1
|
Arras T, Boudewyns A, Dhooge I, Zarowski A, Philips B, Desloovere C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Duration of cochlear implant use in children with prelingual single-sided deafness is a predictor of word perception in the CI ear. Hear Res 2024; 450:109076. [PMID: 38991628 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
As part of a longitudinal study regarding the benefit of early cochlear implantation for children with single-sided deafness, the current work explored the children's daily device use, potential barriers to full-time device use, and the children's ability to understand speech with the cochlear implant (CI). Data were collected from 20 children with prelingual SSD who received a CI before the age of 2.5 years, from the initial activation of the sound processor until the children were 4.8 to 11.0 years old. Daily device use was extracted from the CI's data logging, while word perception in quiet was assessed using direct audio input to the children's sound processor. The children's caregivers completed a questionnaire about habits, motivations, and barriers to device use. The children with SSD and a CI used their device on average 8.3 h per day, corresponding to 63 % of their time spent awake. All children except one could understand speech through the CI, with an average score of 59 % on a closed-set test and 73 % on an open-set test. More device use was associated with higher speech perception scores. Parents were happy with their decision to pursue a CI for their child. Certain habits, like taking off the sound processor during illness, were associated with lower device use. Providing timely counselling to the children's parents, focused on SSD-specific challenges, may be helpful to improve daily device use in these children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine Arras
- ExpORL, Dept. of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Cochlear Technology Centre, Schaliënhoevedreef 20i, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium.
| | - An Boudewyns
- Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Ingeborg Dhooge
- Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrzej Zarowski
- European Institute for ORL-HNS, Sint-Augustinus Hospital Antwerp, Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Birgit Philips
- Cochlear Technology Centre, Schaliënhoevedreef 20i, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Christian Desloovere
- Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Wouters
- ExpORL, Dept. of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Astrid van Wieringen
- ExpORL, Dept. of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Dept. of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Sem Sælands vei 7, 0371 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arndt S, Findeis L, Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Speck I, Ketterer MC, Rauch AK. Long-Term Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Congenital, Perilingual, and Postlingual Single-Sided Deafness. Ear Hear 2024; 45:316-328. [PMID: 37726884 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated the long-term outcomes of children with single-sided deafness (SSD) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery, during and after rehabilitation, and compared the results of children with congenital, perilingual, and postlingual SSD. We evaluated the impact of SSD at age at onset and duration of deafness on their performance. DESIGN Thirty-six children with SSD treated with CI participated in the study: 20 had congenital, seven perilingual (defined: >0 to 4 years), and nine had postlingual deafness (defined as >4 years of age). Their outcome with CI were measured on both subjective and objective scales: duration of device use, speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet, bilateral hearing and localization ability, quality of life and hearing, presence and loudness of tinnitus, and hearing ability of the better hearing ear. RESULTS After a mean follow-up time of 4.75 years, 32 of the 36 children used their CI on a regular basis. The remaining four children were nonusers. These children had congenital SSD and were older than three years at the time of CI surgery. Overall, for congenital/perilingual and postlingual SSD, speech intelligibility in noise and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) speech subscore were significantly improved, as were their subjective and objective localization ability and hearing-related quality of life. Children with postlingual SSD benefited from the CI with regard to speech intelligibility, SSQ speech/spatial/total score, and localization error, and children with congenital SSD showed better results with a short duration of deafness of less than 3 years compared with those with a longer deafness period. CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implantation is a successful treatment for children with congenital/perilingual or postlingual SSD. Results largely differed with respect to the onset and duration of deafness, and better outcomes were achieved by children with postlingual SSD and with a short duration of deafness. Our data also confirmed that children with congenital SSD should be implanted with a CI within three years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Arndt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colasacco CJ, Morgan S, Bornstein R, Drugge E, Stidham KR. Cochlear Implantation in Children With a Long Average Duration of Single Sided Deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2024; 133:345-350. [PMID: 38047440 DOI: 10.1177/00034894231216288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous research has shown the positive effects of cochlear implantation in children with a short duration of single sided deafness (SSD). This case series assessed the impact of cochlear implantation in a cohort of children with a longer average duration of SSD. METHODS A retrospective chart review of 6 children who received a cochlear implant for SSD. The mean age at time of cochlear implantation was 14.7 years old (median = 15.5, interquartile range (IQR) = 2.5) and mean duration of hearing loss before cochlear implantation was 10.8 years (median = 11.5, IQR = 5.3). Pre- and post-operative audiometric data for aided speech perception testing, sentence recognition in quiet, sentence recognition in noise, and word recognition scores were analyzed. RESULTS When compared to preoperative hearing aid scores a 24% significant increase in median word score and a 64% significant increase in median sentence recognition score in quiet was observed at 12 months post-op. CONCLUSION Cochlear implantation in children with a longer duration of SSD can provide benefit to speech recognition. LAY SUMMARY This retrospective case series of children with prolonged single sided deafness demonstrated an improvement in word and sentence recognition within 12 months of receiving a cochlear implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha Morgan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
