Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir in liver-transplanted children infected with Epstein-Barr virus

The IPTA Nashville consensus conference on Post-Transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation in children: II-consensus guidelines for prevention

The International Pediatric Transplant Association (IPTA) convened an expert consensus conference to assess current evidence and develop recommendations for various aspects of care relating to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after solid organ transplantation in children. In this report from the Prevention Working Group, we reviewed the existing literature regarding immunoprophylaxis and chemoprophylaxis, and pre-emptive strategies. While the group made a strong recommendation for pre-emptive reduction of immunosuppression at the time of EBV DNAemia (low to moderate evidence), no recommendations for use could be made for any prophylactic strategy or alternate pre-emptive strategy, largely due to insufficient or conflicting evidence. Current gaps and future research priorities are highlighted.

Screening and Management of PTLD

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) represents a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative diseases occurring in the setting of immunosuppression following hematopoietic stem cells transplant and solid organ transplantation. Despite its overall low incidence, PTLD is a serious complication following transplantation, with a mortality rate as high as 50% in transplant recipients. Therefore, it is important to establish for each transplant recipient a personalized risk evaluation for the development of PTLD based on the determination of Epstein-Barr virus serostatus and viral load following the initiation of immunosuppression. Due to the dynamic progression of PTLD, reflected in the diverse pathological features, different therapeutic approaches have been used to treat this disorder. Moreover, new therapeutic strategies based on the administration of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells have been developed. In this review, we summarize the available data on screening and treatment to suggest a strategy to identify transplant recipients at a higher risk for PTLD development and to review the current therapeutic options for PTLD.

One Year of Preemptive Valganciclovir Administration in Children After Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Valganciclovir (VGCV) is used as prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 1 year of preemptive VGCV administration compared with a shorter administration after pediatric LDLT.

METHODS

VGCV was administered to 56 children who underwent LDLT. CMV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody status, pp65 antigenemia, and other laboratory data were assessed at 1 year after LDLT. Patients were divided into the 1-year group (n = 32) (patients who had 1 year of VGCV administration) and the <1-year group (n = 24) (patients who had less than 1 year of VGCV administration).

RESULTS

Study participants consisted of 34 females and 22 males, with a mean age of 4.2 years at transplant. Regarding pretransplant donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV antibody status, 13 were D positive (+)/R negative (-), 27 were D+/R+, 8 were D-/R+, and 8 were D-/R-. For EBV, 22 were D+/R+, 32 were D+/R-, and 2 were D-/R-. In the 1-year group, only 2 patients (6.5%) developed CMV infection, whereas 8 patients (33.3%) developed CMV infection in the <1-year group. The CMV pp65 antigenemia assay was positive in 2 patients. CMV IgM was positive in 7 patients. One year of preemptive VGCV administration was associated with a lower incidence of CMV infection (P = .008), but not EBV infection. No adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

One year of preemptive VGCV administration after LDLT is safe and suppresses CMV infection. It was useful after pediatric LDLT.

Valganciclovir prophylaxis delays onset of EBV viremia in high-risk pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The role of antiviral prophylaxis to prevent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viremia or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients is controversial. We examined whether valganciclovir (VAL) prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection was associated with EBV viremia following transplantation in EBV-naive children.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was conducted of EBV-naive pediatric heart and renal transplant recipients with an EBV-positive donor from January 1996 to April 2017. VAL was tested for association with EBV viremia-free survival in the first 6 months posttransplantation when immunosuppressant exposure is the highest. Survival models evaluated VAL duration, with adjustment for other baseline confounders.

RESULTS

Among the cohort (n = 44), 3 (6.8%) were heart transplants, 25 (56.8%) received VAL, and 22 (50%) developed EBV viremia in the first-year posttransplantation. Mean time-to-viremia was 143 vs. 90 days for the VAL and no-VAL groups, respectively (p = 0.008), in the first 6 months. Only two patients developed viremia while on VAL. Each additional day of VAL was associated with 1.4% increase in viremia-free survival (p < 0.001). Multivariable modeling of VAL with other baseline risk factors did not identify other independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

VAL is independently associated with delayed onset of EBV viremia, with prolongation of delay with each additional day of antiviral prophylaxis.

