MELD?Moving steadily towards equality, equity, and fairness

Modelling kidney outcomes based on MELD eras - impact of MELD score in renal endpoints after liver transplantation

Background

Acute kidney injury is a common complication in solid organ transplants, notably liver transplantation. The MELD is a score validated to predict mortality of cirrhotic patients, which is also used for organ allocation, however the influence of this allocation criteria on AKI incidence and mortality after liver transplantation is still uncertain.

Methods

This is a retrospective single center study of a cohort of patients submitted to liver transplant in a tertiary Brazilian hospital: Jan/2002 to Dec/2013, divided in two groups, before and after MELD implementation (pre-MELD and post MELD). We evaluate the differences in AKI based on KDIGO stages and mortality rates between the two groups.

Results

Eight hundred seventy-four patients were included, 408 in pre-MELD and 466 in the post MELD era. The proportion of patients that developed AKI was lower in the post MELD era (p 0.04), although renal replacement therapy requirement was more frequent in this group (p < 0.01). Overall mortality rate at 28, 90 and 365 days was respectively 7%, 11% and 15%. The 1-year mortality rate was lower in the post MELD era (20% vs. 11%, p < 0.01). AKI incidence was 50% lower in the post MELD era even when adjusted for clinically relevant covariates (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Liver transplants performed in the post MELD era had a lower incidence of AKI, although there were more cases requiring dialysis. 1-year mortality was lower in the post MELD era, suggesting that patient care was improved during this period.

Liver Transplantation Selection and Allocation Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A European Perspective

For patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation offers the best chance of cure. Over the past two decades, selection criteria to determine eligibility for liver transplantation have been constantly refined but a fair allocation strategy of liver grafts to HCC patients remains challenging. In Europe, over a dozen transplantation networks apply different liver transplantation criteria for HCC patients. In this review, we explore and compare candidate selection and liver graft allocation strategies for patients with HCC with a European perspective and discuss the ethical and technical challenges involved. In addition, we suggest possible paths for future improvement such as transitioning from fixed selection and allocation criteria to a more flexible model of benefit, which includes criteria concerning the graft, response to treatment, the biology of the tumor, and other relevant recipient factors.

Liver transplantation organ allocation between Child and MELD

Liver transplantation (LT) has been established as the most effective therapy for acute and chronic liver diseases over the last few decades due to its excellent long-term results. At the beginning of the LT era, donor organs were allocated based on waiting time. However, as the number of LT candidates consistently increased, a specific allocation system became necessary to prioritize the large number of patients waiting for a limited pool of organs. The LT candidates were categorized into different urgency levels based on their hospital status, degree of liver disease as measured by the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, and accompanying complications of liver disease, such as ascites, variceal bleeding or hepatocellular carcinoma. The majority of European countries, including Austria, still rely on this organ allocation system. In the United States, however, a new allocation system based on the risk of death without transplantation, assessed by the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), was initiated in February 2002. Recent reports have shown that the introduction of the MELD system led to a reduction in waiting list mortality, but also that the MELD score has several limitations that call for further refinements. In the transplant community there are reasonable doubts that MELD is actually superior to the Child-Turcotte Pugh score. Therefore, the optimal liver organ allocation system is yet to be defined.