Impact of photodynamic therapy versus ultrasonic scaler on gingival health during treatment with orthodontic fixed appliances

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for the management of gingivitis and white spot lesions in fixed orthodontic patients: A systematic review

AIM

We conducted this review to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) for the management of gingivitis and white spot lesions (WSLs) in fixed orthodontic patients.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials assessing the clinical effectiveness of aPDT for the management of gingivitis and WSLs in fixed orthodontic patients without time limitation. Primary outcomes were the changes in clinical parameters such as DIAGNOdent, plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and gingival index (GI). Secondary outcomes included measurements of microbial and inflammatory factors, such as cytokine levels (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-1 beta [IL-1β], and interleukin-6 [IL-6]), and bacterial counts.

RESULTS

Our search yielded a total of 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Among the 11 studies that evaluated gingivitis, the majority employed a diode laser (670nm, 150 mW, 22J/cm2, 60seconds) as the light source and methylene blue at a concentration of 0.0005% (applied for 3minutes) as the photosensitizer in a single treatment session. The included studies reported positive effects of aPDT on gingivitis management, with more improvements observed in PI, BOP, and GI following aPDT treatment. Additionally, aPDT was found to reduce the counts of periopathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, as well as inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6). Two studies demonstrated that aPDT, particularly when administered in multiple sessions, effectively controlled the extent of WSLs during orthodontic treatment and yielded favorable outcomes that persisted for several months after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, aPDT appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for managing WSLs and gingivitis in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. However, further high-quality RCTs are necessary to investigate the impact of potential confounding factors on the efficacy of aPDT.

The effects of low-level laser therapy and photodynamic therapy on oral health of fixed orthodontics patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To investigate the effect of low-level laser and photodynamic therapy on the oral health, and periodontal tissue of fixed orthodontic patients and the effect of using photobiomodulation methods compared to routine plaque removal methods and the amount of plaque in fixed orthodontic patients. Method and materials First, the title and summary of related articles were collected by using the search strategy electronic databases PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane's CENTRAL, Scopus, ISI and all the articles that were published from the beginning to February 2023 were evaluated. The title, abstracts and full texts of all the relevant studies were reviewed respectively, and those meeting the criteria were entered into our study. Finally, the quality of the studies was examined and the results of the studies were pooled by means of random effects inverse variance meta-analysis. Results Eighteen randomized studies, conducted between 2015 and December 2022, were selected for meta-analysis. Five studies were conducted as split-mouth, twelve as parallel-group, and one as a cross-over design. Among the studies, five examined the effects of low-level laser therapy and twelve assessed the effects of photodynamic therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that photodynamic therapy significantly reduced probing depth compared to scaling (MD=-0.2 mm, P<0.001), though the difference does not seem to be clinically significant. But no significant differences between photodynamic therapy and scaling or low-level laser therapy and control groups in terms of plaque index, or bleeding on probing, gingival crevicular fluid volume, gingival recession, clinical attachment loss, bacterial load and concentrations of inflammatory substances across multiple follow-up periods. Conclusion Moderate evidence indicates that photodynamic therapy (PDT) is comparable to conventional methods in improving oral health, as measured by periodontal indices, inflammatory proteins, bacterial colonies, and white spot lesions, making it a suitable alternative. Limited evidence suggests low-level laser therapy (LLLT) may improve oral health, particularly addressing caries, but further research is needed.

