1
|
Rayan A, Shahine MS, Rezk K, Zahran AM, Aboshanif MM, Gamal DA. The dogma of cetuximab in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after failure of surgery and radiotherapy: is it true among patients in upper Egypt? Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1611. [PMID: 38414964 PMCID: PMC10898904 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and aim We aimed from the current study to explore the treatment results of cetuximab in combination with a weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel regimen in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) after failure of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods This study was a non-randomised, single arm, phase 2 efficacy study conducted in two oncology centres in upper Egypt, we recruited 31 patients with recurrent HNSCC previously treated with concurrent chemoradiation ± surgery to receive weekly cetuximab, carboplatin and paclitaxel for 18 weeks followed by maintenance cetuximab every 2 weeks for 12 months. All patients underwent intention to treat analysis. Results The current study revealed a significant reduction of the size of recurrent primary lesion (p < 0.001), without comparable significant reduction of regional lymph nodes (LNs) (p = 0.06), the current overall response rate (ORR) was 83.9%, ≥1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 58.1%, also surgical intervention was succeeded to salvage 32.3% who did not achieve complete response to the current protocol, the median PFS was 12 months which was significantly affected by tumour site (p = 0.012), programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) expression (p = 0.01) and overall response rate (ORR) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Based on favourable treatment outcomes, including high ORR and disease control rate, improved median PFS and tolerable toxicity profile, the current weekly cetuximab, carboplatin and paclitaxel with 1 year maintenance cetuximab in responding patients is considered a feasible and effective regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal Rayan
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
- https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-9177
| | - Mohammed S Shahine
- Maxillofacial Surgery, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | - Khalid Rezk
- Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | - Asmaa M Zahran
- Clinical Pathology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | | | - Doaa A Gamal
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Effect of transoral laser microsurgery vs open partial laryngectomy on the prognosis of patients with early laryngeal carcinoma: propensity score-based analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:1301-1310. [PMID: 36239784 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07671-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of surgical procedures (transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and open partial laryngectomy (OPL)) on the prognosis of patients with early laryngeal cancer. METHODS A total of 760 patients diagnosed with early laryngeal cancer (T1-2N0M0) and treated with TLM (n = 416) or OPL (n = 344) between 2004 and 2015 were abstracted from the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) were performed to obtain comparable cohorts. The survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses with a false discovery rate (FDR) correction were applied to contrast the association between two surgical approaches and overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS The 5-year OS for the TLM group was 79.5% versus 77.7% for the OPL group (P = 0.619). Similar results were revealed for the comparison of 5-year DSS rates (91.1% versus 91.5%, P = 0.891). After PSM and SIPTW balance the confounding factors, no significant difference was observed in the OS and DSS of patients treated with TLM compared to patients treated with OPL. The consistent results were still yielded (all P > 0.05), when stratified by gender, age, year of diagnosis, residence, household income, tumor site, T stage, differentiation, and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION This study provides strong evidence that there is no significant difference in the prognosis of early laryngeal carcinoma between the treatment of TLM and OPL, which may be helpful to guide the clinical decision-making of these patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen TH, Pan YY, Lee TL, Wang LW, Tai SK, Chu PY, Lo WL, Wu CH, Yang MH, Chang PMH. Treatment outcomes of cetuximab-containing regimen in locoregional recurrent and distant metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1336. [PMID: 36539738 PMCID: PMC9769042 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10440-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent/ metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCNH) is still a difficult-to-treat disease with poor clinical outcomes and limited treatment choices. In view of locoregional recurrent versus distant metastatic SCCHN, the therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab-containing regimen and relevant prognostic factors for these two groups may be different. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the treatment outcomes of cetuximab-containing regimen in locoregional recurrent and distant metastatic SCCHN groups, and to identify clinical factors correlated with better survival outcomes. METHODS From 2016 to 2020, patients with R/M SCCHN who received cetuximab-containing regimen in our institute were enrolled in this study. Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated in both locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis groups. Exploratory analysis were conducted to investigate major clinical features associated with better outcomes. RESULTS A total of 107 patients with locoregional recurrent SCCHN (N = 66) and distant metastatic SCCNH (N = 41) who received cetuximab-containing regimen were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with oral cavity cancer and patients with disease recurrence within 6 months after radiation therapy were significantly increased in locoregional recurrence group. The median OS (15.6 vs. 9.7 months, P = 0.004) and PFS (5.8 months vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.008) were longer in locoregional recurrence group than in distant metastasis group. In multivariate analysis of clinical features, locoregional recurrence was still an important risk factor associated with better OS (Hazzard ratio (HR) 0.64, p = 0.06) and PFS (HR 0.67, p = 0.075). In addition, a trend of favorable disease control rate (DCR; 62.5% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.056) was noted in locoregional recurrence group. In locoregional recurrence group, prior salvage surgery was associated with longer OS (HR = 0.24, P = 0.008) and PFS (HR = 0.30, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION SCCHN with locoregional recurrence is associated with better disease control and survival outcomes comparing to distant metastatic SCCHN when treated with cetuximab-containing regimen. Salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence may further improves clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tien-Hua Chen
- grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No.201, Sec. 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan 11217 Republic of China ,grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ying Pan
- grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan ,grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Lun Lee
- grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan ,grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Wei Wang
- grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan ,grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shyh-Kuan Tai
- grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan ,grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pen-Yuan Chu
- grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan ,grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Liang Lo
- grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan ,grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hsien Wu
- grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan ,grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Muh-Hwa Yang
- grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No.201, Sec. 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan 11217 Republic of China ,grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Peter Mu-Hsin Chang
- grid.278247.c0000 0004 0604 5314Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No.201, Sec. 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan 11217 Republic of China ,grid.260539.b0000 0001 2059 7017Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan ,Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|