ABO-incompatible deceased donor liver transplantation in the United States: a national registry analysis

ABO Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Children: A Single Centre Experience from India

Background

In recent years, paediatric ABO incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplant (LT) has shown promising outcomes and can potentially eliminate organ shortage. This study aims to report paediatric ABOi LT experience, including short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods

It is a single-centre retrospective study. Out of 108 LTs, 20 were done in children. We compared the outcomes between ABOi (n = 20) and non-ABOi (n = 220) paediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) performed during the study period. All the children received pre-LT desensitization therapy comprising rituximab and plasmapheresis targeting pre-LT isohemagglutinin (IHA) titres of ≤1:16.

Results

Out of 239 paediatric LDLTs from 2017 to 2022, 19 children (11 females) underwent 20 ABOi LTs (including one retransplant with an ABOi domino allograft) at a median age of 12 (12, 51) months, with the majority being biliary atresia (60%). The median change in CD19 cell%, CD20 cell%, and IHA titres after rituximab from day -14 to day -1 (before LT) was satisfactory. In the first 3 months following LT, acute cellular rejection, culture-proven sepsis, and biliary and vascular complications were seen in 10%, 20%, 20%, and 15%, respectively. None of the ABOi LT recipients developed antibody-mediated rejection. ABOi LT recipients, as compared to non-ABOi LT recipients, had a higher incidence of bile leaks and prolonged hospital stay, with the rest of the complications, including biliary strictures and long-term outcomes, being comparable. At a median follow-up of 21 (14, 33) months, 4 children expired (21%).

Conclusion

ABOi LT in children shows excellent outcomes and can be performed safely with prior desensitization when a compatible liver is unavailable.

Pediatric acute liver failure: Current perspective in etiology and management

Pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is a catastrophic clinical condition with very high morbidity and mortality without early detection and intervention. It is characterized by the acute onset of massive hepatocellular injury that releases circulating inflammatory mediators, resulting in metabolic disturbances, coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy and multi-organ failure. The etiological spectrum is dominated by hepatotropic viruses, drug-induced liver injury, metabolic and genetic disorders and immune-mediated diseases. Unlike adults, indeterminate causes for acute liver failure constitute a considerable proportion of cases of acute liver failure in children in the west. The heterogeneity of age and etiology in PALF has led to difficulties in developing prognostic scoring. The recent guidelines emphasize prompt identification of PALF, age-appropriate evaluation for hepatic encephalopathy and laboratory evaluation with careful monitoring. Current therapy focuses on supporting the failing liver and other organs, pending either spontaneous recovery or liver transplantation. Targeted therapy is available for a select group of etiologies. Liver transplantation can be lifesaving and a plan for the same should be organized, whenever indicated. The aim of this review is to define PALF, understand its etiopathogenesis, address the challenges encountered during the management and update the latest advances in liver transplantation and non-transplant treatment options in PALF.

Strategies for ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a definitive treatment for the decompensated liver cirrhosis and fulminant liver failure. With limited availability of cadaveric liver allograft, ABO incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays an important part in further expansion of donor pool. Over the years, with the introduction of Rituximab and improving desensitisation protocol, outcomes of ABOi LDLT are on par with ABO compatible LT. However, ABOi LDLT protocol varies markedly from centre to centre. Intravenous Rituximab followed by plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption effectively reduce ABO isoagglutinins titre before transplant, thereby reducing the risk of antibody mediated rejection in the post-transplant period. Local infusion therapy and splenectomy are not used routinely at most of the centres in Rituximab era. Post-transplant immunosuppression usually consists of standard triple drug regime, and tacrolimus trough levels are targeted at higher level compared to ABO compatible LT. Introduction of newer therapies like Belatacept and Obinutuzumab hold promise to further improve outcomes and reduce the risk of antibody mediated rejection related complications. ABOi LT in emergency situations like acute liver failure and deceased donor LT is challenging due to limited time period for desensitisation protocol before transplant, and available evidence are still limited but encouraging.

ABO-incompatible Pediatric Liver Transplantation With Antibody and B-cell Depletion-free Immunosuppressive Protocol in High Consanguinity Communities

The success of orthotopic liver transplantation as a life-saving treatment has led to new indications and a greater competition for organ grafts. Pediatric patients with acute liver-related crises can benefit from orthotopic liver transplantation, but organ availability in the limited time can be a major obstacle. Crossing ABO blood group barriers could increase the organs available to such patients.

METHODS

From November 2010 to June 2015, 176 children aged 0.2-to18 y were transplanted in the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center. Out of those, 19 children were transplanted across blood group barriers (ABO incompatible). The underlying diseases were biliary atresia (n = 6); progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (n = 4); Crigler-Najjar syndrome (n = 3); hepatoblastoma (n = 2); and urea cycle disorder, Caroli disease, cryptogenic cirrhosis, and neonatal sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1 each). Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and steroids. Pretransplant prophylactic plasmapheresis, high-dose immunoglobulins, and rituximab were not administered.

RESULTS

The grafts were from living donors (n = 17) and deceased donors (n = 2). Living donor morbidity was nil. The recipient median age was 21 mo (5-70 mo). After a median follow-up of 44 mo, 2 recipients (10%) died because of sepsis, 1 because of uncontrolled acute myeloid leukemia. The overall rejection rate was 7%, and no grafts were lost because of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). HLA matching was 3.8 of 6 (A, B, DR), and there were 2 patients presented with acute cellular rejection, 1 patient with AMR, and 1 patient with biliary strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO incompatible liver transplantation is a feasible and life-saving option even with antibody and B-cell depletion-free protocol without increasing the risks for AMR. We speculate that this excellent result is most likely because of presence of relatively low titer ABO isoagglutinins and the high HLA match compatibility caused by habit of longstanding interfamilial marriages as typical of Saudi Arabia.

Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptors (KIR) and Human Leucocyte Antigen C (HLA-C) Increase the Risk of Long-Term Chronic Liver Graft Rejection

Chronic liver rejection (CR) represents a complex clinical situation because many patients do not respond to increased immunosuppression. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors/Class I Human Leukocyte Antigens (KIR/HLA-I) interactions allow for predicting Natural Killer (NK) cell alloreactivity and influence the acute rejection of liver allograft. However, its meaning in CR liver graft remains controversial. KIR and HLA genotypes were studied in 513 liver transplants using sequence-specific oligonucleotides (PCR-SSO) methods. KIRs, human leucocyte antigen C (HLA-C) genotypes, KIR gene mismatches, and the KIR/HLA-ligand were analyzed and compared in overall transplants with CR (n = 35) and no-chronic rejection (NCR = 478). Activating KIR (aKIR) genes in recipients (rKIR2DS2⁺ and rKIR2DS3⁺) increased CR compared with NCR groups (p = 0.013 and p = 0.038). The inhibitory KIR (iKIR) genes in recipients rKIR2DL2⁺ significantly increased the CR rate compared with their absence (9.1% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.020). KIR2DL3 significantly increases CR (13.1% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.008). There was no influence on NCR. CR was observed in HLA-I mismatches (MM). The absence of donor (d) HLA-C2 ligand (dC2⁻) ligand increases CR concerning their presence (13.1% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.018). A significant increase of CR was observed in rKIR2DL3⁺/dC1⁻ (p = 0.015), rKIR2DS4/dC1⁻ (p = 0.014) and rKIR2DL3⁺/rKIR2DS4⁺/dC1⁻ (p = 0.006). Long-term patient survival was significantly lower in rKIR2DS1⁺rKIR2DS4⁺/dC1⁻ at 5–10 years post-transplant. This study shows the influence of rKIR/dHLA-C combinations and aKIR gene-gene mismatches in increasing CR and KIR2DS1⁺/C1-ligands and the influence of KIR2DS4⁺/C1-ligands in long-term graft survival.

When Push Comes to Shove! Emergency ABO-Incompatible Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplant for Acute Wilson's Disease

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) is on the rise as a viable option in countries with limited access to deceased donor grafts. While reported outcomes of ABOi-LT in children are similar to ABO- Compatible liver transplant (ABOc-LT), most children beyond 1-2 years of age will need desensitization to overcome the immunological barrier of incompatible blood groups. The current standard protocol for desensitization is Rituximab that targets B lymphocytes and is given 2-3 weeks prior to LT. However, this timeline may not be feasible in children requiring emergency LT for acute liver failure (ALF) or acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). In this emergency situation of ABOi-LT, a safe multipronged approach may be an acceptable alternative solution. We report a child with acute Wilson's disease with rapidly deteriorating liver function who underwent a successful ABOi-LDLT using a rapid desensitization protocol.

Clinical outcomes after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi-LT) is increasingly used to overcome donor shortage. Evidence about disadvantage and advantage in comparison with ABO-compatible liver transplantation (ABOc-LT) needs to be performed in the early and late periods. Herein, We compared the short-term and long-term outcomes between ABOi-LT and ABOc-LT cohorts.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis based on the observation studies which included outcomes at ≥1 year after ABOi-LT and ABOc-LT procedures, based on the MEDLINE (via Pubmed), the Cochrance Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE (via Ovid) systems. Two researchers independently screened each study according to the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess the quality of each study and extracted data from published studies. The primary outcome indicators were all-cause mortality and graft survival at 1, 3 and 5 years after transplantation. In the meta-analysis, we based on the value of heterogeneity using a fixed-effect and a random-effect. A fixed-effect model was used if the value of I2 was less than or equal 50%; and a random-effect model was used if the value of I2 was greater than 50%.

FINDINGS

Out of 335 identified records, 29 records with 10,783 patients with liver transplants; 2137 of them were ABOi-LTs and the remaining 8646 were ABOc-LTs. There was no significant difference at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year in all-cause mortality, death-censored graft survival and complication incidence rate between ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) group and ABO-compatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOc-LDLT) group. Compared with ABO-compatible deceased donor liver transplantation (ABOc-DDLT), ABO-incompatible deceased donor liver transplantation (ABOi-DDLT) had a higher 1-year all-cause mortality, and the value of totally pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.89 (1.28,2.80). However, there was no significant difference at 3-year and 5-year all-cause mortality between ABOi-DDLT and ABOc-DDLT groups. ABOi-DDLT group had a lower 1-year and 5-year death-censored graft survival than ABOc-DDLT, as the value of totally pooled OR was 1.91 (1.41,2.60) and 1.52 (1.12,2.05), respectively. No significant difference was detected at 3-year death-censored graft survival between ABOi-DDLT and ABOc-DDLT groups. ABOi-DDLT group had a higher complication incidence rate than ABOc-DDLT, and the value of totally pooled OR was 2.26 (1.53,3.33). We found no obvious bias except for the complication of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT; P = 0.038).

