Refusal of treatment among HER2-positive breast cancer patients in China: a retrospective analysis

Background

There is a need to update the understanding of treatment refusal among cancer patients in China, taking into account recent developments. This study investigated how public insurance coverage of the first breast cancer targeted therapy contributed to the changes in treatment refusal among HER2-positive breast cancer patients in China. And it intensively examined and discussed additional barriers affecting patient utilization of innovative anticancer medicines based on the types and reasons for treatment refusal.

Methods

This retrospective study included female breast cancer patients diagnosed as HER2-positive who received treatment at a provincial oncology center in southern China between 2014 and 2020. Multivariable analysis was conducted using a binary logistic regression model. Subgroup analysis was performed with the same regression model.

Results

Among the 1,322 HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received treatment at the study hospital between 2014 and 2020, 327 (24.55%) had ever refused treatment. Economic reasons were reported as the primary cause by 142 patients (43.43%). Patients diagnosed after September 2017, when the first breast cancer targeted therapy was included in the public health insurance, were less likely to refuse treatment (OR = 0.64, 95% CI:0.45 ~ 0.91, p = 0.01) compared to those diagnosed before September 2017. Patients enrolled in the resident health insurance were more likely to refuse treatment (OR = 2.43, 95% CI:1.77 ~ 3.35, p < 0.001) than those enrolled in the employee health insurance.

Conclusion

This study reveals a high rate of treatment refusal among HER2-positive breast cancer patients, primarily attributed to financial factors. The disparity in public health insurance benefits resulted in a heavier economic burden for patients with less comprehensive benefits. Furthermore, the study identified challenges faced by patients seeking quality-assured cancer care in underdeveloped regions in China. By addressing economic barriers, promoting accurate health information, and improving cancer care capacity across the country can reduce the rate of treatment refusal.

Patient and provider factors predict non-surgical management for complex upper gastrointestinal cancers

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for non-metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancers. We analyzed patient and provider characteristics associated with non-surgical management.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers from 2004 to 2018 who underwent surgery, refused surgery, or for whom surgery was contraindicated. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with surgery being refused or contraindicated, and Kaplan-Meier curves assessed survival.

RESULTS

We identified 249,813 patients based on our selection criteria-86.3% had surgery, 2.4% refused, and for 11.3%, surgery was contraindicated. Median overall survival was 48.2 months for patients who underwent surgery versus 16.3 and 9.4 months for the refusal and contraindicated groups. Medical and non-medical factors predicted both surgery refusals and contraindications, such as increasing age (odds ratio = 1.07 and 1.03, respectively, P < .001), Black race (odds ratio = 1.72 and 1.45, P < .001), comorbidities (Charlson-Deyo score 2+, odds ratio = 1.18 and 1.66, P < .001), low socioeconomic status (odds ratio = 1.70 and 1.40, P < .001), no health insurance (odds ratio = 3.26 and 2.34, P < .001), community cancer programs (odds ratio = 1.43 and 1.40, P < .001), low volume facilities (odds ratio = 1.82 and 1.52, P < .001), and stage 3 disease (odds ratio = 1.51 and 6.50, P < .001). On subset analysis (excluding patients age >70, Charlson-Deyo score 2+, and stage 3 cancer), non-medical predictors of both outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSION

Refusal of and medical contraindications for surgery profoundly impact overall survival. The same factors (ie, race, socioeconomic status, hospital volume, and hospital type) predict these outcomes. These findings suggest variation and potential bias that may exist between physicians and patients discussing cancer surgery.

Harmful impact of treatment refusal in T3-4M0 endolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma candidates for total laryngectomy: A STROBE analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the consequences of treatment refusal in total laryngectomy (TL) candidates with T3-4M0 endolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted in an inception cohort of 576 isolated T3-4M0 endolaryngeal SCC candidates for TL consecutively managed between 1970 and 2019 in a French university teaching hospital. The main endpoint was survival time and cause of death in 2 groups. Group A, 4.5% of the cohort, consisted of 26 patients who declined any laryngeal treatment. Group B consisted of 550 patients who accepted TL. Accessory endpoints were causes of TL refusal and associated variables. The STROBE guideline was applied. The significance threshold was set at P<0.005.

