing was the most common surgical incident reported, occurring in 187 of 1572 implantations.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with PS/NSEVA, cochlear implantation improves pure-tone average by 60 to 78 dB HL and capacity of auditory performance/speech intelligibility by 44%. The implantation age for these children has decreased during the last two decades but is still somewhat higher than reported for unselected pediatric cochlear implantation. Perilymph gusher/oozing is the most common surgical complication.

Anatomical and audiological considerations in branchiootorenal syndrome: A systematic review

Objective

Establish anatomical considerations, audiological outcomes, and optimal management in patients with branchiootic/branchiootorenal syndrome (BO/BOR).

Methods

Databases reviewed: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical or radiological studies of patients with BOR syndrome describing either the audiological profile or anatomical changes were included. Articles in which BOR syndrome was associated with other syndromes, and those that were focused only on general and genetic aspects of BOR syndrome were excluded. Articles were assessed using Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system and the Brazzelli risk of bias tool for nonrandomized studies.

Results

Searches identified 379 articles. Of these, 64 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 482 patients from at least 95 families. In 308 patients, hearing loss was categorized as sensorineural (29%), conductive (20%), and mixed (51%). Hearing outcomes were variable in terms of onset, pattern, and severity; ranging from mild to profound deafness. One hundred sixty‐nine patients presented with inner ear anomalies, 145 had middle, and 151 had external ear abnormalities. In 44 studies, 58 ear operations were described. Mixed outcomes were reported in patients managed with hearing aids or middle ear surgery; however, successful cochlear implantation was described in all five cases.

Conclusion

The anatomical and audiological profiles of patients with BO/BOR are variable. A range of surgical procedures were described, however lacked objective outcome measures. Given the range of anatomical variants, management decisions should be made on an individual basis including full audiological and radiological assessment.

Level of evidence

NA.

Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE(S)

To describe cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes, with speech perception, auditory, language, and parent-reported auditory and speech behaviors, in children with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and incomplete partition type 2 (IP-II) and compare to control children without inner ear malformations (IEMs) and to determine cerebrospinal fluid gusher rates and effect on outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to February 2020. Studies reporting relevant outcomes in children with EVA or EVA + IP-II and controls without IEMs undergoing CI were included. Mean differences in speech perception, auditory, and language scores between cases and controls were meta-analyzed. Gusher rates were determined by proportion meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Of 214 identified articles, 42 met inclusion criteria, evaluating 775 cases and 2,191 controls. Of -cases, 578 (74.6%) had EVA and 197 (25.4%) had EVA + IP-II. Cases showed a significant improvement in speech perception, auditory and language performance, comparable to controls. Parent-reported auditory and speech production behaviors outcomes were positive among cases and comparable to controls. Pooled gusher proportions in EVA and EVA + IP-II cases were 27.7% (95% CI: 17.6-39.1) and 48.6% (95% CI: 28.6-69.0), respectively, with a proportion difference of 20.9% (95% CI: 11.0-30.1). Gusher occurrence did not impact speech perception or language outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes in children with EVA or EVA + IP-II undergoing CI are favorable and largely comparable to outcomes in children with hearing loss undergoing CI without IEMs. Intraoperative gusher is more prevalent among children with EVA + IP-II as compared to iEVA. Gusher does not influence speech perception and language development outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2021.

Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Malformations Before and After Cochlear Implantation: A Cohort Study of 274 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Inner ear malformations (IEMs) are common in children with hearing loss. The different types of IEMs form a unique subgroup of cochlear implant (CI) candidates. We aimed to evaluate the auditory perception outcomes of CI in children with different types of IEMs and compare them with CI users without IEMs.

METHODS

The study included 274 CI users with and without IEMs as two groups (n = 137, each). Both groups' chronological age at implantation and duration of CI usage was matched (± 8 months). All subjects were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively by the Ling's sound test and the auditory perception test battery, which includes the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), closed-set Pattern Perception Test (PPT) and open-set Sentence Recognition Test (SRT). Besides, children with IEMs were assessed for language development.