Effect of nanomicelle curcumin-based photodynamic therapy on the dynamics of white spot lesions and virulence of Streptococcus mutans in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment: A randomized double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The formation of white spot lesions (WSLs) around fixed orthodontic appliances is a major complication during treatment. The current double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) study aims to investigate the varying effects of nanomicelle curcumin-based photodynamic therapy (NMCur-aPDT) on microbial count and virulence of Streptococcus mutans as well as the number and dynamics of WSLs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Double-blind prospective RCT, comprised of 48 patients with fixed orthodontic appliances, were recruited for the current study. The patients were divided into four groups according to the type of the treatment (NMCur, LED, NMCur-aPDT or VITIS® anti-caries mouthwash), using block randomization. Antimicrobial and anti-virulence activities of the treatments against isolated S. mutans were assessed via colony counting and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), respectively. The visual inspection using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) score and laser fluorescence (LF) detection using a DIAGNOdent device were used for the detection and assessment of the dynamics of WSLs, respectively, on the labial surface in four areas (i.e., gingival, incisal, mesial, and distal) of the upper and lower anterior teeth at 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120-days follow-up after bonding of the lower and upper arches.

RESULTS

The antimicrobial properties of NMCur, VITIS®, and NMCur-aPDT were time-dependent so the highest reduction in S. mutans population was observed following NMCur-aPDT (99.98%) on day 120 of the study. The gtfB gene expression levels in S. mutans isolates from the NMCur-aPDT group on days 60, 90, and 120 decreased by 2.07-, 2.32-, and 3.01-fold more than in S. mutans isolates from the VITIS® group, respectively (all P < 0.05), while NMCur and LED treatments could not significantly reduce gtfB gene expression up to 120 days of follow-up (P > 0.05). In patients who were treated with LED, an increase in the mean number of WSLs per patient (mean increase, 1.8; P < 0.05) was found, while in NMCur-aPDT and VITIS® groups, not only no increases were observed, but the mean number of WSLs per patient decreased (mean reductions, 0.5 and 0.9, respectively; not significant). LED treatment caused significant increases (P < 0.05) in the mean LF values at 90-and 120-days of follow-up in comparison with the baseline (mean increases, 5.1 and 6.5, respectively) while, in NMCur-aPDT, VITIS®, and NMCur groups 11.8-, 7.1-, and 4.4-reductions in the mean LF values were observed, respectively (all, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The antimicrobial and anti-virulence activities of NMCur-aPDT against S. mutans were higher than the other treatment groups. In patients who were treated with NMCur-aPDT, the mean number and LF values of WSLs per patient were significantly lower than the other groups in 90-and 120-days of follow-up.

Effect of ultrasonic scaling with adjunctive photodynamic therapy on the treatment of gingival inflammation among diabetic patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of methylene blue-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) on the gingival and immunological parameters in diabetic adolescent patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.

METHODS

The selected 40 participants were randomized equally into two groups; Group I (ultrasonic scaling + oral hygiene instructions) and Group II (ultrasonic scaling/oral hygiene instructions + aPDT). Serum HbA1c levels was assessed for all the participants at chairside. Plaque index (Pi), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were analyzed. Moreover, the assessment of crevicular fluid matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP-8) and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP-1α) was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique. All measurements were recorded at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks follow-up periods, respectively. Intergroup comparisons for p-value were computed using Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon singed ranks test to compute p-value for intra-group comparisons. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify explanatory variables for reduction in plaque scores and bleeding on probing, after controlling for the effects of other covariates. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the direction and strength for associations. Significance level was set at 5% for all analyses.

RESULTS

All 40 individuals completed the clinical trial. There was a statistically significant reduction in Pi and BOP in both Group I and Group II from baseline to 12 weeks of follow up (P<0.05). However, there was slight reduction in the plaque scores in Group-II as compared to Group-I at 12 weeks visit (P<0.05). There was also a statistically significant difference for BOP when Group-I was compared with Group-II on 12 weeks follow up assessment (P<0.05). HbA1c assessment indicated no statistically significant difference either within or between groups at any time point (P>0.05). Both MMP-8 and MIP-1α reported a significant decrease for both Groups I and II at 6 weeks and 12 weeks follow-up periods in comparison to baseline (P<0.05). Inter-group comparison indicated a statistically significant difference noted at both 6 weeks follow up that was maintained at 12 weeks follow up (P<0.05). The logistic regression analysis revealed that even after controlling the mean BMI as a predictor, the change of biomarker levels along with the improvement in plaque scores and bleeding on probing was not significant (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

aPDT significantly improved bleeding on probing and proinflammatory biomarkers among diabetic adolescent patients undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy.

