Supraclavicular flap practice patterns and outcomes: A survey of 221 AHNS surgeons

Impact of Flap Size and Comorbidities on Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap Outcomes

Objective

Use of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction has increased in recent years. Limited but improving experience among reconstructive surgeons with the procedure have exposed numerous issues associated with flap success. The objective of this study is to examine the role of flap size on viability.

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Setting

Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Methods

Review of patients undergoing SCAIF reconstruction between January 2014 and March 2022 was performed. Flap failure was defined as >50% skin paddle loss. The total flap surface area was examined. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the association of other variables associated with flap failure.

Results

Eighty-nine supraclavicular island flaps were reviewed. Mean patient age was 63.2 ± 11.4 years. Fifty-five (61.2%) were male. Forty-five flaps (50.6%) were used for the reconstruction of defects of the skin of the neck/face. Twenty-nine flaps (32.6%) were utilized for defects of the pharynx/oropharynx, and 15 (16.9%) were utilized for oral cavity defects. Flap success rate was 94% (73/89). Flap site was not associated with flap failure (P = .46). Flaps >25 cm2 were 75% more likely to be successful. Multivariable logistic regression to assess the association of flap size in the context of other co-morbidities indicated flaps >25 cm2 were 3.6 times more likely to succeed regardless of co-morbidities, and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a 7-fold risk of flap failure (odds ratio: 7.3, 1.72-30.98, P = .007).

Conclusion

An association with improved flap outcomes and larger skin paddles was observed in this series. The applicability of these observations to smaller flaps and larger series with more surgeons requires further study. Co-morbidities, particularly, COPD, continue to impact flap outcomes.

Is Supraclavicular Artery Island flap (SAI) a viable alternative to Free Tissue Transfer (FTT) in head and neck reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of Supraclavicular Artery Island (SAI) Flap versus Free Tissue Transfer for head and neck reconstruction.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library database according to the PRISMA guidelines. Only comparative studies between the two techniques were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Eight studies, reporting a total of 402 patients and same number of flaps, 165 of which underwent reconstruction using supraclavicular artery island flap and 237 reconstructed with free tissue transfer were identified. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding major complications, total flap necrosis, partial flap necrosis, post operative fistula formation, donor site dehiscence, recipient site dehiscence and total flap area.

CONCLUSION

Supraclavicular artery island flap and free tissue transfer seem to be comparable when used in head and neck reconstruction.

Advances in oral tongue reconstruction: a reconstructive paradigm and review of functional outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glossectomy remains a common treatment of oral tongue malignancies, which has a range of functional impacts depending on the extent of resection. This review aims to categorize and provide context for the approach to reconstructing these defects using recent evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

The reconstruction method of choice should be tailored to the size and location of the glossectomy defect with special consideration to replace tongue volume and preserve mobility. There has been an increasing focus on patient-reported outcomes in oral tongue reconstruction. For defects beyond one-third of the tongue, free tissue reconstruction, and more recently, the submental artery island flap yield excellent results. Advances in reconstruction of larger defects have included preoperative soft tissue planning and assessment of outcomes in total glossectomy patients with laryngeal preservation.

SUMMARY

Depending on the defect, the appropriate reconstruction may range from healing by secondary intention to large volume free tissue transfer. In general, functional outcomes diminish with increasing size and complexity of the defect regardless of the reconstructive technique.

Applications of intraoperative angiography in head and neck reconstruction

Objective

Laser-assisted angiography with indocyanine green (LAIG) allows objective intraoperative evaluation of tissue vascularity. We endeavored to describe our experience with this technique in the head and neck region.

Methods

A retrospective review from February 2016 till October 2018 was conducted. We included patients who underwent head and neck procedures in which LAIG was employed. The main outcome was postoperative wound complications. We analysed the influence of LAIG results in intraoperative decision-making process.

Results

Nineteen patients were included, and follow-up was for at least 6 months. LAIG was employed in 11 local flaps, 9 free flaps and 6 cases of pharyngeal closure during total laryngectomies. Wound complications occurred in two cases with distal tip flap necrosis. LAIG findings resulted in changes in decision making intraoperatively in 84% of procedures, which consisted in trimming poorly perfused tissues. There were no pharyngocutaneous fistulas.

Conclusions

This represents a descriptive report on the use of LAIG on diverse head and neck reconstruction cases, with important impact on the decision-making process. A low number of postoperative wound complications were observed.

Resurgence of regional flaps for head and neck reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The strain on healthcare resources in light of the COVID-19 pandemic has forced many head and neck surgeons to explore reconstructive options that may decrease length of stay. Here, we review three common and versatile regional flaps used in head and neck reconstruction that are comparable alternatives to free tissue transfer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Initial anatomic descriptions of the facial artery musculocutaneous (FAMM) flap, the supraclavicular artery island flap and the submental artery island flap were published decades ago. Since then, many have proposed modifications to these descriptions to improve technical ease and patient outcomes. Benefits of regional flaps include ease of harvest, comparable outcomes to free tissue microvascular flaps, shorter operative time and hospital length of stay. Drawbacks to regional flaps include limitations to size and reach, partial necrosis, wound dehiscence and surgeon experience. The integrity of the vascular pedicle is also contingent upon vessel preservation during the cancer ablation.

SUMMARY

Although a resurgence of regional flaps began well before the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions began looking for alternatives to free flap reconstruction to conserve healthcare resources and minimize patient hospitalization time in the past year. There has been a revival of regional flaps such as the FAMM, supraclavicular and submental flaps that are valuable reconstructive options for many defects of the head and neck.

Malnutrition evaluation in head and neck cancer patients: Practice patterns among otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists

BACKGROUND

Physician practice patterns regarding diagnosis and management of malnutrition in the head and neck cancer patient population are not well studied.

METHODS

A 17-question survey was distributed to 1392 members of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS). The impact of hospital type, fellowship training, experience, and specialty was assessed.

RESULTS

Among AHNS members, there were 124 total respondents (9% response rate), including both otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists. Respondents strongly agreed (90%) that malnutrition negatively impacts patient outcomes. The majority (63%) felt comfortable screening for malnutrition, but 13% reported no routine assessment of malnutrition; 57% were unfamiliar with relevant guidelines. Barriers to screening included lack of familiarity with screening tools/guidelines, lack of time, and lack of access to dietitian.

CONCLUSION

Although there was a strong consensus among respondents that the identification and management of malnutrition among head and neck cancer patients is critical, familiarity with relevant guidelines was poor.