Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease is More Severe in Obese Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Management: A Narrative Review

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common and often misinterpreted clinical entity responsible for various symptoms affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. This narrative literature review aims to review the pathophysiology, symptoms, and management of LPR, emphasizing the emerging understanding of gastric content reflux in aerodigestive tissue irritation. Understanding the pathophysiology of LPR will allow general practitioners and specialists to accurately recognize and treat a condition that causes substantial morbidity in the affected patients. Using evidence-based findings from randomized controlled trials, clinical studies, and meta-analyses, the present investigation aims to outline and unify previous research into LPR. A review of anatomical structures, pathogenic mechanisms, endoscopic findings in LPR, and clinical manifestations and treatment options are also discussed. Though controversy around the diagnosis and management of LPR persists, emerging research in cellular damage and diagnostic tools promises to provide increasingly accurate and reliable modalities for characterizing LPR. Hopefully, future research will unify the field and provide overarching guidelines for both primary care and specialists. The present investigation provides an integrated perspective on LPR, a clinically prevalent and complex disease.

The Dubai Definition and Diagnostic Criteria of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The IFOS Consensus

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to gather an international consensus group to propose a global definition and diagnostic approach of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) to guide primary care and specialist physicians in the management of LPR.

METHODS

Forty-eight international experts (otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and physiologists) were included in a modified Delphi process to revise 48 statements about definition, clinical presentation, and diagnostic approaches to LPR. Three voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 8/10. Votes were anonymous and the analyses of voting rounds were performed by an independent statistician.

RESULTS

After the third round, 79.2% of statements (N = 38/48) were approved. LPR was defined as a disease of the upper aerodigestive tract resulting from the direct and/or indirect effects of gastroduodenal content reflux, inducing morphological and/or neurological changes in the upper aerodigestive tract. LPR is associated with recognized non-specific laryngeal and extra-laryngeal symptoms and signs that can be evaluated with validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires and clinical instruments. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing can suggest the diagnosis of LPR when there is >1 acid, weakly acid or nonacid hypopharyngeal reflux event in 24 h.

CONCLUSION

A global consensus definition for LPR is presented to improve detection and diagnosis of the disease for otolaryngologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care practitioners. The approved statements are offered to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated diagnostic approaches to LPR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 Laryngoscope, 134:1614-1624, 2024.

Integrative effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on esophageal motility and pharyngeal symptoms via vagal mechanisms in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

Background and aim

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is primarily characterized by discomfort in the pharynx and has limited treatment options. This research aimed to assess the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) in patients with LPRD and delve into the potential underlying mechanisms.

Methods

A total of 44 participants, diagnosed with LPRD were divided into two groups randomly. Twice-daily stimulation was delivered for 2 weeks for patients in experimental group, with stimulation ranging from 1.0 mA to 1.5 mA (n = 22), while the control group underwent sham tVNS (n = 22) with the same stimulation parameters and different anatomical location. The severity of symptoms and levels of anxiety and depression were monitored using questionnaires. High-resolution esophageal manometry data were collected, and the patients' autonomic function was assessed through heart rate variability analysis.

Results

There was a positive correlation between reflux symptom index (RSI) scores and low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio (r = 0.619; p < 0.001), Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) scores (r = 0.623; p < 0.001), and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) scores (r = 0.593; p < 0.001). Compared to the pre-tVNS phase, RSI (p < 0.001), HAMA (p < 0.001), and HAMD (p < 0.001) scores were significantly reduced after 2 weeks of treatment. Additionally, the resting pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter (UESP; p < 0.05) and lower esophageal sphincter (LESP; p < 0.05) showed significant enhancement. Notably, tVNS led to an increase in root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD; p < 0.05) and high frequency (HF; p < 0.05) within heart rate variability compared to the pre-treatment baseline. Compared to the control group, RSI (p < 0.001), HAMA (p < 0.001), and HAMD (p < 0.001) scores in tVNS group were significantly lower at the end of treatment. Similarly, the resting pressure of UESP (p < 0.05) and LESP (p < 0.05) in tVNS group were significantly higher than that of control group. Notably, RMSSD (p < 0.05) and HF (p < 0.05) in tVNS group were significantly higher than that of control group.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that tVNS as a therapeutic approach is effective in alleviating LPRD symptoms. Furthermore, it suggests that improvements in esophageal motility could be associated with vagus nerve-dependent mechanisms.

Review article: Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux

BACKGROUND

Laryngopharyngeal reflux has classically referred to gastroesophageal reflux leading to chronic laryngeal symptoms such as throat clearing, dysphonia, cough, globus sensation, sore throat or mucus in the throat. Current lack of clear diagnostic criteria significantly impairs practitioners' ability to identify and manage laryngopharyngeal reflux.