- Westchester Institute for Human Development, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Rivka Bornstein
- Department of Otolaryngology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
- Westchester Institute for Human Development, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | | | - Katrina R Stidham
- Department of Otolaryngology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
- Westchester Institute for Human Development, Valhalla, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hicks KB, Park LR, Brown KD, Dillon MT. Long-Term Perceived Benefit of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users with Unilateral Hearing Loss. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:919-925. [PMID: 37466238 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the perceived benefit of cochlear implant (CI) use for children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and evaluate whether perceived abilities are associated with performance on measures of speech recognition and spatial hearing. METHOD Nineteen children with moderate-to-profound UHL underwent cochlear implantation. The Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire modified for children (SSQ-C) were completed by parental proxy pre-operatively and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post-activation. Linear mixed models evaluated perceived benefits over the study period. Pearson correlations assessed the association between subjective report and performance on measures of word recognition with the CI alone and spatial hearing (speech recognition in spatially-separated noise and sound source localization) in the combined condition (CI plus contralateral ear). RESULTS For the SSQ-C, parents reported significant improvements with CI use as compared to pre-operative perceptions (p < 0.001); improved perceptions were either maintained or continued to improve over the 2-year post-activation period. Perceived benefit did not significantly correlate with word recognition with the CI alone or spatial hearing outcomes in the combined condition. CONCLUSION Families of children with UHL observed benefits of CI use early after cochlear implantation that was maintained with long-term device use. Responses to subjective measures may broaden our understanding of the experiences of pediatric CI users with UHL in addition to outcomes on typical measures of CI performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 134:919-925, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla B Hicks
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa R Park
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Santopietro G, Fancello V, Fancello G, Bianchini C, Pelucchi S, Ciorba A. Cochlear Implantation in Children Affected by Single-Sided Deafness: A Comprehensive Review. Audiol Res 2024; 14:77-85. [PMID: 38247563 PMCID: PMC10801602 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Children with single-sided deafness (SSD) may experience delays in language and speech development. Reduced speech discrimination and poor sound localization abilities in young SSD patients may result in greater cognitive efforts required to focus and process auditory information, as well as increased listening-related fatigue. Consequently, these children can have a higher risk of academic failure and are often in need of extra help at school. Recently, cochlear implants (CIs) have been introduced as a rehabilitative option for these children, but their effectiveness is still a topic of debate. A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, searching the Medline database from inception to October 2023. The research identified nine papers that met the inclusion criteria. Data extracted from the selected studies included 311 children affected by SSD and cochlear implants. The reported audiological outcomes were further analyzed. Overall, a high level of satisfaction was described by parents of children with SSD and CI, and those who received a CI under the age of 3 presented better results. However, a proportion of patients did not use the device daily. Our review highlights the possible, and still controversial, role of CI for the hearing rehabilitation of children with unilateral deafness, underlining the need for further research in this field. To date, careful and comprehensive counseling with the child and the family is necessary before considering this option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Santopietro
- ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Virginia Fancello
- ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fancello
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Bianchini
- ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Stefano Pelucchi
- ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Andrea Ciorba
- ENT & Audiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang AL, Kosoko-Thoroddsen TSF, Thomas DA, Lieu JEC. Use of Socioeconomic Demographic Data in Studies on Pediatric Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review. Ear Hear 2024; 45:10-22. [PMID: 37607013 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Social determinants of health (SDOH) (healthcare access and quality, education access and quality, socioeconomic status, social and cultural context, neighborhood and built environment) ( Healthy People 2030 ) have been shown to impact a wide range of health-related outcomes and access to care. Given the medical and nonmedical costs associated with children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL), the varied insurance coverage for hearing healthcare services, and the differences in hearing aid utilization rates between children of different sociodemographic classes, the sociodemographic information of children with UHL enrolled in research studies should be collected to ensure the generalizability of hearing healthcare interventions. Therefore, the objective of this scoping review is to assess the reporting of SDOH data for participants in studies of pediatric UHL and its comparison to population trends. DESIGN Two searches of published literature were conducted by a qualified medical librarian. Two reviewers then evaluated all candidate articles. Study inclusion parameters were from 2010 to present, peer-reviewed studies with prospective study design, and participant population including children (age 0 to 18 years old) with UHL. RESULTS Two literature searches using PubMed Medline and Embase found 442 and 3058 studies each for review. After abstract and paper review, 87 studies were included in final qualitative review, with 22 of these studies reporting race distribution of participants, 15 reporting insurance status or family income, and 12 reporting the maternal education level. CONCLUSIONS Sociodemographic data are not commonly reported in research studies of children with UHL. In reported samples, research participants are more likely to have private insurance and higher family income compared with overall population distribution. These demographic biases may affect the generalizability of study results to all children with UHL. Further evaluation is warranted to evaluate whether participant recruitment affects outcomes that reflect the overall population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Zhang
