Tolerance of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Sinonasal Surgery

Demographics of Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Who Undergo Nasal Surgery

Objective

To assess the demographic characteristics between adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who did and did not undergo nasal surgery (NS).

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Kaiser Permanente Northern California clinical database.

Methods

Retrospective study of adult patients with ≥1 OSA diagnoses linked to clinical encounters from 2009 to 2016. Qualifying NS procedures performed on or after cohort entry through 2017 were ascertained. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared; multivariable logistic regression examined associations of these characteristics with undergoing NS.

Results

A total of 174,821 patients had an OSA diagnosis. Among these, 3518 (2.0%) underwent NS, including septoplasty (61.9%), sinus-related (12.9%), turbinate (14.2%), and rhinoplasty (11.1%) procedures. Compared to the nonsurgery group, NS patients were more likely to be male (75.5% vs 62.1%), younger (48.2 ± 13.0 vs 54.7 ± 14.1), have lower body mass index (31.8 ± 6.4 vs 34.3 ± 8.1), and no comorbid conditions (63.1% vs 53.5%), P < .001. After adjusting for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), neighborhood deprivation, and comorbidities, black and Asian/Pacific Islander adults with OSA had 42% and 46% decreased odds of undergoing NS compared with non-Hispanic white patients (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.58 [0.50-0.67] and 0.54 [0.49-0.61]), while Hispanic patients had similar odds (OR [95% CI]: 1.02 [0.93-1.12]). Patients living in neighborhoods of highest deprivation had 18% lower odds of undergoing NS, compared with patients from neighborhoods corresponding to areas of lowest deprivation (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.75-0.91]).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that younger age, male sex, lower BMI, and higher SES may be associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing NS in OSA patients.

The relationship between positive airway pressure tolerance and adherence: defining a new metric

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence rates range from 30% to 60%, yet adherent patients may still express dissatisfaction with treatment. The identification of factors affecting PAP tolerance could provide insight into its impact on adherence.

METHODS

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea presenting for first follow-up visit after newly initiating PAP therapy were given a 10-question PAP tolerance survey encompassing domains of psychosocial perception, practical issues, and side effects, utilizing 10-point visual analog scales. Relationships between adherence data, tolerance scores, and patient variables (demographics, sleep-related factors, comorbidities, usage data) were explored via 2-tailed t tests, multivariable regression analysis, and recursive partitioning regression trees with a significance level of P ≤ .05.

RESULTS

For 105 patients, tolerance scores were higher in patients considered adherent to therapy (P = .033), as were scores for individual survey questions addressing the ability to fall asleep (P = .013) and sleep through the night (P = .020). Depression positively (P = .006) and insomnia medication use negatively (P = .010) predicted tolerance score. Data-driven tolerance score cutoffs were identified to correlate with PAP adherence, with higher tolerance scores correlating with greater adherence rates.

CONCLUSIONS

PAP tolerance may play an important role in therapy adherence. Tolerance can be statistically defined and categorized based on prior adherence data. Its utility as a predictive tool in assessing future adherence is warranted.

CITATION

Tekumalla S, Plawecki A, Kaffenberger T, et al. The relationship between positive airway pressure tolerance and adherence: defining a new metric. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(7):1033-1038.

Obstructive sleep apnea for the rhinologist

PURPOSE

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a ubiquitous disease defined by repetitive partial or complete cessation of airflow during sleep caused by upper airway collapse. Otolaryngologists play a crucial role in the management of OSA, which is rapidly evolving with the advent of new surgical techniques and medical devices. Here we review the medical and surgical treatment options for OSA with a focus on unique considerations for patients with OSA who undergo nasal, sinus, and skull base surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of OSA includes both nonsurgical and surgical options. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy remains the first-line medical treatment for OSA, but alternatives such as oral appliance and positional therapy are viable alternatives. Surgical treatments include pharyngeal and tongue base surgery, hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy, and skeletal surgery. Nasal surgery has been shown to improve sleep quality and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) tolerance and usage. Sinus and skull base patients with comorbid OSA have special perioperative considerations for the rhinologist to consider such as the need for overnight observation and timing of CPAP therapy resumption.

