The submental flap for head and neck reconstruction: Comparison of outcomes to the radial forearm free flap

Oral Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps after Cancer Ablation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Introduction: The planning of oral reconstruction after tumor resection is a pivotal point for head and neck surgeons. It is mandatory to consider two aspects: the size of the surgical defect and the complexity of the oral cavity as an anatomical region. We offer a review of the literature that focuses on four types of locoregional flaps that can be profitably used for such reconstruction: infrahyoid (IF), nasolabial (NF), platysma (PF), and submental (SF). Methods: The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This systematic review was carried out according to the PICOS acronym through a comprehensive electronic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. For each selected article, we extrapolated eight main parameters, of which all mean values were compared through an ANOVA test. The dimensions of the oral defects were referred to as "small" (<7 cm2), "medium" (7-50 cm2), or "large" (>50 cm2). Results: A total of 139 articles were selected with a total of 5898 patients. The mean ages for each type of flap were not statistically significant (p = 0.30, p > 0.05). Seven sublocations of oral defects were reported: The most common was the tongue (2003 [34.0%] patients), followed by the floor of the mouth (1786 [30.4%]), buccal mucosa (981 [16.6%]), cheek (422 [7.2%]), hard palate (302 [5.1%]), alveolar ridge (217 [3.7%]), and retromolar trigone (187 [3.2%]). The defects were mainly medium-sized (4507 [76.4%] patients), and fewer were small-sized (1056 [17.9%]) or large-sized (335 [5.7%]). Complications were noted, the most frequent of which was flap necrosis, seen in 0.57% of cases. The functional and esthetical results were mainly positive. Conclusions: Locoregional flaps represent a good alternative in medium-sized defects as well as a fairly good alternative in small- and large-sized defects when other options are ruled out.

Comparison of split thickness skin graft versus full thickness skin graft for radial forearm flap donor site closure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most commonly used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) has traditionally been used for closure of the forearm. However, full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) has gained in popularity to achieve more satisfactory results. The aim of the study is to identify the best RFF donor site closure technique by comparing the functional and aesthetic outcomes of STSG and FTSG.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried. Only studies comparing complications rate, functional and aesthetic outcomes between STSG and FTSG were included. The primary outcome was graft failure rate. Secondary outcomes included the aesthetic result and functionality of the forearm/wrist.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included in this review, accounting for a total of 712 patients with mean age of 60.7 years. Overall, 348 patients underwent FTSG and 377 underwent STSG. The mean follow-up was 14.7 months. The rate of graft failure in FTSG was significantly higher compared to STSG (OR: 2.79, 95 % CI 1.38-5.65, p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in rate of tendon exposure (OR: 0.83, p = 0.65) and infection (OR: 1.37, p = 0.42). Regarding the aesthetic outcome, no significant difference between FTSG and STSG based on observer (SMD = -0.37, p = 0.17) and patient (SMD = -0.016, p = 0.93) assessment, respectively. Overall postoperative functional assessment showed a not severely impaired hand and arm function in both groups. Subjective evaluation of pain was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

FTSG is associated with higher risk of graft failure than STSG in RFF donor site closure, without significant improvement in aesthetic results.

Functional donor-site morbidity following reconstruction with pectoralis major flaps: A systematic review

Background

Pectoralis major muscle/myocutaneous flaps (PMMFs) are commonly used in reconstructive surgery, but may result in shoulder disability on the donor side. A systematic review evaluating this morbidity could be beneficial for guiding patients and providers considering this procedure.

Methods

In October 2022, a systematic review of studies evaluating quantitative/qualitative measures of functional morbidity after PMMF was conducted. The results were categorized into PMMF's effect on range of motion (ROM), strength, and ability to complete shoulder-related activities/quality of life.

Results

Eleven studies were included for analysis, which analyzed standard PMMF and two PMMF variants that spared portions of the muscle. Three of five studies demonstrated reduced shoulder ROM for standard PMMF versus controls lasting at least 4 months after head and neck reconstruction. Two of five studies, including two prospective studies demonstrated reduced shoulder strength for standard PMMF versus controls lasting at least 3 months after surgery. Five of nine studies found significant impairment in the ability to conduct shoulder-related activities, including work, up to one year postoperatively for standard PMMF versus controls. Muscle-sparing PMMF variants exhibited more promising outcomes in some categories.

Conclusion

Standard PMMF results in prolonged reductions in shoulder ROM and strength, which may impair patients in shoulder-related activities. Other reconstructive options should be considered in patients who frequently participate in such activities. For patients requiring PMMF, muscle-sparing PMMF variants should be considered as alternatives to the standard PMMF.

