Early ototoxic changes in patients with germ cell tumor after first cycle of cisplatin-based therapy

Systematic Critical Review of Genetic Factors Associated with Cisplatin-induced Ototoxicity: Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety 2022 Update

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin is commonly used to treat solid tumors; however, its use can be complicated by drug-induced hearing loss (ie, ototoxicity). The presence of certain genetic variants has been associated with the development/occurrence of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, suggesting that genetic factors may be able to predict patients who are more likely to develop ototoxicity. The authors aimed to review genetic associations with cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and discuss their clinical relevance.

METHODS

An updated systematic review was conducted on behalf of the Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Pharmacogenomic studies that reported associations between genetic variation and cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were included. The evidence on genetic associations was summarized and evaluated, and knowledge gaps that can be used to inform future pharmacogenomic studies identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 evaluated reports, considering 47 independent patient populations, captured associations involving 24 genes. Considering GRADE criteria, genetic variants in 2 genes were strongly (ie, odds ratios ≥3) and consistently (ie, replication in ≥3 independent populations) predictive of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Specifically, an ACYP2 variant has been associated with ototoxicity in both children and adults, whereas TPMT variants are relevant in children. Encouraging evidence for associations involving several other genes also exists; however, further research is necessary to determine potential clinical relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic variation in ACYP2 and TPMT may be helpful in predicting patients at the highest risk of developing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Further research (including replication studies considering diverse pediatric and adult patient populations) is required to determine whether genetic variation in additional genes may help further identify patients most at risk.

Effect of cisplatin chemotherapy on the inner ear function and serum prestin concentration

PURPOSE

One of the main side effects of chemotherapy with cisplatin is irreversible sensorineural hearing loss. This study was conducted to assess the correlation between the serum prestin concentration as a potential cochlear biomarker and audiologic findings in patients after cisplatin chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 52 patients aged 18-75 years were included in this prospective study. All the subjects were recruited from the radiotherapy and oncology center of a tertiary hospital in Rasht, Iran. Audiologic parameters evaluations and serum prestin concentrations were measured at baseline and after 1-3 weeks of chemotherapy. The inner ear function was evaluated by pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and distortion product of otoacoustic emission (DPOAE). A repeated-measure analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the relationship between the PTA, DPOAE, serum prestin concentration and cumulative cisplatin dose.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (36 females) participated in this study. The PTA results showed that ototoxicity was more frequent among the patients with a high cumulative dose of cisplatin (χ2 trend = 15.25; P < 0.001). DPOAE responses revealed that 38.5% of the patients had ototoxicity change after 40-80 mg of cisplatin administration. After receiving 40-80 mg of cisplatin, serum prestin concentration increased from 130 to 230 pg/ml. There is a significant positive correlation between prestin concentration after receiving more than 80 mg of cisplatin and the ototoxic changes in the DPOAE response.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed correlations between prestin concentrations and ototoxicity diagnosis by DPOAE findings. An early rise in prestin concentration is particularly important and an early sign of hearing loss. Future studies are recommended to investigate the effect of varying doses of cisplatin on prestin concentration and any association between ototoxicity and clinicopathological features.

GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null: predictors of cisplatin-caused acute ototoxicity measured by DPOAEs

Preventing the ototoxicity caused by cisplatin is a major issue yet to be overcome. Useful preventive treatments will soon be available. Consequently, the next step is to filter out those patients who are more prone to develop ototoxicity. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate potential predictive markers of acute ototoxicity as determined by measures of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). A total of 118 patients from our previous DPOAE analysis were put under evaluation. Ototoxic cases were divided according to unilateral (n = 45) or bilateral (n = 23) involvement. The clinicopathological characteristics, hearing test results, germline GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms, and common laboratory parameters were included in the new analysis. Univariate and multivariate statistical tests were applied. According to multivariate logistic regression, the only independent predictor of unilateral ototoxicity (vs. non-affected) was a GSTM1 null genotype (OR = 4.52; 95%CI = 1.3-16.3), while for bilateral damage, the GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 4.76; 1.4-16) was a predictor. The higher starting serum urea level was characteristic of bilateral ototoxicity; however, the only independent marker of bilateral (vs. unilateral) ototoxicity was the presence of GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 2.44; 1.23-4.85). Different processes, involving the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes, respectively, govern the development of acute unilateral and bilateral ototoxicities. Further research is needed to clarify these processes. Based on the above findings, patients whom are at risk may be selected for otoprotective therapies. KEY MESSAGES: The acute ototoxicity was determined by DPOAE in 118 testicular cancer patients. GSTM1 null was the only marker of unilateral ototoxicity (vs. non-affected). The only marker of bilateral hearing loss (vs. non-affected) was the GSTT1 null. GSTT1 null was also the marker of bilateral vs. unilateral ototoxicity. A high-risk group may be selected for new, individualized otoprotective treatment.