AIMS

To discuss current evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

METHODS

We selected studies primarily based on current guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux, and through PubMed searches.

RESULTS

We assess the current diagnostic modalities that can be used to determine if laryngopharyngeal reflux is the cause of a patient's laryngeal symptoms, as well as review some of the common treatments that have been used for these patients. In addition, we note that the lack of a clear diagnostic gold-standard, as well as specific diagnostic criteria, significantly limit clinicians' ability to determine adequate therapies for these patients. Finally, we identify areas of future research that are needed to better manage these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with chronic laryngeal symptoms are complex due to the heterogenous nature of symptom pathology, inconsistent definitions and variable response to therapies. Further outcomes data are critically needed to help elucidate ideal diagnostic workup and therapeutic management for these challenging patients.

Personalized Treatments Based on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Profiles: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current findings of the literature on the existence of several profiles of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients and to propose personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

A state-of-the art review of the literature was conducted using the PubMED, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The information related to epidemiology, demographics, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic responses were extracted to identify outcomes that may influence the clinical and therapeutic courses of LPR.

RESULTS

The clinical presentation and therapeutic courses of LPR may be influenced by gender, age, weight, comorbidities, dietary habits and culture, anxiety, stress, and saliva enzyme profile. The clinical expression of reflux, including laryngopharyngeal, respiratory, nasal, and eye symptoms, and the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring profile of patients are important issues to improve in patient management. The use of more personalized therapeutic strategies appears to be associated with better symptom relief and cures over the long-term. The role of pepsin in LPR physiology is well-established but the lack of information about the role of other gastrointestinal enzymes in the development of LPR-related mucosa inflammation limits the development of future enzyme-based personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux is a challenging ear, nose, and throat condition associated with poor therapeutic responses and a long-term burden in Western countries. Artificial intelligence should be used for developing personalized therapeutic strategies based on patient features.

Relationship Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adult Males

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with OSA who were hospitalized in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery from November 2021 to April 2022 were selected, and male patients with non-OSA during the same period were selected as the control group. Patients who participated in the study completed the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), the Reflux Finding Sign (RFS), and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring. RSI, RFS, and outcomes of 24 hour-MII-pH monitoring were compared between the OSA group and the control group.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were enrolled, of whom 49 were OSA patients and 37 were non-OSA patients. The positive rate of LPR (97.96% vs 75.68%) and the median number of LPR episodes (9 vs 5) were significantly higher in OSA patients than in non-OSA patients (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, respectively). A logistic regression model including body mass index, alcohol consumption, and the presence of OSA showed that having OSA was a risk factor for the occurrence of LPR (P < 0.05, OR [odds ratio] = 9.995, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.084-92.181). There were correlations between Apnea-Hypopnea Index and the number of non-acid LPR episodes and the number of alkaline LPR episodes (r = 0.243, P < 0.05, r = 0.274, P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Having OSA is a risk factor for LPR, and LPR episodes occur more frequently in patients with OSA compared to those without OSA. When OSA is comorbid with LPR, the occurrence of alkaline LPR, such as bile reflux, should be a concurrent concern.

Current Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a complex syndrome characterized by the reflux of gastroduodenal contents into the pharynx or larynx, resulting in a range of symptoms, including chronic cough, throat clearing, pain, dysphagia, hoarseness, and dysphonia. Despite the lack of a gold standard for diagnosis or treatment, various strategies have been proposed to manage LPR. However, the effectiveness of these treatments is compromised by the lack of a uniform treatment protocol, which places a burden on patients, physicians, and the healthcare system. This study aims to systematically review the treatments of LPR and provide updated and useful clinical information to clinical physicians. Methods: The literature with an emphasis on LPR and related keywords is searched and reviewed in PubMed. Results: Treatment of LPR includes health education, lifestyle modification, dietary changes, medications, and surgery, as well as the emergence of a novel treatment method involving external upper esophageal sphincter compression devices. Conclusions: Currently, medication is the main treatment, supplemented with lifestyle and dietary changes, but there is still a lack of effective means for patients with drug-resistant or intolerant LPR. More high-quality and rigorous trials must continue to be conducted to determine the best treatment options and find novel treatments. Taking into account the complexity of LPR, this study proposes a simple algorithm to help clinicians with the initial management of this disease.

