A retrospective review of pain control by a two-step irradiance schedule during topical ALA-photodynamic therapy of non-melanoma skin cancer

Photodynamic therapy light': An enhanced treatment protocol for actinic keratoses with minimal pain and optimal clinical outcome by combining laser-assisted low irradiance PDT with shortened daylight PDT

BACKGROUND

Between 2003 and 2016, 546 patients in our clinic discontinued outpatient treatment for actinic keratoses (AKs) using conventional photodynamic therapy (PDT) because of intolerable pain, thereby necessitating the use of a less painful procedure. Therefore, we developed a novel off-label PDT protocol: 'PDT light'.

METHODS

Laser-assisted low irradiance PDT (li-PDT) was performed beginning in 2014. The dosage was gradually lowered to 8-12 J/cm² in 2018, so that we achieved considerable pain reduction while maintaining comparable therapeutic efficacy. A further considerable reduction in pain was achieved from 2018 onwards by combining the advantages of li-PDT with daylight PDT (DLPDT), thereby resulting in 2018 in the new technique 'PDT light'. Patients with AK Olsen grades 1 or 2 and field cancerization initially received a mild-fractionated CO2 laser pretreatment prior to MAL-incubation (methyl aminolaevulinate, Metvix ®) under occlusion for 1.5-3 h. Then, patients were illuminated on average for 1.02 min with the Aktilite-LED and, after application of an UV-screen on the illuminated area, sent out into daylight for 1 h.

RESULTS

Between March and November 2019, we successfully treated 152 cases using the enhanced 'PDT light' procedure, with 137 cases achieving at follow-up 1 (on average after 8.14 months) good-to-excellent clearance rates (CLA and CLB together 90%) and minimal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel 'PDT light' protocol proved to be an excellent and nearly painless method with an average visual-analogue scale (VAS) score of 1.19. Additional advantages included reduced illumination time, shorter outpatient stays in the clinic, fewer adverse effects, and better patient compliance than with DLPDT alone.

Clinical trial of two-step photodynamic therapy for reduced pain in the treatment of precancerous squamous lesions (Actinic keratoses)

BACKGROUND

Pain associated with aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) for the treatment of facial dermatoses results in low patient compliance. Two-step photodynamic therapy (two-step PDT) may improve comfort by optimizing light amplitude and exposure time.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of two-step PDT in reducing the pain generated during the treatment of facial skin disorders.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with AK were randomly divided into two groups; the experimental group was treated with two-step photodynamic therapy and the control group was treated with conventional photodynamic therapy. The pain intensity of the patients at different times was assessed using the pain numerical rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients completed three ALA-PDT treatments, 13 and 13 patients in each group, respectively. The mean NRS scores of patients in the experimental group (3.28±1.41, 3.33±1.43, 3.42±1.78) were lower than those of the control group (5.00±1.94, 5.09±1.86, 4.86±1.64) on each occasion. The incidence of certain adverse reactions was lower in the experimental group than in the control group. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of clinical outcome, recurrence rate and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Two-step photodynamic therapy can reduce pain and the incidence of some adverse reactions, but does not affect clinical efficacy, recurrence rate and patient satisfaction.

Advanced Light Source Technologies for Photodynamic Therapy of Skin Cancer Lesions

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an increasingly popular dermatological treatment not only used for life-threatening skin conditions and other tumors but also for cosmetic purposes. PDT has negligible effects on underlying functional structures, enabling tissue regeneration feasibility. PDT uses a photosensitizer (PS) and visible light to create cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, which can damage cellular organelles and trigger cell death. The foundations of modern photodynamic therapy began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and in recent times, it has gained more attention due to the development of new sources and PSs. This review focuses on the latest advancements in light technology for PDT in treating skin cancer lesions. It discusses recent research and developments in light-emitting technologies, their potential benefits and drawbacks, and their implications for clinical practice. Finally, this review summarizes key findings and discusses their implications for the use of PDT in skin cancer treatment, highlighting the limitations of current approaches and providing insights into future research directions to improve both the efficacy and safety of PDT. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of PDT for skin cancer treatment, covering various aspects ranging from the underlying mechanisms to the latest technological advancements in the field.