Submental Artery Island Flaps (SAIF) for Oral Cavity Cancer: Surgical Technique and Tertiary Care Experience

In oral cancer surgeries, oncological outcomes take precious driverseat. But the copassengers like reconstruction, cosmesis, swallowing and speech outcomes deserve equivalent importance. Submental Artery Island Flaps (SAIF) provide an underutilized and extremely versatile option for reconstruction of defects following early stage oral cavity tumour resections. In this prospective observational analysis, we describe the technique, challenges and outcomes of SAIF at our tertiary care institute. Sixteen patients with Stage I and II oral cavity cancers were enrolled between June 2020 to May 2021. Verrucous carcinomas were five and well differentiated carcinomas were 11 patients. After tumour excision and neck dissections, defects were reconstructed with Pedicled submental flaps. Complications and functional outcomes were analyzed over two years. Nineteen percent were ladies and 81% were gentlemen. Median age was 52 years. Tongue tumours formed majority with 56% cases. Largest skin paddle taken was 36 cm2. Flap survival was 88%. There were variations in venous drainage of flaps which have been depicted in case figures. There was no report of orocutaneous fistula. Grade 3-4 speech satisfaction was achieved by 81.2% patients at 6 months. Swallowing was excellent, grade 4-5 for 100% of patients at 6 months. One patient had distant metastasis at 7 months and died. SRLR (Submental flap Recurrences) and trismus were zero percent at two years. The unexplored field of submental flaps can be used for oral cancer reconstructions in a versatile way. Donor site easy closures, no scars on face, early resumption of daily activities and short hospital stay makes it one of the ideal options in early stage oral cavity defects.

The evolving landscape of salivary gland tumors

Salivary gland cancers are a rare, histologically diverse group of tumors. They range from indolent to aggressive and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, but radiation and systemic therapy are also critical parts of the care paradigm. Given the rarity and heterogeneity of these cancers, they are best managed in a multidisciplinary program. In this review, the authors highlight standards of care as well as exciting new research for salivary gland cancers that will strive for better patient outcomes.

Survival of Dental Implants Placed in Iliac, Fibula, and Radial Forearm Flaps: A Comprehensive Review

Various donor sites have been extensively documented in the literature for bone free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. These include the radius, scapula, rib, ilium, femur, fibula, and metatarsal bone. Among them, the fibula, ilium, and scapula are the most commonly used and studied for placing endosseous implants and for rehabilitation purposes. Each donor site has its own advantages and disadvantages, which depend on factors such as whether the reconstruction is for the maxilla or mandible, the required volume and length of the bone and soft tissue, and the location, extent, and type of defect that needs to be reconstructed. The aim of this current review is to comprehensively assess the existing literature on the survival of implants in fibula, radial, and iliac flaps.

Regional Flap Donor Sites in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Regional flaps are vital to head and neck reconstruction, allowing surgeons to harvest numerous reliable flaps without the need for microvascular anastomosis. These flaps are very useful in cases of vascular depletion and may prove superior to free flaps as a primary option in certain circumstances. Numerous harvest options are available, and the described harvest techniques are safe and straightforward for an experienced reconstructive surgeon to learn. Donor site morbidity is variable depending on flap selection but minimal in many cases. Regional flaps are an excellent option in resource-limited settings or when minimizing reoperation is a high priority.

Radial Forearm Free Flap for Head and Neck Defect Reconstruction: An Up-to-date Review of the Literature

The radial forearm free flap has emerged as the mainstay of free flaps for oral cavity soft tissue reconstructions because of its versatility and ability to be used in the reconstruction of large and medium-sized defects. This flap is commonly used to restore head and neck defects, including full-thickness lip and oral cavity defects. This flap offers the opportunity to cover severe defects of the facial region due to its long vascular pedicle and elasticity. In addition to its ease of being harvested, the radial forearm free flap provides a sensate, pliable, and thin skin paddle with a long vascular pedicle. However, it can cause severe morbidity at the donor site, mainly due to exposure of the flexor tendon that results from a failed harvesting of the skin graft, changed sensation in the radial nerve, aesthetic deformity, and reduced range of motion and grip strength. This article aims to review all the up-to-date studies discussing the use of radial forearm free flap in head and neck reconstruction.

The submental island flap in head and neck reconstruction: A 10-year experience examining application, oncologic safety, and role of comorbidity

Background

We present our experience on reconstructive versatility and risk of nodal transfer with the submental island flap (SIF). We also examine the role of comorbidity as a predictor of complications.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing SIF over 10-year period. Comorbidity determined using Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 index (ACE-27). Univariable/multivariable logistic regressions performed to determine association of these characteristics and rates of major complications.

Results

Fifty-eight patients underwent SIF reconstruction, 27 (45%) patients had moderate/severe comorbidity, and 24 (41%) experienced major complication. Multivariable analysis identified ACE-27 scores >2 predictive of major flap complications (OR: 17.38, 95% CI: 1.96-153.74, p = .01) and medical complications (OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.11-30.23, p = .037). There were no cases of pathologic nodal transfer.

