Leprosy as a cause of nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Leprosy, also known as Hansen disease, is an airborne spread disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) which commonly presents with skin lesions, peripheral neuropathy, and ocular involvement. This report describes a patient who presented with epiphora secondary to chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction four years after completing antimicrobial treatment for tuberculoid leprosy. At the time of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), the lacrimal sac demonstrated chronic dacryocystitis with granulomatous inflammation and a Fite positive staining bacterial rod-like structure. Pathological examination of the surgical specimen demonstrated numerous non-necrotizing granulomas in a perivascular and neural distribution, compatible with sequelae of previously treated M. leprae infection. The patient has remained symptom free six months after surgery.

The predictive value of nasolacrimal sac biopsy in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

BACKGROUND

During dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), the lacrimal sac wall biopsy is not routinely performed in our hospital, but it is recommended if there is a suspicion of underlying disease other than preoperatively or intraoperatively chronic inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

Most of patients with epiphora have different causes of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). This study aims to examine how important routine lacrimal sac biopsy is during endoscopic DCR surgery.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The study included 50 patients with chronic unilateral epiphora. All patients underwent endoscopic DCR with NLD biopsy. Histopathologic analysis was performed for each specimen.

RESULTS

The findings of NLD biopsy showed chronic inflammation in 33 cases (66%), chronic dacryocystitis in 9 cases (18%), dacryolith with dacryocystitis in one case, granuloma in 4 cases (8%), rhinoscleroma in 2 cases (4%), and one case had a neoplasm. Histopathologic findings were inflammatory cellular infiltrates in 56%, 30% and 14% in mild, moderate and severe chronic inflammatory state (CIS) score, respectively. Fibrosis in 18%, 20% and 62% in mild, moderate and severe CIS score, respectively. Capillary proliferation in 64%, 32% and 4% in mild, moderate and severe CIS score, respectively. Chronic inflammatory signs in 64%, 32% and 4% in mild, moderate and severe CIS score, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although neoplasm and granuloma are rare cause of lacrimal sac or duct obstruction requiring DCR, they were detected through nasolacrimal assessment and routine intraoperative lacrimal sac biopsy.

Orbitopalpebral and ocular sarcoidosis: what does the ophthalmologist need to know

Sarcoidosis is a chronic multisystemic disease of unknown aetiology, characterised by non-caseating granulomas. Ocular involvement rate ranges from 30% to 60% among individuals with sarcoidosis, and can vary widely, making the diagnosis a challenge to the ophthalmologist. Cutaneous manifestations occur in about 22% of sarcoidosis cases, but eyelid involvement is rare. Eyelid swelling and nodules are the most frequent forms of eyelid involvement, but other findings have been reported. The joint analysis of clinical history, ancillary exams and compatible biopsy is needed for the diagnosis, as well as the exclusion of other possible conditions. This review aims to describe the different forms of presentations, the clinical reasoning and treatment options for ocular, eyelid and orbital sarcoidosis.

Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: An Unusual Presentation of Sarcoidosis

Lacrimal drainage system disorders leading to epiphora are a common ophthalmologic complaint. When such a patient is identified, the ophthalmologist frequently collaborates with the otolaryngologist to perform a dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). In rare cases, sinonasal sarcoidosis may lead to nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLD) and dacryocystitis. A 48-year-old Caucasian female was referred to the Otolaryngology clinic for evaluation of a 6-month history of persistent right-sided nasal obstruction and epiphora. After physical examination and computerized tomography (CT) scan, she was diagnosed with right NLD with dacryocystitis. The patient underwent right endoscopic DCR. Pathology from the lacrimal bone and nasal tissue demonstrated noncaseating granulomas suggestive of sarcoidosis. Postoperative evaluation including lung CT scan confirmed systemic sarcoidosis. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction very rarely is the presenting symptom in patients with sarcoidosis. Imaging is necessary to rule out other causes of NLD, and histopathology is essential for diagnosis. Noncaseating granulomas are found along the nasal tissue and lacrimal sac, specifically in the subepithelial layer. Treatment consists of DCR, either endoscopic or external. Both approaches achieve long-lasting resolution of symptoms but may require revision from inflammation and scarring. There is no consensus on the use of intraoperative or postoperative steroids.

Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Sac and Literature Review of the Lacrimal System

Background

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas make up less than 0.1% of head and neck malignancies and are regarded as rare, low-grade malignant neoplasms of the salivary gland. They are thought to arise from intercalated ducts with histopathology showing a classic biphasic morphology of an outer layer of myoepithelial cells and inner layer of epithelial cells. These tumors most commonly occur in the parotid gland; however, rare cases have also been described in the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, subglottis, base of tongue, and the lacrimal gland.

Objective

To describe the clinical presentation, surgical management, and histopathology of the first reported case of lacrimal sac epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. To conduct a literature review of this malignancy, which is present in the lacrimal system.

Methods

Case report (n = 1) and literature review.

Results

We report a case of a 72-year-old man presenting with epiphora and a lacrimal sac mass with intranasal extension on imaging and nasal endoscopy. A combined endoscopic endonasal and open approach provided successful definitive treatment for final pathologic diagnosis of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the lacrimal sac, with orbital reconstruction and lacrimal stenting providing good cosmetic and functional results.

Conclusions

After PubMed database search for any case series or reports of lacrimal system epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas, we believe this is the first documented case originating from the lacrimal sac. Although the histopathology of this tumor is distinct, unusual location and clinical presentation may pose significant diagnostic difficulties.