IN CONCLUSION

The short-term and long-term outcomes were worse after ABOi-DDLT than ABOc-DDLT in the all-cause mortality, death-censored graft survival, and complication incidence rate. However, the same outcomes were essentially comparable between ABOi-LDLT vs. ABOc-LDLT cohorts. Considering the current shortage of liver donors, we believe that ABOi-LT from living donor and deceased donors can save lives under emergency situations.

ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation in Children: A 20 Year Experience from Centres in the TransplantChild European Reference Network

An increasing number of AB0-incompatible (AB0i) liver transplantations (LT) are being undertaken internationally in recent years due to organ shortages and the need for urgent transplantation. The aim of our study was establish the value of ABOi LT from available retrospective results of AB0i pediatric liver transplantations performed in European reference centers now belonging to the TransplantChild, European Reference Network (ERN). Data from medical records were analyzed, including demographic data, diagnosis, urgency of transplantation, time on the waiting list, PELD/MELD score, desensitization procedures, immunosuppression, selected post-transplant complications, and patient and graft survival. A total of 142 patients (pts) with transplants between 1986 and 2018 in 8 European transplant centers were included in the study. The indications for liver transplantation were: cholestatic diseases in 62 pts, acute liver failure in 42 pts, and other conditions in the remaining 38 pts. Sixty-six patients received grafts from living donors, and seventy-six received grafts from deceased donors. Both patient and graft survival were significantly affected by deceased donor type, urgent transplantation, and the development of vascular complications. In the multivariate analysis, vascular complications had a negative impact on patient and graft survival, while a longer time from the first AB0i LT in the study showed better results, suggesting an international learning experience. In conclusion, we believe that AB0i LT in children is now a safe procedure that may be adopted more readily in children.

Expanding Donor Selection and Recipient Indications for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

There is an acute shortage of deceased donor organs for liver transplantation in the United States. Nearly a third of patients either die or become too sick for transplant while on the transplant waitlist. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) bridges the gap between demand and supply of organs for liver transplantation. This article reviews current living donor selection criteria, and avenues for expansion of criteria with novel surgical techniques and ongoing outcomes research. Ways in which institutions can establish and expand LDLT programs using the Living Donor Champion model are discussed. Efforts to expand recipient indications for LDLT are described.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible pediatric liver transplantation: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving method for pediatric patients in emergency situations that has the potential to expand the pool of liver donors. However, the risks of ABO-i compared to ABO-compatible (ABO-c) LT are unclear. To address this clinical uncertainty, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes between ABO-i and ABO-c LT in pediatric patients.

METHODS

A systematic search for studies comparing outcomes between ABO-i and ABO-c LT was performed in the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases through May 2020. Outcomes evaluated included graft survival rate, patient survival rate, rejection, infection, biliary complications, and vascular complications. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies involving 7461 patients were included in the review. Meta-analysis of these studies showed significantly lower 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year graft survival rates for ABO-i vs. ABO-c LT (1 year: OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.59, P < 0.00001; 3 years: OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.36-0.63, P < 0.00001; 5 year: OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.37-0.63, P < 0.00001) as well as significantly lower 1 year, 3 year, 5 year, and 10 year patient survival rates for ABO-i vs. ABO-c (1 year: OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.49, P < 0.00001; 3 years: OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.14-0.40, P < 0.00001; 5 years: OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.64, P < 0.00001; 10 years: OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.90, P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between the groups in incidence of cytomegalovirus infection, acute cellular rejection, acute rejection, biliary complications, or hepatic artery thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed consistently lower patient survival and graft survival in pediatric ABO-i LT compared to ABO-c LT. However, ABO-i LT is still a life-saving emergency option for pediatric patients waiting for a suitable liver source.

ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation with Reduced Rituximab Dose: A Retrospective Analysis of 65 Patients - Can We Fast-Track Liver Transplant Surgery and Improve Long-Term Survival?

BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a feasible alternative for donor liver allograft in emergency situations, especially in Asia, where deceased-donor organs remain scarce. The reported outcomes of ABO-i LDLT after optimal desensitization are comparable to those of ABO-compatible LDLT. In this retrospective study, we found improved outcomes after ABO-i LDLT with a low-dose rituximab in combination with double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and prophylactic antibiotic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2006 and December 2018, a total of 65 recipients underwent ABO-i LDLT surgeries at our center. The study cohort consisted of 50 recipients (Era III) who underwent ABO-i LDLT using the recently updated desensitization protocol, which included rituximab 200 mg intravenous injection once a week prior to LDLT, 4 sessions of DFPP in all patients, and prophylactic antibiotics for 3 months. RESULTS The 3-year overall survival rate achieved in ABO-i LDLT patients was 72.7% (66.6% for Era I and 33.3% for Era II patients). In the study population, 11 patients developed complications due to infection. Five of these patients (10%) died due to overwhelming sepsis. Four patients (8%) were diagnosed with multiple strictures and diffusely scattered dilatation of intrahepatic bile ducts on computed tomography, without vascular complications. Three of them had evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows that the ABO-i LDLT protocol of lowered rituximab combined with pre-transplant sessions of plasmapheresis and a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen can be effective in chronic liver failure patients with clinical urgency in the absence of an ABO-compatible donor. Fast-tracking the use of ABO-i LDLT is feasible in patients with an acute liver failure (ALF) and can safely increase the donor liver pool, with an acceptable outcome.

ABO-Incompatible Liver Transplantation - A Review of the Historical Background and Results

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) using conventional immunosuppression has been considered a contraindication due to the high risk for antibody-mediated complications potentially resulting in graft loss. However, organ shortage has led to the development of anti-A/B antibody reducing immunosuppressive protocols which have made the outcome after living donor (LD) ABOi LT equivalent to that achieved with LD ABO-compatible (ABOc). The experience of deceased donor (DD) ABOi LT is however still limited. In this article, we discuss the historical background and the results after ABOi LT, in the setting of both LD and DD transplantation. We also discuss the remaining hurdles and future strategies in the breaching of the ABO barrier for LT.

ABO-incompatible deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation: Novel titer-based management protocol and outcomes

ABO-ILT have re-emerged as an alternate option for select patients awaiting transplant. However, treatment protocols for children undergoing deceased donor ABO-ILT are not standardized. We implemented a novel IS protocol for children undergoing deceased donor ABO-ILT based on pretransplant IH titers. Children with high pretransplant IH titers (≥1:32) underwent an enhanced IS protocol including plasmapheresis, rituximab, IVIG, and mycophenolate, while children with IH titers ≤1:16 received steroids and tacrolimus. We retrospectively assessed our outcomes of ABO-ILT with ABO-compatible recipients of similar age and diagnosis over a 2-year period. Ten children with median age of 8.9 months underwent ABO-ILT, 4 of 10 patients underwent enhanced IS due to high IH titers. Rates of complications (rejection, infections, biliary, and vascular) at both 1 year and up to 3 years post-transplant were comparable between the groups. Patients with ABO-ILT had good graft function with 100% survival at a median follow-up of 3.3 years. In conclusion, IS tailored to pretransplant IH titers in pediatric deceased donor ABO-ILT is feasible and can achieve outcomes similar to ABO-CLT at 1 and 3 years post-transplantation.

Long-term Outcomes of ABO-incompatible Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been performed to compensate for donor shortage. To date, few studies have reported detailed B-cell desensitization protocols and long-term outcomes of ABOi pediatric LDLT.

METHODS

Twenty-nine pediatric ABOi LDLT recipients were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the clinical outcomes between ABOi (n = 29) and non-ABOi (n = 131) pediatric LDLT recipients. Furthermore, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of our rituximab-based regimen for ABOi pediatric LDLT (2 ≤ age < 18; n = 10).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the incidence of infection, vascular complications, biliary complications, and acute cellular rejection between ABOi and non-ABOi groups. The cumulative graft survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years for non-ABOi group were 92.1%, 87.0%, and 86.1%, and those for ABOi group were 82.8%, 82.8%, and 78.2%, respectively. Rituximab-based desensitization protocol could be performed safely, and reduced CD19+ lymphocyte counts effectively. Although rituximab-treated ABOi group showed comparable clinical outcomes and graft survival rate, 2 patients developed antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

ABOi LDLT is a feasible option for pediatric end-stage liver disease patients. However, it should be noted that current desensitization protocol does not completely prevent the onset of antibody-mediated rejection in several cases.

Liver paired exchange: Can the liver emulate the kidney?

Kidney paired exchange (KPE) constitutes 12% of all living donor kidney transplantations (LDKTs) in the United States. The success of KPE programs has prompted many in the liver transplant community to consider the possibility of liver paired exchange (LPE). Though the idea seems promising, the application has been limited to a handful of centers in Asia. In this article, we consider the indications, logistical issues, and ethics for establishing a LPE program in the United States with reference to the principles and advances developed from experience with KPE. Liver Transplantation 24 677-686 2018 AASLD.

A simplified protocol using rituximab and immunoglobulin for ABO-incompatible low-titre living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

No consensus has been reached regarding optimal treatment strategies for ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We introduce a simplified protocol using rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

METHODS

Data were analysed on adult patients who underwent ABO-I LDLT of which protocol added rituximab (300 mg/m² ) before surgery and IVIG (0.8 g/kg) on post-operative days 1 and 4 to the conventional immunosuppressive regimen used in ABO-compatible (ABO-C) LDLT, without plasmapheresis, splenectomy or graft local infusion. The outcomes were compared with those of ABO-C LDLT by 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Consecutive 43 ABO-I LDLT patients were identified between 2014 and 2016. Before desensitization, the median isoagglutinin titre was 1:8 (range, 1:2-1:64). The titre was reduced to 4 (range, 0-16) at the time of LDLT. None showed a rebound rise of isoagglutinin titres. No antibody-mediated rejection occurred. Biliary stricture was the most common complication with an incidence of 30.2%. A comparator group of 86 ABO-C LDLT patients were selected. There was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate including acute cellular rejection, biliary complications and infection between ABO-I and ABO-C groups. The 3-year cumulative patient survival rates in the ABO-I and ABO-C groups were 82.4% and 85.9% respectively (P = .115).

CONCLUSIONS

A simplified protocol using rituximab and IVIG for ABO-I LDLT was safe and effective in achieving sufficient desensitization and comparable outcomes in patients with the titre no higher than 1:64.

A comparison of desensitization methods: Rituximab with/without plasmapheresis in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Plasmapheresis is a desensitization method used prior to ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation. However, studies on its usefulness in the rituximab era are lacking.

METHODS

Fifty-six adult patients underwent ABO-I living donor liver transplantation between January 2012 and October 2015. A single dose of rituximab (300 mg/m²) was administered 2 weeks before surgery with plasmapheresis in all patients until February 2014 (RP group, n = 26). Patients were administered rituximab only, without plasmapheresis between March 2014 and October 2015 (RO group, n = 30).

RESULTS

The 6-, 12- and 18-month overall survival rates were 92.3%, 80.8% and 76.9% in the RP group and 96.6%, 85.4% and 85.4% in the RO group, respectively (P = 0.574). When the initial isoagglutinin titers < 16, neither group showed a rebound rise of isoagglutinin titers. For patients with initial isoagglutinin titers ≥ 16, the rebound rise of isoagglutinin titers was more prominent in the RP group. There was no difference in time-dependent changes in B cell subpopulations and ABO-I-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient desensitization for ABO-I living donor liver transplantation can be achieved using rituximab alone. This desensitization strategy does not affect the isoagglutinin titers, ABO-I-related complications and patient survival.

Recent advances in ABO incompatible liver transplantation

Liver transplantation has become the best way to cure patients with end-stage liver disease. Due to the shortage of donor organs worldwide and being unable to obtain matched donor liver, most patients with severe hepatic failure lose the chance of operation or even die. As a result, ABO incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantation has become a choice to save the endangered life. However, compared with ABO compatible liver transplantation, ABO-I liver transplantation is more prone to cause severe antibody mediated rejection (AMR), biliary complications, infection, thrombotic microangiopathy, and acute kidney injury. Consequently, its clinical application is limited. In recent years, with the progress of AMR prevention strategies such as immunoabsorption, plasmapheresis, rituximab, splenectomy, intravenous immunoglobulin, and graft perfusion, the clinical efficacy of ABO-I liver transplantation has been significantly improved, although it still faces the challenge of how to prevent and control AMR and postoperative complications.

Outcomes after liver transplantation in accordance with ABO compatibility: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the differences in outcomes between ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantation (LT) and ABO-compatible (ABO-C) LT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible articles published before No-vember 28, 2016 on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints were graft survival, patient survival, and ABO-I-related complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-one retrospective observational studies with a total of 8247 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results of patient survival for ABO-I LT were comparable to those for ABO-C LT. However, ABO-I LT showed a poorer graft survival than ABO-C LT (1-year: OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.57-0.76, P < 0.001; 3-year: OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.85, P < 0.001; 5-yearr: OR =0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.86, P < 0.001). Furthermore, ABO-I LT was associated with more incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (OR = 74.21, 95%CI: 16.32- 337.45, P < 0.001), chronic rejection (OR =2.28, 95%CI: 1.00-5.22, P = 0.05), cytomegalovirus infection (OR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.63-4.29, P < 0.001), overall biliary complication (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.01-2.28, P = 0.04), and hepatic artery complication (OR = 4.17, 95%CI: 2.26-7.67, P < 0.001) than ABO-C LT. In subgroup analyses, ABO-I LT and ABO-C LT showed a comparable graft survival in pediatric patients and those using rituximab, and ABO-I LT showed an increased acute cellular rejection in cases involving deceased donor grafts.

CONCLUSION

Although patient survival in ABO-I LT was comparable to that in ABO-C LT, ABO-I LT was inferior to ABO-C LT in graft survival and several complications. Graft survival of ABO-I LT could be comparable to that of ABO-C LT in pediatric patients and those using rituximab.

Changes in T Cells After ABO-Incompatible Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE

T lymphocytes are an essential component of allograft rejection and tolerance. The aims of the present study are to analyze the characteristics of T-cell subsets between ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABO-I LDLT) and ABO-compatible LDLT (ABO-C LDLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 2013 and June 2014, 61 patients underwent adult LDLT. ABO-I LDLT patients received rituximab and all patients received basiliximab as induction therapy and tacrolimus as maintenance therapy. The distribution of peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets pretransplant and 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post-transplant were serially monitored.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent ABO-I LDLT. Patient characteristics did not vary between the ABO-I and ABO-C groups. Absolute lymphocyte counts and CD4+ T cells in the ABO-I group were lower than those in ABO-C group after LDLT (p =.034 and p =.039, respectively). However, the comparison between the ABO-I and ABO-C groups revealed that the CD8+ T cells, CD4/CD8 ratio, Vδ1 cells, Vδ2 cells, γδ T cells, Vδ1/Vδ2 ratio, CD3-CD56+ cells, and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells did not change significantly over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute lymphocyte counts and CD4+ T cell levels are different between ABO-I and ABO-C groups after LDLT. The present study suggests that T-cell lymphocyte changes in peripheral blood in ABO-I LDLT patients were similar to those in ABO-C LDLT patients.

