Somatosensory evoked potential: Preventing brachial plexus injury in transaxillary robotic surgery

The value of somatosensory evoked potentials in intraoperative evaluation of indirect decompression effect of oblique lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude changes and clinical outcomes of OLIF indirect decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).

METHODS

A prospective study was performed on 201 patients who received oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in our hospital from July 2017 to May 2021 due to single segmental DLSS. The patients were divided into three groups: group A (mild DLSS), group B (moderate DLSS), and group C (severe DLSS). The P40 amplitude during operation were recorded, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated by JOA score 1 year postoperative. ROC curves for satisfactory efficacy of P40 amplitude improvement rate and CSA improvement rate were established. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relationship between P40 improvement rate and JOA improvement rate.

RESULTS

In group A and group B, the improvement rate of JOA in P40 significantly improved group was significantly greater that in improved group and unimproved group (P_a = 0.009; P_b < 0.000). No significant among-subgroup differences in group C (all P > 0.05). In both groups A and B, there was a significant difference in the improvement rate of P40 amplitude between the satisfactory group and the ineffective group (P_a = 0.013; P_b = 0.001), while in group C, there was no statistical significance (P_c = 0.107). By variable Person correlation analysis, a significant positive correlation was obtained between JOA improvement rate and P40 amplitude improvement rate in groups A and B (r₁ = 0.27, P₁ = 0.02; r₂ = 0.508, P₂ = 0.001), no correlation between the two in group C (r₃ = 0.243, P₃ = 0.056). The area under the ROC for assessing surgical efficacy in terms of CSA improvement rate was 0.813 (95% CI: 0.737-0.889, P < 0.001) and 0.767 (95% CI: 0.677-0.856, P < 0.001) in group A and group B, respectively, with satisfactory efficacy cutoff points of 50.18% and 67.89%.

CONCLUSION

For mild and moderate DLSS, the intraoperative P40 amplitude improvement rate can predict the improvement of clinical symptoms after surgery and can be used as a reference index to assess the effect of indirect decompression. For severe DLSS, the P40 amplitude improvement rate has limited significance in guiding indirect decompression, and OLIF indirect decompression is not the right treatment for this type of patients.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring prevented iatrogenic spinal cord injury during robotic-assisted transabdominal adrenalectomy: a case report

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common disease of the cervical spinal cord in patients older than 55 and is characterized by an initial asymptomatic period followed by progressive neurological deficit from degenerative changes of the cervical vertebrae. These changes cause compression and vascular compromise to the cervical spinal cord. Because there are no pathognomonic symptoms, its diagnosis is commonly delayed. Herein we report the first case of the use of IONM during a transabdominal adrenalectomy in a patient with CSM, which prevented an iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI). The patient is a 74-year-old male with what was proven later as cervical spinal stenosis who presented for robotic-assisted transabdominal adrenalectomy. When positioned supine on the operating table, he exhibited upper and lower extremity neurological symptoms, prompting awake fiberoptic intubation and the use of IONM secondary to suspicion for CSM. After being positioned into lateral decubitus, IONM showed a loss of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and attenuated somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) from the right lower extremities and the procedure was aborted and the patient returned supine. TcMEPs returned to baseline, but SSEPs remained attenuated. The patient exhibited normal movement and sensation in post-anesthesia care. A high index of suspicion for CSM is required for older patients, as early diagnosis allows for spinal surgery treatment before acute worsening during anesthesia or non-spinal surgery. Furthermore, a low threshold for the use of IONM in patients with a high likelihood of CSM who require a non-spinal surgery can successfully prevent iatrogenic SCI.

Robotic-assisted parathyroidectomy via transaxillary approach: feasibility and learning curves

Background

There have been few reports of robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy in the literature. We aim to report our experience with robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) in the Western population.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed from July 2010 through July 2019 at two institutions, one in the United States and one in France. Demographic characteristics and perioperative data were collected for all patients undergoing robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy by a single surgeon at each institution. A linear regression model was developed to describe the learning curve for this procedure at each institution.

Results

One-hundred and two patients with PHPT were included with a median age of 55.6±12.4 years and median body mass index (BMI) of 25.5±6.1 kg/m². The majority of patients were female (80.4%). Median total operative time was 116±53 minutes. Minor complications were reported in 2 patients (1.96%), and one case was converted to a trans-cervical approach (TCA) for four-gland exploration. Median patient follow-up time was 6.5±12.2 months, and disease recurrence was reported in one patient. Calculated learning curves showed that one surgeon achieved proficiency by the eighth case, and the other achieved proficiency by the fourteenth case.

Conclusions

This is the largest reported experience of robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy for PHPT in the Asian and Western population. Analysis of the procedural learning curve demonstrates that proficiency in this technique was achieved after performance of less than 15 surgeries. This procedure is safe and feasible in the hands of experienced surgeons for select patients with localized disease.

Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Introduction:

Positioning-related neural injuries are an inherent risk in surgery, particularly in robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction because of unique patient positioning and increased operative times. The implementation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring should be considered in such cases.

Methods:

This was a two-armed study with one prospective intervention group and one retrospective control group. All patients underwent robotic abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic center. The prospective arm underwent robotic reconstruction from January through July 2019. The retrospective database reviewed patients who underwent the same procedure from August 2015 through July 2018. Factors assessed included: demographics (age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities), surgical details (American Society of Anesthesiologists class, procedure, operative time, positioning), outcomes (length of stay, 30-d readmission, reoperation), and any new-onset intraoperative or postoperative neuropathy. Patients were seen in the clinic postoperatively at weeks 1 and 6.

Results:

Ten patients were included in the prospective arm. All received intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. They were compared with 47 patients in the retrospective arm who underwent surgery without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. One position-related neural response from baseline was detected intraoperatively in the prospective arm; however, there were no peripheral neurological symptoms present postoperatively. Two patients in the control group developed transient peripheral neuropathies that resolved within 6 weeks. Demographics, surgical procedures, and length of surgery were similar in both groups. The prospective group had a higher rate of preoperative neuropathy and intraoperative use of vasopressors.

Conclusion:

Incorporation of neurophysiological monitoring in robotic surgery is feasible and may lead to the prevention and reduction in positioning-related injuries.

Conventional Robotic Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Thyroid Cancer

The conventional robotic endoscopic remote access techniques detailed in this article have been discussed in a series of increasing volumes in the literature, including for the treatment of thyroid cancer. Lower-volume centers now perform most robotic thyroidectomies in the United States and are responsible for recent increases in utilization patterns despite higher complication rates. These trends highlight the importance of increasing surgeon exposure to and experience with these techniques in order to improve procedure safety. Additional large-volume, multicenter studies to define patients who will most benefit from these conventional robotic endoscopic procedures for thyroid cancer are needed.