Assessment of the Current Knowledge and Practice of General Practitioners Towards Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Saudi Arabia

Background General practitioners (GPs) have a significant role in the diagnosis of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Some published data revealed a lack of knowledge among GPs about the disease, consequently, this lack of knowledge impacted their performance. This survey aims to assess the current knowledge and practice of general practitioners regarding laryngopharyngeal reflux in Saudi Arabia. Methodology This survey study was conducted to assess the current knowledge and practice of general practitioners regarding laryngopharyngeal reflux in Saudi Arabia using an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed and collected from the five regions in Saudi Arabia, which are The Central Region (Riyadh, Qassim), Eastern Region (Dammam, Al-Kharj, Al-Ahasa), Western Region (Makkah, Madinah, Jeddah), Southern Region (Asir, Najran, Jizan), and Northern Region (Tabuk, Jouf, Hail). Results In the current study, we collected data from 387 general practitioners, 61.8% of whom were aged between 21-30 years old, and 57.4% of the participants were males. Moreover, 40.6% of the participants thought that both LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) share pathophysiology, however, they are two different diseases considering their clinical presentation. Moreover, it was found that heartburn was the most known symptom of LPR among the participants (Mean score 2.14 (SD=1.31), where a lower score indicated more relation). Considering the treatment of LPR, 40.6% and 40.3% of the participants reported using proton pump inhibitors once or twice daily respectively. In contrast, antihistamine/H2 blockers, alginate, and magaldrate were used to a lesser extent as reported by 27.1%, 21.7%, and 12.1%. Conclusion The current study showed limited knowledge among general practitioners considering LPR with a higher rate of referring patients to other departments depending on symptoms which may increase the pressure on other departments of mild cases.

Usefulness, acceptation and feasibility of electronic medical history tool in reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

To investigate usefulness, feasibility, and patient satisfaction of an electronic pre-consultation medical history tool (EPMH) in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) work-up.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with LPR were invited to complete electronic medical history assessment prior to laryngology consultation. EPMH collected the following parameters: demographic and epidemiological data, medication, medical and surgical histories, diet habits, stress and symptom findings. Stress and symptoms were assessed with perceived stress scale and reflux symptom score. Duration of consultation, acceptance, and satisfaction of patients (feasibility, usefulness, effectiveness, understanding of questions) were evaluated through a 9-item patient-reported outcome questionnaire.

RESULTS

Seventy patients completed the evaluation (93% participation rate). The mean age of cohort was 51.2 ± 15.6 years old. There were 35 females and 35 males. Patients who refused to participate (N = 5) were > 65 years old. The consultation duration was significantly lower in patients who used the EPMH (11.3 ± 2.7 min) compared with a control group (18.1 ± 5.1 min; p = 0.001). Ninety percent of patients were satisfied about EPMH easiness and usefulness, while 97.1% thought that EPMH may improve the disease management. Patients would recommend similar approach for otolaryngological or other specialty consultations in 98.6% and 92.8% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of EPMH is associated with adequate usefulness, feasibility, and satisfaction outcomes in patients with LPR. This software is a preliminary step in the development of an AI-based diagnostic decision support tool to help laryngologists in their daily practice. Future randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate the gain of similar approaches on the traditional consultation format.

Assessment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the potential association between presence of LPR symptoms and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a representative sample from a population-based study.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Participants of the follow-up of the Epidemiological Sleep Study were evaluated. Sleep was assessed through questionnaires and polysomnography. The presence of LPR was based on the questionnaire Reflux Score Index (RSI), and scores higher than 13 were suggestive of LPR. A general linear model test was used for comparison of continuous data and Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Predictors of LPR were obtained by regression analysis.

RESULTS

701 were enrolled (54.8% female, 45.2% male; mean age, 50.2 ± 13.3 years). The mean apnea-hypopnea index score was 17 ± 18.3 events/hr, and the mean RSI score was 7.0 ± 8.1. LPR was found in 17% of the volunteers, whereas OSA was present in 38.5% of the sample. Specifically, in those patients with OSA, the prevalence of LPR was 45.4%; however, there was no statistically significant association between LPR and the presence of OSA. The severity of OSA was not associated with RSI score. The presence of LPR was associated with older age, smoking, excessive daytime sleepiness and worse quality of life and sleep scores questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, smoking, but not body mass index, were associated with LPR. There was not statistically significant association of LPR with OSA. Individuals with symptoms of LPR had greater drowsiness and worse quality of life and sleep.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 132:1877-1882, 2022.

Analysis of effects of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and proton pump inhibitor treatment on Eustachian tube function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the effects of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment on Eustachian tube function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

The Eustachian tube score-7 (ETS-7) was observed before and after PPI treatment in the control group, OSA only group, and OSA + LPRD group.