Dipyridamole as a new drug to prevent Epstein-Barr virus reactivation

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a widely distributed gamma-herpesvirus that has been associated with various cancers mainly from lymphocytic and epithelial origin. Although EBV-mediated oncogenesis has been associated with viral oncogenes expressed during latency, a growing set of evidence suggested that antiviral treatments directed against EBV lytic phase may contribute to prevent some forms of cancers, including EBV-positive Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Diseases. It is shown here that dipyridamole (DIP), a safe drug with favorable and broad pharmacological properties, inhibits EBV reactivation from B-cell lines. DIP repressed immediate early and early genes expression mostly through its ability to inhibit nucleoside uptake. Considering its wide clinical use, DIP repurposing could shortly be evaluated, alone or in combination with other antivirals, to treat EBV-related diseases where lytic replication plays a deleterious role.

Novel Therapeutics for Epstein⁻Barr Virus

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a human γ-herpesvirus that infects up to 95% of the adult population. Primary EBV infection usually occurs during childhood and is generally asymptomatic, though the virus can cause infectious mononucleosis in 35–50% of the cases when infection occurs later in life. EBV infects mainly B-cells and epithelial cells, establishing latency in resting memory B-cells and possibly also in epithelial cells. EBV is recognized as an oncogenic virus but in immunocompetent hosts, EBV reactivation is controlled by the immune response preventing transformation in vivo. Under immunosuppression, regardless of the cause, the immune system can lose control of EBV replication, which may result in the appearance of neoplasms. The primary malignancies related to EBV are B-cell lymphomas and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which reflects the primary cell targets of viral infection in vivo. Although a number of antivirals were proven to inhibit EBV replication in vitro, they had limited success in the clinic and to date no antiviral drug has been approved for the treatment of EBV infections. We review here the antiviral drugs that have been evaluated in the clinic to treat EBV infections and discuss novel molecules with anti-EBV activity under investigation as well as new strategies to treat EBV-related diseases.

Antiviral Therapies for Herpesviruses: Current Agents and New Directions

PURPOSE

The objective of this review was to summarize the recent literature describing the current burden of disease due to herpesviruses in the antiviral and transplant era; describe mechanisms of action of antiviral agents and the development of resistance; summarize the literature of recent antiviral agents brought to market as well as agents under development; and to present literature on future strategies for herpesvirus therapeutics.

METHODS

An extensive search of the medical literature related to antiherpesviral therapy was conducted to compose this narrative review. Literature searches were performed via PubMed and ultimately 137 articles were included as most relevant to the scope of this article.

FINDINGS

Herpesviruses are a family of DNA viruses that are ubiquitous throughout human populations and share the feature of establishing lifelong infections in a latent phase with the potential of periodic reactivation. With the exception of herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, and Epstein-Barr virus, which have a significant disease burden in individuals with normal immune function, the morbidity and mortality of the remaining viruses are primarily associated with the immunocompromised host. Over the last half-century, several agents have been tested in large randomized, placebo-controlled trials that have resulted in safe and effective antiviral agents for the treatment of many of these infections.

IMPLICATIONS

With increasing use of antiherpesviral agents for extended periods, particularly in immunocompromised hosts, the emergence of resistant viruses has necessitated the development of newer agents with novel targets and better side-effect profiles.

Antiviral Drugs for EBV

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infects up to 95% of the adult human population, with primary infection typically occurring during childhood and usually asymptomatic. However, EBV can cause infectious mononucleosis in approximately 35–50% cases when infection occurs during adolescence and early adulthood. Epstein–Barr virus is also associated with several B-cell malignancies including Burkitt lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. A number of antiviral drugs have proven to be effective inhibitors of EBV replication, yet have resulted in limited success clinically, and none of them has been approved for treatment of EBV infections.