Conclusion

The SIF is a versatile flap and oncologically safe in carefully selected patients. The ACE-27 index is strongly predictive of major postoperative complications.

Level of Evidence

4.

Flap Reconstruction of the Oropharyngeal Defect After Tumor Resection via Combined Transcervical and Transoral Approach in Patients With HPV-Positive and -Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective

To investigate a novel surgical approach of combined transcervical parapharyngeal space (PPS) with the transoral approach to dissect oropharyngeal cancer.

Methods

31 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer and had undergone surgical treatment in Beijing Tongren Hospital during June 2018 and December 2020 were enrolled. All patients were squamous cell carcinoma patients. There were 25 males and 6 females, and the age ranged between 44 and 70 years old. The number of patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 stage disease was 8, 15, 8, and 0, respectively, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging method, 8th edition. After the dissection of the submandibular and cervical lymph nodes, the parapharyngeal space was exposed, and the parapharyngeal space lymph node and the outer borderline of the tumor were dissected, and then the inner borderline of the tumor was dissected via a transoral approach; the tumor was dissected en bloc, and the defects were reconstructed with the flap from the neck through the parapharyngeal space.

Results

Among the patients enrolled, 21 were HPV positive and 10 were HPV negative. 8 patients were free of lymph node metastasis. The tumor resection margins were negative in all 31 patients. Safe and sufficient excision of tumors was feasible by this new surgical approach, avoiding complications associated with mandibulotomy or lip-splitting. All patients had no obvious dysfunctions of swallowing and voice. By the time of this follow-up, none died caused by OPSCC, and only two patients suffered from local recurrence. The 3-year survival rate is 100%, and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate is 84.58%.

Conclusion

The surgical approach of combined transcervical parapharyngeal space with the transoral approach was effective and safe. On this basis, this approach has the advantage of fewer postoperative complications and better functional results.

Submental Island Flap After Prior Contralateral Neck Dissection: A Case Series and Technical Considerations

OBJECTIVES

The submental island flap is a dependable workhorse in head and neck reconstruction. However, the viability of this flap has not been established for oral cavity reconstruction when a contralateral neck dissection has already been performed in an earlier surgical setting. The aim of this study is to highlight technical considerations and outcomes of this approach with a small case series.

METHODS

Three cases of oral cavity reconstruction with a submental island flap elevated in the context of a prior contralateral neck dissection are presented.

RESULTS

In all cases, a doppler was used to identify the maintenance of the submental perforator in the neck opposite the previous neck dissection. In 2 cases, level IA was included within the dissection field of the previous neck dissection. Additionally, the old neck scar was included within the skin paddle of the submental island flap in 2 cases. In all cases, excellent healing of the flap was observed without partial or complete loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The submental island flap appears to be a reliable reconstruction when a previous contralateral neck dissection has been performed, even when level IA was included in the prior dissection.

Mucosal Melanoma of the Hard Palate: Surgical Treatment and Reconstruction

Mucosal melanomas of the head and neck region are uncommon pathologies that can affect the oral cavity, and are characterized by a high rate of mortality. Considering the lack of knowledge regarding risk and prognostic factors, current best clinical practice is represented by a large surgical excision with disease-free margins, eventually associated with a reconstructive flap. Indeed, given the frequent necessity of postoperative radiotherapy and fast healing process, a reconstruction of the surgical gap is advisable. Even if several flaps have been most commonly used, the submental island flap represents a valid alternative thanks to local advantages and similar oncologic outcomes compared to free flaps.

The contralateral based submental island flap for reconstruction of tongue and floor of mouth defects: Reliability and oncological outcome

BACKGROUND

Submental artery island flap (SIF) is a viable alternative to free flaps for selected oral-cavity defects, however, concerns about its oncologic safety still exists. A novel harvesting technique and its outcome is described in here.

METHODS

This is a prospective study for patients with lateralized oral tongue and/or floor of mouth (FOM) cancers who undergone reconstruction using pedicled SIF based on contralateral submental vessels (CSIF) following resection.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included. Twenty-four patients had T2, 13 had T3, and 4 had T1 tumors. The largest flap skin paddle was 15 × 9 cm. One patient sustained complete and five sustained partial flap loss. Three patients developed tongue tethering. Median follow-up was 13.6 months. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 11 patients (26.8%); 6 oral-cavity recurrences (14.6%), 6 ipsilateral, and 1 contralateral neck recurrences (2.4%).

CONCLUSION

CSIF is a reliable flap that addresses the oncologic controversy and overcomes the disadvantages of ipsilateral flap.