Hepatocellular nodules in cirrhosis: focus on diagnostic criteria on liver biopsy. A Western experience

Comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI sequences for measuring hepatic observation size and its implication of LI-RADS classification

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine the optimal image sequence for measurement of hepatic observations on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI in comparison with pathologic measurement, and to evaluate its clinical impact on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 classification.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-three patients (279 hepatic observations) who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI and subsequent hepatectomy were retrospectively included. Two radiologists independently evaluated the visualization score (five-point scale) and size of each observation on six MRI sequences (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, arterial-phase, portal venous-phase, transitional-phase [TP], and hepatobiliary-phase [HBP] images) and assigned a LI-RADS category. Correlations between MRI and pathologic measurements were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients. A repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc comparison tests was used to compare the visualization scores and absolute differences between MRI sequences and pathologic measurements. The LI-RADS classification according the size measurement of each MRI sequence was compared using Cochran's Q test with a post hoc McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Of the MRI sequences, HBP had the highest visualization score (4.1 ± 0.6) and correlation coefficient (r = 0.965). The absolute difference between MRI and pathologic measurement was lowest on TP (2.3 mm ± 2.2), followed by HBP (2.4 mm ± 2.1). In the LI-RADS classifications, HBP did not have any non-visible observations. Regarding LR-3, LR-4, and LR-5, there was no significantly different LI-RADS classification among the six MRI sequences (p ≥ 0.122).

CONCLUSION

Hepatobiliary-phase images are clinically useful for measuring hepatic observations on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, especially regarding visibility and correlation with pathologic findings.

LI-RADS v2018: how to appropriately use ancillary features in category adjustment from intermediate probability of malignancy (LR-3) to probably HCC (LR-4) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

To determine the appropriate use of ancillary features (AFs) in upgrading LI-RADS category 3 (LR-3) to category 4 (LR-4) for hepatic nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed MRI features of solid hepatic nodules (≤ 30 mm) categorized as LR-3/4 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. In LI-RADS diagnostic table-based-LR-3 observations, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify AFs suggestive of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) rather than non-malignant nodules. Using McNemar's test, the sensitivities and specificities of the final-LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis were compared according to the principles of AF application in category adjustment.

RESULTS

A total of 336 hepatic nodules (191 HCCs; 145 non-malignant) in 252 patients were evaluated. Based on major HCC features, 248 nodules (123 HCCs) were assigned as table-based-LR-3 and 88 nodules (68 HCCs) as table-based-LR-4. In table-based-LR-3 observations, mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity was identified as an independent predictor of HCC as opposed to non-malignant nodules (odds ratio = 3.01, p = 0.002). For HCC diagnosis, different criteria of final-LR-4: only table-based-LR-4, allowing category upgrade using only T2 hyperintensity, or using any AFs favoring malignancy resulted in sensitivities of 35.6% (68/191), 53.9% (103/191), and 88.5% (169/191), and specificities of 86.2% (125/145), 75.9% (110/145), and 21.4% (31/145), respectively, which differed from each other (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While the application of MRI AF in LI-RADS category adjustment increases the sensitivity of LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis, it is accompanied by a significant decrease in specificity. Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, a significant AF indicative of HCC, may be more appropriate for upgrading LR-3 to LR-4.

KEY POINTS

• When upgrading from LR-3 to LR-4 using any MRI ancillary features favoring malignancy, LR-4 sensitivity increases but specificity decreased for HCC diagnosis. • By upgrading LR-3 to LR-4 based on MRI ancillary features found to suggest HCC rather than non-malignant nodules in multivariate analysis (i.e., mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity), LR-4 demonstrated a more balanced sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis (53.9% and 75.9%, respectively).

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI: A Multicenter Study

Background Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may indicate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or nonmalignant cirrhosis-associated nodules. Purpose To assess the distribution of pathologic diagnoses of HBP hypointense nodules without APHE at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and to evaluate clinical and imaging features in differentiating their histologic grades. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included pathologic analysis-confirmed HBP hypointense nodules without APHE (≤30 mm) in patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis screened between January 2008 and June 2016. Central pathologic review by 10 pathologists determined final histologic grades as progressed HCC, early HCC, high-grade dysplastic nodule (DN), and low-grade DN or regenerative nodule. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI features were analyzed by three radiologists. Multivariable logistic regression analyses with elastic net regularization were performed to identify clinical and imaging features for differentiating histologic grades. Results There were 298 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 10; 226 men) with 334 nodules evaluated, and progressed HCCs were diagnosed in 44.0% (147 of 334), early HCCs in 20.4% (68 of 334), high-grade DNs in 27.5% (92 of 334), and low-grade DNs or regenerative nodules in 8.1% (27 of 334). Serum α-fetoprotein level 100 ng/mL or greater (odds ratio, 2.7; P = .01) and MRI features including well-defined margin (odds ratio, 5.5; P = .003), hypointensity at precontrast T1-weighted imaging (odds ratio, 3.2; P < .001), intermediate hyperintensity at T2-weighted imaging (odds ratio, 3.4; P < .001), and restricted diffusion (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .04) were independent predictors for progressed HCC at multivariable analysis. Conclusion In patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI corresponded mainly to progressed HCCs, early HCCs, and high-grade dysplastic nodules. High α-fetoprotein level and some imaging features at MRI helped to differentiate progressed HCC from lower grade nodules. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Motosugi in this issue.

Liver volume-based prediction model stratifies risks for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients on surveillance

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to determine whether dynamic computed tomography (CT)-measured liver volume predicts the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when the CT scans do not reveal evidence of HCC in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients on surveillance.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre cohort study included 1,246 patients who received entecavir and regular HCC surveillance in three tertiary referral centres in South Korea. Liver volumes were measured on portal venous phase CT images. A nomogram was developed based on Cox independent predictors and externally validated. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for comparison with previous prediction models.

RESULTS

Patients who received dynamic CT studies during surveillance had significantly higher risk for HCC compared to patients without CT studies (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.1; p < 0.001). Expected/measured liver volume ratio was an independent predictor of HCC (HR = 4.2; p = 0.002) in addition to age, sex and cirrhosis. The nomogram based on the four predictors discriminated risks for HCC (HR = 4.1 and 6.0 in derivation and validation cohort, respectively, for volume score > 150; p < 0.001). Time-dependent ROC analysis confirmed better performance of the volume score compared to HCC prediction models with conventional predictors (integrated area under curve = 0.758 vs. 0.661-0.712; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-measured liver volume is an independent predictor of future HCC, and nomogram-based liver volume score may stratify the risks of HCC in CHB patients who showed negative CT findings for HCC during surveillance.

Hepatoblastoma in Explanted Livers of Patients With Biliary Atresia

OBJECTIVES

Surveillance of hepatic nodules for malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma is important in the monitoring of patients with biliary atresia (BA). To date, only 2 published case reports describe the finding of hepatoblastoma (HB) in this setting. The present study aimed to investigate this association of HB and BA, and to assess the utility of alpha-fetoprotein (aFP) as a marker in the diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients who underwent isolated liver transplantation (LTx) for the primary diagnosis of BA at a single center, between January 1999 and June 2014, was conducted. Patient demographics, pre-LTx aFP levels, and histologic examination of native liver explants were reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred two (44% men, median age 11 months) patients underwent LTx for BA. Two (2%) explants examinations were confirmatory for concomitant HB; both patients had abnormally elevated aFP. Overall, 56 (55%) patients had available pre-LTx aFP levels. Recipients with persistently abnormal aFP levels (n = 20, 36%) were older at hepatoportoenterostomy (107 vs 68 days, P = 0.02) and younger at LTx surgery (359 vs 1713 days, P < 0.01), compared to patients with constantly normal levels (n = 24, 43%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, HB was found to coexist in approximately 2% of patients with BA undergoing LTx, far exceeding the hypothetical anticipated incidence of 1:10 billion for the concomitant diagnoses. Elevated serum aFP levels may be sensitive but not specific for HB in this context. Further research is required to identify specific mechanisms and risk factors.

