Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated With Improved Survival for Late-Stage Salivary Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in high risk salivary gland cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential survival benefits associated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as opposed to radiotherapy (RT) in patients with resected high-risk salivary gland cancer (SGC), with a specific focus on determining whether these benefits are influenced by the number of high-risk variables.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical treatment for high-risk SGC were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into either CRT or RT groups. The impact of adjuvant therapy on locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using a multivariable Cox model.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were included following propensity score-matching. In comparison to RT, CRT did not demonstrate a significant survival advantage in terms of LRC (p = 0.485, HR: 1.14, 95%CI: 0.36-4.22) and OS (p = 0.367, HR: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.17-3.87) in entire population. But among patients with T3/4 stage, high-grade tumors, and 5 or more positive lymph nodes, the addition of chemotherapy to RT significantly (p = 0.042) correlated with a 15% reduction in the risk of cancer recurrence (95%CI: 4-54%). Conversely, in other subgroups with varying combinations of high-risk variables, CRT did not provide additional survival benefits for LRC and OS compared to RT.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered in conjunction with RT specifically in cases where there is a presence of T3/4 stage, high-grade tumors, and 5 or more metastatic lymph nodes in high-risk SGC.

Translational Insights in the Landscape of Salivary Gland Cancers: Ready for a New Era?

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are rare neoplasms, representing less than 10% of all head and neck tumors, but they are extremely heterogeneous from the histological point of view, their clinical behavior, and their genetics. The guidelines regarding their treatment include surgery in most cases, which can also play an important role in oligometastatic disease. Where surgery cannot be used, systemic therapy comes into play. Systemic therapy for many years has been represented by polychemotherapy, but recently, with the affirmation of translational research, it can also count on targeted therapy, at least in some subtypes of SGCs. Interestingly, in some SGC histotypes, predominant mutations have been identified, which in some cases behave as "driver mutations", namely mutations capable of governing the carcinogenesis process. Targeting these driver mutations may be an effective therapeutic strategy. Nonetheless, it is not always possible to have drugs suitable for targeting driver mutations-and targeting driver mutations is not always accompanied by a clinical benefit. In this review, we will analyze the main mutations predominant in the various histotypes of SGCs.

A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with salivary gland carcinoma treated with postoperative radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to interrogate if the use of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) correlated with superior oncological outcomes for certain subgroups of patients with high-risk salivary gland carcinoma (SGC), compared with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) alone.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 411 patients with surgically resected SGC who underwent PORT (n = 263) or POCRT (n = 148) between 2000 and 2015. Possible correlations of clinical parameters with outcomes were examined using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of survivors is 10.9 years. For the entire cohort, adding concurrent chemotherapy to PORT was not associated with OS, PFS, or LRC improvement. However, patients with nodal metastasis who underwent POCRT had significantly higher 10-year OS (46.2% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.009) and PFS (38.7% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.009) rates than those treated with PORT alone. The presence of postoperative macroscopic residual tumor (R2 resection) was identified as an independent prognosticator for inferior OS (P = 0.032), PFS (P = 0.001), and LRC (P = 0.007). Importantly, POCRT significantly correlated with higher 10-year LRC rates in patients with R2 resection (74.2% vs. 40.7%, P = 0.034) or adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC, 97.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.039). On multivariate analyses, the use of POCRT significantly predicted superior OS (P = 0.037) and PFS (P = 0.013) for node-positive patients and LRC for patients with R2 resection (P = 0.041) or AdCC (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

For surgically resected SGC, POCRT was associated with improved long-term OS and PFS for patients with nodal metastasis and superior LRC for patients with R2 resection or AdCC.

A novel postoperative nomogram and risk classification system for individualized estimation of survival among patients with parotid gland carcinoma after surgery

BACKGROUND

Parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) is a rare but aggressive head and neck cancer, and the prognostic model associated with survival after surgical resection has not yet been established. This study aimed to construct a novel postoperative nomogram and risk classification system for the individualized prediction of overall survival (OS) among patients with resected PGC.