Pediatric renal transplantation: A retrospective single-center study on epidemiology and morbidity due to EBV

Pediatric R-Tx patients are at high risk of developing EBV primary infection. Although high DNA replication is a risk factor for PTLD, some patients develop PTLD with low viral load. In this retrospective single-center study including all pediatric patients having received R-Tx (2003-2012 period), we aimed to identify risk factors for uncontrolled reactions to EBV (defined as the presence of a viral load >10 000 copies/mL or PTLD). A Cox proportional hazard model was performed. A total of 117 patients underwent R-Tx at a mean age of 9.7 ± 5.3 years, 46 of them being seronegative for EBV at the time of R-Tx. During follow-up, 54 patients displayed positive EBV viral load, 22 of whom presenting with primary infection. An uncontrolled reaction to EBV was observed in 24 patients, whilst 4 patients developed PTLD. Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested the following risk factors for an uncontrolled reaction: age below 5 years, graft from a deceased donor, ≥5 HLA mismatches, EBV-seronegative status at the time of R-Tx, and a secondary post-Tx loss of anti-EBNA. Monitoring anti-EBNA after R-Tx may contribute to the early identification of patients at risk for uncontrolled reaction.

Leflunomide/teriflunomide inhibit Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)- induced lymphoproliferative disease and lytic viral replication

EBV infection causes mononucleosis and is associated with specific subsets of B cell lymphomas. Immunosuppressed patients such as organ transplant recipients are particularly susceptible to EBV-induced lymphoproliferative disease (LPD), which can be fatal. Leflunomide (a drug used to treat rheumatoid arthritis) and its active metabolite teriflunomide (used to treat multiple sclerosis) inhibit de novo pyrimidine synthesis by targeting the cellular dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thereby decreasing T cell proliferation. Leflunomide also inhibits the replication of cytomegalovirus and BK virus via both "on target" and "off target" mechanisms and is increasingly used to treat these viruses in organ transplant recipients. However, whether leflunomide/teriflunomide block EBV replication or inhibit EBV-mediated B cell transformation is currently unknown. We show that teriflunomide inhibits cellular proliferation, and promotes apoptosis, in EBV-transformed B cells in vitro at a clinically relevant dose. In addition, teriflunomide prevents the development of EBV-induced lymphomas in both a humanized mouse model and a xenograft model. Furthermore, teriflunomide inhibits lytic EBV infection in vitro both by preventing the initial steps of lytic viral reactivation, and by blocking lytic viral DNA replication. Leflunomide/teriflunomide might therefore be clinically useful for preventing EBV-induced LPD in patients who have high EBV loads yet require continued immunosuppression.

Quantification of Torque Teno Virus and Epstein-Barr Virus Is of Limited Value for Predicting the Net State of Immunosuppression After Lung Transplantation

Background

Major hurdles for survival after lung transplantation are rejections and infectious complications. Adequate methods for monitoring immune suppression status are lacking. Here, we evaluated quantification of torque teno virus (TTV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as biomarkers for defining the net state of immunosuppression in lung-transplanted patients.

Methods

This prospective single-center study included 98 patients followed for 2 years after transplantation. Bacterial infections, fungal infections, viral respiratory infections (VRTI), cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, and acute rejections, as well as TTV and EBV levels, were monitored.

Results

The levels of torque teno virus DNA increased rapidly after transplantation, likely due to immunosuppressive treatment. A modest increase in levels of Epstein-Barr virus DNA was also observed after transplantation. There were no associations between either TTV or EBV and infectious events or acute rejection, respectively, during follow-up. When Tacrolimus was the main immunosuppressive treatment, TTV DNA levels were significantly elevated 6–24 months after transplantation as compared with Cyclosporine treatment.

Conclusions

Although replication of TTV, but not EBV, appears to reflect the functionality of the immune system, depending on the type of immunosuppressive treatment, quantification of TTV or EBV as biomarkers has limited potential for defining the net state of immune suppression.

No effect of treatment with intravenous ganciclovir on Epstein-Barr virus viremia demonstrated after pediatric liver transplantation

EBV after pediatric LT is a risk factor for PTLD. We wanted to evaluate the effect of intravenous ganciclovir on EBV viremia and to identify risk factors for chronic EBV viremia. All pediatric patients who underwent LT in Norway from 2002 until 2015 were reviewed. Twenty-two of 38 patients with viremia were treated with intravenous ganciclovir for a median of 22 (21-38) days. Treated and untreated patients were not different with respect to EBV seroconversion prior to transplantation or age at transplantation, but treated patients had significantly earlier viremia after transplantation (P=.005). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with reduction in virus load in patients treated with ganciclovir compared to untreated patients at 8 weeks. After 1 year, five of 19 patients treated with ganciclovir and six of 14 untreated patients had reduced virus load compared to start of viremia (P=.27). In conclusion, treatment with intravenous ganciclovir did not change the proportion of patients with reduction in EBV load at 8 weeks and 1 year after viremia. Younger age at transplantation, short time from transplantation to viremia, and lack of EBV seroconversion prior to transplantation were significant predictors of chronic EBV viremia.

Viral load of EBV DNAemia is a predictor of EBV-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in pediatric renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication of solid organ transplantation that can be classified into two major subtypes, namely, early lesions and non-early lesions, based on histopathological findings. In the vast majority of cases, proliferating cells are B lymphocytes and, most frequently, proliferation is induced by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection.

METHODS

The aim of our study was to evaluate the natural history of EBV infection and its possible evolution toward PTLD in a pediatric cohort of patients who received a renal transplant between January 2000 and December 2013. A total of 304 patients were evaluated for this study, of whom 103 tested seronegative for EBV at transplantation.

RESULTS

Following transplantation, 50 of the 103 seronegative patients (48.5%) developed a first EBV infection, based on the results of PCR assays for EBV DNA, with 19 of these patients ultimately reverting to the negative state (<3000 copies/ml). Among the 201 seropositive patients only 40 (19.9%) presented a reactivation of EBV. Non-early lesions PTLD was diagnosed in ten patients, and early lesions PTLD was diagnosed in five patients. In all cases a positive EBV viral load had been detected at some stage of the follow-up. Having a maximum peak of EBV viral load above the median value observed in the whole cohort (59,909.5 copies/ml) was a significant and independent predictor of non-early lesions PTLD and all PTLD onset.

CONCLUSIONS

A high PCR EBV viral load is correlated with the probability of developing PTLD. The definition of a reliable marker is essential to identify patients more at risk of PTLD and to personalize the clinical approach to the single patient.

The Role of Antiviral Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

The role of antiviral prophylaxis for the prevention of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains controversial for solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients who are seronegative for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) but who received organs from seropositive donors. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to address this issue. Two independent assessors extracted data from studies after determining patient eligibility and completing quality assessments. Overall, 31 studies were identified and included in the quantitative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the direct comparisons (total 2366 participants), and 22 were included in the indirect analysis. There was no significant difference in the rate of EBV-associated PTLD in SOT recipients among those who received prophylaxis (acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, valganciclovir) compared with those who did not receive prophylaxis (nine studies; risk ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.54). No significant differences were noted across all types of organ transplants, age groups, or antiviral use as prophylaxis or preemptive therapy. There was no significant heterogeneity in the effect of antiviral prophylaxis on the incidence of PTLD. In conclusion, the use of antiviral prophylaxis in high-risk EBV-naive patients has no effect on the incidence of PTLD in SOT recipients.

Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplant recipients

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) contributes to the pathogenesis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in more than 70% of cases. EBV DNAemia surveillance has been reported to assist in the prevention and treatment of PTLD in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Derived from experience in HSCT and taking into account that PCR-based EBV monitoring techniques are currently available in most solid organ transplant (SOT) centres, there is a great interest in EBV surveillance and prevention of PTLD in SOT recipients. In the present document we have tried to address from a practical perspective different important topics regarding the prevention and management of EBV-related PTLD in SOT. To this end, available information on SOT was analysed and combined with potentially useful data from HSCT and expert observations. The document is therefore structured according to different specific questions, each of them culminating in a consensus opinion of the panel of European experts, grading the answers according to internationally recognized levels of evidence. The addressed issues were grouped under the following topics. (i) Timing and epidemiological data of PTLD. Prophylaxis guided by clinical risk factors of early and late PTLD in SOT. (ii) Relationship of EBV DNAemia load monitoring and the development of PTLD in solid organ transplant recipients. (iii) Monitoring of EBV DNAemia after SOT. Which population should be monitored? What is the optimal timing of the monitoring? (iv) Management of SOT recipients with persistent and/or increasing EBV DNAemia.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: from epidemiology to pathogenesis-driven treatment

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) represent the most severe complication of both solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is the main driver of PTLD, particularly those occurring early after transplantation. EBV-driven malignancies are associated with selective expression of latent viral proteins, but uncontrolled lytic replication may favor early phases of cell transformation. Besides immunodepression, persistent immune activation and chronic inflammation play an important role in both virus reactivation and expansion of EBV-infected B cells. EBV-induced immortalization requires the expression of telomerase. TERT, the rate-limiting component of the telomerase complex, is central in the switch from the lytic to the latent viral program, and TERT inhibition induces the EBV lytic cycle and cell death. Immunotherapy and combination of EBV lytic cycle inducers with antiviral drugs are promising strategies to improve the treatment of PTLD patients. This review is aimed at providing an update on the intriguing association between EBV and PTLD, mainly focusing on cases arising after kidney and liver transplantation, which account for the vast majority of transplants.

Current preventive strategies and management of Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in solid organ transplantation in Europe. Results of the ESGICH Questionnaire-based Cross-sectional Survey

There is limited clinical evidence on the utility of the monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia in the pre-emptive management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We investigated current preventive measures against EBV-related PTLD through a web-based questionnaire sent to 669 SOT programmes in 35 European countries. This study was performed on behalf of the ESGICH study group from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. A total of 71 SOT programmes from 15 European countries participated in the study. EBV serostatus of the recipient is routinely obtained in 69/71 centres (97%) and 64 (90%) have access to EBV DNAemia assays. EBV monitoring is routinely used in 85.9% of the programmes and 77.4% reported performing pre-emptive treatment for patients with significant EBV DNAemia levels. Pre-emptive treatment for EBV DNAemia included reduction of immunosuppression in 50.9%, switch to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in 30.9%, and use of rituximab in 14.5% of programmes. Imaging by whole-body 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is used in 60.9% of centres to rule out PTLD and complemented computer tomography is used in 50%. In 10.9% of centres, FDG-PET is included in the first-line diagnostic workup in patients with high-risk EBV DNAemia. Despite the lack of definitive evidence, EBV load measurements are frequently used in Europe to guide diagnostic workup and pre-emptive reduction of immunosuppression. We need prospective and controlled studies to define the impact of EBV monitoring in reducing the risk of PTLD in SOT recipients.

A Therapeutic Trial of Valganciclovir in Patients with Uveitis and Positive Epstein-Barr virus Early Antigen D IgG Titers

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of a therapeutic trial of valganciclovir in patients with uveitis with positive Epstein-Barr virus early antigen D immunoglobulin G titers (EBV EA-D).

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of 14 patients at the Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution who had uveitis with positive EBV EA-D but negative studies for all other causes of uveitis and were treated with valganciclovir 450 mg twice a day or valganciclovir 900 mg twice a day between January 2010 and August 2014.

