Histological recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: Outcome and role of retransplantation

Long-term antiviral treatment for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The management of patients treated for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation and not achieving virological response following treatment with interferon plus ribavirin is controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 70 patients non-responders to antiviral treatment after liver transplantation was performed. Twenty-one patients (30.0%; Group A) were treated for ≤ 12 months and 49 (70.0%; Group B) for more than 12 months.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were comparable for main demographic, clinical and pathological variables. Median duration of antiviral treatment was 8.2 months in Group A and 33.4 months in Group B. No patient achieved a complete virological response. The 5-year patient hepatitis C-related survival rate was 49.2% in Group A and 88.3% in Group B (P=0.002), while the 5-year graft survival rate was 49.2% in Group A and 85.9% in Group B (P=0.007). The median yearly fibrosis progression rate was 1.21 per year in Group A and 0.40 per year in Group B (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged antiviral treatment showed an overall beneficial effect in transplanted patients with a recurrent hepatitis C infection and not responding to conventional therapy. The treatment should be continued as long as it is permitted, in order to improve clinical and histological outcomes.

What is expected from the pathologist in the diagnosis of viral hepatitis?

The clinician expects from the pathologist a clinically relevant diagnosis on the basis of liver biopsy interpretation. Today, a liver biopsy, as invasive procedure, is only justified when a significant benefit for the patient can be expected particularly with respect to the clinical management. Consequently, liver biopsy is usually not required in uncomplicated acute viral hepatitis. It is, however, an important diagnostic tool in chronic hepatitis and in transplanted liver to confirm the clinical diagnosis and to assess stage and grade of necroinflammation, treatment efficiency, and concurrent diseases. The diagnosis of liver disease is based on teamwork between clinician and pathologist. Evaluation of the biopsy in the clinical context requires clinical information and appropriate size and handling of the biopsy specimen. Aim of this review is the discussion of morphologic features of acute and chronic viral hepatitis with regard to their clinical relevance.

Systematic review: anti-viral therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the first cause of liver transplantation worldwide. Recurrence of infection is constant, and compromises patient and graft survival.

AIM

To provide an updated review of the main treatments of recurrent HCV.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1990 to August 2010) and national meeting abstract search. Search terms included hepatitis C, liver transplantation, treatment, sustained virological response. An emphasis was placed on randomised trials.

RESULTS

Anti-viral therapy based on pegylated interferon and ribavirin must be considered before liver transplantation, but is poorly tolerated and has poor results in patients with cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-viral therapy can be administrated systematically early after liver transplantation, or in patients with established recurrent chronic hepatitis. Combination of pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin results in a sustained virological response of up to 30% in patients with histological HCV recurrence. The results of a small trial of polyclonal anti-HCV to prevent recurrence were disappointing.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available anti-viral therapy is effective only in a minority of transplanted patients infected with HCV. Specifically targeted anti-viral therapies combining interferon alpha and ribavirin, or a combination of antiprotease and antipolymerase components, associated with a genetic prediction of anti-viral response and blocking HCV cell entry should improve the long-term prognosis of recurrent hepatitis C in the near future.

Retransplantation for graft failure in chronic hepatitis C infection: a good use of a scarce resource?

AIM

To investigate the outcome of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection undergoing liver retransplantation.

METHODS

Using the UK National Registry, patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCV-related liver disease were identified. Data on patient and graft characteristics, as well as transplant and graft survival were collected to determine the outcome of HCV patients undergoing retransplantation and in order to identify factors associated with transplant survival.

RESULTS

Between March 1994 and December 2007, 944 adult patients were transplanted for HCV-related liver disease. At the end of follow-up, 617 of these patients were alive. In total, 194 (21%) patients had first graft failure and of these, 80 underwent liver retransplantation, including 34 patients where the first graft failed due to recurrent disease. For those transplanted for HCV-related disease, the 5-year graft survival in those retransplanted for recurrent HCV was 45% [95% confidence interval (CI): 24%-64%] compared with 80% (95% CI: 62%-90%) for those retransplanted for other indications (P = 0.01 log-rank test); the 5-year transplant survival after retransplantation was 43% (95% CI: 23%-62%) and 46% (95% CI: 31%-60%), respectively (P = 0.8, log-rank test). In univariate analysis of all patients retransplanted, no factor analyzed was significantly associated with transplant survival.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes for retransplantation in patients with HCV infection approach agreed criteria for minimum transplant benefit. These data support selective liver retransplantation in patients with HCV infection.

Regulatory T cells in HBV and HCV liver diseases: implication of regulatory T lymphocytes in the control of immune response

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Hepatic cirrhosis is a frequent consequence of chronic hepatitis infection (HBV and HCV) or alcohol abuse and the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, liver transplantation remains the only effective therapeutic approach for cirrhosis-related HCC patients. The evolution of the pathology strongly depends on immunological mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Despite the presence of specific T cells, viral chronic infection and continuous tumor growth suggest a failure of immune control. It appears that direct suppression of antiviral or antitumor effector cells by regulatory T cells plays a pivotal role in the impairment of immune response. Several types of regulatory T cells have been described, natural regulatory T cells (nTreg) and induced-type 1 regulatory T cells (Tr1) being the best characterized.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Currently, there is no evidence for a direct implication of regulatory T cells in the evolution of hepatitis, especially concerning chronic infection, cirrhosis late stage and HCC progress. However, recent studies show that regulatory T cells are implicated in the modulation of HBV- and HCV-associated immune response, thus, promoting HCC progress.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Therefore, nTreg and Tr1 cells seem to play an important role in the control of immune response leading to chronic hepatitis infection and progression of the pathology to cirrhosis and HCC.

Factors affecting hepatocyte isolation, engraftment, and replication in an in vivo model

Human hepatocyte transplantation is an alternative treatment for acute liver failure and liver diseases involving enzyme deficiencies. Although it has been successfully applied in selected recipients, both isolation and transplantation outcomes have the potential to be improved by better donor selection. This study assessed the impact of various donor variables on isolation outcomes (yield and viability) and posttransplant engraftment, using the SCID/Alb-uPA (severe combined immunodeficient/urokinase type plasminogen activator under the control of an albumin promoter) human liver chimeric mouse model. Human hepatocytes were obtained from 90 human liver donor specimens and were transplanted into 3942 mice. Multivariate analysis revealed improved viability with younger donors (P = 0.038) as well as with shorter warm ischemic time (P = 0.012). Hepatocyte engraftment, assessed by the posttransplant level of serum human alpha1-antitrypsin, was improved with shorter warm ischemia time. Hepatocytes isolated from older donors (>or=60 years) had lower viability and posttransplant engraftment (P <or= 0.01). In conclusion, the selection of young donors (<60 years) and rapid liver specimen retrieval, allowing for shorter warm ischemia time, are key determinants for the success of both the isolation of high viability human hepatocytes and their subsequent posttransplantation capacity for engraftment and expansion.

Immunohistochemical staining of liver grafts with a monoclonal antibody against HCV-Envelope 2 for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation

AIM

We evaluated the expression of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen on liver grafts by immunohistochemical staining (IHS) using IG222 monoclonal antibody (mAb) against HCV-envelope 2 (E2).

METHODS

The study material was 84 liver biopsy specimens obtained from 28 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCV infection. The biopsy samples were examined histopathologically, and by IHS using IG222 mAb against HCV-E2. Serum HCV-RNA level was measured in all patients. The IHS grades were compared among the three groups classified according to the time elapsed from LDLT (at 1-30, 31-179 and > or =180 days post-LDLT) and among four post-transplant conditions, including acute cellular rejection (ACR).

RESULTS

Immunoreactivity to IG222 was detected in 78.6% of the specimens obtained during the first month after LDLT, and there were no significant differences on the IHS grades between the three groups classified according to the time elapsed from LDLT. The IHS grades were significantly stronger in definite recurrent HCV (n = 12) and probable recurrent HCV (n = 7) than in definite ACR (n = 7) and other complications (n = 8). There were no significant differences in serum HCV-RNA levels among the four post-transplant conditions. There was no significant correlation between the IHS grades using IG222 mAb and serum HCV-RNA levels when data of 84 liver biopsy specimens were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Constant HCV-E2 expression was observed in liver biopsy specimens obtained 1 month or longer. The strong HCV-E2 expression on liver grafts were associated with recurrent hepatitis C after LDLT, but the serum HCV-RNA levels were not.

A single-center experience of retransplantation for liver transplant recipients with a failing graft

With the accumulation of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients, an increased number of patients with graft failure need retransplantation (re-OLT). This study was undertaken to examine our clinical experience of re-OLT for patients with poor graft function after primary transplantation at a single center. We analyzed retrospectively, the clinical data of 32 re-OLTs in 31 patients at our center from January 2004 to February 2007, including indications and causes of death, timing of retransplantation, and surgical techniques. The indications included bile leak (2 cases), biliary stricture (16 cases), recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (5 cases), hepatic artery stenosis (4 cases), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (2 cases), and hepatitis B recurrence (3 cases). The rate of re-OLT was 4.29%. All patients underwent modified piggyback liver transplantations with cadaveric allografts. No intraoperative mortality and acute rejection occurred. Overall, 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) died after re-OLT with survival times ranging from 2 weeks to 28 months. Another 14 patients were cured with survival times of 4 to 32 months. The perioperative mortality rate of patients who underwent re-OLT between 8 and 30 days after their initial transplantation was highest (66.7%). The most common cause of death after re-OLT was sepsis (47.1%), multiple-organ failure (17.6%), and recurrence of HCC (17.6%), whereas the majority of deaths posttransplantation were sepsis-related (54%) within 1 year. Re-OLT is the only therapeutic option for a failing liver graft. Proper indications and optimal operative time, advanced surgical procedures, reasonable individual immunosuppression regimens, and effective perioperative anti-infection treatments contribute to the improved survival of patients after re-OLT.

Histologic abnormalities are common in protocol liver allograft biopsies from patients with normal liver function tests

The utility of protocol liver allograft biopsies remains controversial, particularly in patients with normal liver function tests (LFTs). However, histologic evaluation of these biopsies provides an opportunity to examine the types and severity of liver diseases that can occur in livers with normal clinical and biochemical function. We studied 165 protocol allograft biopsies taken from 100 liver transplant patients at the time of normal LFTs and normal clinical function at 3 to 8 months (n=36), 1 year (n=52), 2 to 3 years (n=54), and 4 to 5 years (n=23). Biopsies were classified as normal, minimal changes (eg, nonaggressive portal or lobular mononuclear inflammation, steatosis <10%), fatty liver disease, recurrent primary liver disease, and transplant-related disease (portal-based rejection or central venulitis, an inflammatory pattern that encompasses perivenular hepatocyte dropout, mononuclear inflammation, pigment-laden macrophages, and variable zone 3 fibrosis). Among these 100 patients, a total of 394 protocol biopsies were performed, and 165 (42%) were taken at the time of normal LFTs and normal clinical function. One hundred twenty-one (73%) were normal or showed minimal/nonspecific changes. Forty-four (27%) showed histologic abnormalities that included fatty liver disease (n=19, nonalcoholic in 18 cases; 13 with mild steatosis, 6 with moderate steatosis, 7 with grade 1/3 steatohepatitic activity, and 2 with stage 1/4 steatohepatitic fibrosis), recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (n=9; all stage 1/4), recurrent hepatitis C infection (n=6; grade 0/4 in 1, grade 1/4 in 5, stage 0/4 in 4, stage 1/4 in 1, and stage 2/4 in 1), recurrent sarcoidosis (n=1), Ito cell hyperplasia (n=4; marked in 2 and mild in 2), central venulitis (n=10; 5 with mild zone 3 fibrosis or central vein obliteration and 1 with central-portal bridging fibrosis), and mild acute portal rejection (n=2). We judged the histologic changes to be of clinical significance in 19 (11.5%) cases. These results indicate that even at the time of normal clinical and laboratory function, a significant fraction of protocol allograft biopsies harbor histologic (27%) and clinically significant (11.5%) abnormalities. These most commonly include fatty liver disease, low-grade/low-stage recurrent hepatitis C and primary biliary cirrhosis, and central venulitis (including some cases with subsequent fibrosis progression). The data support performance of protocol biopsies to assess allograft status, and provide insight into the types and severity of liver diseases that can smolder in transplanted (and by extension, probably also in native) livers with apparent normal function.

Liver transplantation: an update 2008

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Expansion of the donor pool for liver transplantation is a priority. Management of hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma has focused on decreasing recurrence rates after transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Expansion of the pool of donors has focused on live donor liver transplantation and extended criteria donor grafts. The results of live donor liver transplantation are equivalent to those of deceased donor liver transplantation. The use of extended criteria donor grafts has increased significantly. The results are associated with decreased graft survival with the use of grafts that have multiple factors considered as extended criteria for transplantation, particularly in high-risk individuals such as critically ill recipients. Judicious matching of extended criteria donors with recipients is essential to reduce waiting list mortality without reducing posttransplantation survival. The role of pretransplant ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma is evolving to reduce tumor progression and dropout on the list as well as to influence posttransplant recurrence rates. Antiviral and immunosuppressive strategies in reducing the severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence are discussed as is retransplantation for the disease.

SUMMARY

Expansion of the donor pool with the use of extended criteria donors and live donor liver transplantation is a major challenge. Transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C virus relapse are major areas of research.

Tissue hepatitis C virus RNA quantification and protein expression help identify early hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

We compared tissue hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA polymerase chain reaction quantification and HCV immunohistochemistry (IHC) to histology in biopsy tissues in order to differentiate between acute rejection and HCV hepatitis recurrence early after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We analyzed the first biopsy performed because of alteration of serum aminotransferases in 65 consecutive OLT patients with HCV genotype 1b. In the histological analysis, we quantified the portal tracts, Councilman bodies, Councilman body/portal tract (CP) ratio, steatosis, and Knodell and Ishak scores. The 52 patients (80%) with histological HCV recurrence [recurrence-positive (Rec+)] were separated from the 6 (9%) with acute rejection and the 7 (11%) with undetermined pathological features [recurrence-negative (Rec-)]. HCV RNA strongly correlated with HCV IHC, regardless of the histological diagnosis (P < 0.001). Both HCV RNA and HCV IHC were significantly associated with CP ratio (P = 0.041 and P = 0.008). No statistical correlation was found between HCV RNA, HCV IHC, and the other histopathologic features or the hepatitis scores. HCV RNA, HCV IHC, and CP ratio were the only variables able to discriminate between Rec+ and Rec- patients (Mann-Whitney test P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.014). In conclusion, a combined evaluation of histology, tissue HCV RNA, and HCV IHC significantly discriminated between OLT patients with or without HCV recurrence.

Minimizing risk associated with elderly liver donors by matching to preferred recipients

Elderly liver donors (ELDs) represent a possible expansion of the donor pool, although there is great reluctance to use ELDs because of reports that increasing donor age predicts graft loss and patient death. The goal of this study was to identify a subgroup of recipients who would be least affected by increased donor age and thus best suited to receive grafts from ELDs. A national registry of deceased donor liver transplants from 2002-2005 was analyzed. ELDs aged 70-92 (n = 1043) were compared with average liver donors (ALDs) aged 18-69 (n = 15,878) and ideal liver donors (ILDs) aged 18-39 (n = 6842). Recipient factors that modified the effect of donor age on outcomes were identified via interaction term analysis. Outcomes in recipient subgroups were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Recipients preferred for ELD transplants were determined to be first-time recipients over the age of 45 with body mass index <35, non-status 1 registration, cold ischemic time <8 hours, and either hepatocellular carcinoma or an indication for transplantation other than hepatitis C. In preferred recipients, there were no differences in outcomes when ELD livers were used (3-year graft survival: ELD 75%, ALD 75%, ILD 77%, P > 0.1; 3-year patient survival: ELD 81%, ALD 80%, ILD 81%, P > 0.1). In contrast, there were significantly worse outcomes when ELD livers were used in nonpreferred recipients (3-year graft survival: ELD 50%, ALD 71%, ILD 75%, P < 0.001; 3-year patient survival: ELD 64%, ALD 77%, ILD 80%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risks of ELDs can be substantially minimized by appropriate recipient selection.

Current concepts in the evaluation of patients for liver transplantation

Candidates for liver transplantation undergo a thorough medical, surgical, psychosocial and financial evaluation prior to listing for transplantation. Prioritization for allocating livers is based upon the model for end-stage liver disease score and waiting-time mortality with the fundamental concept of giving organs to the sickest first. In the upcoming years the allocation system may be modified to include other factors associated with mortality, such as serum sodium, and may incorporate both pre- and post-transplant mortality. Strategies to expand the donor pool include utilizing livers from donors after cardiac death, split liver transplantation and living donor liver transplantation. Future challenges for liver transplantation will include the obesity epidemic and the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease, particularly hepatitis C.

Liver transplantation: an update 2007

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent attention in liver transplantation has focused on equity in organ allocation and management of posttransplant complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease for liver allocation has been successful in implementing a system based on medical urgency rather than waiting time. Refinements are being studied in improving the prediction of mortality and improving transplant benefit by balancing pretransplant mortality and posttransplant survival. Emerging literature is examining expansion of the current criteria for transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma and the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Chronic renal dysfunction after liver transplantation is a source of considerable morbidity. Nephron-sparing immunosuppression regimens are emerging with encouraging results. Hepatitis C virus infection is difficult to differentiate histologically from rejection, although newer markers are being developed. Antiviral and immunosuppressive strategies for reducing the severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence are discussed. Alcohol relapse is common after liver transplant in alcoholic liver disease patients and can lead to worse outcomes.

SUMMARY

Organ allocation tends to evolve under the model for end-stage liver disease with a focus on maximizing transplant benefit. Hepatitis C virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic renal dysfunction and alcohol relapse are major challenges, and continued research in these areas will undoubtedly lead to better outcomes for transplant recipients.

Sirolimus as the main immunosuppressant in the early postoperative period following liver transplantation: a report of six cases and review of the literature

The use of sirolimus as the main immunosuppressant in a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in the early postoperative period of liver transplantation (LT), when the incidence of rejection is the highest, has seldom been reported. We report six patients who received sirolimus in association with steroids only, at a median time of 10 days after LT (range 3-23). Tacrolimus, initially given as the standard immunosuppressant, was discontinued because of nephrotoxicity in three of these patients and neurotoxicity in the other three. Resolution of the neurological symptoms was observed in all cases and a marked improvement of the renal function in two of three patients. Two patients died, one of sepsis and the other of recurrent hepatitis C virus hepatitis, after 47 and 143 days respectively. Three patients developed acute rejection which responded to intravenous steroids. In this cohort of patients, the use of sirolimus appeared safe and provided an adequate prophylaxis against rejection, even though the drug was administered in the immediate postoperative period after LT.

Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in the setting of liver transplantation

Hepatitis C viremia after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver disease is universal. Progressive HCV disease after transplantation is the leading cause of death, graft failure, and retransplantation. Whether to treat, with which agents, and timing of therapy are unanswered questions. Timing options include pretransplantation, prophylactic, post-transplantation preemptive, and post-transplantation recurrence-based therapy. The latter is most commonly utilized. There are little data for each of these, much less comparisons. Pegylated interferon-alpha has supplanted standard interferon-alpha due to increased efficacy and is generally used in combination with ribavirin (RBV). Efficacy is less than in nontransplant settings due to immunosuppression, an increased prevalence of genotype 1 HCV, patient comorbidities, and decreased functional status. Administration of HCV therapy to cirrhotic patients prior to transplantation may eradicate or suppress HCV and prevent or reduce severity of recurrence. Sustained virological response (SVR) as high as 50% was attained in genotypes 2 or 3 HCV. Comparison of preemptive and histology-based post-transplantation HCV therapy should be done, and more data will be available on pretransplantation therapy. Post-transplant patients are less tolerant of therapy, particularly RBV. SVR, the primary goal of therapy, likely halts disease progression, but only 20% to 30% of treated patients achieve SVR. Preemptive therapy early after transplantation may have advantages due to the potential to delay or blunt severity of graft infection and recurrent hepatitis. In post-transplant therapy, RBV toxicity is attenuated in relation to decreased renal function, and side effects of interferon are more prominent. An ongoing trial will assess preemptive therapy with treatment after histologic recurrence. Novel anti-HCV therapies such as protease and polymerase inhibitors are emerging. These must be tested with urgency in the transplant setting. Retransplantation for progressive HCV disease is more controversial due to poor outcomes, graft shortage, and disease recurrence.