Age-corrected hearing loss after chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate subjective and objective hearing loss in cervical cancer patients after chemoradiation with cisplatin (mono).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 51 cervical cancer patients with indication for chemoradiation were included. Pure tone and impedance audiometry were performed before and after chemoradiation. Hearing loss was scaled according to ASHA criteria. Subjective hearing was assessed with the Oldenburger Sentence Test. To consider age-dependent changes, hearing loss was corrected for age and the time interval between measurements.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 46 years, 46% were active/former smokers (n = 24), 28 (54%) patients were never-smokers. Median total weekly cisplatin dose was 70 ± 14.2 mg. Cumulative doses of cisplatin during chemoradiation ranged between 115.2 and 400 mg cisplatin (mean 336.1 mg, median 342 ± 52.7 mg). The median interval between last chemotherapy and second audiometry was 320 ± 538 days (35-2262 days). Changes in hearing threshold ≥20 dB were experienced by 32/52 patients (62%) following chemoradiation, 55% of them for frequencies ≥6000 Hz. No statistically significant hearing loss remained after chemoradiation upon correction for age and time interval. Patients >40 years had a higher risk of hearing loss than younger patients. Objective data on hearing function did not correlate with subjective hearing loss and did not impair daily activity in any patient.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiation with cumulative cisplatin doses up to 400 mg did not lead to significant impairment of objective or subjective hearing. For cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation, standard audiometry is not indicated.

Hearing loss before and after cisplatin-based chemotherapy in testicular cancer survivors: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss is a well-known long-term effect after cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CBCT) in testicular cancer survivors (TCS), but longitudinal data are sparse. We evaluate hearing loss and the impact of age in TCS treated with CBCT in this longitudinal study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-six TCS treated with CBCT 1980-1994 with audiograms (0.25-8 kHz) pre-chemotherapy (PRE) and at a follow-up survey (SURV) after median 10 years were included (cases). Audiograms at SURV from 46 age-matched TCS without CBCT were included as controls. Linear regression was performed to evaluate predictors for change in the hearing threshold level (HTL) from PRE to SURV. Two definitions of a audiogram-defined hearing loss was applied if: (1) mean HTL for both ears exceeded 20 dB at any frequency 0.25-8 kHz (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) definition) and (2) average HTL for the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz exceeded 20 dB (WHO-M4 definition). Self-reported hearing impairment (SURV) was assessed by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Age and cisplatin dose was significantly associated with a greater change in HTL for the frequencies 2-8 kHz. For the 8 kHz frequency, each 100 mg increase in cumulative cisplatin dose was associated with a deterioration of 3.6 dB (95% CI 1.8-5.3, p < .001). The prevalence of hearing loss (ASHA) among cases was 33% PRE, 70% at SURV and 65% among controls at SURV (cases vs. controls, p = .66). According to M4, the prevalence of hearing loss among cases was 6.5% PRE, 13% at SURV and 2.2% among controls at SURV (cases vs. controls, p = .049). Twenty-nine percent of cases, and 33% of controls (p = .70) reported hearing impairment at SURV.

CONCLUSION

Cisplatin is associated with a hearing loss particularly at higher frequencies. Age appear to be an important factor for hearing loss regardless of treatment. The ASHA definition overestimates the hearing problem.