Comorbidities confounding the outcomes of surgery for third window syndrome: Outlier analysis

New model of superior semicircular canal dehiscence with reversible diagnostic findings characteristic of patients with the disorder

Background

Third window syndrome is a vestibular-cochlear disorder in humans in which a third mobile window of the otic capsule creates changes to the flow of sound pressure energy through the perilymph/endolymph. The nature and location of this third mobile window can occur at many different sites (or multiple sites); however, the most common third mobile window is superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). There are two essential objective diagnostic characteristics needed to validate a model of SSCD: the creation of a pseudoconductive hearing loss and cVEMP increased amplitude and decreased threshold.

Methods

Adult Mongolian gerbils (n = 36) received surgical fenestration of the superior semicircular canal of the left inner ear. ABR and c+VEMP testing were carried out prior to surgery and over acute (small 1 mm SSCD, 1-10 days) or prolonged (large 2 mm SSCD, 28 days) recovery. Because recovery of function occurred quickly, condenser brightfield stereomicroscopic examination of the dehiscence site was carried out for the small SSCD animals post-hoc and compared to both ABRs and c+VEMPs. Micro-CT analysis was also completed with representative samples of control, day 3 and 10 post-SSCD animals.

Results

The SSCD created a significant worsening of hearing thresholds of the left ear; especially in the lower frequency domain (1-4 kHz). Left (EXP)/right (CTL) ear comparisons via ABR show significant worsening thresholds at the same frequency representations, which is a proxy for the human pseudoconductive hearing loss seen in SSCD. For the c+VEMP measurements, increased amplitude of the sound-induced response (N1 2.5 ms and P1 3.2 ms) was observed in animals that received larger fenestrations. As the bone regrew, the c+VEMP and ABR responses returned toward preoperative values. For small SSCD animals, micro-CT data show that progressive osteoneogenesis results in resurfacing of the SSCD without bony obliteration.

Conclusion

The large (2 mm) SSCD used in our gerbil model results in similar electrophysiologic findings observed in patients with SSCD. The changes observed also reverse and return to baseline as the SSCD heals by bone resurfacing (with the lumen intact). Hence, this model does not require a second surgical procedure to plug the SSCD.

Intraoperative Electrocochleography Correlates to Outcomes in Transmastoid and Middle Cranial Fossa Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Repair

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree to which electrocochleography (ECoG) correlates with auditory and vestibular outcomes after repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) via transmastoid (TM) and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adults with SSCD who underwent repair between 2005 and 2019.

INTERVENTION

Pre-, intra-, and postoperative ECoG.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient-reported vestibular and auditory symptoms; pre-, intra-, and postoperative ECoG measures, dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) scores.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients underwent SSCD repair (40 unilateral, six bilateral) between 2005 and 2019, including 24 MCF and 28 TM approaches. There were no differences in preoperative, intraoperative, or postrepair ECoG SP/AP values between the MCF and TM groups (p 0.12, 0.77, 0.58). Patients had subjective improvement in vestibular symptoms (or stable vestibular function in patients operated for predominantly auditory manifestations) with both approaches (MCF: 87.5%; TM: 92.3%; p 0.64). A successful outcome correlated with intraoperative SP/AP ratio normalization (p 0.0005). Similarly, DHI scores were similar in both groups preoperatively (p 0.66) and returned to their preoperative baseline postoperatively with both (p 0.52). Reported vestibular symptoms persisted or worsened more often in patients with migraine (66.6% vs. 28.9%, p 0.03), and with persistently abnormal ECoG measures, though the latter was not statistically significant in this population (38% vs. 15%, p 0.10). Patients had subjective improvement or stability in auditory symptoms using either approach (MCF: 96%; TM: 100%; p 0.62), also correlating with SP/AP ratio normalization (p 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Correction of abnormal preoperative ECoG reliably correlates to patient symptom improvement after SSCD repair. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes were noted between patients undergoing TM versus MCF repair. Circumspection regarding the likelihood of an ideal outcome after SSCD repair should be exercised when counseling patients with concomitant migraine.

DEFINE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED

It is not certain whether outcomes differ between the two dominant approaches for SSCD repair. Surgeons and patients would benefit from an intraoperative metric that reflects satisfactory plugging of SSCD.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

To highlight the reliability and unique utility of intraoperative ECoG and demonstrate the correlation between ECoG correction and symptom improvement for SSCD repair.

DESIRED RESULT

To report subjective and objective outcomes following SSCD repair and encourage adoption of intraoperative ECoG monitoring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

INDICATE IRB OR IACUC

IRB review considers this study exempt (HUM00169949).

