Centrilobular necrosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: association with acute cellular rejection and impact on outcome

The role of the gut microbiome in graft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving option for children with end-stage liver disease. However, about 50% of patients develop graft fibrosis in 1 year after LT, with normal liver function. Graft fibrosis may progress to cirrhosis, resulting in graft dysfunction and ultimately the need for re-transplantation. Previous studies have identified various risk factors for the post-LT fibrogenesis, however, to date, neither of the factors seems to fully explain the cause of graft fibrosis. Recently, evidence has accumulated on the important role of the gut microbiome in outcomes after solid organ transplantation. As an altered microbiome is present in pediatric patients with end-stage liver diseases, we hypothesize that the persisting alterations in microbial composition or function contribute to the development of graft fibrosis, for example by bacteria translocation due to increased intestinal permeability, imbalanced bile acids metabolism, and/or decreased production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Subsequently, an immune response can be activated in the graft, together with the stimulation of fibrogenesis. Here we review current knowledge about the potential mechanisms by which alterations in microbial composition or function may lead to graft fibrosis in pediatric LT and we provide prospective views on the efficacy of gut microbiome manipulation as a therapeutic target to alleviate the graft fibrosis and to improve long-term survival after LT.

Acute, Chronic, and Humoral Rejection: Pathologic Features Under Current Immunosuppressive Regimes

Under current immunosuppressive regimes, T-cell-mediated acute and chronic rejection remain common and important posttransplant complications. The definition of humoral (antibody-mediated) rejection has been greatly expanded in recent years. The histopathologic assessment of allograft biopsies continues to serve an important role in the diagnosis of rejection and to facilitate patient management. The diagnosis of both acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection requires integration of the results of donor-specific antibody testing and C4d immunostaining, as well as exclusion of other potential etiologies of allograft dysfunction. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection should also be included in the differential diagnosis for unexplained allograft fibrosis.

Liver Transplant Pathology: Review of Challenging Diagnostic Situations

Histopathologic assessment of allograft liver biopsies has an important role in managing patients who have undergone liver transplantation. In this review, several topics are discussed that create diagnostic problems in transplant pathology, with emphasis on pathologic features and differential diagnosis. The topics discussed are acute cellular rejection, late acute rejection (centrizonal/parenchymal rejection), chronic rejection, plasma cell hepatitis, idiopathic posttransplant chronic hepatitis, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, selected viral infections (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and hepatitis E), and acute antibody-mediated rejection.

Frequency, clinical presentation, and outcomes of drug-induced liver injury after liver transplantation

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is increasingly being recognized as a common cause of acute hepatitis. The clinical impact of DILI after liver transplantation (LT) is not known. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency, clinical presentation, and outcomes of DILI in LT recipients. LT recipients with possible DILI were identified with electronic pathology records and clinical note database retrieval tools. Diagnostic criteria were applied to identify cases of DILI. Twenty-nine of 1689 LT recipients (1.7%) were identified with DILI. The mean age was 52 years, and 52% were women. The major indications for LT were primary sclerosing cholangitis (28%), cholangiocarcinoma (14%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (14%). The severity of DILI was mild or moderate in 92% of the cases. Nausea or diarrhea (31%), jaundice (24%), and pruritus (10%) were the most common symptoms at the time of diagnosis. The mean biochemistry values were as follows: alanine aminotransferase, 204 ± 263 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase, 108 ± 237 U/L; alkaline phosphatase, 469 ± 689 U/L; and total bilirubin, 1.9 ± 10.3 mg/dL. The median duration of medication use until the diagnosis of DILI was 57 days, and the major agent classes were antibiotics (48%), immunosuppressive agents (14%), and antihyperlipidemic drugs (7%). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was the most common implicated agent (n = 11). Serum liver enzymes improved within a median time of 34 days (range = 5-246 days) after drug withdrawal. Hepatic retransplantation or death did not occur. Among the 50 cases with possible DILI explained by other causes, 13 individuals (26%) had no alternative diagnosis despite histological findings compatible with DILI. In conclusion, DILI is a rare yet underrecognized event among LT recipients. The majority of cases are not clinically severe, and they resolve after drug cessation without hepatic retransplantation or death.

What is the long-term outcome of the liver allograft?