Results

Nine of 14 patients, who had presumed EBV reactivation with associated intraocular inflammation, were successfully treated with valganciclovir: 3 of these were treated with valganciclovir 450 mg twice a day and 6 were treated with valganciclovir 900 mg twice a day. Five of 14 patients failed to respond to valganciclovir with persistent inflammation after at least 2 weeks of valganciclovir therapy, and were subsequently treated with immunomodulatory therapy to control inflammation.

Conclusions

Uveitis can be caused by EBV infection/reactivation. A therapeutic trial with valganciclovir 450 mg twice a day for 1 month in patients with uveitis with positive EBV EA antibody may be beneficial.

Epstein Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative diseases: the virus as a therapeutic target

Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-associated lymphoproliferative diseases (LPDs) express all EBV latent antigens (type III latency) in immunodeficient patients and limited antigens (type I and II latencies) in immunocompetent patients. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is the prototype exhibiting type III EBV latency. Although EBV antigens are highly immunogenic, PTLD cell proliferation remains unchecked because of the underlying immunosuppression. The restoration of anti-EBV immunity by EBV-specific T cells of either autologous or allogeneic origin has been shown to be safe and effective in PTLDs. Cellular therapy can be improved by establishing a bank of human leukocyte antigen-characterized allogeneic EBV-specific T cells. In EBV+ LPDs exhibiting type I and II latencies, the use of EBV-specific T cells is more limited, although the safety and efficacy of this therapy have also been demonstrated. The therapeutic role of EBV-specific T cells in EBV+ LPDs needs to be critically reappraised with the advent of monoclonal antibodies and other targeted therapy. Another strategy involves the use of epigenetic approaches to induce EBV to undergo lytic proliferation when expression of the viral thymidine kinase renders host tumor cells susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of ganciclovir. Finally, the prophylactic use of antiviral drugs to prevent EBV reactivation may decrease the occurrence of EBV+ LPDs.

Valganciclovir suppressed Epstein Barr virus reactivation during immunosuppression with alemtuzumab

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of latent herpes viruses occurs with immunosuppression. Alemtuzumab is an antibody targeting CD52, which is expressed on all B- and T-cells. Treatment with alemtuzumab leads to profound T-cell suppression, and reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) occurs. Valganciclovir is used as an anti-CMV prophylaxis during alemtuzumab therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if EBV reactivation is decreased with valganciclovir prophylaxis.

STUDY DESIGN

Plasma EBV DNA was serially quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction with a World Health Organization EBV standard in patients receiving alemtuzumab therapy with valganciclovir as anti-CMV prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were studied. A total of 258 samples were quantified, at a median of 7 (3-25) specimens per patient. Twenty-four patients never had any quantifiable EBV DNA. Five patients (17%) developed EBV reactivation. Two patients had EBV reactivation at very low levels of about 10(3)IU/mL, 3-4 logs lower than those typically found in post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases. Three patients had EBV reactivation at higher levels of 10(4)IU/mL, which only occurred after two courses of alemtuzumab were administered. EBV reactivation subsided spontaneously in four cases. One patient developed EBV-positive Hodgkin lymphoma, but he had also received previously another potent T-cell suppressing drug fludarabine.

CONCLUSION

Valganciclovir suppressed EBV reactivation during alemtuzumab therapy. It might be a useful prophylaxis in immunocompromized patient populations at high risk of EBV reactivation.

Prevention and treatment for Epstein-Barr virus infection and related cancers

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was the first herpes virus described as being oncogenic in humans. EBV infection is implicated in post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD) and several other cancers in non-immunocompromised patients, with more than 200,000 new cases per year. While prevention of PTLD is improving, mainly based on EBV monitoring and preemptive tapering of immunosuppression, early diagnosis remains the best current option for the other malignancies. Significant progress has been achieved in treatment, with decreased mortality and morbidity, but some challenges are still to face, especially for the more aggressive diseases. Possible prevention by EBV vaccination would be a more global approach of this public health problem, but further active research is needed before this goal could be reached.

