Effect of medical comorbidities on treatment regimen and survival in T3/T4 laryngeal cancer

Single-cell transcriptomic analyses of tumor microenvironment and molecular reprograming landscape of metastatic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a malignant tumor with a high probability of metastasis. The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in cancer metastasis. To gain insights into the TME of LSCC, we conducted single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) on samples collected from LSCC patients with or without lymphatic metastasis. The stem and immune cell signatures in LSCC suggest their roles in tumor invasion and metastasis. Infiltration of a large number of regulatory T cells, dysplastic plasma cells, and macrophages that are at the early development stage in the cancerous tissue indicates an immunosuppressive state. Abundant neutrophils detected at the cancer margins reflect the inflammatory microenvironment. In addition to dynamic ligand-receptor interactions between the stromal and myeloid cells, the enhanced autophagy in endothelial cells and fibroblasts implies a role in nutrient supply. Taken together, the comprehensive atlas of LSCC obtained allowed us to identify a complex yet unique TME of LSCC, which may help identify potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for LSCC.

Treatment and outcome among patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in S tockholm—A population‐based study

Objective

Survival of patients with advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) remains poor and management protocols warrant further development. We thus investigated treatment and outcome-related factors for LSCC in Stockholm, Sweden.

Methods

In a retrospective setting, 520 patients with LSCC diagnosed during 2000-2014, were included. Data on stage, treatment, and outcome were correlated with recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS, respectively).

Results

Five-year OS for all patients was 65%. Five-year RFS for T1a, T1b, T2, T3, and T4 glottic LSCC was 90%, 91%, 77%, 47%, and 80%, respectively. The corresponding figures for T1, T2, T3, and T4 supraglottic LSCC were 64%, 66%, 64%, and 86%.

Conclusion

Patients with a T3 glottic LSCC had unexpectedly poor survival, especially when compared with patients with a T4 tumor. Patients with T4 disease were primarily treated with laryngectomy and postoperative radiotherapy (RT)/chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while most patients with T3 LSCC were treated with RT/CRT.

Defining targets to improve care delivery for T4 larynx squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

United States oncology trends consistently demonstrate that nearly half of T4a larynx carcinoma patients are treated with larynx preservation, despite national guidelines favoring laryngectomy. This study identifies clinical decision-making drivers and defines patient subsets that should become targets for care improvement.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients with cT4 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx from US National Cancer Database 2005-2016. Demographic data and survival rates between clinical pathways were compared. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method with statistical comparisons assessed by log-rank test.

Results

Of 11,556 patients with cT4 disease, laryngectomy (TL) was the initial treatment for 4627 (40%) patients. Larynx preservation via chemoradiation (CRT) occurred for 4307 patients. TL and CRT patients had similar Charlson-Deyo comorbidity indices and insurance status. TL patients had higher total tumor size, lower N3 rates and were more often seen at academic institutions (p < .0001). N0 surgery patients with adjuvant treatment demonstrated superior median survival (MS) compared to CRT (surgery + radiation MS: 69 months, surgery + chemoradiation MS: 66, CRT MS: 37.7), p < .0001. MS for N1/N2 disease patients was 56.5 months for surgery + radiation and 35.5 months for surgery + CRT, superior to CRT, MS 30.8 months, p < .0001. Tri-modality N3 patients with up front surgery had similar MS compared to CRT (surgery + chemoradiation 21.3 months vs. CRT 16.1), p = .95.

Conclusion

National quality improvement initiatives are needed to promote guideline adherence and improve survival in advanced larynx cancer. Targets for such initiatives should be patients with limited or no nodal disease burden, that meet clear T4a imaging criteria.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, non-randomized controlled cohort.

Treatment Results for Stage III Laryngeal Cancer: Analysis of a Populational Database Using Propensity Scores

Introduction Treatment of stage III laryngeal cancer suffered a major paradigm change with surgery being substituted by radiation therapy with chemotherapy.

Objective To evaluate the oncological outcome of different treatment modalities for stage III laryngeal cancer using a population database.

Methods A population database representing patients treated in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, was analyzed. Demographic, clinical and treatment variables were included, and the outcomes of interest were disease-specific and overall survival. Propensity score with nearest neighbor matching was used to compensate for imbalances in treatment groups.

Results We retrieved data from 1,804 patients. In multivariate analysis, age, female gender, payment source, clinical N stage (cN) stages, and treatment modality were significant for disease-specific and overall survival. Patients submitted to surgery treatment had a significantly better disease-specific (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001) compared with chemoradiation. Propensity score matching was based on cN stage, gender, age, topography, and payment modality, and allowed the pairing of 685 patients from each treatment modality. There was a significant difference in disease-specific survival favoring surgery-based treatment (p = 0.017).

Conclusion The treatment choice has a significant impact on survival in patients with stage III laryngeal cancer with surgery-based treatment being superior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT).