Preformed antibodies detected by cytotoxic assay or multibead array decrease liver allograft survival: role of human leukocyte antigen compatibility

The fate of anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation

Introduction

Liver transplant recipients may have pre-formed anti-HLA antibodies directed to mismatched HLA of the liver donor (donor specific antibodies, DSA) or not directed to the liver donor (non-donor specific, non-DSA). We observed the fate of these antibodies (DSA and non-DSA) at 12 months after transplant.

Methods

Patients transplanted between 4/2015 and 12/2018 (N = 216) who had anti-HLA antibody measurements at both transplant and 12 months posttransplant (N = 124) and with DSAs at transplant (N = 31) were considered informative for a paired analysis of the natural history of DSA and non-DSA following liver transplantation.

Results

Class I DSAs and non-DSAs decreased between transplant and 12 months; however, Class I DSAs essentially disappeared by 12 months while Class I non-DSAs did not. Anti-HLA Class II DSAs performed differently. While there was a significant drop in values between transplant and 12 months, these antibodies mostly persisted at a low level.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated a significant difference in the kinetics of DSA compared to non-DSA following liver transplantation, most profoundly for anti-HLA Class I antibodies. Class I DSAs were mostly absent at 12 months while Class II DSAs persisted, although at lower levels. The mechanisms of reduction in anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation are not completely understood and were not pursued as a part of this study. This detailed analysis of Class I and Class II DSAs and non-DSAs represents and important study to explore the change in antibodies at one year from liver transplantation.

Long-term outcomes of crossmatch positive simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations in the United States

The long-term outcomes of positive crossmatch (+XM) simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantations are conflicting. We examined the association between crossmatch status and SLK outcomes in recipients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate with or without steroids. We analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for all primary SLK recipients between 2003 and 2020 with available crossmatch and induction data. We grouped recipients according to the crossmatch status: negative crossmatch (-XM; n = 3040) and +XM (n = 407). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to examine recipient, death-censored liver, and death-censored kidney survival by crossmatch status. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association between crossmatch status and outcomes of interest with follow-up censored at 10 years. Models were adjusted for recipient age, sex, diabetes mellitus, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, duration on the liver waiting list, induction immunosuppression, steroid maintenance, hepatitis C infection, donor age and sex, local vs. shared organ, cold ischemia time, and previous liver transplantation status. In the univariable analysis, crossmatch status was not associated with recipient survival (log-rank p = 0.63), death-censored liver graft survival (log-rank p = 0.05), or death-censored kidney graft survival (log-rank p = 0.11). Compared with -XM, +XM recipients had a similar 1-year liver rejection rate, but higher kidney rejection rate (4.6% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.002). In the multivariable models, +XM status was not associated with deleterious long-term recipient, liver, or kidney grafts survival. -XM and +XM SLK transplantations have comparable long-term recipient, liver graft, and kidney survival with a slightly increased risk of early kidney allograft rejection in the +XM group. Crossmatch positivity in SLK transplantations should not influence the decision to use organs from a specific donor.

Rituximab Desensitization in Liver Transplant Recipients With Preformed Donor-specific HLA Antibodies: A Japanese Nationwide Survey

Background.

The significance of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplant recipients is controversial. Moreover, there has been no established desensitization protocol for DSA-positive recipients.

Methods.

A Japanese nationwide survey was performed to investigate the clinical practice among preformed DSA-positive patients with special reference to rituximab desensitization.

Results.

There was a total of 47 cases, including 2 pediatric cases, in which rituximab (287 ± 159 mg [319 (50–916)/m²]) was administered to desensitize preformed DSA. The decision for the indication of rituximab desensitization was based on a single-antigen assay in the majority of cases (83%, 39/47), and the most frequent protocol was rituximab monotherapy (n = 12) followed by quadruple treatment with rituximab tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and plasmapheresis (n = 11). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y graft and patient survival rates among adult patients were 85%, 83%, 83%, and 81%, 77%, 74%, respectively, while neither graft loss nor death was observed in the 2 pediatric cases. The 1-, 3-, and 12-mo cumulative incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was 11%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. The incidence of AMR was significantly higher in the lower rituximab dose group than in the higher rituximab dose group (cutoff 300 mg/m², 4% versus 24%, P = 0.041). The rate of infusion-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.4%, and all ADRs were mild and self-limiting. A total of 99 ADRs among 27 patients were reported, none of which were severe adverse events associated with rituximab.

Conclusions.

The rituximab induction was well tolerated among DSA-positive liver transplant recipients with a satisfactory outcome. A rituximab dose >300 mg/m² was observed to achieve less incidence of the development of AMR.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation with positive crossmatch: Role of delayed kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Positive crossmatch (XM+) combined liver-kidney transplantation due to preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies has produced mixed results. We sought to understand the role of delayed kidney transplant approach in XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations.

METHODS

XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations were retrospectively reviewed. T- and B-cell XM, complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch, and flow cytometric crossmatch were performed prospectively.

RESULTS

Of 183 combined liver-kidney transplantations performed (2002-2019), 114 (62%) were with "delayed" kidney transplant approach and 19 (19 of 183, 10%) were XM+. Of 19 XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations, kidney transplant was "delayed" in 14 by an average of 47 hours (range 24-64 hours) from liver transplant. There was a significant reduction in both class I (mean pre-liver transplant mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) 26,230 versus mean post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 3,272, P = .01) and total MFI (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 27,233 vs mean post liver transplant and predelayed kidney transplant MFI 11,469, P = .01). However, there was no significant change in the MFI of class II donor-specific antibodies (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 17,899 versus post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 14,341, P = .19). None of XM+ delayed kidney transplants had delayed graft function, and there was no antibody-mediated rejection. One-year patient survival for the XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantation with delayed kidney transplant approach was 92.9%, which is comparable to patient survival of XM- combined liver-kidney transplantation. Whereas patient survival in recipients before "delayed" approach ("simultaneous"; n = 5) was 40% when liver-kidney transplants were performed simultaneously (P = .06).

CONCLUSION

In sensitized combined liver-kidney transplantation recipients, the "delayed" kidney transplant approach is associated with a significant reduction in total and class I donor-specific antibodies after liver transplant before kidney transplant, enabling therapeutic interventions such as plasmapheresis, if needed, providing optimal outcomes similar to crossmatch recipients.

De Novo Donor Specific Antibody and Long-Term Outcome After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The impact of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) which develop after long-term liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial and unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of de novo DSAs on the outcome in LT.

Methods

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published until Dec 31, 2019, that reported de novo DSA outcome data (≥1 year of follow-up) after liver transplant. A literature search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed.

Results

Of 5,325 studies identified, 15 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The studies which reported 2016 liver transplant recipients with de novo DSAs showed an increased complication risk, i.e. graft loss and chronic rejection (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.94-6.71, P < 0.001; I2 58.19%), and allograft rejection alone (OR 6.43; 95% CI: 3.17-13.04; P < 0.001; I2 49.77%); they were compared to patients without de novo DSAs. The association between de novo DSAs and overall outcome failure was consistent across all subgroups and sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that de novo DSAs had a significant deleterious impact on the liver transplant risk of rejection. The routine detection of de novo DSAs may be beneficial as noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.

Understanding, predicting and achieving liver transplant tolerance: from bench to bedside

In the past 40 years, liver transplantation has evolved from a high-risk procedure to one that offers high success rates for reversal of liver dysfunction and excellent patient and graft survival. The liver is the most tolerogenic of transplanted organs; indeed, immunosuppressive therapy can be completely withdrawn without rejection of the graft in carefully selected, stable long-term liver recipients. However, in other recipients, chronic allograft injury, late graft failure and the adverse effects of anti-rejection therapy remain important obstacles to improved success. The liver has a unique composition of parenchymal and immune cells that regulate innate and adaptive immunity and that can promote antigen-specific tolerance. Although the mechanisms underlying liver transplant tolerance are not well understood, important insights have been gained into how the local microenvironment, hepatic immune cells and specific molecular pathways can promote donor-specific tolerance. These insights provide a basis for the identification of potential clinical biomarkers that might correlate with tolerance or rejection and for the development of novel therapeutic targets. Innovative approaches aimed at promoting immunosuppressive drug minimization or withdrawal include the adoptive transfer of donor-derived or recipient-derived regulatory immune cells to promote liver transplant tolerance. In this Review, we summarize and discuss these developments and their implications for liver transplantation.

Donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation: challenges in diagnosis and determining clinical impact

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our understanding of the clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies in liver transplant recipients has evolved in recent years as outcomes for liver allografts have improved and advances in diagnostic testing have made recognition of antibody mediated rejection in transplant patients more sensitive.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two main types of donor-specific antibodies - preformed and de novo - have been reported in the literature to have a negative impact on graft survival, and researchers have been able to further identify subclasses of class II donor-specific antibodies as being the most clinically impactful. Furthermore, there is evidence that donor-specific antibody formation can augment cellular rejection in liver grafts and lead to worsened clinical outcomes. Recent data have shown a higher prevalence of donor-specific antibody formation than previously reported.

SUMMARY

This review explores the most recent literature regarding the clinical impact of both preformed and de-novo donor-specific antibodies and potential management guidelines for patients undergoing liver transplantation. The best practice guidelines for undergoing monitoring for donor-specific antibody formation and protocol biopsies in sensitized patients will depend on further multiinstitutional studies.

HLA class II donor specific antibodies are associated with graft cirrhosis after liver transplant independent of the mean fluorescence intensity level

Background

The importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation (LT) for graft and patient survival is an ongoing controversy. So far it has not been elucidated when and in how far DSA are harmful for graft and patient survival. Therefore, we had the aim to investigate the association of DSA with complications after LT.

Methods

Data of 430 LT recipients were collected and statistically analyzed. Detection of HLA antibodies (Ab) was performed by Luminex assay.

Results

DSA were detected in 81 patients (18.8%). These were mainly HLA class II Ab (81.5%). HLA class II Ab show a higher MFI (median: 5.300) compared to HLA class I Ab (median: 2.300). There is no association between MFI levels and development of complications after LT. However, cirrhosis occurred significantly more often in DSA positive patients (18%) than in patients without detectable DSA (9%, P = 0.027). All DSA positive patients with cirrhosis of the graft showed HLA class II antibodies (OR: 3.028; 95% CI: 1.51–6.075; P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Occurrence of HLA class II DSA after LT is associated with graft cirrhosis and may indicate a higher risk to develop graft damage independent on MFI and requires an individualized risk management.

Kidney Graft Outcomes in High Immunological Risk Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplants

Recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations (SLKTs) have a lower risk of rejection compared with recipients of kidney transplants alone. However, there is disagreement about the impact of pretransplant anti-human leukocyte antigen sensitization on patient and kidney graft survival in the long term. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the recipient immunological risk and comorbidities in renal graft outcomes on SLKT. We reviewed the SLKTs performed in our center from May 1993 until September 2017. Patient and graft survival were analyzed according to the immunological risk, comorbidities, liver and kidney rejection episodes, immunosuppression, and infections. A total of 20 recipients of SLKT were considered in the high immunological risk (HIR) group, and 68 recipients were included in the low immunological risk (LIR) control group. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection, second renal transplant, and time on dialysis prior to transplantation were significantly higher in the HIR group. The incidence of acute kidney rejection was higher in the HIR group (P<0.01). However, death-censored kidney graft survival as well as the estimated glomerular filtration rate at follow-up were not different between the 2 groups. Comorbidities, but not the immunological risk, impact negatively on patient survival. Despite the higher incidence of rejection in the HIR SLKT group, longterm renal function and graft survival were similar to the LIR group.

Influence of Preformed Antibodies in Liver Transplantation

The significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching and preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of DSAs in a large cohort of 810 liver recipients undergoing liver transplant to determine the influence on acute (AR) or chronic liver rejection (CR), graft loss and allograft survival. DSAs were identified using complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) and multiplexed solid-phase-based flow cytometry assay (Luminex). CDC-CM showed that a 3.2% of liver transplants were positive (+CDC-CM) with an AR frequency of 19.2% which was not different from that observed in negative patients (-CDC-CM, 22.3%). Only two patients transplanted with +CDC-CM (7.6%) developed CR and suffered re-transplant. +CDC-CM patients showed a significantly lower survival rate compared to -CDC-CM patients (23.1% vs. 59.1%, p = 0.0003), developing allograft failure within the first three months (p < 0.00001). In conclusion, we have demonstrated a relationship between the presence of preformed DSAs and the low graft liver survival, indicating the important role and the potential interest of performing this analysis before liver transplantation. Our results could help to detect patients with an increased risk of graft loss, a better choice of liver receptors as well as the establishment of individualized immunosuppressive regimens.

Preformed and de novo DSA are associated with T-cell-mediated rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients requiring clinically indicated liver biopsy

Despite growing interest about the impact of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in LT limited data are available for pediatric recipients. Our aim was to perform a retrospective single-center chart review of children (0-16 years) having undergone LT between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2017, to characterize DSA, to identify factors associated with the development of de novo DSA, and to analyze potential associations with the diagnosis of TCMR. Information on patient- and donor-characteristics and LB reports were analyzed retrospectively. Serum obtained before LT and at LB was analyzed for presence of recipient HLA antibody using Luminex^® technology. MFI > 1000 was considered positive. In 63 pediatric LT recipients with a median follow-up of 72 months, the overall prevalence of de novo DSA was 60.3%. Most were directed against class II antigens (33/38, 86.8%). Preformed DSA were present in 30% of patients. Twenty-eight (28/63) patients (44.4%) presented at least one episode of TCMR, mostly (12/28, 43%) moderate (Banff 6-7). De novo DSA were significantly more frequent in patients with TCMR than in patients without (75% vs 48.6%, P = .03), and patients with preformed and de novo DSA had a significantly higher rate of TCMR than patients without any DSA (66.7% vs 20%, P = .02). Neither preformed DSA nor de novo DSA were associated with frequency or severity of TCMR. Recipients with lower weight at LT developed de novo DSA more frequently (P = .04). De novo DSA were highly prevalent in pediatric LT recipients. Although associated with the development of TCMR, they did not appear to impact the frequency or severity of TCMR or graft survival. Instead, de novo DSA may suggest a state of insufficient IS.

Exploring pre-surgery donor-specific antibodies in the context of organ shortage in liver transplant

BACKGROUND

There is a growing disparity between the number of liver transplant (LT) candidates and availability of suitable liver allografts. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), secondary to positive donor-specific antibodies (DSA), remains a concern in liver transplantation. This study aimed to correlate expression of DSA on pre-transplant screening and outcomes of LT, specifically development of AMR in liver allografts and liver function profile in the post-operative period.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic LT (OLT) at the South Australian Liver Transplant Unit was analysed. All patients underwent DSA testing pre-transplant.

RESULTS

Within a cohort of 96 patients, over a post-OLT median follow-up of 849 days, only 2 patients (2%) developed AMR. While both patients had a positive DSA test preoperatively, overall DSA positivity was noted in 31% patients, with a specificity for prediction of AMR of 0.708. No significant association was noted between AMR (p = 0.092), T cell-mediated rejection/TCMR (p = 0.797) or late hepatic artery thrombosis/LHAT (p = 0.521). There was no significant interaction effect between DSA positivity and serum bilirubin or transaminases over a period of 100 days.

CONCLUSION

AMR following LT is uncommon. A positive DSA pre-transplant does not imply a definite risk of AMR. Also, there does not exist a significant interaction in time between DSA expression and serum bilirubin or transaminase levels. Until there emerges evidence to the contrary, it appears reasonable to consider DSA-positive donors within the broad context of marginal donors in the context of a worldwide shortage of LT donor allografts.

Preformed donor-specific antibodies are associated with 90-day mortality in living-donor liver transplantation

AIM

The impact of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between DSAs and short-term outcomes in LDLT recipients, and to clarify the clinical impact of DSAs.

METHOD

Anti-HLA antibodies were screened in preoperative serum samples taken from 40 liver transplant recipients at Ehime University (Toon, Japan) between August 2001 and July 2015. Screening was carried out using the Flow-PRA method, and DSAs were detected in anti-HLA antibody-positive recipients using the Luminex single-antigen identification test. A mean fluorescence intensity of 1000 was used as the cut-off for positivity. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of patients who were DSA-positive to elucidate early clinical manifestations in LDLT recipients.

RESULTS

Fifteen (12 female and 3 male) patients (38%) had anti-HLA antibodies. Eight of the 15 anti-HLA antibody-positive patients were positive for DSAs, and all were women. The 90-day survival rate of DSA-positive patients (50%) was significantly lower than that of DSA-negative patients (84.4%) (0.0112; Wilcoxon test). On univariate analysis, the DSA-positive rate was significantly higher in the 90-day mortality group. Postoperatively, the incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in DSA-positive than DSA-negative patients. Thrombotic microangiopathy developed only in DSA-positive patients. We found no relationship between DSA status and bile duct stricture.

CONCLUSION

Preformed DSAs could be associated with elevated 90-day mortality in LDLT recipients. Further large-scale studies are required to verify the risk associated with DSAs in LDLT.

Follicular helper T cells and humoral response in organ transplantation

Antibody mediated rejection has been recognized as an important contributor to long-term graft loss in most solid organ transplants. Current immunosuppressive regimes are not capable of preventing anti-HLA antibody formation and eventual damage to the graft, and there is a need to develop drugs directed against novel targets to avoid graft allorecognition. In this review we introduce follicular helper T cells (Tfh), a subtype of lymphocyte specialized in helping B cells to differentiate into plasmablasts and produce class-switched antibodies. We focus on the role of Tfh in solid organ transplantation, what is known about Tfh and the production of alloantibodies, how current immunosuppressive therapies affect Tfh and what new molecules could be used to target Tfh in transplantation, with the goal of improving graft survival.

Application and interpretation of histocompatibility data in liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been a resurgence of interest in histocompatibility as it applies to liver transplantation. The association of persistent and de-novo donor specific antibody (DSA) and outcomes after liver transplantation continues to be investigated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consensus continues to evolve regarding the existence of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and pathogenicity of DSA and associated pathologic findings after liver transplantation. The presence of persistent high level, complement fixing DSA or emergence of de novo, Class II DSA has been associated with rejection and worse long-term graft and patient survival. Significant adverse associations of DSA extend to patients after simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplant as well as in pediatric recipients of liver transplantation. A higher degree of HLA incompatibility has been recently associated with worse outcomes in living donor liver transplant.

SUMMARY

In summary, recent consensus guidelines describe and recognize the existence of acute and chronic AMR and provide a basis upon which to build further investigation. Important adverse outcomes including decreased survival, allograft failure and liver fibrosis have been linked to the presence of DSA. Routine donor and recipient HLA typing and DSA assessment will facilitate diagnosis and provide for baseline data, which may help guide future management. Future investigations may help to clarify the role of therapeutic interventions.

Not All Antibodies Are Created Equal: Factors That Influence Antibody Mediated Rejection

Consistent with Dr. Paul Terasaki's "humoral theory of rejection" numerous studies have shown that HLA antibodies can cause acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and decreased graft survival. New evidence also supports a role for antibodies to non-HLA antigens in AMR and allograft injury. Despite the remarkable efforts by leaders in the field who pioneered single antigen bead technology for detection of donor specific antibodies, a considerable amount of work is still needed to better define the antibody attributes that are associated with AMR pathology. This review highlights what is currently known about the clinical context of pre and posttransplant antibodies, antibody characteristics that influence AMR, and the paths after donor specific antibody production (no rejection, subclinical rejection, and clinical dysfunction with AMR).

Impact of Donor-Specific Antibodies on Graft Fibrosis After Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Biliary Atresia

BACKGROUND

Pediatric living donor liver transplant (LDLT) patients sometimes develop graft fibrosis after non-recurrent diseases such as biliary atresia (BA). Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) have recently been shown to play a possible role in graft damage after liver transplantation. We report the impact of DSA on pediatric LDLT for BA patients.

METHODS

Patients under age 18 years who received LDLT for BA at our institution and who had at least 5 years' follow-up were identified, and 23 were eventually enrolled in this study. Pathological findings were assessed with the use of the last available biopsy. Patients were divided into 2 groups, DSA-positive and DSA-negative. Graft fibrosis after LDLT was assessed according to DSA groups.

RESULTS

The mean patient age at transplant was 2.6 years. The mean time to the last available biopsy after LDLT was 8.2 years (4.8-15.6 years); 6 patients (26%) showed no fibrosis, whereas fibrosis was graded as F1, F2, or F3 in 8 patients (35%), 8 patients (35%), and 1 patient, respectively. DSA were observed in 12 patients (52%). Moderate graft fibrosis (F2 and F3) was found in 7 (58%) of the DSA-positive group, but only 2 (18%) of the DSA-negative group, showing a statistically significant difference (P < .05). Pre-transplant cross-matching was performed in 17 patients. The 2 patients with a positive cross-match were DSA-positive. Six cross-match-negative patients developed de novo DSA after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft fibrosis was observed after LDLT for BA during long-term follow-up, more commonly in DSA-positive patients. DSA may play a role in fibrosis formation.

Detection of HLA Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients - Triumphs and Challenges of the Solid Phase Bead Assay

This review outlines the development of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody detection assays and their use in organ transplantation in both antibody screening and crossmatching. The development of sensitive solid phase assays such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique, and in particular the bead-based technology has revolutionized this field over the last 10-15 years. This revolution however has created a new paradigm in clinical decision making with respect to the detection of low level pretransplant HLA sensitization and its clinical relevance. The relative sensitivities of the assays used are discussed and the relevance of conflicting inter-assay results. Each assay has its advantages and disadvantages and these are discussed. Over the last decade, the bead-based assay utilizing the Luminex® fluorocytometer instrument has become established as the "gold standard" for HLA antibody testing. However, there are still unresolved issues surrounding this technique, such as the presence of denatured HLA molecules on the beads which reveal cryptic epitopes and the issue of appropriate fluorescence cut off values for positivity. The assay has been modified to detect complement binding (CB) in addition to non-complement binding (NCB) HLA antibodies although the clinical relevance of the CB and NCB IgG isotypes is not fully resolved. The increase sensitivity of the Luminex® bead assay over the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch has permitted the concept of the "virtual crossmatch" whereby the crossmatch is predicted to a high degree of accuracy based on the HLA antibody specificities detected by the solid phase assay. Dialog between clinicians and laboratory staff on an individual patient basis is essential for correct clinical decision making based on HLA antibody results obtained by the various techniques.

De novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies mediated rejection in liver-transplant patients

The incidence and consequences of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) after liver transplantation (LT) are not well known. We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and complications associated with de novo DSAs in this setting. A total of 152 de novo liver-transplant patients, without preformed anti-HLA DSAs, were tested for anti-HLA antibodies, with single-antigen bead technology, before, at transplantation, at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation, and thereafter annually and at each time they presented with increased liver-enzyme levels until the last follow-up, that is, 34 (1.5-77) months. Twenty-one patients (14%) developed de novo DSAs. Of these, five patients had C1q-binding DSAs (24%). Younger age, low exposure to calcineurin inhibitors, and noncompliance were predictive factors for de novo DSA formation. Nine of the 21 patients (43%) with de novo DSAs experienced an acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Positive C4d staining was more frequently observed in liver biopsies of patients with AMR (9/9 vs. 1/12, P < 0.0001). Eight patients received a B-cell targeting therapy, and one patient received polyclonal antibodies. Only one patient required retransplantation. Patient- and graft-survival rates did not differ between patients with and without DSAs. In conclusion, liver-transplant patients with liver abnormalities should be screened for DSAs and AMR.

2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

Prevention and treatment of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and the role of the 'two-hit hypothesis'

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review outlines the diagnosis, prevention strategies, and possible treatment options for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although rare, severe acute AMR (aAMR) usually occurs in patients with high mean fluorescence intensity despite serial dilutions or high-titer preformed class I donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA). The diagnosis is suspected when allograft dysfunction occurs with DSA, diffuse C4d staining, and a microvascular injury, and may be aided by the aAMR score. However, the incidence of and treatment approach to combined T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) with DSA present and some but not all features of AMR is yet to be determined. Chronic liver allograft AMR is characterized by low-grade chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis with DSA, the chronic AMR (cAMR) score may facilitate diagnosis. The 'two-hit' hypothesis, whereby a coexistent insult upregulates human leukocyte antigen class II target antigens on the microvascular endothelium, may explain why suboptimal donors with lower sensitization levels might suffer from acute AMR and those with chronic complications (e.g., recurrent original disease) might be more susceptible to chronic AMR. Although treatment algorithms are needed, prevention is preferable and at a minimum includes transfusion minimization, and medication adherence.

SUMMARY

Severe acute AMR is rare but diagnosable, and there is need to determine the incidence of and optimal therapy for less severe combined AMR and TCMR. Chronic AMR is likely more common and of significant relevance to long-term allograft survival improvement. The two-hit hypothesis may help to explain the rarity of both findings and shed insight onto future prevention and treatment strategies.

Donor-specific antibodies and liver transplantation

In contrast to other types of organ transplantation, liver-transplant recipients used to be considered highly resistant to donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Consequently, most transplant programs did not consider the presence of DSAs at transplantation or during the follow-up. However, since the early 1990s, antibody-mediated pathological lesions have been recognized in ABO-incompatible liver-transplant recipients. Recent data confirm the detrimental effect of preformed and de novo DSAs in ABO-compatible liver transplantation, with inferior clinical outcomes in patients presenting with circulating antibodies. Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), plasma-cell hepatitis, biliary stricture, but also long-term complications, such as chronic rejection, liver ductopenia, and graft fibrosis, are now recognized to be associated with DSAs. Moreover, some non-HLA DSAs are suspected to induce graft dysfunction. Clinical, biological, and histological patterns within AMR need to be clarified. Treatment of these complications has yet to be defined. This article summarizes recent advances concerning the impact of preformed and de novo DSAs in liver transplantation, it defines the complications associated with DSAs, and discusses the potential strategies to manage patients with such complications.

Management of immunosuppressant agents following liver transplantation: Less is more

Immunosuppression in organ transplantation was revolutionary for its time, but technological and population changes cast new light on its use. First, metabolic syndrome (MS) is increasing as a public health issue, concomitantly increasing as an issue for post-orthotopic liver transplantation patients; yet the medications regularly used for immunosuppression contribute to dysfunctional metabolism. Current mainstay immunosuppression involves the use of calcineurin inhibitors; these are potent, but nonspecifically disrupt intracellular signaling in such a way as to exacerbate the impact of MS on the liver. Second, the impacts of acute cellular rejection and malignancy are reviewed in terms of their severity and possible interactions with immunosuppressive medications. Finally, immunosuppressive agents must be considered in terms of new developments in hepatitis C virus treatment, which undercut what used to be inevitable viral recurrence. Overall, while traditional immunosuppressive agents remain the most used, the specific side-effect profiles of all immunosuppressants must be weighed in light of the individual patient.

Long-term Clinical Relevance of De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Anti-HLA antibodies and especially donor-specific antibodies (DSA) play a significant role in graft survival after solid organ transplantation. Their impact on long-term survival in adult liver transplantation (LT) is controversial, but they may be a risk factor. The effects of DSA after pediatric LT are still unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of DSA in sera from 43 children who had received transplants at our tertiary center. Twenty-four patients had good long-term clinical and laboratory graft function (group 1), whereas 19 LT recipients suffered from histologically confirmed and clinically relevant chronic allograft rejection (group 2); 16 of these have already undergone retransplantation due to graft dysfunction. Inclusion criteria were availability of sera before the first LT to identify preformed antibodies in case of DSA positivity after LT and long-term follow-up at our institution. Sera were analyzed for anti-HLA antibodies using Luminex single antigen beads, where a mean fluorescence intensity value of more than 1500 was considered positive.

RESULTS

The prevalence of DSA was 33% for group 1 and 68% for group 2. Antibodies were predominantly HLA class II. Values of mean fluorescence intensity were comparable in both groups. Only one of the DSA+ ve patients from group 1 exhibited preformed antibodies. In conclusion, pediatric patients with chronic rejection revealed a higher rate of de novo DSA, especially of HLA-class II DSA. Further studies are necessary to confirm these data with a larger pediatric cohort.

Clinical significance of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in liver transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) is widely accepted to be a risk factor for decreased graft survival after kidney transplantation. This entity also plays a pathogenic role in other solid organ transplants as it appears to be an increasingly common cause of heart graft dysfunction and an emerging issue in lung transplantation. In contrast, the liver appears relatively resistant to DSA-mediated injury. This “immune-tolerance” liver property has been sustained by a low rate of liver graft loss in patients with preformed DSA and by the intrinsic liver characteristics that favor the absorption and elimination of DSA; however, alloantibody-mediated adverse consequences are increasingly being recognized, and several cases of acute AMR after ABO-compatible liver transplant (LT) have been reported. Furthermore, the availability of new solid-phase assays, allowing the detection of low titers of DSA and the refinement of objective diagnostic criteria for AMR in solid organ transplants and particularly in LT, have improved the recognition and management of this entity. A cost-effective strategy of DSA monitoring, avoidance of class II human leukocyte antigen mismatching, judicious immunosuppression attached to a higher level of clinical suspicion of AMR, particularly in cases unresponsive to conventional anti-rejection therapy, can allow a rational approach to this threat.

Pathologic sequelae of allosensitization in liver transplantation

The long-term impact of allosensitization between ABO compatible donor/recipient pairs in liver transplantation is unclear. Accumulating clinical evidence suggests that donor-specific antibody formation may lead to antibody-mediated rejection and is causally linked to pathologic injury, graft loss, and death. Although this immune-mediated graft dysfunction is increasingly being associated with poor outcomes, the specific pathologic sequelae are not defined. Herein, we examine the relationship between allosensitization, antibody-mediated rejection, and subsequent graft pathology.

The hematopoietic stem cell number in the peripheral blood of pediatric recipients correlates with the outcome after living donor liver transplantation

It has been proposed that circulating HSCs play a role in graft survival after liver transplantation. The aim was to analyze the relationship between the number of HSCs before and after LDLT and liver function, immune biomarkers, and clinical outcomes in pediatric patients. We studied 15 pairs of adult healthy liver donors and pediatric recipients with ESLD. The CD34/CD45+ cell number was measured in the blood via flow cytometry, and plasma levels of immune biomarkers - via ELISA. CD34/CD45+ cell number in the recipients decreased within the first week after LDLT. The cell number before LDLT was negatively correlated with the plasma levels of CRP and the development of graft dysfunction in the early post-transplant period. After LDLT, the CD34/CD45+ cell number was positively correlated with the pretransplant plasma level of sCD40L, a T-cell activation marker. In adult liver donors, the cell number did not change within the first week after liver resection and was lower than in pediatric recipients. The results suggest that in pediatric recipients, the HSC number may be associated with graft function and could be regarded as a potential predictor of the clinical outcome after LDLT.

Intravenous immunoglobulins in liver transplant patients: Perspectives of clinical immune modulation

Shortage of appropriate donor grafts is the foremost current problem in organ transplantation. As a logical consequence, waiting times have extended and pretransplant mortality rates were significantly increasing. The implementation of a priority-based liver allocation system using the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score helped to reduce waiting list mortality in liver transplantation (LT). However, due to an escalating organ scarcity, pre-LT MELD scores have significantly increased and liver recipients became more complex in recent years. This has finally led to posttransplant decreasing survival rates, attributed mainly to elevated rates of infectious and immunologic complications. To meet this challenging development, an increasing number of extended criteria donor grafts are currently accepted, which may, however, aggravate the patients’ infectious and immunologic risk profiles. The administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) is an established treatment in patients with immune deficiencies and other antibody-mediated diseases. In addition, IVIg was shown to be useful in treatment of several disorders caused by deterioration of the cellular immune system. It proved to be effective in preventing hyperacute rejection in highly sensitized kidney and heart transplants. In the liver transplant setting, the administration of specific Ig against hepatitis B virus is current standard in post-LT antiviral prophylaxis. The mechanisms of action of IVIg are complex and not fully understood. However, there is increasing experimental and clinical evidence that IVIg has an immuno-balancing impact by a combination of immuno-supporting and immuno-suppressive properties. It may be suggested that, especially in the context of a worsening organ shortage with all resulting clinical implications, liver transplant patients should benefit from immuno-regulatory capabilities of IVIg. In this review, perspectives of immune modulation by IVIg and impact on outcome in liver transplant patients are described.

Impact of IgG3 subclass and C1q-fixing donor-specific HLA alloantibodies on rejection and survival in liver transplantation

Recent literature confirms donor-specific HLA alloantibodies (DSA) impair 5-year survival in some but not all liver transplant recipients. In an effort to improve DSA testing's association with rejection and death, we retrospectively evaluated 1270 liver transplant recipients for the presence of IgG3 and C1q-fixing DSA. In patients with preformed DSA, 29 and 51% had IgG3 and C1q-fixing DSA, respectively. In patients with de novo DSA, 62% and 67% had IgG3 and C1q-fixing DSA, respectively. When different types of DSA positive patients were compared to DSA negative patients, multivariable analysis showed that IgG3 DSA positivity had the highest numerical hazard ratio for death (IgG3: HR = 2.4, p < 0.001; C1q: HR = 1.9, p < 0.001; standard DSA: HR = 1.6, p < 0.001). Similarly, multivariable analysis demonstrated de novo IgG3 DSA positivity compared to no DSA had the highest hazard ratio for death (IgG3: HR = 2.1, p = 0.004; C1q: HR = 1.9, p = 0.02; standard DSA: HR = 1.8, p = 0.007). Preformed C1q-fixing class II DSA showed the strongest correlation with early rejection. In conclusion, preformed and de novo IgG3 subclass DSA positive patients had the highest absolute HR for death in side-by-side comparison with C1q and standard DSA positive versus DSA negative patients; however, IgG3 negative DSA positive patients still had inferior outcomes compared to DSA negative patients.

Antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation: current controversies and future directions

Interest in the role of donor-specific human leukocyte antibodies in liver transplantation has been rekindled recently. Emerging evidence suggests that these antibodies may cause injury to the liver allograft. Here we review the clinical literature, highlight controversial results, and propose a path forward for the definition and better understanding of antibody-mediated injury to the liver.

Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in maintenance liver transplant patients

Although large retrospective studies have identified the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) to be a risk factor for rejection and impaired survival after liver transplantation, the long-term predicted pathogenic potential of individual DSAs after liver transplantation remains unclear. We investigated the incidence, prevalence and consequences of DSAs in maintenance liver transplant (LT) recipients. Two hundred sixty-seven LT recipients, who had undergone transplantation at least 6 months previously and had been screened for DSAs at least twice using single-antigen bead technology, were included and tested annually for the presence of DSAs. At a median of 51 months (min-max: 6-220) after an LT, 13% of patients had DSAs. At a median of 36.5 months (min-max: 2-45) after the first screening, 9% of patients have developed de novo DSAs. The sole predictive factor for the emergence of de novo DSAs was retransplantation (OR 3.75; 95% CI 1.28-11.05, p = 0.025). Five out of 21 patients with de novo DSAs (23.8%) developed an antibody-mediated rejection. Fibrosis score was higher among patients with DSAs. In conclusion, monitoring for the development of DSAs in maintenance LT patients is useful in case of graft dysfunction and to identify patients with a high risk of developing liver fibrosis.

The role of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies in liver transplantation

The impact of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies (DSA) on short- and long-term liver transplant outcome is not clearly defined. While it is clear that not all levels of allosensitization produce overt clinical injury, and that liver allografts possess some degree of alloantibody resistance, alloantibody-mediated adverse consequences are increasingly being recognized. To better define the current state of this topic, we assembled experts to provide insights, explore controversies and develop recommendations for future research on the consequences of DSA in liver transplantation. This article summarizes the proceedings of this inaugural meeting. Several insights emerged. Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), although rarely diagnosed, is increasingly understood to overlap with T cell-mediated rejection. Isolated liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of early allograft immunologic injury when preformed DSA are high titer and persist posttransplantation. Persons who undergo simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation are at risk of renal AMR when Class II DSA persist posttransplantation. Other under-appreciated DSA associations include ductopenia and fibrosis, plasma cell hepatitis, biliary strictures and accelerated fibrosis associated with recurrent liver disease. Standardized DSA testing and diagnostic criteria for both acute and chronic AMR are needed to distil existing associations into etiological processes in order to develop responsive therapeutic strategies.

Crossmatch-positive liver transplantation in patients receiving thymoglobulin-rituximab induction

BACKGROUND

Positive crossmatch (CM) in liver transplantation (LT) is associated with worse outcomes. Role of induction immunosuppression in this setting remains to be studied.

METHODS

One thousand consecutive LT patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin±rituximab induction were studied. Pretransplantation sera of 55 CM-positive (CM) patients were tested for C1q-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection required presence of diffuse vascular C4d expression on liver biopsies.

RESULTS

CM was positive in 112 (11%) recipients. Antibody-mediated rejection was observed in 3 (0.03%) patients, whereas acute cellular rejection (ACR) occurred in 31 (3%) patients. CM status was associated with a higher incidence of ACR (9% in CM vs. 2% in CM-negative [CM]; P<0.01) and chronic rejection (4% in CM vs. 1% in CM; P<0.01). Graft survival was slightly lower in CM patients (at 1 year; 85% in CM vs. 89% in CM; P=0.26). Patients with autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis as a group had a tendency toward CM status as well as developing ACR. Upon multivariate analysis, CM status was the strongest predictor of ACR (B=1.14; P=0.02). Only half of CM patients harbored C1q-fixing DSA. Presence of C1q-fixing DSA was not associated with increased incidence of ACR.

CONCLUSIONS

In LT, CM status is associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection, chronic rejection, and slightly worse graft survival. With the use of rabbit antithymocyte globulin±rituximab induction, overall low rejection rates can be achieved in CM LT.

Antibody-mediated rejection as a contributor to previously unexplained early liver allograft loss

We analyzed 60 patients with idiopathic early allograft loss (defined as death or retransplantation at <90 days) to determine the relative contribution of preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies (DSAs) to this endpoint, and we defined strict criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in liver allografts. The inclusion criteria encompassed the availability of a pretransplant serum sample and both postreperfusion and follow-up tissue specimens for a blinded, retrospective re-review of histology and complement component 4d (C4d) staining. AMR was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of all 4 of the following strict criteria: (1) DSAs in serum, (2) histopathological evidence of diffuse microvascular injury/microvasculitis consistent with antibody-mediated injury, (3) diffuse C4d staining in the portal microvasculature with or without staining in the sinusoids or central veins in at least 1 sample, and (4) the exclusion of other causes of a similar type of injury. Patients thought to be experiencing definite AMR on the basis of routine histopathology alone showed the highest levels of DSA sensitization. Forty percent of patients with pretransplant DSAs with a pattern of bead saturation after serial dilutions developed AMR. Another multiparous female developed what appeared to be a strong recall response, which resulted in combined AMR and acute cellular rejection (ACR) causing graft failure. A contribution of DSAs to allograft failure could not be excluded for 3 additional patients who received marginal grafts. In conclusion, liver allograft recipients with preformed DSAs with a high mean fluorescence intensity despite dilution seem to be at risk for clinically significant allograft injury and possibly for loss from AMR, often in combination with ACR.

Presence of antibodies against self human leukocyte antigen class II molecules in autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can arise de novo after liver transplantation (LT) for non-autoimmune liver diseases. Considering the identical features of de novo AIH after LT and classical AIH, as well as the importance of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in graft rejection, we investigated the presence of circulating anti-HLA class II antibodies in the sera of 35 patients with AIH, 30 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and 30 healthy donors using fluorescent dye-impregnated beads bound to HLA molecules. We then investigated the allele specificity of the antibodies and identified the HLA alleles in each patient using DNA-based HLA typing. We also examined HLA class II expression in liver samples using immunohistochemistry. Anti-HLA class II antibodies were detected significantly more frequently in the patients with AIH (88.1%) than in the patients with PBC (33.3%) or in the healthy donors (13.3%) (both P <0.01). We confirmed that the anti-HLA class II antibodies in the AIH patients showed specificity for several HLA class II alleles, including self HLA class II alleles. Moreover, positive reactivity with anti-self HLA class II antibodies was associated with higher serum transaminase levels. In conclusion, we demonstrated, for the first time, that antibodies against self HLA class II alleles were detectable in patients with AIH. Our results suggest that an antibody-mediated immune response against HLA class II molecules on hepatocytes may be involved in the pathogenesis or acceleration of liver injury in AIH.

Influence of preformed donor-specific antibodies and C4d on early liver allograft function

INTRODUCTION. The impact of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is incompletely understood in liver transplantation. The incidence and impact of preformed DSA on early post liver transplant were assessed and these were correlated with compliment fragment C4d on allograft biopsy. METHODS. Pretransplant serum from 41 consecutive liver transplant recipients (brain dead donors; DBD = 27 and cardiac death donors; DCD = 14) were tested for class-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and compared against donor HLA types. Liver biopsies were taken during cold storage (t-1) and post-reperfusion (t0) stained with C4d and graded for preservation-reperfusion injury (PRI). RESULTS. Of the 41 recipients, 8 (20%) had anti-HLA class I/II antibodies pretransplant, 3 (7%) were confirmed preformed DSA; classes I and II (n=1) and class I only (n=2). No biopsies showed definite evidence of antibody-mediated rejection. Graft biopsies in overall showed only mild PRI with ischemic hepatocyte C4d pattern similar in both positive and negative DSA patients. One DSA-positive (33%) compared with four DSA-negative patients (10%) had significant early graft dysfunction; severe PRI causing graft loss from primary nonfunction was seen only in DSA-negative group. Allograft biopsy of preformed DSA-positive patient demonstrated only minimal PRI; however, no identifiable cause could be attributed to graft dysfunction other than preformed DSA. CONCLUSION. Preformed DSA are present in 5-10% liver transplant recipients. There is no association between anti-HLA DSA and PRI and C4d, but preformed DSA may cause early morbidity. Larger studies on the impact of DSA with optimization of C4d techniques are required.

Anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibodies in liver transplant recipients: effect on long-term graft survival

Objective. Presence of anti-HLA antibodies has a well-known impact on kidney grafts survival; however their role in liver transplantation has not been fully elucidated. We conducted a 7-year prospective study to show correlation between presence of anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibodies and liver graft survival. Methods. Blood samples from 123 liver transplant recipients were collected during patients routine visits. Time from transplantation to blood sample collection was different for each patient. Blood samples were tested for anti-HLA (separately class I and II) and MICA antibodies using Luminex assays. Results. There were 32 (26%) patients with positive anti-HLA and 37 (30%) with positive anti-MICA antibodies. Graft loss occurred in 7 cases (23%) in anti-HLA positive group compared to 20 (22%) in anti-HLA negative group (P = ns) and in 8 cases (22%) in anti-MICA positive group but 19 (23%) in anti-MICA negative group (P = ns). No correlations were detected between presence of antibodies and acute graft rejection (AGR). Presence of any antibodies (anti-HLA or anti-MICA antibodies) correlated with late graft rejection (P = 0.04). Conclusion. Presence of anti-HLA or anti-MICA had no impact on long-term liver graft survival; however, detection of any antibodies was correlated with episodes of late graft rejection.