With improved long-term survival following liver transplantation (LT), issues relating to the assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors are becoming increasingly relevant. Histological abnormalities are commonly present in late post-transplant biopsies, including protocol biopsies from patients who appear to be well with good graft function. Recurrent disease is the commonest recognised cause of abnormal graft histology, but may be modified by the effects of immunosuppression or interactions with other graft complications, resulting in complex or atypical changes. Other abnormalities seen in late post-transplant biopsies include rejection (which often has different appearances to those seen in the post-transplant period), de novo disease, "idiopathic" post-transplant hepatitis (IPTH) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. In many cases graft dysfunction has more than one cause and liver biopsy may help to identify the predominant cause of graft damage. Problems exist with the terminology used to describe less well understood patterns of graft injury, but there is emerging evidence to suggest that late rejection, de novo autoimmune hepatitis and IPTH may all be part of an overlapping spectrum of immune-mediated injury occurring in the late post-transplant liver allograft. Careful clinico-pathological correlation is very important and the wording of the biopsy report should take into account therapeutic implications, particularly whether changes in immunosuppression may be indicated. This article will provide an overview of the main histological changes occurring in long-term survivors post-LT, focusing on areas where the assessment of late post-transplant biopsies is most relevant clinically.

De novo autoimmune hepatitis with centrilobular necrosis following liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: a case report

De novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occurred in patients who underwent liver transplantation for a different etiology. This 55-year-old woman was transplanted due to PBC. One year after liver transplantation, she complained of fatigue. Liver function tests showed markedly elevated serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and globulin levels. She also tested positive for anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA). Liver biopsy showed lymphocytic and plasmacytic infiltration in the portal and periportal areas, with numerous areas of bridging centrilobular necrosis, indicating AIH. She had a pretreatment AIH score of 16 points, and a posttreatment score of 18 points according to the scoring system of the International AIH Group (IAHG). The patient was treated effectively with prednisone, but then suffered two further episodes of AIH as a result of decreasing the prednisone dose. Histological features on liver biopsy were similar to those on initial presentation. Treatment with prednisone and azathioprine resulted in a dramatically improved outcome. Her liver function and globulin levels rapidly returned to normal and have remained so thereafter.

Significance of central perivenulitis in pediatric liver transplantation

Central perivenulitis (CP) encompasses dropout of zone 3 hepatocytes, red blood cell extravasation, and perivenular mononuclear inflammation. In the liver transplant setting, CP can occur in isolation or it can occur in association with portal-based disease such as acute cellular rejection (PB-ACR). Some CP is also thought to be a manifestation of chronic rejection, particularly when accompanied by zone 3 fibrosis. Prior studies of CP in pediatric liver allografts have been hampered by lack of protocol biopsies and low rates of histologic follow-up. We studied 62 consecutive liver allografts from 55 pediatric patients (age: < or =18 y) who underwent transplant from the years 1995 to 2007. Forty-nine allografts (79%) had > or =1 year of histologic follow-up, 32 (52%) > or =3 years, and 24 (39%) > or =5 years. We reviewed a total of 445 allograft biopsies (mean: 7.2 per allograft) obtained at 2 days to 11 years; 213 (48%) of these were protocol biopsies. Seven explanted livers that were removed during the course of retransplantation for graft failure in this group were also reviewed. All specimens were scored for the following features: (1) CP (mild, moderate, and severe), (2) portal ACR (mild, moderate, and severe), (3) zone 3 fibrosis (mild=perivenular or severe=bridging), and (4) ductopenia. CP was present in 120 (27%) of 445 biopsies, including 73 with CP+PB-ACR, 16 with CP within 1 month of PB-ACR, 27 with isolated CP, 3 with CP+de-novo autoimmune hepatitis, and 1 with CP+Epstein-Barr virus infection. Overall, CP was observed on at least 1 occasion in 41 (66%) allografts. It was not associated with any specific liver function test abnormality or pattern of liver function test abnormalities, it was not associated with vascular compromise as judged by Doppler ultrasound examinations, and it was not related to type of immunosuppression. CP overall was equally prevalent in the early (< or =3 mo) and late (>3 mo) post-transplant periods, but isolated CP increased in the late period. On follow-up, 6 (15%) of 41 allografts with CP developed ductopenic chronic rejection (4 requiring retransplantation) and 10 (25%) developed zone 3-based fibrosis without ductopenia (2 severe, 8 mild). In contrast, none of the 21 allografts without CP developed chronic rejection (P=0.09) and none had zone 3-based fibrosis on their last biopsy (P<0.001). All patients who developed ductopenia had 1 or more episodes of CP+PB-ACR. In contrast, isolated CP [seen in 17 (27%) allografts on at least 1 occasion] was associated with zone 3-based fibrosis in 50%, but did not lead to ductopenic chronic rejection. These results underscore the high frequency of CP in pediatric liver transplantation, occurring in 27% of all allograft biopsies and 66% of allografts overall. CP is most common in conjunction with portal ACR, where it carries a significant risk for the development of zone 3 fibrosis and a trend toward the development of ductopenic chronic rejection.

The prevalence and natural history of untreated isolated central perivenulitis in adult allograft livers

Central perivenulitis (CP) in the allograft liver can be associated with portal-based acute cellular rejection and autoimmune hepatitis or can occur in isolation (isolated CP). Although several studies have demonstrated the significance of CP, the prevalence and natural history of untreated isolated CP have not been well studied. We examined 100 adult allograft liver recipients who had long-term follow-up, had routine protocol biopsies, and received no treatment for isolated CP. Isolated CP was identified in 28 (28%) patients. It occurred late at a mean of 658 days. Interestingly, patients with late isolated CP (defined as >3 months posttransplant) usually manifested only mildly to modestly elevated liver function tests. However, late isolated CP was associated with prior and subsequent allograft complications. Nearly all (94%) cases of late isolated CP occurred in patients who had early episodes of CP and/or acute cellular rejection. Of 13 patients who developed adverse outcomes in their allografts (zone 3 fibrosis in 10, de novo autoimmune hepatitis in 3, and ductopenia in 3), all experienced episodes of prior CP, and 12 (92%) had late CP; 1 patient required retransplant for chronic rejection, but all were alive within the last year. In summary, "transplant-associated" isolated CP occurs in 28% of adult patients, early CP is predictive of late CP, and late CP (often present as isolated CP) is associated with long-term liver injury in some patients.

Hepatic parenchymal changes and histologic eosinophilia as predictors of subsequent acute liver allograft rejection

During the first episode of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation, centrilobular changes in liver biopsy specimens may be possible indicators of subsequent episodes of ACR, early chronic rejection, or acute graft loss. The purpose of this study was to identify differences between the histopathological findings in liver biopsy specimens obtained during the first rejection episode in patients who subsequently developed further episodes of ACR and those who did not. The histopathological findings in 22 patients who had a single episode of acute rejection (group 1) were compared with those in 23 patients who had multiple episodes of acute rejection (group 2). Only the first liver biopsy samples of the latter group were taken into consideration. We assessed the predictive value of centrilobular necrosis, central vein endothelialitis, pericentral inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, cholestasis, hepatocellular apoptosis, lobular inflammation, the degree of portal eosinophilia, and characteristic portal tract features in poor responders to antirejection treatment. The time to the first episode of ACR and the rejection activity index were similar in patients in both groups. Hepatocellular apoptosis, hepatocellular ballooning, and central vein endothelialitis were common features of both groups. The incidences of pericentral inflammation, centrilobular necrosis, and portal eosinophilia were significantly higher in patients in group 2 than in those in group 1 (P < 0.05). Patients with pericentral inflammation, centrilobular necrosis, and marked portal eosinophilia during an initial episode of acute rejection may be more likely to develop subsequent episodes of ACR.

Hypoattenuation in unenhanced CT reflects histological graft dysfunction and predicts 1-year mortality after living donor liver transplantation

Early postoperative graft function assessments are essential after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to predict patient and graft outcome. Computed tomography (CT) is usually used to evaluate various complications and parenchymal abnormalities after LDLT. Here, we attempted to determine the prognostic values of CT attenuation changes of grafts for predicting 1-year patient survival. Liver attenuation indices (LAIs), derived from differences between hepatic and splenic attenuations, were calculated on unenhanced CT images obtained 10 days after LDLT in 62 adult LDLT recipients between September 2002 and August 2004. Patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to LAI value on the 10th postoperative day, as follows: group L (LAI < or = 5, n = 14) or group H (LAI > 5, n = 48). Parenchymal dysfunction scores, summed parameters for histological dysfunction including both portal tract and centrilobular features, were also assessed on the 10th postoperative day using liver biopsy specimens. Histological parenchymal dysfunction, especially in the centrilobular area, in terms of cholestasis, centrilobular necroinflammation, central vein fibrosis, steatosis, mononuclear infiltrates, and hepatocyte ballooning, was more prominent in group L than in group H, while that in the portal area was similar between the 2 study groups. Significant negative linear correlations were observed between LAI and parenchymal dysfunction scores (r = 0.486, P < 0.001). Group L patients showed lower 1-year survival (69.7%) than group H patients (95.8%; P = 0.0002). Moreover, group H patients died with a functioning graft (n = 3), whereas group L patients died of graft failure (n = 6). After multivariate analysis, LAI alone remained independently associated with 1-year mortality (P = 0.014; odds ratio = 0.845; 95% confidence interval, 0.739-0.967). The sensitivity and specificity of LAI were 84.6% and 75%, respectively, and LAI outperformed MELD score as a predictor of 1-year mortality after LDLT by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In conclusion, LAI, as determined by unenhanced CT 10 days after LDLT, well predicts 1-year patient survival after LDLT.

Does the Banff rejection activity index predict outcome in patients with early acute cellular rejection following liver transplantation?

The Banff schema incorporates a semiquantitative scoring system for grading of acute cellular rejection (ACR) of the liver allograft. The Banff rejection activity index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation (E); bile duct damage (B); and portal inflammation (P); the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI). The purpose of this research was to determine the prognostic value of the Banff RAI score in predicting the response to increased immunosuppression and the long-term outcome of the graft. A retrospective study was done of patients undergoing primary liver transplantation between January 2000 and October 2004 with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression; 495 patients were included, 231 had histologically-confirmed ACR, 193 responded to 1 cycle of high-dose steroids. There was no correlation between the total RAI score and response to steroids, resistant rejection, development of chronic rejection, or graft survival. The E score was related to patient survival, a lower score being associated with a worse outcome (P = 0.048). In multivariable analysis, serum bilirubin, serum aspartate aminotransferase, and E score were significant predictors of death (P = 0.012). In univariable analysis, B score and bilirubin were significantly related to "resistant rejection" (P = 0.018 and 0.002, respectively), but only bilirubin was significant in multivariable analysis (logistic regression). In conclusion, although the Banff RAI score is a useful marker of the severity of rejection, neither the total RAI score nor any of the individual components correlated with response to steroids or graft survival.

Pathomorphological Features of Acute Rejection in Patients After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Own Experience

INTRODUCTION

Acute hepatic allograft rejection remains an important problem following liver transplantation. Liver biopsy specimens show a combination of characteristic changes, first observed by Snover as a diagnostic triad: portal inflammation, bile duct damage, and central or portal vein endothelial inflammation (endothelitis or endothelialitis). The aim of this study was to describe our histopathological assessment of liver transplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the period between September 2000 and June 2004, we evaluated 150 liver biopsy specimens from 105 liver recipients.

RESULTS

Acute rejection was diagnosed in 26.6% of liver biopsies taken from 31.4% patients who demonstrated clinical symptoms of liver damage. In 90% of cases the rejection was described as minimal or mild, and in 10% as moderate. There was no episode of severe acute rejection. Only four biopsies (10%) showed nothing but Snover triad changes. In 9 (22.5%) cases only acute rejection was diagnosed; the remaining showed in addition to acute rejection the possibility of other concomitant pathologies: viral infection in 15 cases (37.5%), biliary flow obstruction in 11 cases (28.5%), functional cholestasis in two cases (5%), and ischemic complications in three cases (7.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Histologically confirmed acute rejection episodes were diagnosed in 14.9% liver recipients. Liver biopsy specimens, aside from Snover triad features, often showed other unspecific morphological changes. Differentiation of acute rejection from other accompanying diseases is sometimes difficult, requiring precise clinical data and pathologist experience.

Histologic characteristics of late cellular rejection, significance of centrilobular injury, and long-term outcome in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Cellular rejection is a common event in orthotopic liver transplantation, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Late acute cellular rejection, which occurs at least 3 months post-transplant, affects 8-32% of pediatric liver transplant recipients. The histopathology and clinical outcome of patients affected by late cellular rejection are incompletely understood. The aims of this study were 1) to characterize late cellular rejection in the pediatric liver transplant population and describe the histopathology of late cellular rejection, with specific attention to centrilobular injury, including necrosis, inflammation, and endothelialitis and 2) to characterize the long-term outcome of pediatric liver transplant recipients with centrilobular injury, including necrosis, inflammation, and endothelialitis. All liver biopsies performed from August 1997 to August 2002 on pediatric patients at least 6 months post-transplant were reviewed, scored for rejection by Banff criteria and examined for centrilobular inflammatory changes. Histology was then correlated with clinical outcomes. Fifteen percent of biopsies had late cellular rejection by Banff criteria. Centrilobular inflammation, necrosis and central vein endothelialitis were common in these biopsies. In patients with similar centrilobular changes, but not meeting Banff criteria for rejection, 29% were treated for rejection and responded well clinically. The long-term outcome of patients with isolated centrilobular injury is similar to that of patients with centrilobular changes associated with portal based rejection. In conclusion, the presence of centrilobular inflammation, necrosis, or central vein endothelialitis should prompt consideration of late cellular rejection.