Photodynamic Therapy in Orthodontics: A Literature Review

Treatment of malocclusions using fixed orthodontic appliances makes it difficult for patients to perform hygiene procedures. Insufficient removal of bacterial biofilm can cause enamel demineralization, manifesting by visible white spot lesions or periodontal diseases, such as gingivitis periodontitis or gingival hyperplasia. The classic methods of preventing the above problems include, in addition to proper hygiene, ultrasonic scaling, periodontal debridement, and oral rinses based on chlorhexidine. New alternative methods of reducing plaque around brackets are being developed. There is a growing interest among researchers in the possibility of using photodynamic therapy in orthodontics. A literature search for articles corresponding to the topic of this review was performed using the PubMed and Scopus databases and the following keywords: ‘photodynamic therapy’, ‘orthodontics’, and ‘photosensitizer(s)’. Based on the literature review, two main directions of research can be distinguished: clinical research on the use of photodynamic therapy in the prevention of white spot lesions and periodontal diseases, and ex vivo research using a modified orthodontic adhesive by adding photosensitizers to them. Methylene blue is the most frequently used photosensitizer in clinical trials. The effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy is mainly compared to the ultrasonic scaler as a single therapy or as an adjunct to the ultrasonic scaler. In their conclusions, the researchers most often emphasize the effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial levels in patients treated with fixed appliances and the possibility of using it as an alternative to routine procedures aimed at maintaining a healthy periodontium. The authors suggest further research on the use of photodynamic therapy to prove the validity of this method in orthodontics. It should also not be forgotten that proper hygiene is the basis for maintaining oral cavity health, and its neglect is a contraindication to orthodontic treatment.

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy and periodontal treatment in patients with gingivitis and fixed orthodontic appliances: Protocol of randomized, controlled, double-blind study

It is known that the presence of orthodontic brackets predisposes for a change in the biofilm, facilitating the development of gingivits. The sites are difficult to access with a toothbrush and periodontal curette, worsening inflammation, in addition, a gingival hyperplasia is associated with poor hygiene. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of photodinamyc therapy (PDT) as an adjuvant treatment, considering clinical immunoregulatory and microbiological parameters. This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study will include 34 patients, both genders, having used fixed appliance for more than 12 months, with gingivitis. Participants will be divided into two groups: G1 (n = 17)- Scaling and Root Planing + PDT placebo and G2 (n = 17)- Scaling and Root Planing + PDT. In G2 the following dosimetric parameters will be used: methylene blue 0.005%, λ= 660 nanometers (nm), 9 Joules (J) per site, irradiance= 3.5Watts (W)/ centimeters (cm), radiant exposure= 318J/cm. All participants will receive oral hygiene guidance prior the curetes scaling. The clinical periodontal data to be analyzed are plaque index, gingival index and probing depth. Crevicular fluid, from 4 pre-determined sites and saliva, will be collected and analysed for IL-6, IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α and IL-10 cytokines using ELISA (Enzyme immunoabsorption assay) method. Total Bacteria count will also be performed, by qPCR and Universal16SrRNA gene. All analysis will be realized using in the baseline (T0), 7 (T1) and 21 (T2) days after treatment. Oral health-related quality of life will be assessed using the OHIP-14 questionnaire at times T0 and T2. If sample distribution is normal, the Student T-test will be applied if it is not normal, the Mann-Whitney test will be used. The data will be presented in terms of ± PD and The significance level will be set at p < 0.05. Our results may improve quality of life and add data to establish a therapeutic alternative for gingivitis during the orthodontic treatment. Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04037709. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04037709 - Registered in July 2019.