Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in the Breastfeeding Infant

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the state-of-art regarding the use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics, specifically investigating FEES feasibility, safety, diagnostic accuracy, and protocols.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched for original studies on the pediatric population that instrumentally assessed swallowing function using FEES. A hand-search of the references of included studies was performed. Data on the population, feasibility of endoscope insertion and bolus trials, adverse events, sensitivity and specificity, and FEES equipment and protocol were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the checklists of the Johanna Briggs Institute. Selection of the studies, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted by two independent researchers.

RESULTS

Eighty-two reports from 81 studies were included. The mean overall quality of the studies was 80 % (17-100 %). The feasibility of endoscope insertion was high (89%-100 %), while the feasibility of bolus trials varied from 40 % to 100 %. Adverse events were excessive crying (8 studies), irritability or agitation (4 studies), transitory oxygen desaturations (3 studies, 1.2-6.7 % of the patients), epistaxis (3 studies, 0.8-3.3 % of the patients), increased heart rate (1 study, 1 patient), vomiting (1 study, 1 patient), hypertonia (1 study), and hypersalivation (1 study). No major complications were reported. Using VFSS as the reference standard, FEES was generally found to be less sensitive (25-94 %) but more specific (75-100 %) for aspiration, whereas the reverse was true for penetration (sensitivity 76-100 %, specificity 44-83 %). FEES protocols were highly heterogeneous with poor reporting.

CONCLUSION

FEES is a safe, accurate, and generally feasible examination in the pediatric population with suspected dysphagia. However, a consensus on the best FEES protocol for clinical practice and research is currently lacking.

Breastfeeding in infants who aspirate may increase risk of pulmonary inflammation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate management strategies and pulmonary outcomes for breastfed infants with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of breastfed infants diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia with documented aspiration or laryngeal penetration on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS). Medical records were reviewed for VFSS results and speech-language pathologist recommendations following VFSS, results of chest x-ray, results of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) within 1 year of VFSS, and aspiration-related hospitalizations occurring before or within 1 year of VFSS. Subjects were categorized as cleared or not cleared to breastfeed based on the VFSS. Proportions were compared with Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests and means with Student's t-tests.

RESULTS

Seventy-six infants (4.7 ± 0.4 months old) were included; 50% (38) had aspiration and 50% (38) had laryngeal penetration. After VFSS, 70% (53) were cleared to breastfeed while 30% (23) were not cleared to breastfeed. Patients with aspiration were less likely to be cleared to breastfeed (p = .006); however, 55% (21/38) of those with aspiration were still cleared to breastfeed. Infants cleared to breastfeed had significantly more pulmonary hospitalizations (p = .04) and were also at increased risk of elevated neutrophil count (p = .02) and culture growth on BAL (p = .01). Significantly increased abnormal neutrophil count was also found in those cleared to breastfeed with laryngeal penetration (p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with oropharyngeal dysphagia counseled to continue breastfeeding had increased risk of BAL inflammation and more pulmonary hospitalizations compared to those that were told to stop breastfeeding.

International pediatric otolaryngology group (IPOG) consensus on approach to aspiration

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for a comprehensive management approach for infants and children presenting with symptoms or signs of aspiration.

METHODS

Three rounds of surveys were sent to authors from 23 institutions worldwide. The threshold for the critical level of agreement among respondents was set at 80 %. To develop the definition of "intractable aspiration," each author was first asked to define the condition. Second, each author was asked to complete a 5-point Likert scale to specify the level of agreement with the definition derived in the first step.

RESULTS

Recommendations by the authors regarding the clinical presentation, diagnostic considerations, and medical and surgical management options for aspiration in children.

CONCLUSION

Approach to pediatric aspiration is best achieved by implementing a multidisciplinary approach with a comprehensive investigation strategy and different treatment options.

Current opinion in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: the role of the otolaryngologist in the management of pediatric dysphagia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dysphagia affects at least 1% of the pediatric population. This prevalence further increases in patients who are born prematurely or who have underlying neuromuscular or cardiopulmonary disorders. A multidisciplinary team approach, including an Otolaryngologist, can help promote an expedited diagnosis and therapeutic regimen, ensuring that the patient receives adequate nutrition needed for growth and development.

RECENT FINDINGS

The development and growth of multidisciplinary aerodigestive clinics have improved outcomes in pediatric patients with dysphagia. If a structural concern is noted on examination, there remain a multitude of medical and surgical options to help improve patient outcomes and swallow. These treatment options are usually multimodality and specific interventions may be employed to target a specific and notable abnormality.

SUMMARY

Pediatric dysphagia is a complex concern. For the otolaryngologist, etiologies with surgical targets may include ankyloglossia, tonsillar hypertrophy, laryngomalacia, laryngo-esophageal cleft, vocal fold movement impairment, and cricopharyngeal achalasia. The development and formalization of a multidisciplinary approach has streamlined and broadened treatment options for these patients. An otolaryngologist is integral as part of the treatment team of these patients.