Current techniques for AB0-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

For a long time, it was considered medical malpractice to neglect the blood group system during transplantation. Because there are far more patients waiting for organs than organs available, a variety of attempts have been made to transplant AB0-incompatible (AB0i) grafts. Improvements in AB0i graft survival rates have been achieved with immunosuppression regimens and plasma treatment procedures. Nevertheless, some grafts are rejected early after AB0i living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to antibody mediated rejection or later biliary complications that affect the quality of life. Therefore, the AB0i LDLT is an option only for emergency situations, and it requires careful planning. This review compares the treatment possibilities and their effect on the patients’ graft outcome from 2010 to the present. We compared 11 transplant center regimens and their outcomes. The best improvement, next to plasma treatment procedures, has been reached with the prophylactic use of rituximab more than one week before AB0i LDLT. Unfortunately, no standardized treatment protocols are available. Each center treats its patients with its own scheme. Nevertheless, the transplant results are homogeneous. Due to refined treatment strategies, AB0i LDLT is a feasible option today and almost free of severe complications.

Antibody-mediated rejection after ABO-incompatible pediatric living donor liver transplantation for propionic acidemia: A case report

We herein present the case of a four-yr-old boy with PA who developed AMR after ABO-incompatible LDLT despite undergoing B cell desensitization using rituximab. Although the CD19+ lymphocyte count decreased to 0.1% nine days after the administration of rituximab, he developed a high fever which was accompanied by arthralgia due to a streptococcal infection 13 days after rituximab prophylaxis. After the clearance of the infection, he underwent ABO-incompatible LDLT 36 days after the administration of rituximab. The CD19+ lymphocyte count just prior to LDLT was 1.2%. He developed AMR five days after LDLT, and the antidonor-type IgM and IgG antibody titers increased to 1:1024 and 1:1024, respectively. He was treated by plasma exchange, IVIG, steroid pulse therapy, and rituximab re-administration; however, his liver dysfunction continued. Despite intensive treatment, he died due to complicated abdominal hernia, acute renal failure, and ARDS. This case suggests that a streptococcal infection may induce the activation of innate immune responses; thus, additional desensitization therapy should be considered prior to ABO-incompatible LDLT if B cell reactivation is suspected.

Liver transplantation with deceased ABO-incompatible donors is life-saving but associated with increased risk of rejection and post-transplant complications

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) liver transplantation (LT) with deceased donor organs is performed occasionally when no ABO-compatible (ABOc) graft is available. From 1996 to 2011, 61 ABOi LTs were performed in Oslo and Gothenburg. Median patient age was 51 years (range 13-75); 33 patients were transplanted on urgent indications, 13 had malignancy-related indications, and eight received ABOi grafts for urgent retransplantations. Median donor age was 55 years (range 10-86). Forty-four patients received standard triple immunosuppression with steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil, and forty-four patients received induction with IL-2 antagonist or anti-CD20 antibody. Median follow-up time was 29 months (range 0-200). The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) were 85/71%, 79/57%, 75/55%, and 59/51%, respectively, compared to 90/87%, 84/79%, 79/73%, and 65/60% for all other LT recipients in the same period. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year GS for A2 grafts were 81%, 67%, 62%, and 57%, respectively. In conclusion, ABOi LT performed with non-A2 grafts is associated with inferior graft survival and increased risk of rejection, vascular and biliary complications. ABOi LT with A2 grafts is associated with acceptable graft survival and can be used safely in urgent cases.

Pediatric Liver Transplantation Across the ABO Blood Group Barrier: Is It an Obstacle in the Modern Era?

BACKGROUND

The initial experience with ABO incompatible (ABOi) orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) was dismal. In the current study, we investigated whether ABOi pediatric OLTs could achieve acceptable patient outcomes. The option for ABOi transplantation is vital because critically ill children have limited access to donor liver allografts.

STUDY DESIGN

Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analysis was performed on data collected from 13,179 pediatric OLT recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database, including 540 ABOi recipients. We also analyzed 18 pediatric recipients of ABOi OLTs at Texas Children's Hospital. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: transplanted between 1987 to 2002 (remote era) and 2002 to 2013 (modern era).