Two-step irradiance schedule for condyloma acuminatum and the influencing factors of analgesic effect: A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The two-step irradiance schedule in photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging treatment method with a remarkable analgesic effect. We evaluated the influencing factors of pain in condyloma acuminate (CA) treatment with a two-step irradiance schedule.

METHODS

All patients were randomly divided into a two-step irradiance group and control group. The two-step irradiance group used 40 mW/cm² for the first 8min, followed by 80 mW/cm² for 16 min, while the control group used 80 mW/cm² for 20 min. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and pain-influencing factors were recorded accordingly.

RESULTS

In the two-step irradiance and control groups, 64 and 63 patients completed the treatment, respectively. The NRS scores of the two-step irradiance group were significantly lower than that of the control group (p < .001), with a low fluence rate inducing less pain compared with a high fluence rate (p < .001). Moreover, when the total fluence accumulated to 57.6 J/cm² , the pain experienced by patients reached its peak. The NRS score of the urethral orifice group was the highest, and the male external genitalia group was the lowest. The NRS score was at its lowest in the first session and highest in the second session. There was a linear relationship between pain and wart size. Among these influencing factors, the fluence rate had the greatest impact on pain.

CONCLUSION

The two-step irradiance schedule provides better analgesic effects than standard treatment irradiation while showing similar treatment efficacy. Factors that influence pain include high fluence rate, CA at the urethral orifice, second therapy session, wart size, and the interval between CO₂  laser and ALA-PDT.

Photodynamic Therapy: A Compendium of Latest Reviews

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising therapy against cancer. Even though it has been investigated for more than 100 years, scientific publications have grown exponentially in the last two decades. For this reason, we present a brief compendium of reviews of the last two decades classified under different topics, namely, overviews, reviews about specific cancers, and meta-analyses of photosensitisers, PDT mechanisms, dosimetry, and light sources. The key issues and main conclusions are summarized, including ways and means to improve therapy and outcomes. Due to the broad scope of this work and it being the first time that a compendium of the latest reviews has been performed for PDT, it may be of interest to a wide audience.

Three-step irradiance schedule versus two-step irradiance schedule for pain control during topical 5-aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy of facial acne in Chinese patients: A prospective randomized comparative study

BACKGROUND

A two-step irradiance schedule has been found to be useful for pain control during photodynamic therapy (PDT) on nonmelanotic skin cancer and condyloma acuminatum.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of a new three-step irradiance schedule derived from the psychological "peak-end rule" and two-step irradiance schedule in relieving pain during 5-aminolevulinic acid PDT (ALA-PDT) on acne.

METHODS

A total of 90 moderate to severe acne patients were enrolled in our study and randomly divided into two groups with a ratio of 1:1. They were treated by a light-emitting diode light source of 633 ± 10 nm after being incubated with 5% ALA for an hour using a two-step or three-step irradiance schedule, respectively. The total irradiance intensity was 84 J/cm² of each session and the treatment interval was 2 weeks. Pain was recorded 30 min after each PDT using a visual analog scale (VAS). Follow-up was done at baseline and 2 weeks after each treatment. The numbers of lesions were counted after the third treatment through the pictures taken before and all the side effects were recorded at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven subjects completed the total three treatments (44 cases in Group A and 43 cases in Group B). The average VAS of Group B (1.61 ± 0.67) was significantly lower than that of Group A (3.14 ± 0.67), with a difference of 1.52 ± 0.08 (p < 0.0001) between them. Both groups received a similar effective rate after the total three sessions (88.64% vs. 88.37%, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The new three-step irradiance method could relieve pain during ALA-PDT more significantly than the two-step schedule with a similar effective rate.