RESULTS

Progress in the IEMs' group differed according to the type of ear anomaly. CI users with enlarged vestibular aqueduct had the highest scores, while users with common cavity had the lowest. Children with IEMs performed well on the closed-set test while having difficulty with the open-set test.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation outcomes are favourable in IEMs' patients with a cochlear nerve visible on magnetic resonance imaging. Our results indicate that it is critical to take the anatomical differences into account during follow-up and rehabilitation programmes. Each CI user should be evaluated according to his or her individual needs.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome-Should We Provide Cochlear Implants Earlier?

OBJECTIVE

Examine postoperative speech perception outcomes in a large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) patients at a major cochlear implantation center.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre (SCIC) database and medical records from January 1994 to December 2015 was performed.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with a diagnosis of LVAS who received a cochlear implant (CI). Only those with speech perception outcomes recorded at least 12 months post implant were included in our analysis.

INTERVENTION(S)

Therapeutic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Postoperative speech perception scores.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2015, 176 adult and pediatric patients with a diagnosis of LVAS underwent cochlear implantation at SCIC. Postoperative Bamford-Kowal Bench (BKB) sentence test scores were obtained for 97 patients. The postoperative median BKB score was 93% with a lower quartile score of 85% and an upper quartile score of 98%. Smaller numbers were available for post-CI City University of New York (CUNY) and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores yet similar excellent results were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results suggest the CI should be considered when BKB scores have dropped to 85%. We suggest that rather than LVAS cases representing a challenge to cochlear implantation, they are amongst the best candidates for surgery, and should receive a CI at an earlier stage in hearing loss, when they have better speech perception. This allows stable hearing to be established earlier along with excellent speech perception outcomes.

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformation: A multicenter study on auditory performance and speech production outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter study evaluated the auditory performance and speech production outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear anomaly and compared the outcomes of patients with different kinds of malformation.

METHODS

Cochlear implantation was performed in 107 children with inner ear malformation at four tertiary academic centers. The categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores were evaluated preoperatively and one year and two years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Types of inner ear malformation and their frequencies were: incomplete partition type-I, 19 (17.8%) patients; incomplete partition type-II, 31 (29%), common cavity, 17 (15.9%), cochlear hypoplasia, 17 (15.9%), and isolated enlarged vestibular aqueduct (isolated EVA), 23 (21.5%) patients. EVA was the coexisting anomaly in 27(25.2%) subjects. The median CAP and SIR scores improved significantly during the first two years after cochlear implantation in all groups (p-values <0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was seen in CAP and SIR scores of children with different inner ear malformations (p-value = 0.147 and 0.570, respectively) or in patients with isolated EVA compared to coexisting EVA (p-value = 0.538 and 0.075, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The median CAP and SIR scores two years after surgery were 5 (Understanding of common phrases without lip-reading) IQR: 4-6, and 3 (Connected speech is intelligible to a listener who concentrates and lip-reads within a known context) IQR: 3-4, respectively. Auditory performance and speech production were significantly improved in all inner ear malformation patient groups, and no significant difference was observed between the scores of patients with different types of anomaly.

Receptive language acquisition in a pediatric population with Pendred syndrome and non-syndromic enlarged vestibular aqueduct

Background: Children with Pendred syndrome (PS) and non-syndromic enlarged vestibular aqueduct (NSEVA) represent a group of pre-lingual hearing-impaired individuals with rehabilitation challenges.Objective: To evaluate receptive language capabilities in a pediatric cohort with PS and NSEVA.Materials and methods: Twenty-four (24) children diagnosed with either PS or NSEVA, were examined using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) and compared to a cohort of 55 Danish children with normal hearing, as well as to a mixed group of 29 children with hearing impairment of congenital and hereditary non-syndromal type. In addition, test results were compared to normative data (PPVT-4 US standard scores).Results: PS/NSEVA children's PPVT-4 test scores fall within the normative data for the PPVT-4 (US) but proved to be significantly lower statistically, when compared to Danish children with normal hearing (p<.0001) or to children with mixed non-syndromic hereditary hearing impairment (p=.006). Implantation age was significantly later for the PS/NSEVA group (median = 43 months), compared to the mixed non-syndromic hereditary congenial hearing impairment group (median = 11 months).Conclusions and significance: Children with PS/NSEVA perform below age equivalent for receptive vocabulary outcome when compared to both children with normal hearing, and children with non-syndromic mixed hereditary congenital hearing impairment who receive cochlear implants earlier.