Histopathology of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently the sixth most common type of cancer with a high mortality rate and an increasing incidence worldwide. Its etiology is usually linked to environmental, dietary or life-style factors. HCC most commonly arises in a cirrhotic liver but interestingly an increasing proportion of HCCs develop in the non-fibrotic or minimal fibrotic liver and a shift in the underlying etiology can be observed. Although this process is yet to be completely understood, this changing scenario also has impact on the material seen by pathologists, presenting them with new diagnostic dilemmas. Histopathologic criteria for diagnosing classical, progressed HCC are well established and known, but with an increase in detection of small and early HCCs due to routine screening programs, the diagnosis of these small lesions in core needle biopsies poses a difficult challenge. These lesions can be far more difficult to distinguish from one another than progressed HCC, which is usually a clear cut hematoxylin and eosin diagnosis. Furthermore lesions thought to derive from progenitor cells have recently been reclassified in the WHO. This review summarizes recent developments and tries to put new HCC biomarkers in context with the WHOs reclassification. Furthermore it also addresses the group of tumors known as combined hepatocellular-cholangiocellular carcinomas.

Morphometric analysis of hepatocellular nodular lesions in HCV cirrhosis

We generated a computerized morphometric model to evaluate and quantify the morphological features in large regenerative nodules (LRN), high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sixteen LRN, 10 HGDN and 16 HCC in HCV-cirrhotic livers were stained with H&E, smooth muscle actin, CD34, CD31 and reticulin to evaluate volume and surface fractions. On H&E stains, the most discriminatory features between LRN, HGDN and HCC were volume fraction and the number of hepatocyte nuclei in unit volume and hepatocyte nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio. On immunohistochemistry, volume fractions of capillarised sinusoids, capillary units and isolated arteries were significantly different among all groups and highest in HCC; surface fraction of reticulin was markedly decreased in HCC. Our morphometric model is an objective method for quantification of the morphological changes of the nodular lesions, and it could be applied to studies involving histological evaluation of the spectrum of nodular lesions arising in the cirrhotic liver.

Keratin 19 epithelial patterns in cirrhotic stroma parallel hepatocarcinogenesis

Cirrhotic septa harbor vessels and inflammatory, fibrogenic, and ductular epithelial cells, collectively referred to as the ductular reaction (DR). Lack of the DR in the stromal compartment around hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been documented; however, the relationship of epithelial keratin 19 (K19) structures to progression of intralesional carcinogenesis has not been explored. K19 immunoreactivity in the stromal compartment around 176 nodules in cirrhotic explants was examined. Quantitative differences (P < 0.0001) were manifested in three distinct histologically identifiable patterns: "complex" around cirrhotic nodules (CN), "attenuated" around dysplastic nodules (DN), and "absent" around HCC. Markers of necrosis or apoptosis could not explain the perinodular K19 epithelial loss; however, multicolor immunolabeling for K19, vimentin, E-Cadherin, SNAIL, and fibroblast-specific protein 1 (FSP-1) demonstrated discrepancies in immunophenotype and cytomorphologic features. Variability of cellular features was accompanied by an overall decrease in epithelial markers and significantly increased fractions of SNAIL- and FSP-1-positive cells in the DR around DN when compared with CN (P < 0.0001). Immunolabeling of transforming growth factor-β signaling components (TGFβR1, SMAD3, and pSMAD2/3) demonstrated increased percentages of pSMAD2/3 around DN when compared with CN (P < 0.0001). These findings collectively suggest marked alterations in cellular identity as an underlying mechanism for the reproducible extralesional K19 pattern that parallels progressive stages of intranodular hepatocarcinogenesis. Paracrine signaling is proposed as a link that emphasizes the importance of the epithelial-stromal compartment in malignant progression of HCC in cirrhosis.

From chronic liver disorders to hepatocellular carcinoma: Molecular and genetic pathways

Hepatocarcinogenesis is a process attributed to progressive genomic changes that alter the hepatocellular phenotype producing cellular intermediates that evolve into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). During the preneoplastic phase, the liver is often the site of chronic hepatitis and/or cirrhosis, and these conditions induce liver regeneration with accelerated hepatocyte cycling in an organ that is otherwise proliferatively at rest. Hepatocyte regeneration is accelerated by upregulation of mitogenic pathways involving molecular and genetic mechanisms. Hepatic growth factors, inhibitors and triggers may also play a role. This process leads to the production of monoclonal populations of aberrant and dysplastic hepatocytes that have telomerase re-expression, microsatellite instability, and occasionally structural aberrations in genes and chromosomes. Development of dysplastic hepatocytes in foci and nodules and the emergence of HCC are associated with the accumulation of irreversible structural alterations in genes and chromosomes even if the genomic basis of the malignant phenotype is largely heterogeneous. Therefore, a malignant hepatocyte phenotype may be produced by changes in genes acting through different regulatory pathways, thus producing several molecular variants of HCC. On these bases, a key point for future research will be to determine whether the deletions are specific, due to particular loci in the minimally deleted regions of affected chromosome arms, or whether they are non-specific with loss of large portions of chromosomes or entire chromosome arms leading to passive deletion of loci. The final aim is the possibility of identifying a step where carcinogenetic processes could be terminated.