RESULTS

Age, sex, smoking history, and drinking history showed no differences among 3 groups (P > .05). The body mass index (BMI) in the control group was lower than that in other groups (P < .017). Before PPI treatment, the abnormality rate of ETS-7 in the OSA + LPRD group statistically differed from that in the control group and the OSA only group (P < .017). After PPI treatment, the abnormality rate of ETS-7 in the OSA + LPRD group exhibited no significant differences compared with that in the control group and the OSA only group (P > .017), and it declined remarkably compared with that before PPI treatment (75% vs 35%, χ² = 13.334, P = .001). Moreover, the multivariate analysis revealed that only LPRD had an independent correlation with the abnormality of ETS-7 (OR = 1.245, 95% CI: 1.759-6.861, P = .000).

CONCLUSION

In view of its high incidence in OSA patients, LPRD may be a considerable factor for the high incidence of abnormality rate of ETS-7 in OSA patients, and PPI therapy is of significant value in improving Eustachian tube function in OSA patients with LPRD.

Correlation Between Refractory Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The occurrence, development, and prognosis of refractory laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) may be related to anxiety and depression. Our study aims to investigate anxiety and depressive symptoms in LPRD and clarify the correlations among them.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with LPRD and subsequently referred to the Department of Mental Health for treatment. The patients were divided into the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS)/Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) positive group (+) and the SAS/SDS negative group (-). All patients were treated (oral administration) with a standard dose of proton pump inhibitor (PPI, omeprazole 20 mg bid) plus one tablet of Deanxit (flupentixol-melitracen) after breakfast. Treatment efficacy was evaluated after one month of drug treatment. The therapeutic effect of PPI treatment alone was compared with that treated with PPI + Deanxit.

RESULTS

Among 28 patients with refractory LPRD, the main reflux symptoms and signs were specific. There were differences in gender distribution and age distribution among the 28 patients with refractory LPRD, and there were 17 patients (60.7%) in the SAS/SDS (+) group and 11 patients in the SAS/SDS (-) group (39.3%). Regarding efficacy evaluation after one month of PPI + Deanxit treatment, the differences in indices before and after treatment were statistically significant (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depressive symptoms influence the occurrence, development, and treatment efficacy of refractory LPRD. Attention to and targeted treatment of anxiety and depressive symptoms can help improve the treatment outcomes of patients with refractory LPRD.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common disorder in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). This meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the LPR prevalence in individuals with OSAHS and to analyze the correlation of LPR positivity with the clinical features of patients with OSAHS. A detailed review of the English and Chinese literature on the occurrence of LPR in patients with OSAHS was performed by employing online search tools such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, VIP, CNKI, WanFang, etc. Two researchers analyzed the studies for quality according to the STROBE standard checklist. The acquired data were analyzed using Stata 11.0 and R 3.6.1 software. The effect size was estimated and calculated using weighted mean difference (WMD) and correlation coefficients. Moreover, a combined analysis was performed by employing either a random- or fixed-effects model. Ultimately, 27 studies met our inclusion criteria. Our study revealed that the LPR prevalence in OSAHS patients was 49%. We carried out subgroup analyses as per OSAHS severity, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). The results suggested that the probability of LPR in European and American patients with OSAHS was higher, and the prevalence of LPR was higher in obese individuals and patients with severe OSAHS. Moreover, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and BMI were higher in LPR-positive OSAHS patients than in LPR-negative OSAHS patients, but no significant variation in age was observed in the two groups. Moreover, the reflux symptom index (RSI) scores and the reflux finding score (RFS) exhibited a positive correlation with AHI. The current literature shows a higher incidence of LPR in individuals with OSAHS (49%). The severity of AHI in individuals with OSAHS is associated with the presence of LPR. Patients with OSAHS accompanied by LPR showed higher BMI and AHI as compared to those patients with LPR-negative OSAHS.

The Association between Free Sugars Consumption and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Cross-Sectional Study among Chinese Adolescents

There is a lack of evidence to show prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the association between LPR and dietary factors. Adolescents consume the most amount of free sugars among the Chinese population. We conducted this study to investigate the prevalence of LPR in Chinese adolescents and explore the association between free sugars consumption and LPR. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1517 middle school students in Hunan, China. An online questionnaire was applied to collect data on the condition of LPR, consumption of free sugars and other self-reported covariates. Height, weight and waist circumference were collected by anthropometric measurements. Logistic regression was applied to assess the association between LPR and free sugars consumption. The mean and standard deviation of free sugars consumption was 53.14 ± 44.75 (g/d). The prevalence of LPR was 8.11%. A positive association was observed between LPR and higher free sugars consumption after adjusted multiple covariates, with adjusted odds ratio (95% confident interval) of 1.656 (1.125–2.438). The prevalence of LPR among Chinese adolescents was high. Further analytic studies with strict design are required to test the association between LPR and free sugar consumption. Systematic strategies and policies should to be developed to reduce the intake of free sugars in order to prevent LPR.