Disparities in Speech Therapy for Voice Disorders Between English- and Non-English-Speaking Patients

Impact of Patient Factors on Attendance at Remote Telehealth Swallow Therapy

In-person swallow therapy is a primary and effective treatment for dysphagia. However, remote telehealth is now a widely utilized component of healthcare delivery for therapeutic interventions. This study evaluates potential factors influencing attendance at telehealth swallow therapy. Retrospective review of 308 patients referred for telehealth swallow therapy from April 2020-November 2021 included patient referral diagnosis, diagnostic swallowing evaluations, and sociodemographic information including age, race, health insurance, interpreter use, and socioeconomic status. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared patient and appointment factors for those who attended telehealth swallow therapy with those who did not attend. Overall, 71.8% of patients attended at least one telehealth swallow therapy appointment while 28.2% did not attend any. The most common referral diagnoses were "Cancer" (19.2%) and "Dysphagia Unspecified" (19.2%). Patients diagnosed with "Cancer" and "Muscle Tension" were significantly less likely to attend telehealth swallow therapy compared to those with "Dysphagia Unspecified," "Globus," and "Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease/Laryngopharyngeal Reflux" after adjusting for covariates. Lower socioeconomic status (p = 0.023), no interpreter use (p < 0.001), and more diagnostic evaluations (p = 0.001) correlated with higher telehealth swallow therapy attendance. Race and sex did not correlate with attendance. Most patients referred to telehealth swallow therapy attended at least one appointment. Patients with dysphagia associated with cancer and muscle tension, those with higher socioeconomic status, interpreter use, and fewer diagnostic swallowing evaluations were less likely to attend telehealth swallow therapy. Future research should investigate and compare attendance and efficacy of telehealth swallow therapy with in-person therapy.

'Hearing silences': Exploring culturally safe transitional care: A qualitative study among Turkish-speaking migrant frail older adults

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the experiences and transitional care needs of Turkish frail older adults living in the UK and determine how this information can be utilized to improve the provision of culturally sensitive care during the transitional period.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive research with semi-structured individual interviews.

METHODS

"The 'Silences' Framework guided the research design, from conceptualizing the research question to structuring the report of final outputs. For this study, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with sixteen older adults living with frailty and five family caregivers between January and May of 2023 in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

Major themes that were identified included: (i) information and communication, (ii) care and support, (iii) the role of culture and (iv) trust and satisfaction. Further analysis, through discussion and immersion in the data, revealed that care transition periods were presented alongside three phases of transitional care: pre-transition (during hospitalization), early-transition (the period between discharge and the 7th day after discharge) and late transition (the period between the 8th day and 12th month after discharge).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that the communication and informational needs of frail older individuals change during the transition period. While Turkish older adults and family caregivers expressed satisfaction with healthcare services in the UK, many struggled due to a lack of knowledge on how to access them.

IMPACT

The support of family caregivers is a crucial component in facilitating transitional care for frail older patients, as they help in accessing healthcare services and using technological devices or platforms. It should be noted that family caregivers often hold the same level of authority as their elderly Turkish counterparts.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Potential Risks for Healthcare Disparities Among Individuals With Voice and Upper Airway Disorders: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess the potential epidemiological association between various possible risk factors and healthcare disparities specifically related to the access, use and/or quality of speech language pathology services for individuals with voice and upper airway disorders.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Full text journal articles were identified through PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science. The reference sections of included articles were also manually screened and identified four additional studies for consideration of inclusion. Included articles specifically addressed healthcare disparities in voice and upper airway disorders related to speech pathology care. International literature was excluded. Eligible studies were reviewed and data extracted. Risk of bias of each eligible study was performed using the quality assessment tool from National Institute of Health for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Data from eligible studies were synthesized thematically.

RESULTS

A total of 1,101 resources were retrieved from the search; of these, 133 were duplicates. Titles and abstracts of 968 articles were screened, with 14 selected for full-text review. Eleven articles were considered eligible for inclusion. Voice disorders were the condition most frequently examined followed by only one article addressing upper airways disorders. There was considerable heterogeneity in the methodology and statistical analyses among the eligible papers. There was a lack of standard methodology for collecting and accurately determining patient characteristics as well as variability in measuring confounding variables and providing statistical analyses for such adjustments that may have impacted the findings. The information extracted from these articles revealed healthcare disparities related to sex/gender, age, insurance status/coverage, race/ethnicity, among others including etiology and preferred language.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the limited research on speech language pathology-specific healthcare disparities for individuals with voice and upper airway disorders. There was significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity between studies which may have contributed to varied results between studies. There is a need for greater methodological rigor and prospectively designed studies to better characterize the impact of disparities in the access to, use of, and quality of speech pathology care for this patient population.