Graft rejection in pediatric liver transplant patients with Epstein-Barr viremia and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease

Treatment of primary EV and PTLD in pediatric LT recipients (pLT) involves IS reduction/cessation. Retrospective review of pLT at our institution from 2001-2009 was conducted to characterize risk factors for GR after EV/ PTLD. Of 184 pLT, EV occurred in 61 (33%) at mean 16.5 m (0-82) and PTLD in 18 (9.8%) at mean 17.7 m (3-78) post-LT. Median age at pLT was 11 m (1-245 m) and follow-up six yr. For EV, 86% underwent IS reduction and 51% received antivirals. GR occurred in 12 (27.9%) with EV and 15 (83.3%) after PTLD diagnosis (relative risk of GR for PTLD 2.98). GR treated with methylprednisolone bolus in half and/or oral IS in half. Following GR therapy, four had PTLD relapses, no graft loss and one EV patient required re-transplantation. GR history before EV was a risk factor for GR after EV (p = 0.024). GR at any point after pLT was a risk factor for PTLD (p = 0.001). Children with EV and GR prior to EV should be monitored closely for GR after IS reduction and GR is a significant risk factor for PTLD. Most children with PTLD eventually developed GR.

Screening of de novo tumors after liver transplantation

De novo malignancies are frequent complications after liver transplantation. They are one of the leading causes of late death. Some authors have reported promising results following implementation of extensive cancer surveillance programs. Screening protocols might benefit patients by providing a diagnosis at an earlier stage when tumors may be cured. These protocols should be based on the specific risk factors of every patient. Unfortunately, the scientific evidence supporting screening protocols is still very weak both in the general population and in the transplant patients. On this basis, there is not enough evidence to recommend routine screening for all liver transplant recipients, apart from the recommendations accepted for the general population. Multicenter studies in selected groups of patients at high risk for malignancy may be the only way of defining the potential benefit of screening programs post-transplantation.

Predictors of long-term outcome after liver transplant

Liver transplantation is the standard of care for children with life-threatening liver disease. Survival rates posttransplantation are rising with current 1-year and 5-year rates being greater than 90% and 85%, respectively. Numerous factors contribute to posttransplant outcomes of graft and patient survival, including improved surgical techniques, immunosuppressive regimens, and posttransplant management. The present review aims to discuss predictors of long-term outcomes of pediatric transplant recipients and identify potential risk factors.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease following liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite contemporary immunosuppressive regimens, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains a major complication after liver transplantation. This review highlights advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of PTLD in liver transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The spectrum of PTLD after liver transplant ranges from polymorphic lymphoproliferation to high-grade monoclonal lymphoma and is usually related to outgrowth of lymphocytes infected with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Risk factors for PTLD include EBV-seronegativity of the recipient, young age, intensity of immunosuppression, and the first year posttransplant. Measurement of EBV load by quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays is an important aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of PTLD although the specificity for PTLD is only about 50% (specificity for EBV is ∼100%). In patients diagnosed with PTLD, management options include reduction of immunosuppression, rituximab, combination chemotherapy, and adoptive immunotherapy. Outcomes have improved because rituximab has been incorporated into treatment regimens, and immunotherapy approaches show promise.

SUMMARY

PTLD is a significant complication after liver transplantation, particularly in children. Advances in early detection approaches have aided in the diagnosis and management of PTLD, but further research to identify better predictive biomarkers is needed to improve risk-based treatment strategies.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid-organ transplantation

A post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an uncommon but serious complication following solid-organ transplantation. The incidence varies, depending on the type of organ transplanted, the degree of immunosuppression, the number of episodes of acute rejection and a patient's immune status to Epstein-Barr virus. The incidence of PTLD is thought to be bimodal; cases in the first year after solid-organ transplantation are typically related to Epstein-Barr virus. A second incidence occurs more than 1 year following transplantation and is typically not related to Epstein-Barr virus. A variety of therapeutic approaches has been used for these patients, with more recent strategies including the use of rituximab, with or without combination chemotherapy. Efforts continue to be made to improve the outcome of patients with PTLD.

