Biochemical and Pain Comparisons Between the Laser Lancing Device and Needle Lancets for Capillary Blood Sampling: A Randomized Control Trial

Minimally invasive capillary blood sampling methods

INTRODUCTION

Whole blood samples, including arterial, venous, and capillary blood, are regularly used for disease diagnosis and monitoring. The global Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for a more resilient screening capacity. Minimally invasive sampling techniques, such as capillary blood sampling, are routinely used for point of care testing in the home healthcare setting and clinical settings such as the Intensive Care Unit with less pain and wounding than conventional venepuncture.

AREAS COVERED

In this manuscript, we aim to provide a overview of state-of-the-art of techniques for obtaining samples of capillary blood. We first review both established and novel methods for releasing blood from capillaries in the skin. Next, we provide a comparison of different capillary blood sampling methods based on their mechanism, testing site, puncture size, cost, wound geometry, healing, and perceptions of pain. Finally, we overview established and new methods for enhancing capillary blood collection.

EXPERT OPINION

We expect that microneedles will prove to be a preferred option for paediatric blood collection. The ability of microneedles to collect a capillary blood sample without pain will improve paediatric healthcare outcomes. Jet injection may prove to be a useful method for facilitating both blood collection and drug delivery.

Analysis of penetration depth and healing process of a needleless laser lancet using swept-source optical coherence tomography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Needleless laser lancets have been used to reduce needle pain in people who undertake self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Although clinical trials have been conducted to understand the degree of pain associated with the developed laser blood sampling device, it is only judged by the patients' subjective judgment. This study aimed to analyze the performance and healing process of a needleless laser lancet. In particular, the penetration depth and healing process of a conventional lancet and a needleless laser lancet were quantitatively analyzed using a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To reduce unnecessary animal sacrifice, pig skin was used to establish and set the conditions for needleless laser lancets (wavelength of 2.94 μm; LMT-5000; Lameditech), and the penetration depth and healing process were quantitatively assessed at 0, 6, 9, and 16 h after laser (energy, 150-270 mJ in stages; voltage, 7.4 Vdc ; pulse width, approximately 200 microsecond) irradiation using 7-week-old male BALB/c nude mice. The penetration depth and healing process were measured using homemade SS-OCT, and histopathological examination was performed to observe the healing process.

RESULTS

Four 7-week-old male BALB/c nude mice were tested at intensity levels of 1-3 using a needleless laser lancet and compared with the experimental values using a conventional lancet. After the lancet test, the diameter and depth of the puncture were measured using SS-OCT and the healing process was confirmed using SS-OCT and pathological slides. The puncture diameter of the needleless laser lancet was about 0.5 mm regardless of the level. In addition, the average depths at Levels 1, 2, and 3 of the measured needleless laser lancet were approximately 1.05, 1.18, and 1.52 mm, respectively, and the last common lancet was approximately 0.9 mm. In addition, the healing process of the needleless laser lancet and conventional lancet was confirmed through the SS-OCT system.

CONCLUSION

After using the needleless laser lancet, quantitative indicators such as the diameter of puncture, penetration depth, and healing process were confirmed through two-dimensional and three-dimensional images of the homemade SS-OCT system and microscopic imaging of pathological slides.

Comparison of Laser and Conventional Lancing Devices for Blood Glucose Measurement Conformance and Patient Satisfaction in Diabetes Mellitus

Self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose is important for controlling diabetes. Recently, a laser lancing device (LMT-1000) that can collect capillary blood without skin puncture was developed. We enrolled 150 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Blood sampling was performed on the same finger on each hand using the LMT-1000 or a conventional lancet. The primary outcome was correlation between glucose values using the LMT-1000 and that using a lancet. And we compared the pain and satisfaction of the procedures. The capillary blood sampling success rates with the LMT-1000 and lancet were 99.3% and 100%, respectively. There was a positive correlation (r=0.974, P<0.001) between mean blood glucose levels in the LMT-1000 (175.8±63.0 mg/dL) and conventional lancet samples (172.5±63.6 mg/dL). LMT-1000 reduced puncture pain by 75.0% and increased satisfaction by 80.0% compared to a lancet. We demonstrated considerable consistency in blood glucose measurements between samples from the LMT-1000 and a lancet, but improved satisfaction and clinically significant pain reduction were observed with the LMT-1000 compared to those with a lancet.

Comparison between a laser lancing device and lancet for capillary blood sampling, capillary blood hemoglobin measurement, and blood typing

BACKGROUND

Blood donor screening includes tests using capillary blood, which is usually obtained by finger pricking using a lancet; however, the lancet has some shortcomings, such as skin puncture pain and needle stick injury. Recently, laser lancing devices for finger-prick sampling have been developed. We compared capillary blood Hb (cHb) levels and blood typing results obtained using a laser lancing device with those obtained using a lancet.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

cHb levels, blood typing results, and skin puncture pain scores were assessed in 191 participants. Finger-prick sampling was performed using LMT-1000 (LaMeditech, Seoul, Korea) and a lancet on the same finger on different hands. Paired venous Hb (vHb) levels were assessed in 103 participants using an automated hematology analyzer and compared with the cHb levels obtained using both lancing devices.

RESULTS

The paired cHb results obtained with the laser lancing device and lancet showed a strong correlation (r = 0.927, p < .001) without any significant difference (p = .113) and a substantial agreement (κ = 0.654) for the identification of participants with a low Hb level (<12.5 g/dl). cHb levels were significantly higher than vHb levels with both lancing devices (mean differences: 0.27-0.43 g/dl). The results of blood typing using the laser lancing device showed 100% accuracy. Use of the laser lancing device showed significantly lower skin puncture pain scores (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Use of a laser lancing device for capillary Hb measurement and blood typing showed accurate results, with significantly reduced skin puncture pain. Laser lancing devices could be feasible for donor screening tests.