METHODS

Patients with PGC who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were randomized into training and validation cohorts (7:3). A nomogram developed using independent prognostic factors based on the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Harrell's concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), and calibration plots were used to validate the performance of the nomogram. Moreover, decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to compare the clinical use of the nomogram with that of traditional TNM staging.

RESULTS

In this study, 5077 patients who underwent surgery for PGC were included. Age, sex, marital status, tumor grade, histology, TNM stage, surgery type, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Based on these independent factors, a postoperative nomogram was developed. The C-index of the proposed nomogram was 0.807 (95% confidence interval 0.797-0.817). Meanwhile, the time-dependent AUC (> 0.8) indicated that the nomogram had a satisfactory discriminative ability. The calibration curves showed good concordance between the predicted and actual probabilities of OS, and DCA curves indicated that the nomogram had a better clinical application value than the traditional TNM staging. Moreover, a risk classification system was built that could perfectly classify patients with PGC into three risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study constructed a novel postoperative nomogram and corresponding risk classification system to predict the OS of patients with PGC after surgery. These tools can be used to stratify patients with high or low risk of mortality and provide high-risk patients with more directed therapies and closer follow-up.

Assessing Rates of Positive Surgical Margins After Standard Excision of Vulvar Melanomas

BACKGROUND

Vulvar melanoma is a rare malignancy with frequent recurrence and poor prognosis. National guidelines recommend wide local excision of these tumors with allowances for narrower margins for anatomic and functional limitations, which are common on specialty sites. There is presently a lack of data of margin positivity after standard excision of vulvar melanomas.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the rate of positive margins after standard excision of vulvar melanomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of surgically excised vulvar melanomas from the NCDB diagnosed from 2004 to 2019.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 2,226 cases. Across surgical approaches and tumor stages, 17.2% (Standard Error [SE]: 0.8%) of cases had positive surgical margins. Among tumor stages, T4 tumors were most commonly excised with positive margins (22.9%, SE: 1.5%). On multivariable survival analysis, excision with positive margins was associated with significantly poorer survival (Hazard Ratio 1.299, p = .015).

CONCLUSION

We find that positive margin rates after standard excision of vulvar malignancies are higher than for other specialty site melanomas. Our data suggest that use of surgical approaches with complete margin assessment may improve local control and functional outcomes for patients with vulvar melanoma as they have for patients with other specialty site melanomas.

Clinical value of adjuvant therapy on the prognosis of ductal carcinoma of the major salivary gland: a large-scale cohort study

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and value of adjuvant therapy for major salivary duct carcinoma (SDC).

METHODS

Data of SDC patients who received surgery was obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2016). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to evaluate the clinical value of adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were enrolled. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 53.8% and 70.8%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor size, T, N, TNM staging, SEER combined staging, number of regional lymph nodes examined, and number of positive lymph nodes were associated with OS and DSS. Age and primary surgical methods were also related to OS. Among patients with negative lymph nodes, patients with tumor size > 4 cm had significantly worse prognosis (P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis showed that age > 75 years, T3-4, and positive lymph nodes were independent risk factors for SDC. After PSM, the prognostic factors were age, tumor site, and T and N stage. Postoperative radiotherapy could improve OS in patients with tumor size > 4 cm (P = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, submandibular gland lesions, T3-4 stage, and lymph node involvement were independent prognostic factors for SDC. In patients with tumors > 4 cm, adjuvant radiotherapy improved the OS of SDC patients.

Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy versus Radiotherapy Alone in Major Salivary Gland Cancers: A Stratified Study Based on the External Validation of the Distant Metastasis Risk Score Model

BACKGROUND

The role of additional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for distant metastasis (DM) on the resected malignancy of the major salivary gland (SGM) remained unknown. We conducted this study to externally validate a recently reported DM risk score model and compare the survival outcome between adjuvant CRT and RT alone.

MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients with SGM following postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). The cumulative incidence of DM was assessed using a competing risk method. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox proportional-hazards regression to identify significant predictors for DM. Patients were classified as high- and low-risk subgroups with the cutoff value of the DM risk score model. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to minimize the bias of the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 586 eligible patients were analyzed and 67 cases underwent adjuvant CRT. The 5-year incidence of DM was 19.5% (95% CI 16.0-23.0%). The model reasonably discriminated the DM risk between the high- and low-risk subgroup in our cohort, and the c-index was 0.75. No survival benefit was observed for the CRT group compared with RT alone in the entire cohort after IPTW (p = 0.095). After subgroup analysis, increased mortality was identified with the administration of CRT in the low-risk subset (p = 0.002) while no significant difference in OS was illustrated in the high-risk subgroup (p = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

This external validation provides further exploration of the DM risk score model in major SGM. Our results demonstrated no support for the utility of additional chemotherapy to PORT in the major SGM, especially in the low-risk subgroup of patients with DM.

[Radiation therapy of malignant salivary gland tumors]

Due to their rarity, histologic heterogeneity, and localization, treatment of malignant salivary gland tumors requires an interdisciplinary approach. First-line treatment includes complete tumor resection. Postoperative radiation therapy is advised in patients with risk factors, i.e., incomplete tumor resection, high-grade tumors, or perineural invasion. Definitive radiation therapy is only advised for inoperable tumors because of significantly lower local control and survival rates when compared to combined surgery and radiation therapy. In radiation oncology, modern techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or particle therapy with heavy ions (i.e., C12) have led to improved outcomes in the treatment of head and neck tumors, especially of adenoid cystic carcinomas. Given the biological and physical benefits of particles, particle therapy, particularly carbon ion radiation, is a promising therapeutic approach for salivary gland tumors that will be further investigated in prospective clinical studies.

Systemic therapy for salivary gland malignancy: current status and future perspectives

Salivary gland malignancies are rare neoplasms that have a broad histological spectrum and a variety of biologic behaviors. Salivary gland malignancies are known as chemo-resistant tumors, which render optimal treatment challenging. This review summarizes the role of systemic therapy for salivary gland malignancies. To date, the advantage of adding concurrent chemotherapy has remained undefined for both postoperative and inoperable locally advanced salivary gland malignancy patients undergoing radiotherapy. For recurrent/metastatic disease, local and/or systemic treatment options should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting with consideration to both patient needs and tumor factors. For symptomatic patients or those who may compromise organ function, palliative systemic therapy can be a reasonable option based on the results of phase II studies. Platinum combination regimens as first-line therapy have been widely accepted. Personalized therapies have become established options, particularly for androgen receptor-positive, HER2-positive and NTRK fusion-positive salivary gland malignancies (i.e. androgen receptor and HER2 in salivary duct carcinoma and NTRK3 in secretory carcinoma). For patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also been developed. Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited activity to date. Investigation of active systemic treatments for salivary gland malignancy remains a significant unmet need. Future directions might include a more comprehensive genomic screening approach (usually next-generation sequencing-based) and combination strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors. These are rare malignancies that require ongoing effort in the conduct of high-quality clinical trials.

Survival outcomes in patients with parotid gland carcinoma treated with postoperative therapies using risk stratification

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the role of postoperative treatment in parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) based on risk stratification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 301 PGC patients were retrospectively analyzed using risk stratification. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis were performed to conduct survival analysis.

RESULTS

In the high-risk group, those treated with postoperative radiotherapy (RT) had a better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) than those treated with surgery alone. In the low-risk group, both surgery + RT and surgery +  chemotherapy (CT) significantly improved DFS when compared with surgery alone. Cox analysis showed that patients who underwent surgery + RT or surgery + CT had a lower risk of disease progression than those who underwent surgery alone in the low-risk group. In the high-risk group, patients who underwent surgery + RT had a lower risk of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative RT showed considerable benefit in improving disease control in patients with PGC, even in those without high-risk factors.

Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Salivary Glands

BACKGROUND

Cancer stem cells (CSC) are cells that exhibit stem cell properties and are pivotal in tumor biology. CSC markers have been described for many tumorous entities. However, to this date, there is no data on CSC markers in respect to squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the salivary glands.

METHODS

Histologic samples from patients with salivary gland SCCs were stained for CSC markers (ALDH-1/BMI-1/SOX-2/CD-44/vimentin) and divided into high and low expression subgroups. These were then correlated with tumor and patient characteristics as well as overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, recurrence-free survival and local control rates (LCR) after 3 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 samples were included. CD-44 and ALDH-1 expression were associated with tumor origin (metastatic/primary disease, p = 0.048 and p = 0.011, respectively). Strong BMI-1 expression was associated with poorer OS (62.9 vs. 27.3%, p = 0.029), strong SOX-2 expression was associated with poorer LCR (62.5 vs. 21.9%, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

CD-44 and ALDH-1 may be useful in differentiating between primary SCCs and metastatic disease. BMI-1 and SOX-2 are correlated with poorer prognosis.

The Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy and Prognostic Model in Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Parotid Gland

Background

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of parotid gland (parotid SCC) is a high malignant histologic subtype of parotid cancers with aggressive clinical presentation. However, the clinical features and survival benefit of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for primary parotid SCC are not well known.

Methods

A retrospective population-based study was performed to identify the role of PORT in parotid SCC patients diagnosed between 1975 and 2016 from SEER database. A prognostic risk model was established based on patient clinical features, including age, tumor stage, and node involvement status. Patients were stratified into high, intermediate, and low risk according to this model. The survival benefit of radiotherapy was compared in the whole cohort and different risk groups.

Results

Nine hundred thirty-one parotid SCC patients were extracted from SEER database, 634 (68.1%) in the RT group and 286 (30.7%) in the non-RT group. Overall, 503 (54.0%) deaths occurred, with a median follow-up of 84 months, the 5-year OS was 43.6% in the whole cohort, 47.7 vs 35.9% in patients with/without PORT (P = 0.005), and 58.9 vs. 38.8 vs. 27.1% in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group (P < 0.001). Compared with surgery alone, PORT significantly improved the OS of patients with medium risk (47.5 vs. 20.6, P < 0.001), whereas not in the low risk (61 vs. 54%, P = 0.710) and high (25.6 vs. 28.7%, P = 0.524).

Conclusion

This prognostic model can separate the patients with parotid squamous cell carcinoma into different risk. PORT significantly improved the OS of patients with intermediate risk, whereas high-risk group may need more intensive treatment strategies.

Oncologic outcome and potential prognostic factors in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid gland

BACKGROUND

Primary parotid squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is an uncommon tumour, and there is limited data on its prognosis and treatment. The goal of the current study was to analyse the potential prognostic factors and clinical outcomes for this tumour type.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with surgically treated primary parotid SCC were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS), which were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards method.

RESULTS

In total, 53 patients were included for analysis. Perineural and lymphovascular invasion were observed in 21 and 16 patients, respectively. Intraparotid node (IPN) metastasis was reported in 23 patients with an incidence rate of 43.3%. Twenty-six patients with cN0 disease underwent neck dissection, and pathologic node metastasis was observed in 10 cases. The 5-year LRC and DS S rates were 35 and 49%, respectively. The Cox model was used to report the independence of disease stage and IPN metastasis in predicting LRC and the independence of disease stage and perineural invasion in predicting DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of primary parotid SCC is relatively unfavourable. IPN metastasis significantly decreases disease control, disease stage is the most important prognostic factor, and neck dissection is suggested for patients at any stage.