Understanding nationwide readmissions after parotidectomy

Emergency department visits following endoscopic skull base surgery: An opportunity for improvement

BACKGROUND

Readmissions are major healthcare expenditures, key hospital metrics, and are often preceded by an evaluation in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to analyze ED visits within 30 days of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS), risk factors for readmission once in the ED, and ED-related evaluation and outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review from January 2017 to December 2022 at a high-volume center of all ESBS patients who presented to the ED within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Of 593 ESBS cases, 104 patients (17.5%) presented to the ED following surgery within 30 days, with a median presentation of 6 days post-discharge (IQR 5-14); 54 (51.9%) patients were discharged while 50 (48.1%) were readmitted. Readmitted patients were significantly older than discharged patients (median 60 years, IQR 50-68 vs. 48 years, 33-56; p < 0.01). Extent of ESBS was not associated with readmission or discharge from the ED. The most common discharge diagnoses were headache (n = 13, 24.1%) and epistaxis (n = 10, 18.5%); the most common readmitting diagnoses were serum abnormality (n = 15, 30.0%) and altered mental status (n = 5, 10.0%). Readmitted patients underwent significantly more laboratory testing than discharged patients (median 6, IQR 3-9 vs. 4, 1-6; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of patients who presented to the ED following ESBS were discharged home but underwent significant workup. Follow-up within 7 days of discharge, risk-stratified endocrine care pathways, and efforts to address the social determinants of health may be considered to optimize postoperative ESBS care.

Analysis of Otolaryngologic Readmissions at a High-Volume Quaternary Referral Center

OBJECTIVES

To identify common reasons for readmission following otolaryngologic surgery at a high-volume center and identify possible risk factors for readmission.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of readmissions identified by hospital-based electronic medical record reporting mechanism.

RESULTS

From January 2019 to September 2020, there were 87 readmissions following 808 index surgeries. The most common reason for readmission was for planned surgery (23%), followed by post-operative neck infection, bleeding, or pneumonia. Patients with unplanned readmissions had significantly longer index admission duration than patients who were not readmitted (median 7 days vs. median 5 days, resp.; p = 0.0056). Analysis of cases of unplanned readmission for neck infection and bleeding identified the oral cavity/pharynx as the most common site of initial surgery and that a majority of patients had a history of radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neck infection, bleeding, and pneumonia were the most common reasons for unplanned readmission following otolaryngologic surgery, and a large portion of patients required additional procedures during readmission. Unplanned readmissions for bleeding were significantly more costly than readmissions for neck infections. Long-index hospitalizations, index surgery involving the oral cavity and pharynx, and a history of radiation therapy may be useful clinical features that could stratify the risk of readmission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4, retrospective chart review Laryngoscope, 133:2546-2552, 2023.

Drainless parotidectomy using tissue fibrin sealant - A retrospective case-control study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of drainless parotidectomy using fibrin sealant on length of stay, post-operative seroma and related complications. For this purpose, a retrospective matched case-control series was held in a single academic center. All patients who underwent drainless parotidectomies, including deep lobe tumors and revision surgeries, were compared to matched controls in which a suction drain was inserted. Main outcomes were length of hospital stay and post-operative seroma. A total of 123 patients (41 cases and 82 controls) were included in the study. Fibrin sealant group had higher rates of total parotidectomy compared with the control group (25.0% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.054). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the fibrin sealant group (1.0 ± 0.3 days vs. 1.5 ± 0.6 days, p < 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the fibrin sealant group and the control regarding post-operative seromas (9.8% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.574, respectively), aspirations rate (7.3% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.381), and infection rates (0% vs.3.7%, p = 0.550). In conclusion, drainless parotidectomy does not increase post operative seroma rates and related complications, and can also be implemented for revision surgery.

Outpatient Parotidectomy, a Safety and Financial Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate the safety, efficacy, and potential cost-savings of the outpatient parotidectomy procedure.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent a parotidectomy at a large academic center from 2015 through 2019 including demographic data, postoperative complications, drain placement, readmission, and financial cost. A comparison was performed between patients who underwent an outpatient vs inpatient parotidectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients underwent parotidectomy (136 outpatient; 199 inpatient). Comparison of patient demographics, common comorbidities, tumor size, tumor type, postoperative complications, and readmission rate was similar between the inpatient and outpatient cohorts. The overall mean cost difference between inpatient parotidectomy and outpatient parotidectomy for all years was $1528.58 (95%CI: $1139-$1916).

CONCLUSION

The outpatient parotidectomy procedure has a comparable safety profile to the inpatient procedure while providing a significant cost-savings benefit.

Evaluating resident involvement and the 'July effect' in parotidectomy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of resident involvement and the 'July effect' on peri-operative complications after parotidectomy.

METHOD

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for parotidectomy procedures with resident involvement between 2005 and 2014.

RESULTS

There were 11 733 cases were identified, of which 932 involved resident participation (7.9 per cent). Resident involvement resulted in a significantly lower reoperation rate (adjusted odds ratio, 0.18; 95 per cent confidence interval, 0.05-0.73; p = 0.02) and readmission rate (adjusted odds ratios 0.30; 95 per cent confidence interval, 0.11-0.80; p = 0.02). However, resident involvement was associated with a mean 24 minutes longer adjusted operative time and 23.5 per cent longer adjusted total hospital length of stay (respective p < 0.01). No significant difference in surgical or medical complication rates or mortality was found when comparing cases among academic quarters.

CONCLUSION

Resident participation is associated with significantly decreased reoperation and readmission rates as well as longer mean operative times and total length of stay. Resident transitions during July are not associated with increased risk of adverse peri-operative outcomes after parotidectomy.

Does neck dissection affect post-operative outcomes in parotidectomy? A national study

OBJECTIVE

To characterize post-operative complications in parotidectomy with neck dissection.

METHODS

Patients age ≥ 18 receiving a parotidectomy or parotidectomy with neck dissection between 2005 and 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with unknown demographic variables were excluded. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 13,609 parotidectomy patients were analyzed, 11,243 (82.6%) without neck dissection and 2366 (17.4%) with neck dissection. Both length of surgery (mean minutes ± standard deviation [SD] = 335.9 ± 189.2 vs. 152.9 ± 99.0, p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (mean days ± SD = 3.90 ± 4.76 vs. 1.04 ± 2.14, p < 0.001) were greater with dissection. 13.9% of parotidectomies with neck dissection and 3.5% without dissection (p < 0.001) had at least one complication, which remained significant after multivariable adjustment (Odds Ratio[OR] = 1.565 (95%CI = 1.279-1.914), p < 0.001). The increase in post-operative complications was predominately driven by an increased transfusion rate (7.4% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis also demonstrated no significant difference in rates of returning to the operating room (OR = 1.122 (95%CI 0.843-1.493), p > 0.05) or rates of readmission (OR = 1.007 (95%CI 0.740-1.369), p > 0.05). Parotidectomy with neck dissection was more likely to be inpatient (OR = 4.411 (95%CI 3.887-5.004), p < 0.001) and to be ASA class 3 (OR = 1.367 (95%CI 1.194-1.564), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide data demonstrates that parotidectomy with neck dissection is associated with increased rates of post-operative complications; however, neck dissection did not significantly impact readmission or reoperation rates. These findings indicate that neck dissection is a relatively safe addition to parotidectomy and provide novel evidence in the management of parotid malignancies.