1
|
Milton CK, Bien AG, Krempl GA, Sanclement JA, Mhawej R, Glenn CA. Primary Dural Repair Using Titanium Microclips Following Lateral Skull Base Surgery. Skull Base Surg 2022; 83:e306-e311. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective Standard techniques for primary dural repair following lateral skull base surgery are both technically challenging and time consuming without the potential for primary dural repair. Inadequate closure may result in postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak infectious sequalae. Traditional methods of dural repair rely on secondary obliteration of the CSF fistula. We hypothesized that the use of nonpenetrating titanium microclips may serve as a useful adjunct in primary dural repair or the establishment of an immobile repair layer following lateral skull base surgery.
Methods Here, we report a novel technique for primary dural repair using nonpenetrating titanium microclips as an adjunct to standard techniques in a series of six patients with lateral skull base pathologies.
Results A total of six consecutive lateral skull base tumor patients with titanium microclip dural reconstruction were included in our case series. Lateral skull base pathologies represented in this group included two jugular foramen schwannomas, one vestibular schwannoma, one petroclival meningioma, one glomus jugulare paraganglioma, and one jugular foramen chordoid meningioma.
Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of microclips in repairing dural defects following lateral skull base surgery. Surgical outcomes for this small case series suggest that dural repair of the later skull base with nonpenetrating titanium microclips is a useful adjunct in dural repair following lateral skull base surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille K. Milton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Alexander G. Bien
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Greg A. Krempl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Jose A. Sanclement
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Rachad Mhawej
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| | - Chad A. Glenn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shan A, Lin FR, Nieman CL. Age-related Hearing Loss: Recent Developments in Approaching a Public Health Challenge. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40136-020-00271-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
3
|
Kay-Rivest E, Mascarella M, Sewitch MJ, Cloutier F, Mijovic T. Association between Smoking and 30-Day Outcomes in Otologic Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 162:108-113. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599819889622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the effect of current smoking status on 30-day postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing otologic surgery.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingDatabase of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2006 to 2016.Subjects and MethodsAdult patients undergoing middle ear and mastoid surgery were included. Preoperative smoking status was determined, and adverse events within 30 days of surgery were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study sample. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the association between sociodemographic and clinical variables and postoperative adverse events. Population-attributable fractions were then calculated.ResultsA total of 10,684 patients who underwent otologic surgery were included, of whom 2036 (19.1%) were smokers. The most commonly performed surgery was tympanoplasty with and without ossicular chain reconstruction, followed by canal wall up tympanomastoidectomy. Adverse events occurred in 221 (2.1%) patients; the most common was superficial wound infections (n = 99, 0.9%). In smokers, the odds ratio for any adverse event was 1.97 (95% CI, 1.42-2.71). The odds ratios (95% CIs) for superficial wound infections, wound dehiscence, and 30-day readmission among smokers were 1.89 (1.32-2.86), 3.92 (1.26-11.60), and 1.84 (1.15-2.87), respectively. The population-attributable fraction for any adverse event in smokers was 15.5%.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing otologic surgery, smokers are more likely than nonsmokers to have postoperative adverse events—in particular, wound infections, wound dehiscence, and readmission to hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kay-Rivest
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marco Mascarella
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, and Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maida J. Sewitch
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, and Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Cloutier
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Pierre Boucher Hospital, Longueil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tamara Mijovic
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bi WL, Mooney MA, Yoon S, Gupta S, Lawton MT, Almefty KK, Corrales CE, Dunn IF. Variation in Coding Practices for Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80:96-102. [PMID: 30733907 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Nationwide databases are frequently used resources for assessing practice patterns and clinical outcomes. However, analyses based on billing codes may be limited by the inconsistent application of current procedural terminology (CPT) codes to specific operations. We investigated the variability among commonly used CPT codes for vestibular schwannomas resection and sought to identify factors that underlie this variation. Methods The surgical procedure for 274 cases of vestibular schwannoma resections from two institutions was reviewed and classified as retrosigmoid, translabyrinthine, or middle fossa approaches. We then assessed the CPT codes assigned to each case and analyzed their association with surgical approach, surgeons involved, the coding specialty, and year of surgery. We further compared the incidence of CPT codes assigned for vestibular schwannoma surgeries in the American College Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2010 to 2014. Results The majority (65%) of vestibular schwannoma resections within the institutional cohort were billed with skull base approach and/or excision codes, whereas 76% of cases in NSQIP were associated with a single craniotomy for tumor code. The use of skull base codes over the past decade increased within our institutional cohort but remained relatively stable within NSQIP. CPT codes did not consistently reflect the operative approaches for vestibular schwannomas. Conclusion We observed significant variability in coding patterns for vestibular schwannoma surgeries within institutions, surgical practices, and national databases. These results call for discretion in interpretation of data from aggregated billing code-based nationwide databases and suggests a role for institutional standardization of CPT assignments for the same approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Michael A Mooney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Seungwon Yoon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Saksham Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Michael T Lawton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Kaith K Almefty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - C Eduardo Corrales
- Division of Otolaryngology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
An updated assessment of morbidity and mortality following skull base surgical approaches. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018; 171:109-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Revised: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|