The application of markers (HSP70 GPC3 and GS) in liver biopsies is useful for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Liver biopsy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection is largely restricted to small hepatocellular lesions, which are often morphologically challenging, requiring careful distinction between dysplastic nodules (high-grade) and well-differentiated HCC.

METHODS

We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of a panel of markers (HSP70 GPC3 and GS), previously tested in resection specimens, in a series of liver biopsies of large regenerative nodules (n=13), low-grade dysplastic nodules (n=21), high-grade dysplastic nodules (n=50), very well-differentiated (VWD) (n=17), well-differentiated (WD-G1) (n=40) and G2-3 (n=35) HCC.

RESULTS

Almost all cases of large regenerative and low-grade dysplastic nodules did not stain while high-grade dysplastic nodules showed 1 marker (22%) but never 2 or 3. For HCC detection the overall accuracy of marker combination was 60.8% (3 markers) and 78.4% (2 markers) with 100% specificity. When restricted to VWD+WD-G1 HCC the accuracy was 57% (3 markers) and 72.9% (2 markers) with 100% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

This panel proved useful to detect well-differentiated HCC in biopsy. Two immunoreactive markers (out of 3) are recommended as the most valuable diagnostic combination for HCC detection. The diagnostic accuracy of the panel could be improved using additional markers, as suggested by studies of expression profiling in other human models.

Histological features of early hepatocellular carcinomas and their developmental process: for daily practical clinical application : Hepatocellular carcinoma

Based on clinical and pathological experience, indistinct margin-type hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were considered to be typical early-stage HCCs with good prognosis. For histological diagnosis, the assessment of stromal invasion (tumor invasion into portal tracts and fibrous septa) is very important. In differentiating stromal invasion from pseudoinvasion (benign hepatic tissue in the fibrous stroma), the following 5 items are useful: (1) macroscopic or panoramic views of the histological specimen, (2) amount of fibrous components of the stroma, (3) destruction of the structure of portal tracts, (4) loss of reticulin fibers around cancer cells, and (5) cytokeratin 7 immunostaining for ductular proliferation. Parenchymal features of early HCCs are summarized as follows: (1) thin trabecular structure, (2) hypercellularity, (3) hyperstainability of cytoplasm, and (4) microacinar formation. Detailed understanding of the total biopsy procedure and various difficult lesions is necessary for a correct biopsy diagnosis. Evaluation of noncancerous tissue is also required to attain a better understanding of the developmental process and clinical stages of HCCs.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma without preoperative tumor biopsy

BACKGROUND

Progress in liver imaging has made pretransplantation tumor biopsy no longer systematic in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of a preoperative diagnosis of HCC based on clinical and radiological findings in 102 cirrhotics qualified for liver transplantation (LT) between January 1995 and August 2003 at our institution.

METHODS

The diagnostic accuracy of our policy was assessed by comparing pretransplant diagnosis with the pathologic report of explanted livers.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for the preoperative clinical and radiological diagnosis of HCC were 89%, 94.3%, 77%, and 93.3%, respectively. A false-positive preoperative diagnosis was made in 20 of 102 patients (19.6%) (dysplastic nodules [n=9], regenerative nodules [n=5] cholangiocellular carcinoma [n=1], hemangioma [n=1], and no lesion [n=4]). All tumors larger than 3 cm were correctly diagnosed, irrespective of serum alpha-fetoprotein (sAFP) levels. The risk of overestimating the diagnosis of HCC in the subgroup of patients with tumors less than 3 cm was conversely correlated with preliver transplantation sAFP (sAFP<or=100 ng/L: 28%; sAFP>100: 11%; sAFP>200: 0%).