Overcoming barriers in photodynamic therapy harnessing nano-formulation strategies

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been extensively investigated for decades for tumor treatment because of its non-invasiveness, spatiotemporal selectivity, lower side-effects, and immune activation ability. It can be a promising treatment modality in several medical fields, including oncology, immunology, urology, dermatology, ophthalmology, cardiology, pneumology, and dentistry. Nevertheless, the clinical application of PDT is largely restricted by the drawbacks of traditional photosensitizers, limited tissue penetrability of light, inefficient induction of tumor cell death, tumor resistance to the therapy, and the severe pain induced by the therapy. Recently, various photosensitizer formulations and therapy strategies have been developed to overcome these barriers. Significantly, the introduction of nanomaterials in PDT, as carriers or photosensitizers, may overcome the drawbacks of traditional photosensitizers. Based on this, nanocomposites excited by various light sources are applied in the PDT of deep-seated tumors. Modulation of cell death pathways with co-delivered reagents promotes PDT induced tumor cell death. Relief of tumor resistance to PDT with combined therapy strategies further promotes tumor inhibition. Also, the optimization of photosensitizer formulations and therapy procedures reduces pain in PDT. Here, a systematic summary of recent advances in the fabrication of photosensitizers and the design of therapy strategies to overcome barriers in PDT is presented. Several aspects important for the clinical application of PDT in cancer treatment are also discussed.

Sulfonated hydroxyaluminum phthalocyanine-biogenic Au/Ag alloy nanoparticles mixtures for effective photo-eradication of Candida albicans

In response to the increasingly widespread resistance of fungi to traditional treatment, we have reported successful photodynamic inactivation of Candida albicans planktonic cells using di-(AlPcS₂) and trisulfonated (AlPcS₃) hydroxyaluminum phthalocyanines in combination with Au/Ag alloy nanoparticles synthesized by the cell-free filtrate of Trichoderma koningii. These nanostructures with Au:Ag molar ratios 2:1, 1:1 and 1:2 have individual plasmonic band at 513-515 nm, 505-509 nm and 486-489 nm, respectively. XPS analysis of the ratio of gold to silver on the surface of these alloys indicated that Au and Ag formed a bimetallic system, wherein Au was coated with Ag. The XRD pattern revealed the angles at 38.2, 44.5, 64.9 and 78.0°. TEM analysis indicated that the average diameter of the synthesized alloys was 9 ± 3 nm, 8 ± 3 nm and 16 ± 3 nm for structures with Au:Ag molar ratios 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1, respectively. The FTIR band absorption, SEM-EDS analysis and basic elemental composition obtained by XPS confirmed that these nanostructures are stabilized by protein(s). Diode laser with the peak-power wavelength ʎ = 650 nm (output power of 40 mW; power density of 105 mW cm^-2) was used as a light source. The mixture of AlPcS₂+Au/Ag-NPs (Au:Ag = 2:1) can be considered as an effective photosensitizer, because eradication of C. albicans, as required by the American Society of Microbiology (99.9 %), was achieved at a low dose of light of 31.5 J cm^-2. It was postulated that this low dose of light applied to the photo-induced fungicidal effect may be painless for potential patients.

European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 2: emerging indications - field cancerization, photorejuvenation and inflammatory/infective dermatoses

In addition to approved indications in non-melanoma skin cancer in immunocompetent patients, topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) has also been studied for its place in the treatment of, as well as its potential to prevent, superficial skin cancers in immune-suppressed patients, although sustained clearance rates are lower than for immune-competent individuals. PDT using a nanoemulsion of ALA in a daylight or conventional PDT protocol has been approved for use in field cancerization, although evidence of the potential of the treatment to prevent new SCC remained limited. High-quality evidence supports a strong recommendation for the use of topical PDT in photorejuvenation as well as for acne, refractory warts, cutaneous leishmaniasis and in onychomycosis, although these indications currently lack approvals for use and protocols remain to be optimized, with more comparative evidence with established therapies required to establish its place in practice. Adverse events across all indications for PDT can be minimized through the use of modified and low-irradiance regimens, with a low risk of contact allergy to photosensitizer prodrugs, and no other significant documented longer-term risks with no current evidence of cumulative toxicity or photocarcinogenic risk. The literature on the pharmacoeconomics for using PDT is also reviewed, although accurate comparisons are difficult to establish in different healthcare settings, comparing hospital/office-based therapies of PDT and surgery with topical ointments, requiring inclusion of number of visits, real-world efficacy as well as considering the value to be placed on cosmetic outcome and patient preference. This guideline, published over two parts, considers all current approved and emerging indications for the use of topical photodynamic therapy in Dermatology prepared by the PDT subgroup of the European Dermatology Forum guidelines committee. It presents consensual expert recommendations reflecting current published evidence.

