Exploring Patient's Preference of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Laryngeal Movement Disorders

Adult Normative Data for the OMNI-Vocal Effort Scale (VES)

PURPOSE

To establish normative values for the OMNI-Vocal Effort Scale (VES) in healthy adults without voice complaints. Secondary objective is to determine if there are differences in perceived vocal effort across age groups and between sexes.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective data collection across groups.

METHOD

A nine-item survey was administered by speech-language pathologists with specialization in voice to consenting adults 18 years or older. Participants underwent an auditory perceptual evaluation of voice and answered questions regarding age, history of voice problems, history of voice surgery, smoking history and hearing loss. Participants were instructed to rate their perceived vocal effort in conversational speech using the OMNI-VES. Multivariant analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one participants were recruited. The majority of adults without voice complaints reported that producing conversational voice was within the "extremely easy" to "easy" range, 0-3 (92.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary data for perceived vocal effort. The OMNI-VES may be a useful tool in understanding changes in perceived vocal effort as a result of treatment for voice disorders. Further normative data are needed between sexes, across the gender spectrum, and older adult populations. Future directions include examining the magnitude of difference between numeric values on the scale and use of the scale with other dysphonic populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3726-3731, 2024.

Comparison of Outcome Measures (Subjective, Objective, and Patient-Based) in Laryngeal Dystonia Treatment With Botulinum Toxin A Injection

BACKGROUND

Outcome assessment in laryngeal dystonia is hindered by lack of consensus on a core set of outcome measures to quantify treatment effect and disease severity on quality of life. Potential outcome measure domains include objective voice, clinician reported, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for determining treatment success and longitudinal disease tracking. We aim to determine correlations between a selections of outcome measure tools following Botulinum toxin injection.

METHODS

A selection of instruments were administered to assess adductor laryngeal dystonia patient outcomes before and after Botulinum toxin injection. Voice samples recorded using a cellular telephone application were used for objective acoustic measures (CPPS, acoustic voice quality index) and speech language pathologist perceptual analysis (CAPE-V). Additionally, patients completed a PROMs battery consisting of the Voice Handicap Index-10, Communicative Participation Item Bank-10, OMNI-Vocal Effort Scale, 3 visual analog scale (VAS) questions. Changes in these outcome measures pre-post treatment were compared between each other and with a global rating of change questionnaire (GRCQ) using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Twenty six patients (20 female, mean age 57.7 years) participated. Using an anchor based GRCQ, patients reported Botox efficacy was the only outcome measure found to have significant correlation (r = 0.54, P = 0.022); all other outcome measures did not meet statistically significant correlation. Amongst the selected outcome tools, several moderate-strong correlations were identified, largely for outcome measures within the same domain. Most notable were correlations between the patient reported OMNI-VES and VAS questions (r > 0.68, P < 0.05), clinician CAPE-V strain and overall severity (r = 0.900, P < 0.001), and acoustic voice quality index with sustained vowel CPPs (r = -0.797, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Correlation between outcome measures instruments used for patients with adductor laryngeal dystonia requires further attention. Weak correlations with an anchor based GRCQ were found for this study's selected outcome instruments. A select number of correlations were found between outcome instruments within each of the individual outcome measure domains (patient perception, clinical perception, objective acoustics), but there was largely a lack of correlation found for instruments between these three separate domains.