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotics with nodules larger than 3 cm irrespective of sAFP or nodules less than 3 cm with sAFP greater than 200 ng/L, the pretransplant diagnosis of HCC can be made without performing biopsy. In other cases (i.e., nodules less than 3 cm and sAFP lower than 200 ng/L), histologic confirmation of HCC or a close follow-up imaging should be considered.

How to characterize non-hypervascular hepatic nodules on contrast-enhanced computed tomography in chronic liver disease: feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with a microbubble contrast agent

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although hypervascular appearance is characteristic in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic nodules without hypervascular appearance are sometimes found in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The aim of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with Levovist to characterize small, non-hypervascular hepatic nodules on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in patients with CLD.

METHODS

The subject was 41 hepatic nodules (<30 mm, 18.5 +/- 5.6 mm) which showed non-hypervascular appearance on CECT in 35 patients with CLD; their histological results were 31 HCC (15 well, 14 moderate, and two poor) and 10 regenerative nodules (RN). CEUS with Levovist was performed under intermittent scanning (1-s interval) using APLIO at the early phase and the liver-specific phase, and the contrast enhancement of the nodule was assessed in comparison to that of the surrounding liver parenchyma. The contrast-enhanced findings with the time-intensity analysis were compared with the histological results.

RESULTS

Twelve nodules with weak enhancement in the liver-specific phase were HCC, regardless of their early-phase appearances. The other 29 nodules with equivalent or weak enhancement in the early phase and equivalent enhancement in the liver-specific phase were 19 HCC and 10 RN. Among them, the maximum-intensity ratio of tumor to non-tumor in the early phase was significantly higher in HCC than in RN (P < 0.01, n = 16), and the receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed a sensitivity of 1.0 and a specificity of 0.83 for their characterization.

CONCLUSION

CEUS with Levovist may be an alternative to biopsy to characterize small, non-hypervascular hepatic nodules on CECT in patients with CLD.

Large (>or=2 cm) non-hypervascular nodules depicted on MRI in the cirrhotic liver: fate and implications

AIM

To determine the fate and clinical implication of large (>or=2 cm), non-hypervascular nodules depicted on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the cirrhotic liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 21 patients with cirrhosis (14 hepatitis B, two ethanol abuse, four cryptogenic, one Wilson's disease), 25 large (>or=2 cm in the longest dimension) non-hypervascular nodules were identified on dynamic MRI. The implications for diagnosis of the initial size, contour, and signal characteristics on MRI in addition to patients' age and cause of cirrhosis were assessed in our analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve (75%) out of 16 lesions were malignant or potentially-malignant from 14 hepatitis B patients, while seven (78%) of the nine lesions from other patients were benign (p=0.016). The mean age of the patients who had malignant or potentially malignant lesions (57 years) was older than that for the other patients (47 years; p=0.039). The ratio of the short-to-long diameter was higher in malignant or potentially malignant lesions (mean 0.86) than in benign lesions (mean 0.69; p=0.008). There was no discriminative signal intensity characteristic (p>0.2 for all factors) that indicated the malignant potential for each non-hypervascular nodule. For all 10 lesions in the hepatitis B patients who were older than 52 years with a short-to-long diameter ratio of more than 0.75, the positive predictive value for malignant potential based on these three combined factors was 100%.

CONCLUSION

In older patients with cirrhosis from hepatitis B, large (>or=2 cm), non-hypervascular nodules with a spherical contour have a high malignant potential.

Hepatitis B virus-associated multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: a stepwise increase in allelic alterations

Hepatocarcinogenesis is a multistep process, but systematic analysis using a genetic or molecular approach to accurately delineate the different stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development is scarce. In this study, we used genome-wide allelotyping to systematically evaluate the allelic alterations in the multisteps of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. The overall fractional allelic loss (FAL) indices of cirrhosis, dysplastic nodules (DN), and HCC were significantly different, with a clear stepwise increase (P < 0.001). Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was uncommon in cirrhotic livers (n = 24; mean FAL index +/- SD, 0.09 +/- 0.09; median, 0.07). In contrast, LOH was common in our 74 HCC nodules, which were predominantly hepatitis B virus-associated (mean FAL index +/- SD, 0.40 +/- 0.23; median, 0.38). The 18 DNs had FAL index (mean +/- SD, 0.27 +/- 0.19; median, 0.20) in between that of cirrhosis and HCC. Importantly, high-grade DNs had FAL index significantly higher than that of low-grade DNs (P = 0.031) and close to that of HCC, indicating that high-grade DNs were genetically closer to HCC. However, there was no significant difference in FAL indices between primary HCCs and their corresponding intrahepatic metastases, but this absence of major allelic losses in this transformation to a metastatic phenotype does not exclude small-scale chromosomal losses or gene deletions. To conclude, hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocarcinogenesis is a multistep process accompanied by stepwise increase in allelic losses from cirrhosis and low- and high-grade DN to HCC. Such allelic losses contribute to promote tumor development and progression.