Conventional and combination topical photodynamic therapy for basal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established treatment option for low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

OBJECTIVES

To compare efficacy, cosmesis and tolerability of PDT for BCC with alternative treatments.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception until 1 September 2017. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PDT for nodular (n) and superficial (s) BCC reporting at least one of the following outcomes: clearance at 3 months and sustained at 1 or 5 years; recurrence at ≥ 1 year; cosmesis; adverse events; tolerability.

RESULTS

From 2331 search results, 15 RCTs (2327 patients; 3509 BCCs) were included. PDT efficacy (5-year sustained clearance) was high but inferior to excisional surgery [nBCC pooled risk ratio (RR) 0·76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·63-0·91], and without re-treatment of partially responding lesions, was modestly inferior to imiquimod (sBCC: RR 0·81; 95% CI 0·70-0·95) and similar to fluorouracil (sBCC: RR 0·88; 95% CI 0·75-1·04). Five-year sustained clearance was inferior with conventional vs. fractionated PDT (sBCC: RR 0·76; 95% CI 0·68-0·84). PDT cosmesis was superior to surgery (sBCC: RR 1·68, 95% CI 1·32-2·14; nBCC: RR 1·82, 95% CI 1·19-2·80) and cryosurgery (BCC: RR 3·73, 95% CI 1·96-7·07), and without re-treatment of partially responding lesions was similar to imiquimod (sBCC: RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·85-1·19) and fluorouracil (sBCC: RR 1·04, 95% CI 0·88-1·24). Peak pain was higher but of shorter duration with PDT than topical treatments. Serious adverse reactions were rarer with PDT than imiquimod (sBCC: RR 0·05, 95% CI 0·00-0·84) and fluorouracil (sBCC: RR 0·11, 95% CI 0·01-2·04). Combination PDT regimens demonstrated reduced recurrence and improved cosmesis; however, results from these small studies were often nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT is an effective treatment for low-risk BCC, with excellent cosmesis and safety. Imiquimod has higher efficacy than single-cycle PDT but more adverse effects. Highest efficacy is with excisional surgery. Fractionated and combination PDT options warrant further study.

Assessing daylight & low-dose rate photodynamic therapy efficacy, using biomarkers of photophysical, biochemical and biological damage metrics in situ

BACKGROUND

Sunlight can activate photodynamic therapy (PDT), and this is a proven strategy to reduce pain caused byconventional PDT treatment, but assessment of this and other alternative low dose rate light sources, and their efficacy, has not been studied in an objective, controlled pre-clinical setting. This study used three objective assays to assess the efficacy of different PDT treatment regimens, using PpIX fluorescence as a photophysical measure, STAT3 cross-linking as a photochemical measure, and keratinocyte damage as a photobiological measure.

METHODS

Nude mouse skin was used along with in vivo measures of photosensitizer fluorescence, keratinocyte nucleus damage from pathology, and STAT3 cross-linking from Western blot analysis. Light sources compared included a low fluence rate red LED panel, compact fluorescent bulbs, halogen bulbs and direct sunlight, as compared to traditional PDT delivery with conventional and fractionated high fluence rate red LED light delivery.

RESULTS

Of the three biomarkers, two had strong correlation to the PpIX-weighted light dose, which is calculated as the product of the treatment light dose (J/cm²) and the normalized PpIX absorption spectra. Comparison of STAT3 cross-linking to PpIX-weighted light dose had an R=0.74, and comparison of keratinocyte nuclear damage R=0.70. There was little correlation to PpIX fluorescence. These assays indicate most of the low fluence rate treatment modalities were as effective as conventional PDT, while fractionated PDT showed the most damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Daylight or artificial light PDT provides an alternative schedule for delivery of drug-light treatment, and this pre-clinical assay demonstrated that in vivo assays of damage could be used to objectively predict a clinical outcome in this altered delivery process.