RESULTS

One-and 3-year actuarial survival estimates increased significantly (P<0.0001) from 39% and 15% in group A, to 83% and 63% in group B, respectively. In group A, 92% of causes of death implicated index SCC progression, whereas in group B intercurrent disease, metachronous second primary, locoregional and/or metastatic SCC progression and postoperative complications accounted for 37%, 31%, 29%, and 2%, respectively. The actuarial survival estimates within group A increased significantly (P=0.0003) from 0% at 1-year in patients managed with isolated supportive care to 56% in patients managed with chemotherapy (reaching 0% at 5years). Reasons for TL refusal were fear of surgery, refusal of tracheostoma, loss of physiologic phonation, and certain comorbidities. Age and chronologic period correlated significantly with TL refusal. Median age decreased (P<0.001) from 69years in group A to 58 years in group B. Percentage TL refusal increased (P<0.0001) from 2% to 11% before and after start 1990, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current study determined loss of survival with refusal of any laryngeal treatment including TL, noted benefit of chemotherapy associated to supportive care, and discussed the possible contribution of immunotherapy.

Refusal of Surgery in Pituitary Adenoma Patients: A Population-Based Analysis

We characterized the clinical and sociodemographic factors predictive of surgery refusal in pituitary adenoma (PA) patients. We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify adult PA patients treated from 2004−2015 receiving or refusing surgery. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards analysis identified clinical and/or sociodemographic factors predictive of surgery refusal or mortality, respectively. Of the 34,226 patients identified, 280 (0.8%) refused surgery. On multivariate logistic regression, age > 65 (OR: 2.64; p < 0.001), African American race (OR: 1.70; p < 0.001), Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity (C/D) Index > 2 (OR: 1.52; p = 0.047), and government insurance (OR: 2.03; p < 0.001) or being uninsured (OR: 2.16; p = 0.03) were all significantly associated with surgery refusal. On multivariate cox-proportional hazard analysis, age > 65 (HR: 2.66; p < 0.001), tumor size > 2 cm (HR: 1.30; p < 0.001), C/D index > 1 (HR: 1.53; p < 0.001), having government insurance (HR: 1.66; p < 0.001) or being uninsured (HR: 1.67; p < 0.001), and surgery refusal (HR: 2.28; p < 0.001) were all significant predictors of increased mortality. Macroadenoma patients receiving surgery had a significant increase in overall survival (OS) compared to those who refused surgery (p < 0.001). There are significant sociodemographic factors that influence surgery refusal in PA patients. An individualized approach is warranted that considers functional status, clinical presentations, and patient choice.

The impact of patient preference in the treatment algorithm for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC) has revolutionized the standard of care approach in first-line treatment. The heterogeneity of disease presentation and treatment-related toxicities can be associated with suboptimal patient compliance to oncologic care. Hence, prioritizing quality of life and well-being are crucial aspects to be considered in tailoring the best treatment choice. The aim of our work is to present a short report on the topic of the patient’s preference in regard to treatment and its consequences on quality of life in the recurrent/metastatic setting. According to the literature, there’s an unmet need on how to assess patient attitude in respect to the choice of treatment. In view of the availability of different therapeutic strategies in first-line management of RM-HNSCC, increasing emphasis should be put on integrating patient preferences into the medical decision-making.

FTO Regulates Arecoline-exposed Oral Cancer Immune Response through PD-L1

The high prevalence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in South Asia is associated with habitual areca nut chewing. Arecoline, a primary active carcinogen within areca nut extract, is known to promote OSCC pathological development. Dysregulation of N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) modification has begun to emerge as a significant contributor to cancer development and progression. However, the biological effects and molecular mechanisms of m6A modification in arecoline‐promoted OSCC malignance remain elusive. We reveal that chronic arecoline exposure substantially induces upregulation of fat mass and obesity‐associated protein (FTO), MYC, and programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) in OSCC cells. Moreover, upregulation of PD‐L1 is observed in OSCC cell lines and tissues and is associated with areca nut chewing in OSCC patients. We also demonstrate that arecoline‐induced FTO promotes the stability and expression levels of PD‐L1 transcripts through mediating m6A modification and MYC activity, respectively. PD‐L1 upregulation confers superior cell proliferation, migration, and resistance to T‐cell killing to OSCC cells. Blockage of PD‐L1 by administration of anti‐PD‐L1 antibody shrinks tumor size and improves mouse survival by elevating T‐cell‐mediated tumor cell killing. Therefore, targeting PD‐L1 might be a potential therapeutic strategy for treating PD‐L1‐positive OSCC patients, especially those with habitual areca nut chewing.