Morphology and cochlear implantation in enlarged vestibular aqueduct

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work is to explore audiometry following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and to investigate the effects of inner ear morphological variation on post CI audiometry.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of both natural and cochlear-implant-aided audiometry results, using all available measurements in a mixed-effects model accounting for longitudinal change and the grouping structure of ears. Patients who visited our tertiary academic medical center between 2000 and 2016 were identified as having EVA according to Cincinnati criteria on radiological examination; patients eligible for CI were then selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariable modeling showed a statistically significant hearing improvement in ears with EVA undergoing CI with regards to pure tone average (-64.0 dB, p < 0.0001), speech reception threshold (-57.90 dB, p < 0.0001), and word score (34.8%, p > 0.0001). Vestibular aqueduct midpoint size and the presence of incomplete partition type II (IP II) did not have significant independent associations with audiometric findings. However, multivariable modeling revealed a statistically significant interaction between IP II and CI such that IP II ears demonstrated a decrease in WS improvement of 30.2% (p = 0.0059) compared to non-IP II ears receiving CI.

CONCLUSION

There is a statistically significant audiometric benefit to ears with EVA receiving CI. Morphology, specifically the presence of IP II, may hinder CI benefit in terms of word score however this finding needs clinical validation. This data improves personalization of surgical counseling and planning for patients with EVA considering CI.

Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings

Objective

(1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu.

Data Sources

PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus.

Review Methods

Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories—closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences—and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test.

Results

Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.

Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct (EVA) Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To analyze audiometric outcomes after bilateral cochlear implantation in patients with isolated enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) syndrome and associated incomplete partition (IP) malformations. Secondary objective was to analyze rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) gusher in patients with IP-EVA spectrum deformities and compare this with the existing literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with EVA syndrome who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants between June 1999 and January 2014 were identified in the University Hospitals Case Medical Center cochlear implant database. Isolated EVA (IEVA) and Incomplete Partition Type II (IP-II) malformations were identified by reviewing high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging. Demographic information, age at implantation, surgical details, postimplantation audiometric data including speech reception thresholds (SRT), word, and sentence scores were reviewed and analyzed. Intra- and postoperative complications were analyzed as well and compared with the literature.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (32 implanted ears) had pediatric cochlear implantation for EVA-associated hearing loss. Data from 16 controls (32 implanted ears) were used to compare audiometric and speech outcomes of EVA cohort. Mean age at implantation was 6.8 years for EVA cohort and 6.0 years for controls. There was no statistically significant difference in long-term postoperative SRT, monaurally aided word scores, and binaurally tested word scores between pediatric EVA group and controls. The EVA patients had a long-term mean sentence score of 85.92%. A subset of EVA patients implanted at mean age of 3.18 years (n = 15 ears) had similar audiometric outcomes to another control group with Connexin 26 mutations (n = 20 ears) implanted at a similar age. Further subset analysis revealed no significant differences in age at implantation, SRT, and word scores in patients with IEVA and IP-II malformation. There was no significant association between size of vestibular aqueduct and age at implantation. There was no CSF gusher or other intra- or postoperative complications reported in our series.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral sequential cochlear implantation can be performed safely in patients with EVA. Audiometric outcomes are excellent and comparable to pediatric cochlear implant patients with no malformations. CSF gusher rates can be minimized by trans-round window approach. Further long-term studies are needed to identify differences within IP-EVA spectrum deformities, audiometric outcomes, and proportions of EVA patients who will need cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation.