1
|
Ankolekar A, Eppings L, Bottari F, Pinho IF, Howard K, Baker R, Nan Y, Xing X, Walsh SLF, Vos W, Yang G, Lambin P. Using artificial intelligence and predictive modelling to enable learning healthcare systems (LHS) for pandemic preparedness. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2024; 24:412-419. [PMID: 38831762 PMCID: PMC11145382 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
In anticipation of potential future pandemics, we examined the challenges and opportunities presented by the COVID-19 outbreak. This analysis highlights how artificial intelligence (AI) and predictive models can support both patients and clinicians in managing subsequent infectious diseases, and how legislators and policymakers could support these efforts, to bring learning healthcare system (LHS) from guidelines to real-world implementation. This report chronicles the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the diverse data sets generated throughout its course. We propose strategies for harnessing this data via AI and predictive modelling to enhance the functioning of LHS. The challenges faced by patients and healthcare systems around the world during this unprecedented crisis could have been mitigated with an informed and timely adoption of the three pillars of the LHS: Knowledge, Data and Practice. By harnessing AI and predictive analytics, we can develop tools that not only detect potential pandemic-prone diseases early on but also assist in patient management, provide decision support, offer treatment recommendations, deliver patient outcome triage, predict post-recovery long-term disease impacts, monitor viral mutations and variant emergence, and assess vaccine and treatment efficacy in real-time. A patient-centric approach remains paramount, ensuring patients are both informed and actively involved in disease mitigation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anshu Ankolekar
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne Eppings
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Yang Nan
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Xiaodan Xing
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon LF Walsh
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wim Vos
- Radiomics (Oncoradiomics SA), Liege, Belgium
| | - Guang Yang
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Bioengineering Department and I-X, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Flory J, Ancker JS, Kim SYH, Kuperman G, Vickers A. Decision architecture randomisation: extremely efficient clinical trials that preserve clinician and patient choice? BMJ Evid Based Med 2024; 29:71-74. [PMID: 37479243 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James Flory
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Gilad Kuperman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nickolls BJ, Relton C, Hemkens L, Zwarenstein M, Eldridge S, McCall SJ, Griffin XL, Sohanpal R, Verkooijen HM, Maguire JL, McCord KA. Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075601. [PMID: 38458814 PMCID: PMC10928784 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cohort studies generate and collect longitudinal data for a variety of research purposes. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) increasingly use cohort studies as data infrastructures to help identify and recruit trial participants and assess outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine the extent, range and nature of research using cohorts for RCTs and describe the varied definitions and conceptual boundaries for RCTs using cohorts. DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES Searches were undertaken in January 2021 in MEDLINE (Ovid) and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Methodology Registry (Final issue, third Quarter 2012). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Reports published between January 2007 and December 2021 of (a) cohorts used or planned to be used, to conduct RCTs, or (b) RCTs which use cohorts to recruit participants and/or collect trial outcomes, or (c) methodological studies discussing the use of cohorts for RCTs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted on the condition being studied, age group, setting, country/continent, intervention(s) and comparators planned or received, unit of randomisation, timing of randomisation, approach to informed consent, study design and terminology. RESULTS A total of 175 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. We identified 61 protocols, 9 descriptions of stand-alone cohorts intended to be used for future RCTs, 39 RCTs using cohorts and 34 methodological papers.The use and scope of this approach is growing. The thematics of study are far-ranging, including population health, oncology, mental and behavioural disorders, and musculoskeletal conditions.Authors reported that this approach can lead to more efficient recruitment, more representative samples, and lessen disappointment bias and crossovers. CONCLUSION This review outlines the development of cohorts to conduct RCTs including the range of use and innovative changes and adaptations. Inconsistencies in the use of terminology and concepts are highlighted. Guidance now needs to be developed to support the design and reporting of RCTs conducted using cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverley Jane Nickolls
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Clare Relton
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lars Hemkens
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin (METRICS-B), Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Merrick Zwarenstein
- Department of Family Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra Eldridge
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephen J McCall
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Center for Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Ras Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Xavier Luke Griffin
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ratna Sohanpal
- Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathon L Maguire
- University of Toronto Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hollestelle MJ, van der Graaf R, Sturkenboom MCJM, Cunnington M, van Delden JJM. Building a Sustainable Learning Health Care System for Pregnant and Lactating People: Interview Study Among Data Access Providers. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024; 7:e47092. [PMID: 38329780 PMCID: PMC10884907 DOI: 10.2196/47092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many areas of health care, learning health care systems (LHSs) are seen as promising ways to accelerate research and outcomes for patients by reusing health and research data. For example, considering pregnant and lactating people, for whom there is still a poor evidence base for medication safety and efficacy, an LHS presents an interesting way forward. Combining unique data sources across Europe in an LHS could help clarify how medications affect pregnancy outcomes and lactation exposures. In general, a remaining challenge of data-intensive health research, which is at the core of an LHS, has been obtaining meaningful access to data. These unique data sources, also called data access providers (DAPs), are both public and private organizations and are important stakeholders in the development of a sustainable and ethically responsible LHS. Sustainability is often discussed as a challenge in LHS development. Moreover, DAPs are increasingly expected to move beyond regulatory compliance and are seen as moral agents tasked with upholding ethical principles, such as transparency, trustworthiness, responsibility, and community engagement. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the views of people working for DAPs who participate in a public-private partnership to build a sustainable and ethically responsible LHS. METHODS Using a qualitative interview design, we interviewed 14 people involved in the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) ConcePTION (Continuum of Evidence from Pregnancy Exposures, Reproductive Toxicology and Breastfeeding to Improve Outcomes Now) project, a public-private collaboration with the goal of building an LHS for pregnant and lactating people. The pseudonymized transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS A total of 3 themes were identified: opportunities and responsibilities, conditions for participation and commitment, and challenges for a knowledge-generating ecosystem. The respondents generally regarded the collaboration as an opportunity for various reasons beyond the primary goal of generating knowledge about medication safety during pregnancy and lactation. Respondents had different interpretations of responsibility in the context of data-intensive research in a public-private network. Respondents explained that resources (financial and other), scientific output, motivation, agreements collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry, trust, and transparency are important conditions for participating in and committing to the ConcePTION LHS. Respondents also discussed the challenges of an LHS, including the limitations to (real-world) data analyses and governance procedures. CONCLUSIONS Our respondents were motivated by diverse opportunities to contribute to an LHS for pregnant and lactating people, primarily centered on advancing knowledge on medication safety. Although a shared responsibility for enabling real-world data analyses is acknowledged, their focus remains on their work and contribution to the project rather than on safeguarding ethical data handling. The results of our interviews underline the importance of a transparent governance structure, emphasizing the trust between DAPs and the public for the success and sustainability of an LHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke J Hollestelle
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Bioethics & Health Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Rieke van der Graaf
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Bioethics & Health Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Data Science & Biostatistics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Bioethics & Health Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laurijssen S, van der Graaf R, Schuit E, den Haan M, van Dijk W, Groenwold R, le Sessie S, Grobbee D, de Vries M. Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system. Learn Health Syst 2024; 8:e10379. [PMID: 38249849 PMCID: PMC10797564 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation of an LHS in cardiology departments presents itself with ethical challenges, including ethical review and informed consent. In this qualitative study, we investigated stakeholders' attitudes toward ethical issues regarding the implementation of an LHS in the cardiology department. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using 35 semi-structured interviews and 5 focus group interviews with 34 individuals. We interviewed cardiologists, research nurses, cardiovascular patients, ethicists, health lawyers, epidemiologists/statisticians and insurance spokespersons. Results Respondents identified different ethical obstacles for the implementation of an LHS within the cardiology department. These obstacles were mainly on ethical oversight in LHSs; in particular, informed con sent and data ownership were discussed. In addition, respondents reported on the role of patients in LHS. Respondents described the LHS as a possibility for patients to engage in both research and care. While the LHS can promote patient engagement, patients might also be reduced to their data and are therefore at risk, according to respondents. Conclusions Views on the ethical dilemmas of a LHSs within cardiology are diverse. Similar to the literary debate on oversight, there are different views on how ethical oversight should be regulated. This study adds to the literary debate on oversight by highlighting that patients wish to be informed about the learning activities within the LHS they participate in, and that they wish to actively contribute by sharing their data and identifying learning goals, provided that informed consent is obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Laurijssen
- Department of HealthcareSaxion Applied UniversityDeventerNetherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Martine de Vries
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health LawLeids Universitair Medisch CentrumLeidenNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
David SP, Dunnenberger HM, Choi S, DePersia A, Ilbawi N, Ward C, Wake DT, Khandekar JD, Shannon Y, Hughes K, Miller N, Mangold KA, Sabatini LM, Helseth DL, Xu J, Sanders A, Kaul KL, Hulick PJ. Personalized medicine in a community health system: the NorthShore experience. Front Genet 2023; 14:1308738. [PMID: 38090148 PMCID: PMC10713750 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1308738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Genomic and personalized medicine implementation efforts have largely centered on specialty care in tertiary health systems. There are few examples of fully integrated care systems that span the healthcare continuum. In 2014, NorthShore University HealthSystem launched the Center for Personalized Medicine to catalyze the delivery of personalized medicine. Successful implementation required the development of a scalable family history collection tool, the Genetic and Wellness Assessment (GWA) and Breast Health Assessment (BHA) tools; integrated pharmacogenomics programming; educational programming; electronic medical record integration; and robust clinical decision support tools. To date, more than 225,000 patients have been screened for increased hereditary conditions, such as cancer risk, through these tools in primary care. More than 35,000 patients completed clinical genetic testing following GWA or BHA completion. An innovative program trained more than 100 primary care providers in genomic medicine, activated with clinical decision support and access to patient genetic counseling services and digital healthcare tools. The development of a novel bioinformatics platform (FLYPE) enabled the incorporation of genomics data into electronic medical records. To date, over 4,000 patients have been identified to have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a gene with medical management implications. Over 33,000 patients have clinical pharmacogenomics data incorporated into the electronic health record supported by clinical decision support tools. This manuscript describes the evolution, strategy, and successful multispecialty partnerships aligned with health system leadership that enabled the implementation of a comprehensive personalized medicine program with measurable patient outcomes through a genomics-enabled learning health system model that utilizes implementation science frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P. David
- Department of Family Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Outcomes Research Network, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Henry M. Dunnenberger
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Sarah Choi
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Allison DePersia
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Outcomes Research Network, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Nadim Ilbawi
- Department of Family Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Christopher Ward
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Dyson T. Wake
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Janardan D. Khandekar
- Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Kellogg Cancer Center, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Yvette Shannon
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Kristen Hughes
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Nicholas Miller
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Kathy A. Mangold
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Linda M. Sabatini
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Donald L. Helseth
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Alan Sanders
- Center for Psychiatric Genetics, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Karen L. Kaul
- Outcomes Research Network, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
- Department of Pathology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Peter J. Hulick
- Mark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Outcomes Research Network, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leung T, Verheij RA, Francke AL, Tomassen M, Houtzager M, Joling KJ, Oosterveld-Vlug MG. Setting up a Governance Framework for Secondary Use of Routine Health Data in Nursing Homes: Development Study Using Qualitative Interviews. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e38929. [PMID: 36696162 PMCID: PMC9909520 DOI: 10.2196/38929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the nursing home sector, reusing routinely recorded data from electronic health records (EHRs) for knowledge development and quality improvement is still in its infancy. Trust in appropriate and responsible reuse is crucial for patients and nursing homes deciding whether to share EHR data for these purposes. A data governance framework determines who may access the data, under what conditions, and for what purposes. This can help obtain that trust. Although increasing attention is being paid to data governance in the health care sector, little guidance is available on development and implementation of a data governance framework in practice. OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe the development process of a governance framework for the "Registry Learning from Data in Nursing Homes," a national registry for EHR data on care delivered by nursing home physicians (in Dutch: specialist ouderengeneeskunde) in Dutch nursing homes-to allow data reusage for research and quality improvement of care. METHODS Relevant stakeholders representing practices, policies, and research in the nursing home sector were identified. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 people from 14 stakeholder organizations. The main aim of the interviews was to explore stakeholders' perspectives regarding the Registry's aim, data access criteria, and governing bodies' tasks and composition. Interview topics and analyses were guided by 8 principles regarding governance for reusing health data, as described in the literature. Interview results, together with legal advice and consensus discussions by the Registry's consortium partners, were used to shape the rules, regulations, and governing bodies of the governance framework. RESULTS Stakeholders valued the involvement of nursing home residents and their representatives, nursing home physicians, nursing homes' boards of directors, and scientists and saw this as a prerequisite for a trustworthy data governance framework. For the Registry, involvement of these groups can be achieved through a procedure in which residents can provide their consent or objection to the reuse of the data, transparency about the decisions made, and providing them a position in a governing body. In addition, a data request approval procedure based on predefined assessment criteria indicates that data reuse by third parties aligns with the aims of the Registry, benefits the nursing home sector, and protects the privacy of data subjects. CONCLUSIONS The stakeholders' views, expertise, and knowledge of other frameworks and relevant legislation serve to inform the application of governance principles to the contexts of both the nursing home sector and the Netherlands. Many different stakeholders were involved in the development of the Registry Learning from Data in Nursing Homes' governance framework and will continue to be involved. Engagement of the full range of stakeholders in an early stage of governance framework development is important to generate trust in appropriate and responsible data reuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert A Verheij
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Tranzo, School of Social Sciences and Behavioural Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Anneke L Francke
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marit Tomassen
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Max Houtzager
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karlijn J Joling
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Onstwedder SM, Jansen ME, Leonardo Alves T, Cornel MC, Rigter T. Pursuing Public Health Benefit Within National Genomic Initiatives: Learning From Different Policies. Front Genet 2022; 13:865799. [PMID: 35685439 PMCID: PMC9171010 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Population-based genomic research is expected to deliver substantial public health benefits. National genomics initiatives are widespread, with large-scale collection and research of human genomic data. To date, little is known about the actual public health benefit that is yielded from such initiatives. In this study, we explore how public health benefit is being pursued in a selection of national genomics initiatives.Methods: A mixed-method study was carried out, consisting of a literature-based comparison of 11 purposively sampled national genomics initiatives (Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, United Kingdom (UK), and United States (USA)), and five semi-structured interviews with experts (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, UK, USA). It was analyzed to what extent and how public health benefit was pursued and then operationalized in each phase of an adapted public health policy cycle: agenda setting, governance, (research) strategy towards health benefit, implementation, evaluation.Results: Public health benefit within national genomics initiatives was pursued in all initiatives and also operationalized in all phases of the public health policy cycle. The inclusion of public health benefit in genomics initiatives seemed dependent on the outcomes of agenda setting, such as the aims and values, as well as design of governance, for example involved actors and funding. Some initiatives focus on a research-based strategy to contribute to public health, while others focus on research translation into healthcare, or a combination of both. Evaluation of public health benefits could be performed qualitatively, such as assessing improved public trust, and/or quantitatively, e.g. research output or number of new diagnoses. However, the created health benefit for the general public, both short- and long-term, appears to be difficult to determine.Conclusion: Genomics initiatives hold the potential to deliver health promises of population-based genomics. Yet, universal tools to measure public health benefit and clarity in roles and responsibilities of collaborating stakeholders are lacking. Advancements in both aspects will help to facilitate and achieve the expected impact of genomics initiatives and enable effective research translation, implementation, and ultimately improved public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M. Onstwedder
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Health Protection, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine program, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Suzanne M. Onstwedder,
| | - Marleen E. Jansen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Health Protection, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine program, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Teresa Leonardo Alves
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Health Protection, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Martina C. Cornel
- Department of Human Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine program, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tessel Rigter
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Health Protection, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Personalized Medicine program, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Team V, Jones A, Teede H, Weller CD. Pressure Injury Surveillance and Prevention in Australia: Monash Partners Capacity Building Framework. Front Public Health 2021; 9:634669. [PMID: 34778157 PMCID: PMC8581233 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
A hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) is a common complication across the globe. The severity of HAPI ranges from skin redness and no skin breakdown to full skin and tissue loss, exposing the tendons and bones. HAPI can significantly impact the quality of life. In addition to the human cost, this injury carries a high economic burden with the cost of treatment far outweighing the preventative measures. The HAPI rates are a key indicator of health services performance. Globally, healthcare services aim to reduce its incidence. In Australia, the federal health minister has prioritised the need for improvement in HAPI surveillance and prevention. Capacity building is vital to optimise pressure injury (PI) surveillance and prevention in acute care services. In this perspective article, we provide a framework for capacity building to optimise HAPI prevention and surveillance in a large cross-sector collaborative partnership in Australia. This framework comprises six key action areas in capacity building to optimise the HAPI outcomes, such as research, organisational development, workforce development, leadership, collaboration, and consumer involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Team
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Angela Jones
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Carolina D. Weller
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chew CKT, Hogan H, Jani Y. Scoping review exploring the impact of digital systems on processes and outcomes in the care management of acute kidney injury and progress towards establishing learning healthcare systems. BMJ Health Care Inform 2021; 28:e100345. [PMID: 34233898 PMCID: PMC8264899 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Digital systems have long been used to improve the quality and safety of care when managing acute kidney injury (AKI). The availability of digitised clinical data can also turn organisations and their networks into learning healthcare systems (LHSs) if used across all levels of health and care. This review explores the impact of digital systems i.e. on patients with AKI care, to gauge progress towards establishing LHSs and to identify existing gaps in the research. METHODS Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies of real-time or near real-time digital AKI management systems which reported process and outcome measures were included. RESULTS Thematic analysis of 43 studies showed that most interventions used real-time serum creatinine levels to trigger responses to enable risk prediction, early recognition of AKI or harm prevention by individual clinicians (micro level) or specialist teams (meso level). Interventions at system (macro level) were rare. There was limited evidence of change in outcomes. DISCUSSION While the benefits of real-time digital clinical data at micro level for AKI management have been evident for some time, their application at meso and macro levels is emergent therefore limiting progress towards establishing LHSs. Lack of progress is due to digital maturity, system design, human factors and policy levers. CONCLUSION Future approaches need to harness the potential of interoperability, data analytical advances and include multiple stakeholder perspectives to develop effective digital LHSs in order to gain benefits across the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clair Ka Tze Chew
- Transformation and Innovation Team, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Helen Hogan
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Yogini Jani
- Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Towards a Responsible Transition to Learning Healthcare Systems in Precision Medicine: Ethical Points to Consider. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11060539. [PMID: 34200580 PMCID: PMC8229357 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Learning healthcare systems have recently emerged as a strategy to continuously use experiences and outcomes of clinical care for research purposes in precision medicine. Although it is known that learning healthcare transitions in general raise important ethical challenges, the ethical ramifications of such transitions in the specific context of precision medicine have not extensively been discussed. Here, we describe three levers that institutions can pull to advance learning healthcare systems in precision medicine: (1) changing testing of individual variability (such as genes); (2) changing prescription of treatments on the basis of (genomic) test results; and/or (3) changing the handling of data that link variability and treatment to clinical outcomes. Subsequently, we evaluate how patients can be affected if one of these levers are pulled: (1) patients are tested for different or more factors than before the transformation, (2) patients receive different treatments than before the transformation and/or (3) patients’ data obtained through clinical care are used, or used more extensively, for research purposes. Based on an analysis of the aforementioned mechanisms and how these potentially affect patients, we analyze why learning healthcare systems in precision medicine need a different ethical approach and discuss crucial points to consider regarding this approach.
Collapse
|
12
|
van der Graaf R, van Dijk W, Laurijssen SJM, Schuit E, Grobbe DE, de Vries MC. The Duty to Support Learning Health Systems: A Broad Rather than a Narrow Interpretation. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:14-16. [PMID: 33373568 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1845870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ewoud Schuit
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University
| | | | | |
Collapse
|