CD20 expression predicts survival in paediatric post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) following solid organ transplantation

The prognostic role of CD20 expression and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) after solid organ transplantation (SOT) in paediatric patients is poorly understood. We retrospectively examined the relationship of CD20 and EBV with the time interval from SOT to PTLD diagnosis, and PTLD-related event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in 45 consecutive PTLD patients (≤25 years) following SOT. These 45 paediatric SOT patients (28 heart, 11 liver, six kidney) were diagnosed with PTLD 45 months (mean; SD 43; range 4-153; median 24·5) after SOT, with PTLD diagnosis at 118 months (mean) (SD 77; range 14-287) of age. Of 40 evaluable tumours (11 monomorphic, 19 polymorphic, five early lesions, five rare subtypes), 32 (80%) had detectable EBV and 28 (70%) were classified as CD20(+) . Patients whose PTLD expressed CD20 or EBV had shorter intervals between SOT and PTLD onset (28 vs. 64 or 77 months for CD20 and EBV respectively) (P < 0·02), even after adjusting for age at SOT. Patients with CD20(+) tumours had higher 5-year PTLD-related EFS (83·7% vs. 28·6%, P < 0·001) and OS (95·8% vs. 56·3%, P = 0·01). EBV expression was unrelated to PTLD-related EFS or OS. CD20 expression is associated with timing of development of PTLD and predicts survival in PTLD diagnosed following paediatric SOT.

De novo malignancies following liver transplantation: impact and recommendations

1. De novo malignancy is one of the leading causes of late mortality after liver transplantation. 2. The risks of skin cancers and lymphoma are more than 10-fold greater than the risks in an age-matched and sex-matched general population. 3. Some types of neoplasia, such as lung, head and neck, and colorectal cancer, are more frequent in liver transplant recipients than in an age-matched and sex-matched population. The risks of other frequent malignancies, such as prostate and breast cancer, do not seem to be increased. 4. The most important risks for posttransplant malignancy are Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity (for lymphoma), sun exposure (for skin cancer), smoking, and increasing age. 5. Despite the absence of evidence, general recommendations (such as avoidance of overimmunosuppression, sunlight protection, and cessation of smoking) should be given. Screening protocols may help to detect neoplasia at an early stage of disease.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disease in non-immunocompromised hosts: a status report and summary of an international meeting, 8-9 September 2008

BACKGROUND

Recently novel Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lymphoproliferative diseases (LPDs) have been identified in non-immunocompromised hosts, both in Asia and Western countries. These include aggressive T-cell and NK-cell LPDs often subsumed under the heading of chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV) infection and EBV-driven B-cell LPDs mainly affecting the elderly.

DESIGN

To better define the pathogenesis, classification, and treatment of these disorders, participants from Asia, The Americas, Europe, and Australia presented clinical and experimental data at an international meeting.

RESULTS

The term systemic EBV-positive T-cell LPD, as adopted by the WHO classification, is preferred as a pathological classification over CAEBV (the favored clinical term) for those cases that are clonal. The disease has an aggressive clinical course, but may arise in the background of CAEBV. Hydroa vacciniforme (HV) and HV-like lymphoma represent a spectrum of clonal EBV-positive T-cell LPDs, which have a more protracted clinical course; spontaneous regression may occur in adult life. Severe mosquito bite allergy is a related syndrome usually of NK cell origin. Immune senescence in the elderly is associated with both reactive and neoplastic EBV-driven LPDs, including EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

CONCLUSION

The participants proposed an international consortium to facilitate further clinical and biological studies of novel EBV-driven LPDs.