A Comparative Study: Superficial Shaving Combined With Photodynamic Therapy Versus Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Plantar Warts

Photodynamic therapy for recalcitrant plantar warts: Case reports and a literature review

Plantar wart is one of the most recalcitrant types of cutaneous warts with a high recurrence rate. Recalcitrant plantar warts are resistant to traditional treatments such as cryotherapy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a modern, non-invasive method utilized to treat benign and malignant skin disorders. Several previous studies have reported the effective application of PDT treatment for plantar warts. We reported three cases of recalcitrant plantar warts successfully treated with PDT.

Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Liquid Nitrogen Cryotherapy and Curettage for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Periungual and Subungual Warts: Clinical Experience and Literature Review

Warts are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and can involve multiple parts of skin and mucosa, of which periungual and subungual warts are the most difficult to treat. Periungual or subungual wart is verruca vulgaris growing around or under the fingernail, destroying and deforming the nail and nail bed. Currently, liquid nitrogen cryotherapy and CO2 laser are often used for the treatment. Clinically, few doctors routinely use photodynamic therapy (PDT) to treat viral warts. We used PDT combined with liquid nitrogen cryotherapy and curettage to successfully treat a case of intractable periungual and subungual warts.

Photodynamic therapy combined with surgery versus Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma: A retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the preferable surgery for difficult -to-treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC) but is an expensive, labor-intensive, and time-consuming technique. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy combined with surgery(S-PDT) versus Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for the treatment of difficult-to-treat BCC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative study. A total of 32 patients, 16 patients with 48 lesions, were treated with S-PDT and the other 16 patients with 17 lesions treated by MMS were enrolled in this study. Follow-up was at least 36 months posttreatment.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate was no statistical difference between the S-PDT and MMS (P = 1.000, Fishers exact test). The median follow-up was 42.5 months (range 36-63 months).Mean healing time in the S-PDT [17.9 days (SD 9.8)] is longer than in MMS [7.5 days (SD 1.5)] during follow-up(P＜0.001,Independent T test) . On the whole, the cosmetic outcome of patients in S-PDT was statistically no significant difference with that in MMS according to a 4-point scale (p = 0.719, chi-squared test).

CONCLUSIONS

S-PDT is a safe, effective, and novel cosmetic treatment, which holds the potential to be an alternative treatment to MMS for some cases.

Effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy with Transfer Factor Capsules in the Treatment of Multiple Plantar Warts

BACKGROUND

Plantar warts are a common cutaneous disease of the sole of the foot caused by human papillomavirus. Photodynamic therapy has gained increasing attention in the treatment of plantar warts.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy combined with transfer factor capsules in the treatment of multiple plantar warts.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with multiple plantar warts who visited our outpatient department from September 2017 to August 2019 were randomly divided into two groups. Twenty-three patients received photodynamic therapy (treatment group) and thirty-eight received cryotherapy (control group). Both groups also received immune modulator transfer factor capsules. Skin lesion score, numeric rating scale- (NRS-) 10 score, recurrence rate, adverse reactions, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were analyzed in both groups.

RESULTS

The mean skin lesion score improved from 13.39 ± 3.88 before treatment to 1.48 ± 2.50 after the last treatment in the treatment group and from 12.47 ± 2.99 before treatment to 4.47 ± 3.67 after the last treatment in the control group. The success rate after 3 months of treatment was 86.96% in the treatment group and 39.47% in the control group. After 3 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the treatment group (20%) than in the control group (53.33%). The mean DLQI score at three months after treatment was significantly lower in the treatment group (3.61 ± 1.16) than in the control group (6.31 ± 2.59).

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy combined with immunomodulators significantly increased the cure rate and reduced the recurrence rate of multiple plantar warts compared with traditional cryotherapy combined with immunomodulators.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Intralesional 5-Fluorouracil/Lidocaine/Epinephrine Injection with Cryotherapy to Treat Common and Palmoplantar warts: a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Cutaneous warts are treated by different treatments with various efficacy. Intralesional injection of 5-fluorouracil (IL 5-FU) has been compared with placebo and a few other wart treatments. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of IL 5-FU injection with cryotherapy to treat common and palmoplantar warts. Forty-five patients with common and palmoplantar warts were treated with either IL 5-FU admixed with lidocaine and epinephrine (5-FU+LE) or cryotherapy, once weekly for six sessions. The patients were assessed for clinical response score, the thickness of warts, pain score, and quality of life in treatment sessions, two weeks and eight weeks after the last session. Nine patients (64.3%) in the 5-FU+LE group, and 5 patients (35.7%) in cryotherapy group experienced complete response (p=0.285). Both treatments caused improvement of clinical response score in the patients during the treatment time (p<0.001), but the efficacy of treatments was not significantly different (p=0.793). Changes in wart thickness were significantly more marked in the 5-FU+LE group compared to the cryotherapy group (p=0.021). The patients in the cryotherapy group experienced more severe pain compared to the 5-FU+LE group (p=0.011). The quality of life better improved in the 5-FU+LE group compared to the cryotherapy group (p = 0.02). To conclude, most of the patients that experienced complete clinical response had received 5-FU+LE injection, though the difference was not significant. However, 5-FU+LE injection accompanied less pain and caused more reduction in wart thickness and more improvement in quality of life compared to the cryotherapy.

The combination treatment of ozone water, superficial shaving, and photodynamic therapy in recalcitrant plantar warts: A successful case

In this work, we report the treatment of a patient with recalcitrant plantar warts with aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT), pretreatment with ozone water, and superficial shaving. With only one-time treatment, the lesions completely disappeared after three weeks and did not reappear during the two-year follow-up. Photodynamic therapy combination therapy has been reported to be successful for plantar warts with a low recurrence rate, while ozone water is an emerging treatment for infectious skin diseases, which can modulate immunity without obvious side effects. Pretreatment with ozone water and superficial shaving before PDT is a potential new strategy for treating recalcitrant and large plantar warts.

Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Involving a Novel Photosensitizer Combined With an Antibiotic in the Treatment of Rabbit Tibial Osteomyelitis Caused by Drug-Resistant Bacteria

Osteomyelitis is deep tissue inflammation caused by bacterial infection. If such an infection persists, it can lead to dissolution and necrosis of the bone tissue. As a result of the extensive use of antibiotics, drug-resistant bacteria are an increasingly common cause of osteomyelitis, limiting the treatment options available to surgeons. Photodynamic antibacterial chemotherapy has attracted increasing attention as a potential alternative treatment. Its advantages are a broad antibacterial spectrum, lack of drug resistance, and lack of toxic side effects. In this study, we explored the impact of the new photosensitizer LD4 in photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT), both alone and in combination with an antibiotic, on osteomyelitis. A rabbit tibial osteomyelitis model was employed and microbiological, histological, and radiological studies were performed. New Zealand white rabbits (n = 36) were randomly divided into a control group, antibiotic group, PACT group and PACT + antibiotic group for treatment. In microbiological analysis, a reduction in bacterial numbers of more than 99.9% was recorded in the PACT group and the PACT + antibiotic group 5 weeks after treatment (p < 0.01). In histological analysis, repair of the damaged bone tissue was observed in the PACT group, and bone repair in the PACT + antibiotic group was even more significant. In radiological analysis, the X-ray Norden score showed that the severity of bone tissue defects or destruction followed the pattern: PACT + antibiotic group < PACT group < antibiotic group < control group.

The application of physical pretreatment in photodynamic therapy for skin diseases

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used in skin diseases; the response rate of PDT treatment varies widely. The limited penetration in the tissue of photosensitizers influenced the penetration depth of PDT, which obviously impacts the therapeutic effect. The studies have improved the efficacy of PDT through various pretreatment applications; especially, the physical pretreatment had achieved significant outcomes. We will review the physical pretreatment to optimize the efficacy of PDT in skin diseases by searching the literature on this topic. The types of physical pretreatment commonly used in the clinical practice are discussed: curettage, superficial shaving, laser, surgical resection, plum-blossom needles, and microneedles. Compared with PDT alone, the physical pretreatment before PDT application was generally improved the efficacy and reduced the recurrence, especially in actinic keratoses (AK), Bowen disease (BD), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and viral warts. The application of the physical pretreatments before PDT may improve the efficacy of PDT in various skin diseases. However, each kind of physical pretreatment has the benefit and shortcoming, and the applicable situation is different.