Head and neck cancer patients declining curative treatment: a case series and literature review

There is a scarcity of data assessing outcomes of head and neck cancer patients who refuse treatment for potentially curable disease. We report the data of patients who refused curative treatment at a tertiary referral centre and perform a review of the literature. Patients with a potentially curable mucosal head and neck cancers that were discussed at the multidisciplinary tumour board of a referral centre in a two-year period were included. Two cohorts were obtained: patients who accepted the proposed treatment and those who declined it. Statistical analysis was performed using a univariate analysis with parametric and non-parametric tests. Of a total of 803 patients, 14 (1.74%) refused treatment despite being potentially curable. Their median survival was 6.92 months (range 3-12). Patients who refused treatment were older (73.07 years [95% CI, 66.86-79.28] vs 65.56 years [95% CI, 64.70-66.43], p = 0.030) and more likely to have T4 disease (50% vs 26.04%, p = 0.044). Most patients with curable disease accept conventional treatment and those who refuse it experience dismal outcomes. This report provides objective evidence and can be employed to better counsel patients who refuse curative treatment.

Does insurance type influence overall survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

Patients with head and neck cancer with Medicaid or no insurance present at a more advanced stage and have lower survival. This study is one of the first to examine the relationship between specific insurance types and overall survival for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Henry Ford Cancer Institute.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective database review was performed using the Henry Ford Virtual Data Warehouse Tumor Registry. Six hundred and fifty patients diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were identified. Insurance groups analyzed were fee for service, health maintenance organization, Henry Ford Medical Group - a managed care type insurance, Medicare and Medicaid/uninsured. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to analyze overall survival and display survival differences respectively.

RESULTS

The uninsured group had the lowest median survival time of 29.8 months (95% CI: 20.3-44.8) and the highest HR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.16-2.93) as compared to the HMO group at p < 0.001. Patients with fee for service insurance had longer overall survival compared to the other insurance types. Patients with fee for service insurance also had a high proportion of patients with advanced stage disease, but a younger mean age. Henry Ford Medical Group had a higher mean age and no statistically significant difference in survival when compared to fee for service. (p = 0.999) After controlling for socioeconomic status, insurance type remains a significant predictor of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Fee for service had the highest overall survival of the different insurance types, but it was only statistically significant when compared to the Medicaid/uninsured group.

Chemoradiation in Unresectable Oral Cavity Cancer: A Myth or Reality!

Objective  Earlier studies have shown that chemoradiation (CTRT) has benefits in the head-and-neck cancer, but how far it is true for oral cavity subset that has not been exactly explored. Keeping the null hypothesis as CTRT has no benefit in oral cavity cancer, we studied the outcome of patients undergoing chemoradiation in unresectable oral cavity cancers. The aim of this study is to study whether overall survival (OS) increases with chemoradiation in unresectable oral cavity cancers.

Patients and Methods  Between December 2014 and February 2017, 23 patients aged 18 years and above were planned chemoradiation for unresectable oral cavity cancer and were included for this analysis.

Results  The median age of patients was 43 years and all patients were addicted to tobacco. In total, 12 of 23 (52%) completed CTRT. One patient (1/23) was alive at the time of final analysis with median OS of 5.83 (2.73–9.60) months. The median progression free survival and OS in patients who completed chemoradiation were 6.42 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.67–10.53) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 4.4–23.07), respectively.

Conclusion  CTRT has a limited role in unresectable oral cancers.

What has the National Cancer Database taught us about oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma?

