Type 2 Inflammatory Shift in Chronic Rhinosinusitis During 2007-2018 in Belgium

Diagnostic biomarkers for chronic rhinosinusitis in adult asthmatics in real-world practice

Background

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common comorbid condition of asthma that affects the long-term outcome of asthmatic patients. CRS is a heterogeneous disease requiring multiple biomarkers to explain its pathogenesis. This study aimed to develop potential biomarkers for predicting CRS in adult asthmatic patients in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods

This study enrolled 108 adult asthmatic patients who had maintained anti-asthmatic medications, including medium-to-high doses of inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonists, and compared clinical characteristics between patients with CRS (CRS group) and those without CRS (non-CRS group). CRS was diagnosed based on the results of paranasal sinus X-ray and/or osteomeatal-unit CT as well as clinical symptoms. Type-2 parameters, including blood eosinophil count, serum levels of periostin/dipeptidyl peptidase 10 (DPP10) and clinical parameters, such as FEV1% and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), were analyzed. All biomarkers were evaluated by logistic regression and classification/regression tree (CRT) analyses.

Results

The CRS group had higher blood eosinophil counts/FeNO levels and prevalence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) than the non-CRS group (n = 57, 52.8% vs. n = 75, 47.2%; P < 0.05), but no differences in sex/smoking status or asthma control status were noted. The CRS group had higher serum periostin/DPP10 levels than the non-CRS group. Moreover, logistic regression demonstrated that serum periostin/DPP10 and the AERD phenotype were significant factors for predicting CRS in asthmatic patients (adjusted odds ratio, 2.14/1.94/12.39). A diagnostic algorithm and the optimal cutoff values determined by CRT analysis were able to predict CRS with 86.27% sensitivity (a 0.17 negative likelihood ratio).

Conclusion

Serum periostin, DPP10 and the phenotype of AERD are valuable biomarkers for predicting CRS in adult asthmatic patients in clinical practice.

[Experience of biological therapy in severe forms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the conditions of regional healthcare]

Recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with a predominant Th2 endotype of inflammation, including associated with bronchial asthma and/or allergic rhinitis, aspirin triad, refers to diseases with an insufficient level of control, despite the use of a wide range of options for conservative and surgical treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze our own experience, clinical and organizational features of the application of the method of biological therapy in patients with severe forms of recurrent CRSwNP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

25 patients with severe and moderate forms of CRSwNP were examined, who, in a round-the-clock hospital (model CSG 36.018) was treated with Dupilumab, in the form of subcutaneous injections of 300 mg/2 ml 1 every two weeks. The diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of anamnestic data, SNOT-22 quality of life questionnaires, visual endoscopic examination, evaluation of CT data (Lund-Mackay scale), laboratory data. The effectiveness of treatment was monitored after 16 weeks, based on endoscopic examination data, evaluation of CT and SNOT-22 data. In 3 observations, a study of pathomorphological material for tissue eosinophilia was performed.

RESULTS

The duration of the course of treatment ranged from 10 to 56 weeks. The most striking clinical effect was observed for signs such as sense of smell and nasal breathing (in some cases-after the first injection). The degree of regression of polyps according to CT and endoscopic examination was more prolonged in time, the same dynamics was observed in the level of total IgE. In a number of patients, the phenomenon of eosinophilia growth was observed against the background of treatment (with regression of clinical symptoms). Pathomorphological examination confirmed a high level of tissue eosinophilia as one of the fundamental signs of Th2 inflammation. One patient with concomitant chronic tubar dysfunction had an improvement in hearing. All patients with AD noted a subjective improvement in disease control (a decrease in the frequency and severity of choking attacks). The cancellation (break in treatment) of treatment was accompanied by a gradual return of symptoms in all patients at various times.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have not achieved an acceptable level of control of CRSwNP,that meets the criteria of Th2 inflammation can be considered as candidates for the use of targeted biological therapy. With strict compliance with the selection criteria, there is a good clinical effect, primarily in relation to nasal symptoms (sense of smell and nasal breathing) and improved control of asthma symptoms.

Advances in chronic rhinosinusitis in 2020 and 2021

Major progress has been achieved in the understanding and clinical practice of chronic rhinosinusitis, with or without nasal polyps. These advances resulted in a better understanding of the pathophysiology, the distribution into subgroups, and consequently in a better management perspective using classical approaches and biologics. Pathomechanisms, endotypes and biomarkers, and finally innovative therapeutic approaches are themes especially for the more severe forms of chronic rhinosinusitis, those with uncontrolled severe nasal polyps. Biologicals against key type 2 cytokines are gaining ground in the long-term treatment approaches of often recurrent nasal polyps, and should be integrated in care pathways making use of classical and innovative treatment pathways. These areas of interest show a fast development and will profoundly change our disease management within a decade.

Revisiting Asian chronic rhinosinusitis in the era of type 2 biologics

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a highly heterogeneous disorder exhibiting considerable epidemiological, clinical and immunopathological variations across patients with distinct ethnic backgrounds and in different geographic locations. Asian CRS patients present less eosinophilic and type 2 (T2) inflammation, but more prominent neutrophilic inflammation compared with patients in Western countries. Although several biologics targeting important elements of T2 inflammation, such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IgE, demonstrate promising benefit for Caucasian patients with recurrent nasal polyps, their efficacy in Asian patients remains poorly defined. The distinct endotypes in Asian patients warrant the identification and selection of patients who would benefit from T2 biologics in Asian countries. Additionally, developing novel treatments targeting neutrophilic, type 1, and type 3 inflammation may benefit approximately 50% of Asian CRS patients with non-T2 inflammation. In this review, we summarized and discussed recent progress in the study of Asian CRS endotypes in comparison with those in patients in Western countries, and the methods of identifying Asian patients with eosinophilic or T2 inflammation. T2 biologic treatment of Asian CRS patients, potential therapeutic candidates targeting non-T2 inflammation in Asian CRS patients and the progress on developing other T2 biologics were discussed.

Practical Review of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Well-characterized in chronic rhinosinusitis, type 2 inflammation is frequently associated with nasal polyps, comorbid asthma, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity. Despite medical and surgical treatment, it recurs in a significant proportion of patients. Thus, severe uncontrolled type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is the most difficult-to-treat phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis. Recently, dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-4 receptor α, and omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody against immunoglobulin E, were approved for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the United States, Europe, and Korea. Therefore, rhinologists should understand novel biologics and their use. Here, we provide a literature review of several biologics with their indications, effectiveness, and safety.

Rethinking neutrophils and eosinophils in chronic rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) often is characterized by an eosinophilic inflammatory pattern, nowadays referred to as type 2 inflammation, although the mucosal inflammation is dominated by neutrophils in about a third of the patients. Neutrophils are typically predominant in 50% of patients with CRS without nasal polyps, but also are found to play a role in patients with severe type 2 CRS with nasal polyp disease. This review aims at summarizing the current understanding of the eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation in CRS pathophysiology, and provides a discussion of their reciprocal interactions and the clinical impact of the mixed presentation in patients with severe type 2 CRS with nasal polyps. A solid understanding of these interactions is of utmost importance when treating uncontrolled severe CRS with nasal polyps with biologicals that are preferentially directed toward type 2 inflammation. We here focus on recent findings on both eosinophilic and neutrophilic granulocytes, their subgroups and the activation status, and their interactions in CRS.