Analysis of temporal bone thickness outside of the petrous temporal bone between superior semicircular canal dehiscence and normal patients

BACKGROUND

SSCD is a rare inner ear disorder. This study aims to compare the thickness of the temporal bone beyond the petrous portion between healthy subjects and those with SSCD to determine whether the etiopathology of SSCD is localized to the petrous temporal bone or generalized to other parts of the temporal bone.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records from September 2011 to February 2018 was conducted at a single-institution study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 had a confirmed diagnosis of SSCD, while Group 2 had no known ear or temporal bone pathology. Participants' high-resolution coronal and axial temporal bone computed tomography scans were analyzed. Regions within the temporal bone were measured and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 262 scans were included. Group 1 consisted of 103 scans, while Group 2 consisted of 159 scans. There was no statistically significant difference in the thickness of temporal bones between patients diagnosed with SSCD and patients without otologic disease.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the etiology of SSCD is limited to the petrous portion of the temporal bone. SSCD may be unrelated to a larger process of global temporal bone degeneration. Additional clinical screening for regions outside the petrous temporal bone is not warranted unless SSCD patients present with symptoms characteristic of other temporal bone pathologies.

Concomitant Dehiscences of the Temporal Bone: A Case-Based Study

Otic capsule dehiscences create a pathological third window in the inner ear that results in a dissipation of the acoustic energy consequent to the lowered impedance. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) was identified by Minor et al in 1998 as a syndrome leading to vertigo and inner ear conductive hearing loss. The authors also reported the relation between the dehiscence and pressure- or sound-induced vertigo (Tullio's phenomenon). Prevalence rates of SSCD in anatomical studies range from 0.4% to 0.7% with a majority of patients being asymptomatic. The observed association with other temporal bone dehiscences, as well as the propensity toward a bilateral or contralateral "near dehiscence," raises the question of whether a specific local bone demineralization or systemic mechanisms could be considered. The present report regard a case of a patient with a previous episode of meningitis, with a concomitant bilateral SSCD and tegmen tympani dehiscence from the side of meningitis. The patient was affected by dizziness, left moderate conductive hearing loss, and pressure/sound-induced vertigo. Because of disabling vestibular symptoms, the patient underwent surgical treatment. A middle cranial fossa approach allowed to reach both dehiscences on the symptomatic side, where bone wax and fascia were used for repair. At 6 months from the procedure, hearing was preserved, and the vestibular symptoms disappeared.

Third Window Syndrome: Surgical Management of Cochlea-Facial Nerve Dehiscence

Objective: This communication is the first assessment of outcomes after surgical repair of cochlea-facial nerve dehiscence (CFD) in a series of patients. Pre- and post-operative quantitative measurement of validated survey instruments, symptoms, diagnostic findings and anonymous video descriptions of symptoms in a cohort of 16 patients with CFD and third window syndrome (TWS) symptoms were systematically studied. Study design: Observational analytic case-control study. Setting: Quaternary referral center. Patients: Group 1 had 8 patients (5 children and 3 adults) with CFD and TWS who underwent surgical management using a previously described round window reinforcement technique. Group 2 had 8 patients (2 children and 6 adults) with CFD who did not have surgical intervention. Interventions: The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were administered pre-operatively and post-operatively. In addition, diagnostic findings of comprehensive audiometry, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds and electrocochleography (ECoG) were studied. Symptoms before and after surgical intervention were compared. Main outcome measures: Pre- vs. post-operative DHI, HIT-6, and audiometric data were compared statistically. The thresholds and amplitudes for cVEMP in symptomatic ears, ears with cochlea-facial nerve dehiscence and ears without CFD were compared statistically. Results: There was a highly significant improvement in DHI and HIT-6 at pre- vs. post-operative (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The age range was 12.8-52.9 years at the time of surgery (mean = 24.7 years). There were 6 females and 2 males. All 8 had a history of trauma before the onset of their symptoms. The mean cVEMP threshold was 75 dB nHL (SD 3.8) for the operated ear and 85.7 dB (SD 10.6) for the unoperated ear. In contrast to superior semicircular canal dehiscence, where most ears have abnormal ECoG findings suggestive of endolymphatic hydrops, only 1 of 8 operated CFD ears (1 of 16 ears) had an abnormal ECoG study. Conclusions: Overall there was a marked improvement in DHI, HIT-6 and symptoms post-operatively. Statistically significant reduction in cVEMP thresholds was observed in patients with radiographic evidence of CFD. Surgical management with round window reinforcement in patients with CFD was associated with improved symptoms and outcomes measures.

Vestibule-Middle Ear Dehiscence Tested With Perilymph-Specific Protein Cochlin-Tomoprotein (CTP) Detection Test

An 8-year-old boy was referred to the ENT department for further evaluation of right-sided conductive hearing loss. A small cyst anterior to the oval window and fixation of the stapes footplate were observed during an exploratory tympanotomy. The concentration of a perilymph-specific protein, cochlin-tomoprotein (CTP), in the middle ear lavage fluid was measured with an ELISA-based CTP detection kit. The level of CTP in the middle ear lavage fluid before fenestration of the cyst was 0.26 ng/ml (negative), and its level after fenestration was 2.98 ng/ml (positive), confirming the presence of perilymph in the cyst. A small bone dehiscence, considered to be the fissula ante fenestram, was observed anterior to the stapes footplate after removal of the cyst. The CTP detection test results allowed us to confirm that the small bone dehiscence was connected to the inner ear.