Surgeon Volume and Laryngectomy Outcomes

The role of surgery for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in the era of targeted therapeutics: A scoping review

Background

Questions exist regarding patient selection for surgery in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), particularly with the advent of neoadjuvant-targeted therapeutics. The present scoping review sought to evaluate what extent of surgical resection should be performed in ATC.

Methods

A scoping review was carried out in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocols. Included studies were required to provide clear description of the surgery performed for ATC.

Results

The final search identified 6901 articles. Ultimately only 15 articles including 1484 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 765 patients (51.5%) underwent attempted curative intent surgery. The approach to resection of adjacent tissues varied between studies. Eight studies considered laryngeal ± pharyngeal resection (8/15, 53.3%), eight studies (53.3%) considered tracheal resection and again eight studies (53.3%) considered esophageal resection. More extensive resections increased morbidity without improving overall survival (OS) (<9 months in the 12 studies using a combination of surgery and chemoradiotherapy). In the three studies utilizing targeted therapy in addition to surgery, OS was notably improved while surgical resection following neoadjuvant therapy was less extensive.

Conclusions

There is no clear agreement in the literature regarding the limits of surgical resection in locoregionally advanced ATC. A definition of surgically resectable disease will be required to guide surgical decision making in ATC, particularly with the potential to reduce tumor burden using neoadjuvant targeted treatment in suitable patients.

Level of evidence

III.

Everything but the squeal: a guide for head and neck surgery training on the live porcine model

PURPOSE

The porcine model has been demonstrated to be cost-effective for head and neck surgery training. There is no literature describing the porcine head and neck anatomy. The purpose of this study is to provide a porcine surgical guide for training head and neck residents.

METHODS

Five head and neck dissections were performed under general anesthesia on the Large White pig model in the animal facilities of the University Hospital Fundación Jiménez. Sessions were photographed, and reference anatomical measurements were taken.

RESULTS

The sternum-chin distance (x = 15.80 cm, σ = 0.44), chin-chin distance (x = 11.10 cm, σ = 2.30), prelaryngeal musculature length (x = 10.30 cm, σ = 1.92) and supraomohyoid triangle area (x = 7.07 cm², σ = 3.91) were among the measurements obtained. The porcine head and neck anatomy was detailed.

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck porcine anatomy was thoroughly described, with emphasis on the similarities with human anatomy. The porcine model is capable of simulating human anatomy for surgery training.