The wealth of data in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) has allowed numerous studies investigating patient, disease, and treatment-related factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC); however, to date, no summation of these studies has been performed. The aim of this study was to provide a concise review of the NCDB studies on OCSCC, with the hopes of providing a framework for future, novel studies aimed at enhancing our understanding of clinical parameters related to OCSCC. Two databases were searched, and 27 studies published between 2002 and 2020 were included. The average sample size was 13,776 patients (range 356-50,896 patients). Four areas of research focus were identified: demographic and socioeconomic status, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This review highlights the impact of age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on the prognosis and management of OCSCC, describes the prognostic factors, and details the modalities and indications for neck dissection and adjuvant therapy in OCSCC. In conclusion, the NCDB is a very valuable resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the management of OCSCC, offering an incomparable perspective on a large dataset of patients. Future developments regarding hospital information management, review of data accuracy and completeness, and wider accessibility will help clinicians to improve the care of patients affected by OCSCC.

Predictors of Long-Term Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Score Stability Following Septoplasty With Inferior Turbinate Reduction

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Determine the postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score stability between 1 and ≥6 months after septoplasty with inferior turbinate reduction (ITR). Education level and occupation were evaluated to determine their effects on NOSE score stability during the postoperative period.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series. Patients were included if they underwent septoplasty with ITR for nasal obstruction due to septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy. NOSE scores were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and ≥6 months postoperatively. Education level and occupation were collected postoperatively via telephone survey. Changes in NOSE scores were compared between the different time points. Education level and occupation were analyzed to determine if they affected NOSE scores.

RESULTS

There were 98 patients included, and 56 were male (57.1%). Mean NOSE scores preoperatively and at 1 and ≥6 months postoperatively were 72.1, 17.1, and 12.0, respectively. Patients demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant reduction in NOSE score at 1 month (-54.9, P < .001) and at ≥6 months postoperatively (-60.0, P < .001). The mean 6.2-point decrease in NOSE score from 1 to ≥6 months was statistically, but not clinically significant. There were no significant differences in NOSE score changes based on educational level and occupation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients achieved statistically and clinically significant reductions in NOSE scores at 1 months, with no clinically significant differences in NOSE scores at ≥6 months, suggesting NOSE score stability between these postoperative time points. Neither education level nor occupation influenced NOSE scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2105-E2110, 2021.

The Kerala Model of health care delivery and its impact on Oral cancer care during the COVID 19 pandemic

•

Among oral cancers Kerala has a higher incidence of tongue cancers akin to the Western world.

•

Higher Literacy and Social equality have been instrumental in cost-effective and equitable treatment of Oral cancers.

•

This has become more noticeable during the current COVID 19 pandemic.

Analysis of patients who decline treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: National perspective

BACKGROUND

To analyze demographic and socioeconomic factors that influence patients' decisions to decline treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the National Cancer Data Base of patients with oral cavity/oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal SCC.

RESULTS

A total of 166 204 patients were included, of which 689 patients declined all treatment. Among early-stage (I-II) patients, Charlson/Deyo score ≥ 3, hypopharyngeal cancer, and no insurance or Medicare were more likely to decline all recommended treatment (P < .05). Among advanced stage (III-IV) patients, females (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.53; P = .013), Charlson Deyo score ≥ 1, non-oral cavity cancers, and closer distance between patient's area of residence from treating facility were more likely to decline all treatment (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients and patients with no insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid are more likely to decline recommended treatment for SCC of the head and neck. Educational status is not predictive of declining treatment.

Malignant development in patients with oral potentially malignant disorders detected through nationwide screening: Outcomes of 5-year follow-up at a single hospital

BACKGROUND

Although survival rate and quality of life are improved if patients with oral carcinoma can be detected early, however, such lesions are usually asymptomatic; therefore, it is hard to raise awareness. Screening has proved to be cost-effective for early detection.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with oral carcinomas and 555 patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) who were detected through screening were examined the relationship between clinicopathological features and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative cancer-free interval rate was 94.1%, and the annual malignant transformation rate was 1.16%. The rate of interval carcinoma development from Candida hyperplasia, oral submucous fibrosis, homogeneous leukoplakia, non-homogenous leukoplakia, and verrucous hyperplasia, was 13.6%, 5.7%, 4.6%, 12.1%, and 21.3%, respectively. Significant independent risk factors for interval carcinoma development were heavy betel quid chewing, verrucous hyperplasia, and surgery refusal.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-designed risk assessment, treatment, and surveillance program could lead to earlier cancer detection and thereby reduce mortality and morbidity.