Social Determinants of Health: Implications for Voice Disorders and Their Treatment

PURPOSE

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and related conditions, such as discrimination, are social determinants of health (SDOHs). Critical race theory (CRT) is a lens through which to understand SDOHs in a way that may impact our clinical care. When prolonged or chronic, SDOHs might cause toxic stress and trauma, which, in turn, adversely affect health and are shown to be relevant for some voice disorders. The goals of this tutorial are to (a) review the literature on SDOHs that potentially contribute to disparities; (b) discuss explanatory models and theories that describe how psychosocial factors influence health; (c) relate the foregoing information to voice disorders, highlighting functional voice disorders (FVDs) as a particular case in point; and (d) describe how trauma-informed care can improve patient outcomes and advance health equity for vulnerable populations.

CONCLUSIONS

This tutorial concludes with a call for heightened awareness of the role that SDOHs such as structural and individual discrimination may play in voice disorders, and a call for research into SDOHs, traumatic stress, and health disparities in this patient population. A call is also made for more universal practice of trauma-informed care in the clinical voice domain.

Effects of Language, Age, and Hearing Loss on Health-Related Quality of Life

Objective

To understand the effect of age on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hearing loss and determine how primary language mediates this relationship.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

General otolaryngology clinic in Los Angeles.

Methods

Demographics, medical records, and HRQoL data of adult patients presenting with otology symptoms were reviewed. HRQoL was measured using the Short-Form 6-Dimension utility index. All patients underwent audiological testing. A path analysis was performed to generate a moderated path analysis with HRQoL as the primary outcome.

Results

This study included 255 patients (mean age = 54 years; 55% female; 27.8% did not speak English as a primary language). Age had a positive direct association with HRQoL (p < .001). However, the direction of this association was reversed by hearing loss. Older patients exhibited significantly worse hearing (p < .001), which was negatively associated with HRQoL (p < .05). Primary language moderated the relationship between age and hearing loss. Specifically, patients who did not speak English as a primary language had significantly worse hearing (p < .001) and therefore worse HRQoL (p < .01) than patients who spoke English as a primary language with hearing loss. Increasing age was associated with bilateral hearing loss compared to unilateral hearing loss (p < .001) and subsequently lower HRQoL (p < .001). Polypharmacy (p < .01) and female gender (p < .01) were significantly associated with lower HRQoL.

Conclusion

Among otolaryngology patients with otology symptoms, older age and not speaking English as a primary language were associated with worse hearing and subsequently lower HRQoL.

Demographic differences in the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis

Objective

To determine the impact of patient demographics and social determinants of health on treatment pathways for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) at a tertiary laryngology clinic.

Study design

Retrospective medical record review.

Methods

Patient demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and insurance status) were extracted for adults diagnosed with UVFP between 2009 and 2019. Odds ratios for the associations between sociodemographic factors and UVFP treatment pathways were determined by chi-square analyses.

Results

A total of 1490 UVFP diagnoses were identified during the study period with the majority being female (58%), White (85%), non-Hispanic (97%), and publicly insured (54%). Five treatment pathways were identified: observation, injection laryngoplasty, voice therapy, laryngeal framework surgery/thyroplasty, and reinnervation surgery. There were 538 patients who underwent observation, 512 injection laryngoplasty, 366 voice therapy, 136 thyroplasty, and 26 laryngeal reinnervation surgery. Males were more likely to undergo injection laryngoplasty than females (OR 1.32; CI 1.08-1.61), whereas females were more likely to undergo voice therapy (OR 1.39; CI 1.09-1.76). Patients with public insurance (OR 1.48; CI 1.03-2.14) and Hispanics (OR 2.60; CI 1.18-5.72) were more likely to undergo thyroplasty. Patients who underwent reinnervation surgery were younger than those in other treatment pathways (median: 39.1 years vs. 50.7-56.1 years).

Conclusions

Gender, ethnicity, and insurance status were significantly associated with specific UVFP treatment pathways. Patients with public insurance were more likely to undergo surgical intervention than voice therapy. This data overall supports differences in care pathway utilization for UVFP based on social determinants of health.

Level of evidence

Level IV.