Topical treatment for plantar warts: A systematic review

There are a wide variety of treatments for plantar warts, but none has been shown to be effective in all patients. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the efficacy of different topical treatments on plantar warts. Systematic electronic searches (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) were conducted in April 2020. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and retrospective or prospective clinical trials of the effects of topical and nonsurgical treatments of plantar warts were included. Two authors performed the study selection and data extraction. Any discrepancies between the two reviewers were discussed with a third reviewer. Forty-four studies were included. The average cure rates of the most frequent treatments were variable across the studies: cryotherapy (45.61%), salicylic acid (13.6%), cantharidin-podophyllin-salicylic acid formulation (97.82%), laser (79.36%), topical antivirals (72.45%), intralesional bleomycin (83.37%), and intralesional immunotherapy (68.14%). Twenty-two studies (50%) had a level of evidence 1b and grade of recommendation A, five studies (11.4%) had a level of evidence 2b and grade of recommendation B, two studies (4.5%) had a level of evidence 3b and grade of recommendation B, and 15 studies (34,1%) with a level of evidence 4 and grade of recommendation C. First-choice treatments for common warts, such as cryotherapy and salicylic acid, have low-cure rates for plantar warts. Other treatments, such as CPA formulation, immunotherapy, and intralesional bleomycin, which have compassionate use, have higher cure rates. This review should stimulate future high-quality research to evaluate these specialized treatments.

The application of medical scale in the treatment of plantar warts: analysis and prospect

Plantar warts are common cutaneous diseases on the sole caused by the human papillomavirus, with a high annual incidence rate of 14%. It often causes pain, which impairs quality of life of patients. Numerous therapeutic options for plantar warts exist with variable success. However, all of them, including first-line treatment, have different adverse reactions or high recurrence rates. There is no one effective method for all patients. The choice of treatment method puzzles doctors. With the help of medical scales, we can analyze the patients' condition, so as to guide the choice of treatment methods, which is of great significance for the individualized treatment of patients with plantar warts. This review takes cryotherapy, intralesional injection of bleomycin and photodynamic therapy as examples to discuss the application of medical scales in the treatment of plantar warts, summarizes the scales that can be used to evaluate the status of plantar wart, adverse reactions, prognosis and patient's financial situation, and discusses their clinical and scientific value. We hope to use scales to consider the severity of plantar warts and economic level, help different patients to choose different treatment options, and make suggestions on the evaluation of the adverse reactions and treatment effect.

A Critical Reappraisal of Off-Label Use of Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Non-Neoplastic Skin Conditions

BACKGROUND

In the past 30 years, topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been investigated for the treatment of a broad spectrum of cosmetic, inflammatory, and infectious skin conditions with variable, and often contrasting, results. However, the non-expert clinician may be in difficulty evaluating these results because different sensitizers, concentrations, formulations, light sources, and irradiation protocols have been used. In addition, many of these studies have poor quality design being case reports and uncontrolled studies of few cases.

SUMMARY

With the aim to clarify the potential usefulness of PDT for the treatment of infectious and inflammatory skin diseases as well as selected cosmetic indications, we searched for randomized controlled clinical trials, non-randomized comparative studies, retrospective studies, and case series studies with a number of at least 10 patients, published since 1990. Later, we reappraised the results in order to give a simple critical overview. Key Messages: Evidence from the literature seems to strongly support the use of ALA- and MAL-PDT for the treatment of common skin diseases such as acne, warts, condylomata, and Leishmania skin infection and for photorejuvenation, i.e., the correction of selected cosmetic changes of aging and photoaging. For other disorders, the level of evidence and strength of recommendation are lower, and controlled randomized studies with prolonged follow-ups are necessary in order to assess the clinical usefulness and other potential advantages over current treatment options.