RESULTS

Analysis revealed 4 main points. First, there was a significant (p < 0.01) improvement in ABOi OLT survival in the modern era. Second, threshold analysis revealed superior outcomes (p < 0.01) for OLT recipients younger than 2 years of age. Third, survival outcomes for ABOi and ABO-identical OLTs were the same for recipients younger than 2 years: ABOi was 91.8% (1 year) and 88.4% (5 year), and ABO identical was 91.5% (1 year) and 86.7% (5 year) (p = 0.94). Lastly, we found identical OLT results when analyzing our own institutional experience. To date, there has been a 92.9% survival rate in the modern era compared with 75% in the remote era. All recipients younger than 2 years (n = 9) are still alive, compared with 78% of those older than 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis revealed a significant improvement in the survival of ABOi liver transplant recipients in the modern era. Importantly, ABOi liver transplantation can be performed in recipients younger than 2 years of age with equivalent outcomes compared with ABO-identical recipients.

Case-matched comparison of ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has a high success rate. There are few detailed comparisons regarding biliary complications, infective complications and patient survival between ABO-compatible (ABO-C) and ABO-I LDLT. The aim was to compare the outcomes of ABO-I LDLT with those of ABO-C LDLT using the matched-pairs method.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ABO-I LDLT procedures between 2010 and 2013 were studied. They were matched for significant variables with patients who had ABO-C LDLT (1:2 matching).

RESULTS

Forty-seven ABO-I LDLT procedures were included. Ninety-four patients who had ABO-C LDLT were selected as a comparator group. The incidence of cytomegalovirus, bacterial and fungal infections during the first 3 months was similar after ABO-I LDLT and ABO-C LDLT (85 versus 76 per cent, 28 versus 37 per cent, and 13 versus 20 per cent, respectively). Antibody-mediated rejection occurred after two procedures within 2 weeks of transplantation, but liver function improved with plasma exchange in both patients. There were no differences in the rate of acute rejection and biliary complications between ABO-I and ABO-C groups (P = 0.478 and P = 0.511 respectively). Three patients who had ABO-I LDLT developed diffuse intrahepatic biliary complications and progressed to graft failure. The 1-, 2- and 3-year patient survival rates after ABO-I LDLT and ABO-C LDLT were 89 versus 87 per cent, 85 versus 83 per cent, and 85 versus 79 per cent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcomes of ABO-I LDLT were comparable to those of ABO-C LDLT in this study. ABO-I LDLT is an effective and safe transplant option with the potential to expand the pool of live donors.

Intravenous immunoglobulins in liver transplant patients: Perspectives of clinical immune modulation

Shortage of appropriate donor grafts is the foremost current problem in organ transplantation. As a logical consequence, waiting times have extended and pretransplant mortality rates were significantly increasing. The implementation of a priority-based liver allocation system using the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score helped to reduce waiting list mortality in liver transplantation (LT). However, due to an escalating organ scarcity, pre-LT MELD scores have significantly increased and liver recipients became more complex in recent years. This has finally led to posttransplant decreasing survival rates, attributed mainly to elevated rates of infectious and immunologic complications. To meet this challenging development, an increasing number of extended criteria donor grafts are currently accepted, which may, however, aggravate the patients’ infectious and immunologic risk profiles. The administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) is an established treatment in patients with immune deficiencies and other antibody-mediated diseases. In addition, IVIg was shown to be useful in treatment of several disorders caused by deterioration of the cellular immune system. It proved to be effective in preventing hyperacute rejection in highly sensitized kidney and heart transplants. In the liver transplant setting, the administration of specific Ig against hepatitis B virus is current standard in post-LT antiviral prophylaxis. The mechanisms of action of IVIg are complex and not fully understood. However, there is increasing experimental and clinical evidence that IVIg has an immuno-balancing impact by a combination of immuno-supporting and immuno-suppressive properties. It may be suggested that, especially in the context of a worsening organ shortage with all resulting clinical implications, liver transplant patients should benefit from immuno-regulatory capabilities of IVIg. In this review, perspectives of immune modulation by IVIg and impact on outcome in liver transplant patients are described.

Influence of donor-recipient CYP3A4/5 genotypes, age and fluconazole on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric liver transplantation: a population approach

AIM

To characterize the effect of donor and recipient CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes as well as relevant patient characteristics on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric liver transplantation.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Data from 114 pediatric liver transplant recipients were retrospectively collected during the first 3 months following transplantation. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling, including characterization of influential covariates.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with first order elimination best fitted the data. Estimates of apparent volume of the central compartment, intestinal clearance, hepatic clearance and intercompartmental clearance were 79 l, 0.01 l/h, 10.9 l/h and 105 l/h, respectively. Time post-transplantation, recipient age, donor CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genotypes and fluconazole administration significantly influenced tacrolimus apparent clearance while bodyweight influenced volume of distribution.

CONCLUSION

The proposed model displayed acceptable fitting performances and enabled identification of statistically significant and clinically relevant covariates on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the early pediatric post liver transplantation period.

