Facial microcirculatory and biomechanical skin properties after single high energy (Er):YAG laser application

Energy-Based Skin Rejuvenation: A Review of Mechanisms and Thermal Effects

BACKGROUND

Energy-based photoelectric and ultrasonic devices are essential for skin rejuvenation and resurfacing in the field of plastic surgery and dermatology. Both functionality and appearance are impacted by factors that cause skin to age, and various energy types have variable skin penetration depths and modes of transmission.

AIM

The objective is to advise safe and efficient antiaging treatment while precisely and sensitively controlling and assessing the extent of thermal damage to tissues caused by different kinds of energy-based devices.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed to review the mechanisms of action and thermal effects of photoelectric and ultrasonic devices in skin remodeling applications.

RESULTS

This paper reviews the thermal effects of energy-based devices in skin resurfacing applications, including the tissue level and molecular biochemical level. It seeks to summarize the distribution form, depth of action, and influencing factors of thermal effects in combination with the mechanisms of action of various types of devices.

CONCLUSION

Accurate control of thermal damage is crucial for safe and effective skin remodeling treatments. Thorough investigation of molecular biochemical indicators and signaling pathways is needed for real-time monitoring and prevention of severe thermal injury. Ongoing research and technological advancements will improve the accuracy and control of thermal damage during treatments.

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating the Single and Combined Efficacy of Radiofrequency and Hybrid Fractional Laser for Nonsurgical Aesthetic Genital Procedures in Post-Menopausal Women

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of interventions that provide long-term relief of genitourinary symptoms of menopause has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate radiofrequency and hybrid fractional laser (HFL) treatments for menopausal vulvovaginal symptoms.

METHODS

Thirty-one postmenopausal women completed all treatments and at least 1 follow-up. Outcomes included the Vulvovaginal Symptom Questionnaire (VSQ), Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire (VLQ), Urogenital Distress Short Form, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), laxity measurements via a vaginal biometric analyzer probe, and gene expression studies.

RESULTS

Mean VSQ score decreased 2.93 (P = 0.0162), 4.07 (P = 0.0035), and 4.78 (P = 0.0089) among placebo, dual, and HFL groups 3 months posttreatment and decreased to 3.3 (P = 0.0215) for dual patients at 6 months. FSFI scores increased in the desire domain for placebo and dual groups and in arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain domains for the HFL group 3 and 6 months posttreatment. An increase of 1.14 in VLQ score (P = 0.0294) was noted 3 months and 2.2 (P = 0.002) 6 months following dual treatment. There was also a mean decrease of 15.3 (P = 0.0069) in IIQ score for HFL patients at 3 months. Dual, HFL, and RF treatments resulted in statistically significant decreases in collagen I, elastin, and lysyl oxidase expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Several self-reported improvements were noted, particularly among HFL, dual, and placebo groups 3 and 6 months posttreatment. Objective biopsy analysis illustrated decreased gene expression, suggesting that treatments did not stimulate new extracellular matrix production.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Regenerative effect of combined laser and human stem cell-conditioned medium therapy on hypertrophic burn scar

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the effect of combined treatment with non-ablative laser and human stem cell-conditioned medium (HSCM) on tissue regeneration after burn-induced hypertrophic scar (HTS) formation.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with HTSs on both sides of the same body part were subjected to three sessions of non-ablative laser treatment, with an interval of four weeks between each treatment. Following laser treatment, HSCM and normal saline were applied to the HTSs of the right (experimental) and left side (control), respectively. Over the next 6 days, HSCM and moisturizer were applied to experimental scars, while only moisturizer was applied to control scars. Skin characteristics were evaluated before laser treatment and on the seventh day after the third laser treatment.

RESULTS

No significant intergroup differences were noted in the initial evaluation (P > 0.05). We found significant differences between the pre- and post-treatment measurements of erythema (P < 0.001), trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL; P < 0.001), and Cutometer® parameters (all parameters; P <0^.05) of experimental scars. Control scars also showed significant differences between pre- and post-treatment measurements of thickness (P = 0.01), erythema (P < 0.001), TEWL (P < 0.001), and Cutometer® parameters (all parameters; P < 0.05). Changes (pre- to post-treatment) in scar thickness between the experimental (-0.003 ± 0.09) and control scars (0.04 ± 0.12) were significant (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that HSCM has a positive effect on short-term results when applied after laser treatment of hypertrophic scars.