Lack of additive benefit of oral steroids on short-term postoperative outcomes in nasal polyposis

Relationship of Lesion Location to Postoperative Steroid Use in Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is known to recur after surgery. The treatment choice for recurrent ECRS, such as oral steroids or biological agents, must be chosen carefully, and identifying the lesion location may be useful. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative course of ECRS patients and assess the relationship between endoscopic lesion location and postoperative oral steroid use.

METHODS

Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery from April 2018 to March 2020 were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of oral steroid use after surgery. The primary endpoint was the lesion location on endoscopic findings during surgery: middle turbinate, middle meatus, superior turbinate, superior meatus, nasal septum, and sphenoethmoidal recess. Subjective symptoms, blood tests, and computerized tomography (CT) findings (Lund-Mackay score) were evaluated as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Among 264 patients, 88 were diagnosed histologically with ECRS (mean 48.98 ± 1.40 years, 67 males/21 females). Twenty-three patients were steroid-using, 65 were steroid-free, and six stopped attending their appointments. Patients with sphenoethmoidal recess lesions were significantly more likely to require steroids (p = 0.019). There was a significant association between steroid use and younger age (p = 0.041), olfactory dysfunction (p = 0.021), and all sinuses (Frontal sinus: p < 0.001, Anterior ethmoid sinus: p = 0.002, Posterior ethmoid sinus: p = 0.011, Maxillary sinus: p = 0.018, Sphenoid sinus: p = 0.034, Total score: p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A sphenoethmoidal recess lesion was a risk factor for requiring postoperative steroids. Young age, olfactory dysfunction, and preoperative severe CT findings were also significant risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:2511-2516, 2023.

Systemic corticosteroids in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis-A systematic review

Purpose

When first-line chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) treatment fails, patients can either be treated with oral or injected systemic corticosteroids. Although the EPOS and international guidelines for CRS do not mention injected corticosteroids, it is commonly used by ear, nose, and throat specialists. While the risks of systemic corticosteroids, in general, are known, the pros and cons of injected and oral corticosteroids (OCS) in CRS treatment are unclear.

Methods

A systematic review of studies that report the effects and/or side effects of injected and oral corticosteroids in the treatment of CRS was made according to the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Altogether, 48 studies were included, only five studies reported on injected corticosteroids, and five attended with side effects. Three studies found beneficial effects of OCS perioperatively on sinus surgery, while four articles found no effect. Nineteen articles reported that OCS resulted in an improvement in symptoms. Two articles presented a longer-lasting effect of injected corticosteroids than OCS. Three studies reported adverse side effects of systemic corticosteroids, while two studies showed no adverse side effects. One study showed less adrenal suppression after injected corticosteroids compared to OCS. The evidence is not strong but shows a positive effect of systemic corticosteroids that lasts longer with injections.

Conclusion

Although systemic corticosteroids are widely used to treat CRS, there is a lack of studies comparing the OCS and injected corticosteroids. The evidence is sparse, however, injected steroids show longer effects with fewer side effects. An RCT study is needed to compare OCS and injected corticosteroids.

Oral Corticosteroids for Patients with Eosinophilic Diseases: An Expert Panel View on Use, Overuse, and Strategies to Reduce Use

Severe asthma (SA), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) are three conditions driven by IL-5 and eosinophilic inflammation. As these conditions have high use of healthcare services, as well as lifestyle and psychological burdens, safe treatment to achieve optimal control is key. In all three conditions, as for many other eosinophilic diseases (ED), oral corticosteroids (OCS) are often used for both acute and maintenance treatment where disease activity is high. While, in general, OCS are very effective, their use is limited by a well-recognised high potential for adverse effects (AE). Moreover, cumulative exposure to OCS may not be acknowledged in many patients, especially for those predominantly treated in primary care, exposing patients to potentially damaging long-term OCS-related AEs. To discuss the use of OCS for these eosinophilic diseases, as well as to provide guidance on how to help limit their use, a board of European experts within each field was gathered. The experts completed questionnaires regarding treatment and referral pathways for patients with SA, CRSwNP, or EGPA; then, in an online meeting, discussed a number of issues in regard to OCS use. Here, the authors present the key recommendations from the expert advisory panel alongside some background to these conditions regarding treatment with OCS.