Evaluation of Lymph Node Ratio Association With Long-term Patient Survival After Surgery for Node-Positive Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Importance

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) carries the highest mortality rate among cutaneous cancers and is rapidly rising in incidence. Identification of prognostic indicators may help guide patient counseling and treatment planning. Lymph node ratio (LNR), the ratio of positive lymph nodes to the total number of examined lymph nodes, is an established prognostic indicator in other cancers.

Objectives

The primary objective was to evaluate the association between LNR and patient survival after surgery for node-positive MCC. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether the survival rates associated with adjuvant therapies vary by patient LNR status.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective cohort study of patients with node-positive MCC treated with surgery and lymphadenectomy. We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry for patient records. Data originated from 2004 through 2017 for the NCDB and from 1973 through 2016 for the SEER registry. The SEER registry comprises a population-based US cohort while cases from the NCDB include all reportable cases from Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities and represents approximately 70% of all newly diagnosed cancers in the United States. All data analysis took place between August 1, 2018, and February 11, 2019.

Exposures

The ratio of positive lymph nodes to the total number of examined lymph nodes, LNR, was stratified into quartiles.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival (NCDB) and disease-specific survival (SEER).

Results

We identified 736 eligible cases in the NCDB and 538 eligible cases in the SEER registry. Among these 1274 patients, the mean (SD) age was 71.1 (11.5) years, and 401 (31.5%) were women. After controlling for clinical and tumor factors including AJCC N staging, patient LNR of 0.07 to 0.31 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.81) and greater than 0.31 (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.10-3.86) was associated with significantly worse survival than an LNR less than 0.07. Univariate supplementary analysis performed in the SEER data set revealed a similar association of LNR with disease-specific survival. For patients with an LNR greater than 0.31, treatment with surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was associated with improved survival compared with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy alone (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97), while this was not found for patients with an LNR of 0.31 or lower (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.33).

Conclusions and Relevance

For lymph node-positive MCC, LNR offers a potentially prognostic metric alongside traditional TNM staging that may be useful for both patient counseling and treatment planning after surgery.

Treatment of primary nonmetastatic melanoma at high-volume academic facilities is associated with improved long-term patient survival

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of cancer care have demonstrated improved long-term patient outcomes for those treated at high-volume centers. The influence of treatment center characteristics on outcomes for primary nonmetastatic melanoma is not currently established.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the association of cancer treatment center case volume and academic affiliation with long-term patient survival for cases of primary nonmetastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Cases of melanoma diagnosed in US adults from 2004 to 2014 and included in the National Cancer Database were identified. Hospitals were grouped by yearly case-volume quartile: bottom quartile, 2 middle quartiles, and top quartile.

RESULTS

Facility case volume was significantly associated with long-term patient survival (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rates were 76.8%, 81.9%, and 86.4% for patients treated at institutions in the bottom, middle, and top quartiles of case volume, respectively. On multivariate analysis, treatment at centers in both middle quartiles (hazard ratio, 0.834; 95% confidence interval, 0.778-0.895) and in the top quartile (hazard ratio, 0.691; 95% confidence interval, 0.644-0.741) of case volume was associated with improved survival relative to that of patients treated at hospitals in the bottom quartile of case volume. Academic affiliation was associated with improved outcomes for top-quartile- but not middle-quartile-volume facilities.

LIMITATIONS

Disease-specific survival was not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment at a high-volume facility is associated with improved long-term patient survival for melanoma. High-volume academic centers have improved patient outcomes compared with other high-volume centers.