Two-step irradiance schedule versus single-dose cold compress for pain control during 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy of condyloma acuminatum

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two-step irradiance schedule in relieving pain during PDT of CA.

METHODS

The study was a prospective, controlled trial of 141 CA patients who were randomly divided into Group A (two-step irradiance schedule) and Group B (single-dose cold compress). The numeric rating scales (NRS) of patients' pain were recorded at 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes during each PDT.

RESULTS

The efficacy of PDT and NRS scores of patients in the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference in gender, age, lesion site, and disease course between the two groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the cure rate of patients in the two groups was not significantly different (97.1% vs. 95.8%, χ²  = 0.000, P = 1.000). However, the NRS scores at different time points and number of PDT sessions were significantly different (F = 198.233 and 165.224, respectively, P < 0.05). The NRS scores of patients in Group A were significantly lower than those of patients in Group B (F = 82.762, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the NRS scores at different positions were significantly different (F = 28.286, P < 0.0001). The NRS scores of penis were significantly lower than those of the vulva and crissum (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with single-dose cold compress, two-step irradiance schedule could more significantly reduce the patients' pain degree during treatment, especially for vulva and crissum. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:908-912, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Photodynamic Therapy: A Clinical Consensus Guide

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) periodically develops consensus documents for its members concerning various aspects of dermatologic surgery. Advances in photodynamic therapy (PDT) have been many and PDT use has been established in a variety of skin conditions.

OBJECTIVE

The ASDS board of directors proposed a committee of experts in the field to develop consensus documents on different treatments. An expert panel reviewed the literature on PDT and discussed the findings. The consensus was reached with evidence-based recommendations on different clinical applications for PDT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This consensus document includes discussions regarding PDT, including different photosensitizers and various light source activators, historical perspective, mechanism of action, various therapeutic indications and expected outcomes, pre- and post-care, and management of adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Photodynamic therapy is highly effective for pre-cancerous lesions, superficial nonmelanoma skin cancers, inflammatory acne vulgaris and other conditions. New protocols including laser mediated PDT significantly improve results for several indications.

CONCLUSION

The ASDS consensus document on PDT will be helpful for educating members on safe and effective PDT for a variety of indications.

A prospective study of pain control by a 2-step irradiance schedule during topical photodynamic therapy of nonmelanoma skin cancer

BACKGROUND

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) for selected nonmelanoma skin cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) has yielded high long-term complete response rates with very good cosmesis. Pain during light activation of the photosensitizer can be a serious adverse event. A 2-step irradiance protocol has previously been shown to minimize ALA-PDT pain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the irradiance-dependent pain threshold for MAL-PDT, to adapt the 2-step protocol to a light-emitting diode (LED) light source, and assess clinical response.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 25 superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) received an initial irradiance by laser at 40 or 50 mW/cm², or LED at 35 mW/cm² followed by an irradiance at 70 mW/cm² for a total of 75 J/cm². Pain levels were recorded for both irradiance steps. Efficacy was assessed at 6, 12, or 24 months.

RESULTS

Pain was mild in the 40/70 mW/cm² laser cohort. Three instances of irradiance-limiting pain occurred at 50/70 mW/cm². Pain was minimal in the 35/70 mW/cm² LED cohort. Clinical response rates were 80% in the 50/70 mW/cm² laser cohort and 90% in the 35/70 mW/cm² LED cohort.

CONCLUSION

Topical PDT can be effectively delivered to sBCC with minimal treatment-related pain by a 2-step irradiance protocol.