SUMMARY

OSA patients present with special considerations for the rhinologist. Patients with moderate to severe OSA may benefit from overnight observation after ambulatory surgery, especially those with an elevated BMI, cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and those who are not using CPAP regularly at home. Though CPAP may be safely resumed in the perioperative setting of nasal, sinus, and skull base surgery, the exact timing depends on patient, surgeon, and systemic factors such as severity of OSA, CPAP pressures required, extent of surgery, and the postoperative monitoring setting. Lastly, nasal and sinus surgery can improve sleep quality and CPAP tolerance and compliance in patients with OSA.

Considerations for Functional Nasal Surgery in the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Population

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and nasal obstruction are common in the general population and frequently treated by otolaryngologists and facial plastic surgeons. Understanding the appropriate pre-, peri-, and postoperative management of OSA patients undergoing functional nasal surgery is important. OSA patients should be appropriately counseled in the preoperative period on their increased anesthetic risk. In OSA patients who are continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) intolerant, the role of drug-induced sleep endoscopy should be discussed with the patient, and depending on the surgeon's practice may prompt referral to a sleep specialist. Should multilevel airway surgery be indicated, it can safely be performed in most OSA patients. Surgeons should communicate with the anesthesiologist regarding an airway plan given this patient population's higher propensity for having a difficult airway. Given their increased risk of postoperative respiratory depression, extended recovery time should be given to these patients and the use of opioids as well as sedatives should be minimized. During surgery, one can consider using local nerve blocks to reduce postoperative pain and analgesic use. After surgery, clinicians can consider opioid alternatives such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Neuropathic agents, such as gabapentin, require further research in their indications for managing postoperative pain. CPAP is typically held for a period of time after functional rhinoplasty. The decision on when to restart CPAP should be individualized to the patient based on their comorbidities, OSA severity, and surgical maneuvers performed. More research would provide further guidance in this patient population to shape more specific recommendations regarding their perioperative and intraoperative course.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Clinical Efficacy of Nasal Surgery in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder characterized by upper airway obstruction during sleep. To reduce the morbidity of OSA, sleep specialists have explored various methods of managing the condition, including manifold positive airway pressure (PAP) techniques and surgical procedures. Nasal obstruction can cause significant discomfort during sleep, and it is likely that improving nasal obstruction would enhance the quality of life and PAP compliance of OSA patients. Many reliable studies have offered evidence to support this assumption. However, few comprehensive guidelines for managing OSA through nasal surgery encompass all this evidence. In order to address this gap, the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (KORL-HNS) and the Korean Society of Sleep and Breathing designated a guideline development group (GDG) to develop recommendations for nasal surgery in OSA patients. Several databases, including OVID Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed, were searched to identify all relevant papers using a predefined search strategy. The types of nasal surgery included septoplasty, turbinate surgery, nasal valve surgery, septorhinoplasty, and endoscopic sinus surgery. When insufficient evidence was found, the GDG sought expert opinions and attempted to fill the evidence gap. Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians' grading system. The GDG developed 10 key action statements with supporting text to support them. Three statements are ranked as strong recommendations, three are only recommendations, and four can be considered options. The GDG hopes that this clinical practice guideline will help physicians make optimal decisions when caring for OSA patients. Conversely, the statements in this guideline are not intended to limit or restrict physicians' care based on their experience and assessment of individual patients.

The safety of respiratory positive pressure support immediately following pediatric tonsillectomy

INTRODUCTION

Adenotonsillectomy is the first-line treatment for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The postoperative course may be complicated by hypoxia, requiring intervention. Positive pressure respiratory support (PPS) could be used to bridge the postoperative period and avoid invasive mechanical ventilation; however, the safety of PPS following tonsillectomy has not been established. Objective To review the incidence of complications and risk factors associated with PPS use immediately after tonsillectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2020 of patients who underwent tonsillectomy and were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at a single healthcare system.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty patients met inclusion criteria, including 101 patients treated with PPS immediately following surgery. A similar number of patients were diagnosed with severe OSA in each group prior to surgery. One patient in the PPS cohort developed pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax. Eleven patients (12%) in the PPS group and 18 patients (2%) in the non-PPS group developed life-threatening complications, defined as pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum, re-intubation, post-tonsillectomy bleeding that required surgical intervention, pulmonary edema and death, and all occurred in patients who had not used PPS at baseline. Regression analysis identified body mass index, surgical technique, and PPS use to be associated with increased odds of life-threatening complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that PPS is generally safe to use. New-onset PPS is associated with increased odds of life-threatening complications, likely reflecting a severe post-surgical clinical course.