Changing prognosis of oral cancer: An analysis of survival and treatment between 1973 and 2014

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Oral cavity cancer is the most commonly occurring malignancy of the head and neck. There are limited data suggesting a change in prognosis of oral cavity cancers. We aimed to evaluate temporal trends in demographics, treatment, and prognosis of oral cavity cancer diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 inclusive.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 16,030 adult patients diagnosed with oral cavity cancer between 1973 and 2014 inclusive and treated surgically in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registry was conducted. A supplemental analysis was conducted using data from the National Cancer Database. Multivariate Cox survival regressions and univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The prognosis of both early- and late-stage disease has significantly improved between 1973 and 2014. Among patients with early-stage disease, 3-year survival increased from 78.0% (standard error [SE] = 1.3) for those diagnosed from 1973 to 1980 to 92.2% (SE = 1.1) for those diagnosed from 2011 to 2014. Among patients with late-stage disease, 3-year survival ranged from 51.9% (SE = 1.5) for those diagnosed from 1973 to 1980 to 70.3% (SE = 1.9) for those diagnosed from 2011 to 2014. For patients with late-stage disease, this improved prognosis occurred in tandem with increasing usage of chemoradiotherapy as adjuvant therapy. There has also been increasing utilization of neck dissection for early- and late-stage disease, along with higher nodal yields from performed dissections.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of oral cavity cancer has improved significantly from the early 1970s to recent years. In late-stage oral cancer, this change has been associated with an increased use of adjuvant therapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in particular.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 128:2762-2769, 2018.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated With Improved Survival for Late-Stage Salivary Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Salivary squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) represent a unique disease entity because many are thought to represent metastases from primary cutaneous malignancies. Nevertheless, they represent a significant proportion of parotid gland cancers and have a notably poor prognosis. Recently, there has been controversy regarding the utility of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of these malignancies, with most studies concluding that there is no survival benefit. We aim to determine the outcomes associated with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of early- and late-stage salivary SCC.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 2,285 of surgically resected adult salivary SCC diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database was conducted. Patients were divided into early- (I/II) and late-stage (III/IV) groups. Demographic, facility, tumor, and survival variables were included in the analyses. Multivariate Cox survival regressions, propensity-score matched analyses, and univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for late-stage patients was associated with improved survival compared to the use of adjuvant radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.774, P = 0.026). Five-year survival for late-stage patients treated with surgery alone, surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy, and surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 31.1% (standard error [SE]: 2.5), 45.6% (SE: 2.2), and 58.9% (SE: 3.4). Use of adjuvant therapy (either chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone) was associated with improved survival for early-stage patients (HR 0.746, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

The addition of chemotherapy to the adjuvant therapy of late-stage patients with salivary SCC may result in improved long-term survival. Expanded use of adjuvant therapy for early-stage disease may also improve patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 129:883-889, 2019.

Extracapsular extension is not a significant prognostic indicator in non-squamous cancers of the major salivary glands

Background

Extracapsular extension (ECE) is a well-established prognostic feature in squamous cell cancers of the head and neck. Although some extrapolate data from mucosal head and neck cancer to include ECE as a high-risk feature in salivary gland cancers, data is lacking about ECE’s prognostic value for these malignancies. We investigate whether ECE is a significant prognostic indicator in pathologic node-positive cancers of the major salivary glands.

Methods

A retrospective study of adult salivary gland cancer cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 in the NCDB was conducted. Demographic, tumor, treatment, and survival variables were included in the study. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as multivariate Cox survival regressions were performed.

Results

Positive ECE status was associated with significantly worse survival in salivary SCC (HR 1.687; p = 0.002) but not non-squamous salivary cancers (HR 1.000; p = 0.998) on multivariate analysis. While post-operative radiotherapy was not associated with improved survival for patients without high-risk adverse features (high grade or positive surgical margins), its use was associated with better survival for ECE-positive salivary SCC patients without one of these additional adverse features (HR 0.064; p = 0.010).

Conclusions

Although ECE is a significant prognostic indicator in salivary SCC, its prognostic significance for non-squamous salivary cancers may be limited. Radiotherapy may improve survival in cases with at least one high-risk adverse feature: high grade; positive surgical margins; and for salivary SCC specifically, positive ECE status.