Anatomy-Based Frequency Allocation in Cochlear Implantation: The Importance of Cochlear Coverage

Morphologic Analysis of the Scala Tympani Using Synchrotron: Implications for Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

To use synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging (SR-PCI) to visualize and measure the morphology of the entire cochlear scala tympani (ST) and assess cochlear implant (CI) electrode trajectories.

METHODS

SR-PCI images were used to obtain geometric measurements of the cochlear scalar diameter and area at 5-degree increments in 35 unimplanted and three implanted fixed human cadaveric cochleae.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional diameter and area of the cochlea were found to decrease from the base to the apex. This study represents a wide variability in cochlear morphology and suggests that even in the smallest cochlea, the ST can accommodate a 0.4 mm diameter electrode up to 720°. Additionally, all lateral wall array trajectories were within the anatomically accommodating insertion zone.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to use SR-PCI to visualize and quantify the entire ST morphology, from the round window to the apical tip, and assess the post-operative trajectory of electrodes. These high-resolution anatomical measurements can be used to inform the angular insertion depth that can be accommodated in CI patients, accounting for anatomical variability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A. Laryngoscope, 134:2889-2897, 2024.

Application of anatomy-based spacing of electrode contacts for achieving a uniform semitonal resolution: A novel concept in cochlear implant electrode design

Using anatomy-based fitting, we can determine the place-specific map with individualized center frequencies for each electrode contact that is a closer match to the natural pitch-place of the cochlea. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the tonal presentation across the electrode array and to calculate the semitone difference between each adjacent pair of contacts according to their anatomy-based map. The secondary objective is to determine the distancing of the contacts that would result in an equal semitone difference with a uniform tonal presentation. A total of 167 ears were included in this retrospective study. The frequencies across the electrode arrays were found to be unequally presented. The semitonal condensations were higher in the apical inter-contact spaces compared to the basal inter-contact spaces, being 3.0-2.3 semitones/mm (Kruskal Wallis test, p < 0.000). The anatomy-based spacing of the electrode contacts was larger in the basal inter-contact spaces compared to the apical inter-contact spaces, ranging from 1.92 to 1.48 mm. In conclusion, the current electrode designs do not have uniform tonal representation throughout the electrode array. There is a more condensed tonal presentation in the apical electrodes than in the basal electrodes, resulting in a lower tonal resolution in the apical region.

Otological Planning Software-OTOPLAN: A Narrative Literature Review

The cochlear implant (CI) is a widely accepted option in patients with severe to profound hearing loss receiving limited benefit from traditional hearing aids. CI surgery uses a default setting for frequency allocation aiming to reproduce tonotopicity, thus mimicking the normal cochlea. One emerging instrument that may substantially help the surgeon before, during, and after the surgery is a surgical planning software product developed in collaboration by CASCINATION AG (Bern, Switzerland) and MED-EL (Innsbruck Austria). The aim of this narrative review is to present an overview of the main features of this otological planning software, called OTOPLAN®. The literature was searched on the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The search terms used were "OTOPLAN", "cochlear planning software" "three-dimensional imaging", "3D segmentation", and "cochlear implant" combined into different queries. This strategy yielded 52 publications, and a total of 31 studies were included. The review of the literature revealed that OTOPLAN is a useful tool for otologists and audiologists as it improves preoperative surgical planning both in adults and in children, guides the intraoperative procedure and allows postoperative evaluation of the CI.

Accuracy of Preoperative Cochlear Duct Length Estimation and Angular Insertion Depth Prediction

OBJECTIVE

In cochlear implantation with flexible lateral wall electrodes, a cochlear coverage of 70% to 80% is assumed to yield an optimal speech perception. Therefore, fitting the cochlear implant (CI) to the patient's individual anatomy has gained importance in recent years. For these reasons, the optimal angular insertion depth (AID) has to be calculated before cochlear implantation. One CI manufacturer offers a software that allows to visualize the AID of different electrode arrays. Here, it is hypothesized that these preoperative AID models overestimate the postoperatively measured insertion angle. This study aims to investigate the agreement between preoperatively estimated and postoperatively measured AID.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Single-center tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

INTERVENTION

Preoperative and postoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The cochlear duct length was estimated by determining cochlear parameters ( A value and B value), and the AID for the chosen electrode was (i) estimated by elliptic circular approximation by the software and (ii) measured manually postoperatively by detecting the electrode contacts after insertion.

RESULTS

A total of 80 HRCT imaging data sets from 69 patients were analyzed. The mean preoperative AID estimation was 662.0° (standard deviation [SD], 61.5°), and the mean postoperatively measured AID was 583.9° (SD, 73.6°). In all cases (100%), preoperative AID estimation significantly overestimated the postoperative determined insertion angle (mean difference, 38.1°). A correcting factor of 5% on preoperative AID estimation dissolves these differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an electrode visualization tool may lead to shorter electrode array choices because of an overestimation of the insertion angle. Applying a correction factor of 0.95 on preoperative AID estimation is recommended.