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- These are co-first authors/contributed equally to this work
| | - Tinna-Sólveig F Kosoko-Thoroddsen
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- These are co-first authors/contributed equally to this work
| | - Deborah A Thomas
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Judith E C Lieu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park LR, Dillon MT, Buss E, Brown KD. Two-Year Outcomes of Cochlear Implant Use for Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss: Benefits and Comparison to Children With Normal Hearing. Ear Hear 2023; 44:955-968. [PMID: 36879386 PMCID: PMC10426784 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing loss, including cases of single-sided deafness (SSD), lack access to binaural cues that support spatial hearing, such as recognizing speech in complex multisource environments and sound source localization. Listening in a monaural condition negatively impacts communication, learning, and quality of life for children with SSD. Cochlear implant (CI) use may restore binaural hearing abilities and improve outcomes as compared to alternative treatments or no treatment. This study investigated performance over 24 months of CI use in young children with SSD as compared to the better hearing ear alone and to children with bilateral normal hearing (NH). DESIGN Eighteen children with SSD who received a CI between the ages of 3.5 and 6.5 years as part of a prospective clinical trial completed assessments of word recognition in quiet, masked sentence recognition, and sound source localization at regular intervals out to 24-month postactivation. Eighteen peers with bilateral NH, matched by age at the group level, completed the same test battery. Performance at 24-month postactivation for the SSD group was compared to the performance of the NH group. RESULTS Children with SSD have significantly poorer speech recognition in quiet, masked sentence recognition, and localization both with and without the use of the CI than their peers with NH. The SSD group experienced significant benefits with the CI+NH versus the NH ear alone on measures of isolated word recognition, masked sentence recognition, and localization. These benefits were realized within the first 3 months of use and were maintained through the 24-month postactivation interval. CONCLUSIONS Young children with SSD who use a CI experience significant isolated word recognition and bilateral spatial hearing benefits, although their performance remains poorer than their peers with NH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa R. Park
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Margaret T. Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin D. Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aldè M, Binda S, Primache V, Pellegrinelli L, Pariani E, Pregliasco F, Di Berardino F, Cantarella G, Ambrosetti U. Congenital Cytomegalovirus and Hearing Loss: The State of the Art. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4465. [PMID: 37445500 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In developed countries, congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the most common congenital viral infection, representing the leading non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss (HL). Diagnosis of cCMV infection can be performed by detection of CMV DNA in urine or saliva within 2-3 weeks after birth, or later in dried blood samples on the Guthrie card. Currently, there are many controversies regarding the preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches to cCMV infection. HL secondary to cCMV is highly variable in onset, side, degree, audiometric configuration, and threshold changes over time. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to perform a long and thorough audiological follow-up in children with cCMV infection to ensure early identification and prompt treatment of progressive and/or late-onset HL. Early cochlear implantation appears to be a valid solution not only for children with bilateral profound HL, but also for those with single-sided deafness, improving localization ability and understanding speech in noisy environments. Moreover, the decision to apply a unilateral cochlear implant in children with cCMV is strengthened by the non-negligible possibility of hearing deterioration of the contralateral ear over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Aldè
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Audiology Unit, Department of Specialist Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Binda
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Primache
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Pellegrinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Pariani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Pregliasco
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Di Berardino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Audiology Unit, Department of Specialist Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Cantarella
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of Specialist Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Ambrosetti
