Are Spanish-Speaking Families Less Satisfied with Care in Pediatric Otolaryngology?

Association of ethnicity and time to surgery among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Objectives

Determine factors associated with delayed endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic center. Patients were included in the study if they were at least 18 years old and underwent surgery for CRS. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed to collect demographic and clinical data. Patients with CRS secondary to another pathology such as malignancy were excluded. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine factors associated with the number of days between a patient's preoperative consultation and the date of surgery.

Results

A total of 103 patients with a mean age of 46.6 ± 16.8 years were included in the analysis; 51.5% of patients were females, 46.6% identified as White, and 29.1% identified as Hispanic. The majority of patients (67.0%) had preferred provider organization health insurance; 43.7% of patients had nasal polyps, 70.9% had a deviated nasal septum, and the mean preoperative Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22 (SNOT-22) score was 41.0 ± 23.8. The mean time to surgery after the final preoperative visit was 71.7 days ± 65.6 days. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with increased time to surgery (p < .05) when controlling for other variables. No other variables were associated with time to surgery on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Hispanic ethnicity may be an independent predictor of increased time to sinus surgery independent of disease severity and other demographic variables.

Level of Evidence

2b.

Understanding Hispanic Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth During COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have described the use of telehealth for pediatric surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate equity in telehealth use by comparing rates of utilization and satisfaction with pediatric surgical telemedicine among Hispanic patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients seen by a surgical subspecialty provider in the outpatient setting at a quaternary pediatric hospital between April 1 and June 30, 2020. Patients evaluated in the same three-month period in 2019 were analyzed as a historic control. Differences in Family Experience Survey (FES) responses based on race and ethnicity and preferred language of care were assessed using univariable and multivariable generalized linear modeling.

RESULTS

The pandemic cohort included fewer patients of Hispanic ethnicity and fewer Spanish-speakers. After controlling for visit type, comparison of Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients revealed that Spanish-speaking families had significantly lower scores for FES items that evaluated healthcare provider explaining (IRR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.90), listening (IRR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92), and time spent with the family (IRR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.89). There were no differences in FES responses based on insurance status or degree of medical complexity.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth services were less commonly used among Hispanic and Spanish-speaking patients. Language may differentially affect family satisfaction with healthcare and telehealth solutions. Strategies to mitigate these inequities are needed and may include strengthening interpreter services and providing language-concordant care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Impact of Language and Ethnicity on Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after tracheostomy between children from Spanish- and English-speaking families.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care children's hospital.

METHODS

All children <18 years of age who had a tracheostomy placed between 2014 and 2020 were included. Comorbidities and postsurgical outcomes were compared between (1) children whose families preferred speaking Spanish or identified as Hispanic/Latino and (2) children from English-language or non-Hispanic families.

RESULTS

A total of 339 children met inclusion, with 11% (37/339) from families identifying Spanish as their primary language and 33% (112/339) identifying as Hispanic. Spanish-speaking families were more likely to have tracheostomy-dependent children with cardiac conditions (65% vs 42%, P = .008) and high complexity (72% vs 49%, P = .007). Outcomes were similar regardless of language preference, with 45% (153/339) still tracheostomy dependent, 28% (94/339) decannulated, and 6.8% (23/339) deceased at a median follow-up of 1.77 years (interquartile range, 0.65-3.43). Severe neurocognitive disabilities were similar between Spanish- and English-language families (P > .05). Spanish language was not associated with times to decannulation or death in univariate or multiple regression models. A sensitivity analysis of self-identified Hispanic or Latino patients did not show significant differences for time to decannulation, death, or neurocognitive disability rates (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Spanish language and Hispanic ethnicity appear to have minimal impact on pediatric tracheostomy outcomes.