Current role of ultrasound for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a decisive influence on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients. Although α-fetoprotein (AFP) is a known and specific tumor maker for HCC, it is not suitable for the screening and surveillance of HCC because of its poor predictive value and low sensitivity. The use of imaging modalities is essential for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of HCC. Ultrasound (US) plays a major role among them, because it provides real-time and non-invasive observation by a simple and easy technique. In addition, US-guided needle puncture methods are frequently required for the diagnosis and/or treatment process of HCC. The development of digital technology has led to the detection of blood flow by color Doppler US, and the sensitivity for detecting tumor vascularity has shown remarkable improvement with the introduction of microbubble contrast agents. Moreover, near real-time 3-dimensional US images are now available. As for the treatment of HCC, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) was developed as a novel technology that provides a transcutaneous ablation effect without needle puncture. These advancements in the US field have led to rapid progress in HCC management, and continuing advances are expected. This article reviews the current application of US for HCC in clinical practice.

Hepatic precancerous lesions and small hepatocellular carcinoma

Precancerous lesions that may be detected in chronically diseased, usually cirrhotic livers, include: clusters of hepatocytes with atypia and increased proliferative rate (dysplastic foci) that usually represent an incidental finding in biopsy or resection specimens; and grossly evident lesions (dysplastic nodules) that may be detected on radiologic examination. There are two types of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (defined as HCC that measures less than 2 cm): early HCC, which is well-differentiated and has indistinct margins; and distinctly nodular small HCC, which is well- or moderately differentiated, and is usually surrounded by a fibrous capsule. Precise diagnosis of precancerous and early cancerous lesions by imaging methods is often difficult or impossible. Detection of a dysplastic lesion in a biopsy specimen is a marker of increased risk for HCC development, and warrants increased surveillance. High-grade dysplastic nodules and small HCCs should be treated by local ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation.

Recent advances in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

In the last decade, new imaging techniques have become available, offering the possibility of investigating contrast perfusion of liver nodules in cirrhosis. It is now accepted that a non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be established based on the vascular pattern, obtained with pure blood pool contrast agents. The diagnostic pattern includes: hypervascularity in the arterial phase (15-35 s after contrast injection), consisting in a contrast signal in the nodule greater than in the surrounding parenchyma, followed by contrast wash out, which leads the nodule to show the same, or, more specifically, a lower contrast signal, than the surrounding parenchyma in the portal and late phases (>40 s after injection). Such a pattern can be obtained not only by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, but also by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, most simply with real-time low mechanical index harmonic imaging ultrasound equipment with second-generation ultrasound contrast agents. The risk of false-positive diagnosis of malignancy isnearly abolished when the functional vascular pattern is not the only feature, but is superimposed on a nodule visible also without contrast. One single contrast imaging technique may suffice to make a diagnosis of HCC if the nodule is >1 cm in diameter and has developed during a surveillance program. Other types of contrast agents, such as those taken up by the reticular-endothelial system cells, may offer additional diagnostic clues, but definitive evidence of their efficacy is still to be produced. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced imaging techniques now offer the possibility of a non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in a large number of cases, reducing the need of invasive investigations, such as ultrasound-guided biopsy or angiography.

Hepatocellular dysplastic nodules

The multistep process of hepatic carcinogenesis is mirrored by the morphologic classification of lesions detectable in cirrhosis, which include large regenerative nodules (LRN), low grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN), and high grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN). The latter belong to the "bordeline malignancy" category requiring accurate distinction from well-differentiated and early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nodules in cirrhosis are usually detected by non-invasive imaging techniques, which are unable to discriminate malignant from non-malignant forms, particularly in the 1-2-cm sized group. Liver biopsy is essential in providing practical diagnostic information to hepathologists in the management of cirrhotic patients with ultrasound (US)-detectable nodules. Histologic diagnosis on liver samples is based on the accurate search of a set of cyto-architectural features (e.g. cell atypia, cell crowding, trabecular thickness, microacini) and by a supplement of histochemical (Gomori staining) and immunocytochemical stainings. The latter rely upon the search of both well established and novel markers, targeted to evaluate stromal invasion (CK7/19), the vascular pattern (ASMA and CD34), or tumor markers (including HSP70 and glipican-3). Still, the diagnostic sensitivity is limited by the type and size of sampling and by its representativity of the entire lesion. Thus, the best diagnostic approach requires the integration ofclinical, morphological, and immunocytochemical information with imaging data (i.e. US pattern, perfusional pattern, helical computed tomography/magnetic resonance pattern). Molecular data are still under evaluation as to their diagnostic efficacy in this controversial field. Discrepancies have emerged recently between Eastern and Western interpretation of these lesions, particularly in the category of "borderline" nodules that are mostly labelled as early, well differentiated HCC by Eastern pathologists and as HGDN by Western pathologsts. Novel and more objective phenotypical and molecular markers are needed to discriminate within the grey area of borderline lesions that, epidemiologically, are likely distinct between Eastern and Western geographic areas. These tools might allow a better understanding of the boundaries of the process going from high grade dysplasia to in situ HCC and from the latter to microinvasive HCC and advanced HCC, for proper clinical management and optimal therapy.

Ductular reaction is helpful in defining early stromal invasion, small hepatocellular carcinomas, and dysplastic nodules

BACKGROUND

Stromal invasion is 1 of the main features used to distinguish high-grade dysplastic nodules (DNs) from well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). The authors hypothesized that ductular reaction (DR) takes place around noninvasive hepatocellular nodules but not within the stroma contiguous to invasive HCC.

METHODS

DR/cytokeratin 7 (CK7)-positive patterns were evaluated in 105 resected small hepatic nodules according to the level of invasion. The nodules were classified histologically prior to immunostaining as noninvasive (large regenerative nodules, low-grade DNs, and high-grade DNs), minimally invasive (early HCCs with a vaguely nodular type), and overtly invasive (typical HCCs with a distinctly nodular type) in a review by expert pathologists, the current gold standard. Intranodular DR (inner DR) and DR around the nodule periphery (outer DR) were assessed separately on a semiquantitative scale from 0 to 4+.

RESULTS

DR was 3 or 4+ in the majority of noninvasive nodules (inner DR, 81%; outer DR, 91%), whereas DR was 0 or 1+ in overtly invasive HCCs (inner DR, 96%; outer DR, 81%). Minimally invasive HCCs showed an intermediate DR pattern (2 or 3+ inner DR, 75%; 2+ outer DR, 67%). DR characteristically was absent at the stromal-invasive, leading edge of tumor cells in both minimally invasive HCCs (focal loss of DR/CK7) and overtly invasive HCCs (diffuse loss of DR/CK7). The DR patterns in 41 needle-biopsy samples were similar to the patterns observed in resected nodules.

CONCLUSIONS

DR/CK7 immunostaining may help to identify small foci of invasion and to distinguish noninvasive, high-grade DNs from both minimally invasive and overtly invasive HCCs.

Diagnostic value of HSP70, glypican 3, and glutamine synthetase in hepatocellular nodules in cirrhosis

Hepatocellular nodules in cirrhosis include regenerative (large regenerative, LRN) and dysplastic (low and high grade, LGDN and HGDN) nodules, early and grade 1 HCC (eHCC-G1), and overt HCC. The differential diagnosis may be particularly difficult when lesions such as HGDN and eHCC-G1 are involved. We investigated the diagnostic yield of a panel of 3 putative markers of hepatocellular malignancy such as HSP70, glypican 3 (GPC3), and glutamine synthetase (GS). We selected 52 surgically removed nonmalignant nodules (15 LRNs, 15 LGDNs, 22 HGDNs) and 53 HCCs (10 early, 22 grade 1, and 21 grade 2-3) and immunostained them for HSP70, GPC3, and GS. The sensitivity and specificity of the individual markers for the detection of eHCC-G1 were 59% and 86% for GS, 69% and 91% for GPC3, and 78% and 95% for HSP70. We identified 2 main phenotypes: (1) all negative, seen in 100% LRN and LGDN, 73% HGDN and 3% eHCC-G1; (2) all positive, a feature detected in less than half the eHCC-G1. Using a 3-marker panel, when at least 2 of them, regardless which, were positive, the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of eHCC-G1 were respectively 72% and 100%; the most sensitive combination was HSP70+/GPC3+ (59%) when a 2-marker panel was used.