The Effect of Pharyngeal Surgery on Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-Analysis

There is controversy about the effect of pharyngeal surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence, and the related results of meta-analysis have not yet been available. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of pharyngeal OSA surgery on PAP therapy parameters such as optimal pressure levels and usage time. We selected studies investigating optimal PAP levels or usage time before and after pharyngeal OSA surgery, regardless of the study design. Pharyngeal OSA surgery included uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and its variants, tonsillectomy, Pillar implants, radiofrequency ablation, tongue base surgery and its variants, and genioglossus advancement. Studies in which isolated nasal surgery was performed were excluded. The random-effects model was used due to significant heterogeneity among the studies. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis of optimal PAP levels, and five studies in the meta-analysis of PAP usage time. After pharyngeal OSA surgery, the summed optimal PAP level was significantly decreased (standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.113; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.667 to -0.559)), and the summed usage time of PAP was significantly increased (SMD, 0.794; 95% CI, 0.259 to 1.329). This study illustrated that pharyngeal OSA surgery lowered optimal PAP levels and enhanced PAP usage time. The results of the meta-analysis contribute to our understanding of the role of pharyngeal OSA surgery in patients with PAP intolerance.

Surgical correction of nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea improves CPAP outcomes and compliance

BACKGROUND

Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy curtails most of the negative impacts of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), its efficacy is limited by its low long-term adherence. Nasal obstruction contributes to OSA pathophysiology and necessitates high CPAP titration pressures which reduce CPAP compliance.

AIM

This study aims at elucidating the outcomes of surgical correction of nasal obstruction in patients intolerant to CPAP therapy.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients with severe OSA intolerant to CPAP secondary to surgically correctable nasal obstruction were operated upon. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at least 3 months after the surgical intervention. Subjective assessment entailed the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score (NOSE) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Objectively the patients were assessed by acoustic rhinometry and standard polysomnography.

RESULTS

Nasal surgical intervention resulted in an a statistically significant decrease in the mean NOSE score, ESS and optimal CPAP titration pressure. In addition, the minimal cross-sectional area (MCA1&2) increased significantly postoperatively. There was a positive correlation between the improvement in NOSE score as well as the MCA1& 2 and the postoperative decrease in CPAP titration pressure. Surgical correction of nasal obstruction improved CPAP outcomes and compliance in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal surgery in OSA objectively assessed by acoustic rhinometry improved nasal obstruction with a resultant decrease in the CPAP pressure requirements. Given that lower CPAP pressures improve adherence to CPAP therapy, surgical alleviation of nasal obstruction should be considered a crucial intervention in the management armamentarium of OSA.

Independent Role of Nasal Congestion in Positive Airway Pressure Compliance for OSA Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To determine the independent role of nasal congestion in positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy compliance and factors associated with an unfavorable shift of PAP compliance.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

This follow-up study comprised 174 patients with newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who accepted PAP therapy from January 2017 to June 2019. Information was collected on basic demographics, comorbidities, sleep-related symptoms, nasal symptoms, and upper airway assessment. PAP adherence data were collected at the end of the first week and the third month.

RESULTS

After 3 months of follow-up, 147 participants were included for final data analysis. The proportion of nasal congestion (29.2% vs 52.0%, P = .005) and its severity (mean rank, 58.5 vs 75.1; P = .007) were significantly higher in the noncompliance group as compared with the compliance group. After adjustment for basic demographics, comorbidities, sleep-related symptoms or sleep study parameters, and Friedman clinical staging, multinomial logistic regression models showed that nasal congestion (all odds ratios >2.0, P < .05) was independently associated with a higher odds of PAP noncompliance. Patients with an unfavorable shift of PAP compliance were younger (mean ± SD, 47.5 ± 10.6 vs 53.1 ± 12.6 years; P = .021) and had a lower body mass index (27.2 ± 3.7 vs 29.3 ± 5.0, P = .027) than those who consistently complied. OSA severity was associated with PAP compliance, initially and in the long term.

CONCLUSION

Nasal congestion is an independent predictor of PAP noncompliance. Younger patients with lower BMI were more likely to have an unfavorable shift of PAP compliance. Initial and long-term adherence to PAP therapy was affected by OSA severity.