Bedeutung und Vorteile des Einsatzes von Fetten in der Fischernährung

A new twist on an old regression: transfer of chemicals to beef and milk in human and ecological risk assessment

Exposure of humans to chemicals in beef or milk is part of almost all risk evaluation procedures carried out to reduce emissions or to remediate sites. Concentrations of substances in these livestock products are often estimated using log-log regressions that relate the biotransfer factor BTF to the octanol-water partition ratio K(ow). However, the correctness of these empirical correlations has been questioned. Here, we compare them to the mechanistic model OMEGA that describes the distribution of substances in organisms by integrating theory on chemical fugacity and biological allometry. OMEGA has been calibrated and validated on thousands of laboratory and field data, reflecting many chemical substances and biological species. Overall fluxes of water, food, tissue (growth), milk and stable substances calculated by OMEGA are within a factor of two from independent data obtained in experiments. Rate constants measured for elimination of individual compounds of a recalcitrant nature vary around the level expected from the model for output to faeces and milk. Both data and model suggest that biotransfer BTF of stable substances to beef and milk is independent of the octanol-water partition ratio K(ow) in the range of 10(3)-10(6). This contradicts empirical regressions including stable and labile compounds. As expected, levels of labile substances vary widely around a tentative indication derived from the model. Transformation and accumulation of labile substances remains highly specific for the chemical and organism concerned but depends weakly on the octanol-water partition ratio K(ow). Several possibilities for additional refinement are identified.

The power of size. 1. Rate constants and equilibrium ratios for accumulation of organic substances related to octanol-water partition ratio and species weight

Most of the thousands of substances and species that risk assessment has to deal with are not investigated empirically because of financial, practical, and ethical constraints. To facilitate extrapolation, we have developed a model for accumulation kinetics of organic substances as a function of the octanol-water partition ratio (Kow) of the chemical and the weight, lipid content, and trophic level of the species. The ecological parameters were obtained from a previous review on allometric regressions. The chemical parameters, that is, resistances that substances encounter in water and lipid layers of organisms, were calibrated on 1,939 rate constants for absorption from water for assimilation from food and for elimination. Their ratio was validated on 37 laboratory bioconcentration and biomagnification regressions and on 2,700 field bioaccumulation data. The rate constant for absorption increased with the hydrophobicity of the substances with a Kow up to about 1,000 and then leveled off, decreasing with the weight of the species. About 39% of the variation was explained by the model, while deviations of more than a factor of 5 were noted for labile, large, and less hydrophobic molecules as well as for algae, mollusks, and arthropods. The efficiency for assimilation of contaminants from food was determined mainly by the food digestibility and thus by the trophic level of the species. A distinction was made between substances that are stable, that is, with a minimum elimination only, and those that are labile, that is, with an excess elimination probably largely due to biotransformation. The rate constant for minimum elimination decreased with the hydrophobicity of the substance and the weight of the species. About 70% of the variation was explained by the model, while deviations of more than a factor of 5 were noted for algae, terrestrial plants, and benthic animals. Labile substances were eliminated faster than isolipophilic stable compounds, but differences in laboratory elimination and accumulation were small compared with those in field accumulation. Excess elimination by vertebrates was faster than by invertebrates. Differences between terrestrial and aquatic species were attributed to water turnover rates, whereas differences between trophic levels were due to the food digestibility. Food web accumulation, expressed as organism-organic solids and organism-food concentrations ratios could be largely explained by ecological variables only. The model is believed to facilitate various types of scientific interpretation as well as environmental risk assessment.