CONCLUSION

The adopted panel of 3 markers is very helpful in distinguishing eHCC-G1 from dysplastic nodules arising in cirrhosis.

Biliary and reticuloendothelial impairment in hepatocarcinogenesis: the diagnostic role of tissue-specific MR contrast media

The development and progression of a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a chronically diseased liver, i.e., the carcinogenesis, comprise a multistep and long-term process. Morphologically, this process is associated with the presence of distinct nodular lesions in the liver that are called 'preneoplastic lesions.' These preneoplastic lesions are associated with and can precede the growth and progression of well-differentiated HCCs . The characterization of nodular lesions and demonstration of the multistep development of HCC in the cirrhotic liver by imaging modalities represent a challenging issue. The arterial hypervascular supply, depicted by different dynamic studies, represents a fundamental radiological criterion for the diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed with tissue-specific contrast media can help to investigate the "grey area" of carcinogenesis, in which significant histological changes are already present without any imaging evidence of neoangiogenesis. The purpose of this review is to provide information on the properties of tissue-specific MR contrast agents and on their usefulness in the demonstration of the pathologic changes that take place at the level of the biliary and reticuloendothelial systems during the carcinogenetic process in liver cirrhosis.

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the liver: Algorithmic approach and current issues in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

The role of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the evaluation of focal liver lesions has evolved. Guided FNAB is still useful to procure a tissue diagnosis if clinical, biochemical and radiologic findings are inconclusive. Major diagnostic issues include: (i) Distinction of benign hepatocellular nodular lesions from reactive hepatocytes, (ii) Distinction of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WD-HCC) from benign hepatocellular nodular lesions, (iii) Distinction of poorly differentiated HCC from cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic carcinomas, (iv) Determination of histogenesis of malignant tumor, and (v) Determination of primary site of origin of malignant tumor. This review gives a general overview of hepatic FNAB; outlines an algorithmic approach to cytodiagnosis with emphasis on HCC, its variants and their mimics; and addresses current diagnostic issues. Close radiologic surveillance of high-risk cirrhotic patients has resulted in the increasing detection of smaller lesions with many subjected to biopsy for tissue characterization. The need for tissue confirmation in clinically obvious HCC is questioned due to risk of malignant seeding. When a biopsy is indicated, core needle biopsy is favored over FNAB. The inherent difficulty of distinguishing small/early HCC from benign hepatocellular nodular lesions has resulted in indeterminate reports. Changing concepts in the understanding of the biological behavior and morphologic evolution of HCC and its precursors; and the current lack of agreement on the morphologic criteria for distinguishing high-grade dysplastic lesions (with small cell change) from WD-HCC, have profound impact on nomenclature, cytohistologic interpretation and management. Optimization of hepatic FNAB to enhance the yield and accuracy of diagnoses requires close clinicopathologic correlation; combined cytohistologic approach; judicious use of ancillary tests; and skilled healthcare teams.

General management

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The general management of hepatocellular carcinoma begins with an accurate diagnosis. With advances in imaging studies, noninvasive diagnosis has become an accepted standard of care for hepatocellular carcinoma, though pathologic examination is still required in selected cases. Following diagnosis, accurate staging is the next most important step in selecting the most appropriate treatment modality. Patients with localised tumor and compensated liver disease should be considered for partial hepatectomy, and patients with poor hepatic function but early tumor stage are candidates for liver transplantation. Patients who do not qualify for either of these curative treatments may be evaluated for palliative therapy, of which transarterial chemoembolisation is most widely used. This review will discuss the role of biopsy, the pros and cons of noninvasive and pathologic tissue diagnosis as well as the general approach to choose the most appropriate treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.