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zeitler DM, Dunn C, Schwartz SR, McCoy JL, Jamis C, Chi DH, Goldberg DM, Anne S. Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Cochlear Implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:1511-1520. [PMID: 36934432 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 03/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) benefits with cochlear implantation (CI) in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL) versus bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BSNHL). STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional survey of parents of children who underwent CI for USNHL and BSNHL. SETTING Tertiary care academic centers. METHODS The "Children with cochlear implants: parental perspectives" survey was administered. Parents rated responses on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores greater than 3.0 were considered favorable. Responses were recorded within 8 domains and groups were compared with respect to domain scores. Analysis of covariance models was used to compare groups while adjusting for age at implantation and duration of implant use. RESULTS There were 31 patients with USNHL and 27 patients with BSNHL. The average age of implantation in BSNHL patients was 1.9 and 6.7 years for USNHL. Parents of all children answered favorably in all domains. When adjusted for age at implantation and duration of implant use, parents of BSNHL children responded significantly more favorably only in 2 domains. When comparing patients with older age or prolonged duration of hearing loss in the USNHL cohort, there were favorable responses in all domains with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION There are HR-QOL benefits of CI in USNHL children; less pronounced favorable results were noted only in 2 domains when compared to BSNHL children. Benefits were noted with CI in USNHL children at an older age at implantation or prolonged duration of hearing loss. Therefore, these factors should not be absolute contraindications for CI in USNHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jennifer L McCoy
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - David H Chi
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Biever A, Kelsall DC, Lupo JE, Haase GM. Evolution of the candidacy requirements and patient perioperative assessment protocols for cochlear implantation. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 152:3346. [PMID: 36586869 DOI: 10.1121/10.0016446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implantation as an approved clinical therapy ushered in an exciting era of innovation for the treatment of hearing loss. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of cochlear implants as a treatment option for adults with profound sensorineural hearing loss in 1985. The landscape for treating adults and children with significant hearing loss has changed dramatically over the last three decades. The purpose of this paper is to examine the evolving regulatory process and changes to clinical care. A significant emerging trend in cochlear implantation is the consideration of steroids to preserve hearing during and following surgery. This parallels the quest for hearing preservation in noise-induced hearing disorders, especially considering the current interest in biological drug therapies in this population. The future will likely usher in an era of combination therapeutics utilizing drugs and cochlear implantation. For over 30+ years and following regulatory compliance, the Rocky Mountain Ear Center has developed an extensive candidacy and outcome assessment protocol. This systematic approach evaluates both unaided and aided auditory performance during candidacy stages and post-implantation. Adjunctive measures of cognition and quality-of-life augment the auditory assessment in specific populations. Practical insights into lessons learned have directed further clinical research and have resulted in beneficial changes to clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Biever
- Rocky Mountain Ear Center, Englewood, Colorado 80113, USA
| | | | - J Eric Lupo
- Rocky Mountain Ear Center, Englewood, Colorado 80113, USA
| | - Gerald M Haase
- University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Horrocks LM, Kitterick PT, Jayasinghe DS, Willis KR, Martin KRM, Dixit A, Thornton SK. Multiple congenital anomalies and adverse developmental outcomes are associated with neonatal intensive care admission and unilateral hearing loss. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1068884. [PMID: 36704143 PMCID: PMC9873408 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1068884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To determine congenital and developmental outcomes of children with Unilateral Hearing Loss (UHL) who were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). METHOD Retrospective, single-site study that followed 25 children with permanent congenital UHL and a NICU admission to a NICU of Nottingham University Hospital. Birth and two-year developmental follow-up data were collected. They were compared to matched control group who had a NICU admission but no hearing loss (matched on gestational age, weight and sex). RESULTS The median birthweights, gestational ages and number of days spent on the NICU for the UHL population were 2510 g, 36 weeks, and 12 days respectively. Most children (20/25; 80%) with UHL and a NICU admission were diagnosed with a congenital anomaly within the first two years of life. Only half (13/25) of these children were diagnosed with a congenital anomaly at discharge. Children with UHL and a NICU admission were more likely than the matched group (NICU admission only; p < .001) to have multiple congenital anomalies. We found a positive association between multiple congenital anomalies and developmental impairment for the NICU graduates with UHL (p = .019). This UHL-NICU group were also more likely than the matched NICU children to have developmental impairment (7/25 vs. 0/25; p = .01), speech and language therapy (13/25 vs. 1/25; p < .001), inner ear malformations (14/25 vs. 0/25, p < .001) or craniofacial anomalies (12/25 vs. 2/25; p = .004). INTERPRETATION Children with UHL and a NICU admission were at high risk of congenital anomalies and certain adverse developmental outcomes. Improved congenital anomaly screening is needed at birth for this population. Having multiple congenital anomalies suggests closer developmental monitoring is needed. This study contributes towards producing clinical screening and management guidelines to ensure consistent high-quality care for this unique population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy M Horrocks
- Hearing Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Pádraig T Kitterick
- Hearing Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dulip S Jayasinghe
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Karen R Willis
- Children's Audiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine R M Martin
- Children's Development Centre, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abhijit Dixit
- Clinical Genetics, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sally K Thornton
- Hearing Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|