Effect of postoperative systemic prednisolone on short-term and long-term outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A multi-centered randomized clinical trial

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine whether postoperative additive systemic steroid administration in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) impacted selected endoscopic, subjective and objective outcome measures.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority multicenter trial of n=106 patients with CRSwNP. All patients underwent primary functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) followed by topical nasal steroids. Patients were randomized to a systemic steroid or placebo for 1 month. Patients were followed up for 2 years over 9 time points. The primary outcome measures were the differences between groups with respect to the nasal polyp score (NPS) and sinonasal quality of life (SNQoL). Secondary outcome measures included interactions with respect to the Lund-Kennedy score (LKS), sinonasal symptoms, general quality of life (GQoL), 16-item odor identification test scores, recurrence rates, need for revision surgery and mucus biomarker levels.

Results

106 patients were randomized to either the placebo or the systemic steroid group (n=53 per group). Postoperative systemic steroids were not superior to placebo with respect to all primary (p= 0.077) and secondary outcome measures (p&gt;0.05 for all). Reported adverse events were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the addition of postoperative systemic steroids after primary FESS did not confer a benefit over topical steroid nasal spray alone with respect to NPS, SNQOL, LKS, GQOL, sinonasal symptoms, smell scores, recurrence rates, the need for revision surgery or biomarkers over a short-term follow-up of up to 9 months and a long-term follow-up of up to 24 months in CRSwNP patients. Functional endoscopic surgery did, however, show a strong effect on all outcome measures, which remained relatively stable up to the endpoint at 2 years.

Correlation of polyp grading scales with patient symptom scores and olfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various nasal polyp (NP) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature. However, no single system has been identified as superior. Correlations between NP scoring systems and patient symptoms, quality of life (QOL) or olfaction vary widely.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline. Any study examining endoscopy scores and symptom, QOL or olfaction measures in cross sectional manner or after therapeutic intervention were included.

RESULTS

This review identified 55 studies for a pooled meta-analysis of Lund-Kennedy (LK-NP) polyp scores (N = 6), Meltzer scores (N = 6), Nasal polyp scores (NPS; N = 19), Total polyp score (TPS; N=8) Lilholdt scores (N = 8), Olfactory cleft endoscopy score (OCES; N =4), Discharge, inflammation, polyp/edema score (DIP; N = 2), and Perioperative sinus endoscopy score (POSE; N = 2). Meta-regression assessed correlations between NP grading systems and SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), and Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT40). None of the NP grading systems correlated significantly with any symptom, QOL or olfactory metric. In intervention studies of surgery or monoclonal antibody treatment, changes in NPS scores did not correlate with any patient reported outcome measure (PROM) or olfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Current NP endoscopic scoring systems are not associated with PROMs such as SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, and TNSS as well as objective measures of olfaction. NP grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.

Twelve-year long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding long-term postoperative follow-up of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients is scarce in the literature. The objective of the present study was to report long-term 12-year postoperative outcomes for CRSwNP patients.

METHODS

CRSwNP patients were prospectively followed after endoscopic sinus surgery. Sinonasal symptoms, nasal polyp score (NPS), Barcelona Smell Test 24 (BAST-24), Lund-Mackay Score (LMS), and Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire were assessed before and 12 years after surgery.

RESULTS

At long-term follow-up (median, 12 years), a strong improvement was noted for all patients (N=76) in nasal symptoms score, NPS, BAST-24, and LMS scores compared with baseline. No long-term improvement in SF-36 was found.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CRSwNP have a long-term 12-year postoperative improvement in nasal symptoms, polyp size, computed tomography, and olfaction.

Yardstick for the medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition of the paranasal sinuses defined by classic symptoms, imaging findings, or endoscopic findings. There are a growing number of emerging pharmacologic therapies being evaluated to treat patients with CRS, some of which have gained indication status in the United States. There have not been updated treatment guidelines published in the United States however since 2014. This document is meant to serve as an updated expert consensus document for the pharmacologic management of patients with CRS. We review available data focusing on prospective clinical trials on oral and intranasal corticosteroids, nasal irrigation, biologics, antibiotics, and allergy immunotherapy for CRS both with and without nasal polyposis, including specific therapies for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease-associated CRS and allergic fungal CRS. There are multiple options to treat CRS, and clinicians should be knowledgeable on the efficacy and risks of these available therapies. Allergists-immunologists now have various therapies available to treat patients with CRS.

[Postoperative treatment following paranasal sinus surgery]

Postoperative care is a crucial aspect for the success of paranasal sinus interventions. Basic procedures include saline nasal wash, which should be started on the first postoperative day, topical steroids, and antibiotics in cases of infection. Medical treatment involves aspiration of secretion in the inferior meatus during the first week. Removal of scabs in the surgical field should be carried out under endoscopic control beginning at the second week. Intervals are scheduled individually. Occlusion of the nose for the time of epithelium regeneration provides a moist space in the ethmoid, which improves wound healing.