Clinical, biochemical and histological study of the effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on oral mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil in hamsters

Oral mucositis (OM) is a debilitating side effect of chemotherapy, which can be relieved by phototherapy. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) may be used for the treatment of OM, when infection is present. However, there are no studies showing that aPDT affects tissue repair process when used in the treatment of lesions caused by OM. This work aims to evaluate the effect of aPDT in healing OM induced by 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). Two hundred forty-five hamsters were divided into two groups, control (C) and experimental, which were subdivided into 4 subgroups (Ch, ChP, ChL, aPDT). C group received only the vehicle of chemotherapy and anesthesia, whereas all animals of the experimental groups received anesthesia and chemotherapy agent 5-FU to induce OM. Ch group received no OM treatment; ChP group received an application of methylene blue (MB) 0.01%; ChL received irradiation with low-power-laser (LPL-660 nm/120 J /cm(2)/40 mW/4.4 J per point); and aPDT received MB and LPL irradiation. OM Clinical severity were daily assessed by a blinded examiner. The animals were sacrificed after 5, 7 and 10 days of experiment and their oral mucosa were removed for biochemical (enzymatic activity of SOD and catalase) and histological analyzes (light microscopy). After statistical analysis was performed, results showed that aPDT reduced the severity of OM on the tenth day of the experiment, when compared to the initial OM score (p < 0.05), as well as increased keratinization with organized collagen deposition in the lamina propria. In conclusion, aPDT can be safely used in animals with infected OM because it does not affect lesion-repairing processes.

Photodynamic therapy: current status and future directions

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive therapeutic modality used for the management of a variety of cancers and benign diseases. The destruction of unwanted cells and tissues in PDT is achieved by the use of visible or near-infrared radiation to activate a light-absorbing compound (a photosensitizer, PS), which, in the presence of molecular oxygen, leads to the production of singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species. These cytotoxic species damage and kill target cells. The development of new PSs with properties optimized for PDT applications is crucial for the improvement of the therapeutic outcome. This review outlines the principles of PDT and discusses the relationship between the structure and physicochemical properties of a PS, its cellular uptake and subcellular localization, and its effect on PDT outcome and efficacy.

Development of photodynamic therapy regimens that control primary tumor growth and inhibit secondary disease

Effective therapy for advanced cancer often requires treatment of both primary tumors and systemic disease that may not be apparent at initial diagnosis. Numerous studies have shown that stimulation of the host immune system can result in the generation of anti-tumor immune responses capable of controlling metastatic tumor growth. Thus, there is interest in the development of combination therapies that both control primary tumor growth and stimulate anti-tumor immunity for control of metastatic disease and subsequent tumor growth. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an FDA-approved anticancer modality that has been shown to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Augmentation of anti-tumor immunity by PDT is regimen dependent, and PDT regimens that enhance anti-tumor immunity have been defined. Unfortunately, these regimens have limited ability to control primary tumor growth. Therefore, a two-step combination therapy was devised in which a tumor-controlling PDT regimen was combined with an immune-enhancing PDT regimen. To determine whether the two-step combination therapy enhanced anti-tumor immunity, resistance to subsequent tumor challenge and T cell activation and function was measured. The ability to control distant disease was also determined. The results showed that the novel combination therapy stimulated anti-tumor immunity while retaining the ability to inhibit primary tumor growth of both murine colon (Colon26-HA) and mammary (4T1) carcinomas. The combination therapy resulted in enhanced tumor-specific T cell activation and controlled metastatic tumor growth. These results suggest that PDT may be an effective adjuvant for therapies that fail to stimulate the host anti-tumor immune response.

Photodynamic therapy: oncologic horizons

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a light-based intervention with a long and successful clinical track record for both oncology and non-malignancies. In cancer patients, a photosensitizing agent is intravenously, orally or topically applied and allowed time to preferentially accumulate in the tumor region. Light of the appropriate wavelength and intensity to activate the particular photosensitizer employed is then introduced to the tumor bed. The light energy will activate the photosensitizer, which in the presence of oxygen should allow for creation of the toxic photodynamic reaction generating reactive oxygen species. The photodynamic reaction creates a cascading series of events including initiation of apoptotic and necrotic pathways both in tumor and neovasculature, leading to permanent lesion destruction often with upregulation of the immune system. Cutaneous phototoxicity from unintentional sunlight exposure remains the most common morbidity from PDT. This paper will highlight current research and outcomes from the basic science and clinical applications of oncologic PDT and interpret how these findings may lead to enhanced and refined future PDT.