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation for severe hepatitis B patients

Effect of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation on patients with severe hepatitis B (SHB) remains unclear. Herein, we summarized 22 cases with SHB in whom were performed emergency liver transplantation from ABO-incompatible donors. The immunosuppressive protocol consisted basiliximab, tacrolimus, steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. The mean MELD score was 35.2 ± 7.1. Major complications included rejection, infections, biliary complications, hepatic artery thrombosis or stenosis and portal vein thrombosis. Patient survival rates were 40.9%, 78.9% and 82.3% in 1 year, 29.2%, 66.8% and 72.9% in 3 years, and 21.9%, 60.1% and 62.5% in 5 years for ABO-incompatible, ABO-compatible and ABO-identical groups. Graft survival rates were 39%, 78.9% and 82.3% in 1 year, 27.8%, 66.4% and 71.1% in 3 years, and 20.9%, 57.9% and 61.0% in 5 years for incompatible, compatible and identical ABO graft-recipient match. The 1-, 3-, 5-year graft and patient survival rates of ABO-incompatible were distinctly lower than that of ABO-compatible group (P < 0.05). Our results suggested that ABO-incompatible liver transplantation might be a life-saving procedure for patients with SHB as a promising alternative operation when ABO-compatible donors are not available and at least bridges the second opportunity for liver retransplantation.

ABO incompatible renal transplantation without antibody removal using conventional immunosuppression alone

ABO incompatible living donor renal transplantation (ABOi) can achieve outcomes comparable to ABO compatible transplantation (ABOc). However, with the exception of blood group A2 kidneys transplanted into recipients with low titer anti-A antibody, regimens generally include antibody removal, intensified immunosuppression and splenectomy or rituximab. We now report a series of 20 successful renal transplants across a range of blood group incompatibilities using conventional immunosuppression alone in recipients with low baseline anti-blood group antibody (ABGAb) titers. Incompatibilities were A1 to O (3), A1 to B (2), A2 to O (2), AB to A (2), AB to B (1), B to A1 (9), B to O (1); titers 1:1 to 1:16 by Ortho. At 36 months, patient and graft survival are 100%. Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) occurred in one patient with thrombophilia and low level donor-specific anti-HLA antibody. Four patients experienced cellular rejection (two subclinical), which responded to oral prednisolone. This series demonstrates that selected patients with low titer ABGAb can undergo ABOi with standard immunosuppression alone, suggesting baseline titer as a reliable predictor of AbMR. This reduces morbidity and cost of ABOi for patients with low titer ABGAb and increases the possibility of ABOi from deceased donors.

Kinetics of B, T, NK lymphocytes and isoagglutinin titers in ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation using rituximab and basiliximab

BACKGROUND

The kinetics of isoagglutinin titers and lymphocyte subpopulations including B, T, and natural killer (NK) cells after ABO incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have not been evaluated.

METHODS

From January 2012 to July 2013, consecutive ABO-I LDLT patients were enrolled at the National Cancer Center. Our desensitizing protocol included rituximab, plasma exchanges, basiliximab, and intravenous immune globulin without splenectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (14 males, 6 females) underwent ABO-I LDLT due to HCC (n=15) or liver cirrhosis (n=5). There was no hyperacute and antibody-mediated rejection. The isoagglutinin titers were effectively lowered less than 1:16 before operation. CD 19+ B cells were rapidly eliminated after rituximab and suppressed during 6months postoperatively. CD3+ and CD4+ T cells were elevated higher than CD8+ T cells. CD4/CD8 ratio was increased during first 1month postoperatively and decreased thereafter. CD16+CD56+ NK cells were lowered and restored after 4months of LDLT. Among 15 patients with HCC, 5 patients (33.3%) experienced early tumor recurrence (1/8 within Milan and 4/7 beyond Milan).

CONCLUSIONS

Our protocol showed effective results in preventing antibody-mediated rejection and suppressing B lymphocytes. Application to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma should be considered due to decreased natural immunity after ABO-I LDLT.

Use of ABO-incompatible grafts in living donor liver transplantation--first report from India

ABO incompatibility is the commonest reason for rejection of donors in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The donor pool could be expanded by 25 % to 35 % if the ABO barrier is overcome. In the absence of pre-conditioning, transplantation across the blood groups is fraught with the almost universal risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that rapidly leads to graft loss. However, AMR can be prevented by removal of preformed antibodies and reducing their production by B cells. We describe our initial experience of three cases of ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) LDLT: a 42-year-old male, an 8-month-old male and a 28-month-old female, all of blood group O+ who received blood group B + right lobe, B + left lateral segment, and A + left lateral segment liver grafts, respectively. Pre-LDLT conditioning included administration of anti-CD20 antibody (Rituximab(®)) to the adult 4 weeks prior, and four to seven sessions of double-filtration plasmapheresis to all, to remove preformed antibodies and achieve anti-donor blood group antibody (ADA) titers of ≤ 1:16 IgG and ≤ 1:8 IgM, respectively. In addition, cases 1 and 3 received mycophenolate mofetil for 7 days prior to LDLT. After LDLT, all three patients achieved normal graft function over 8-17 days with no evidence of AMR and without the need for further plasmapheresis. Postoperative complications included portal vein thrombosis (one successfully re-explored), CMV (one), Pseudomonas and Klebsiella sepsis (one each), and abdominal collection (one treated with percutaneous drainage). All are currently well with normal graft function and low ADA titers at 8, 16, and 19 months after ABO-i LDLT.

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation is suitable in patients without ABO-matched donor

BACKGROUND & AIMS

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation is usually contraindicated because of the risk of antibody-mediated humoral rejection of the graft. We describe 22 successful cases of patients who had living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from ABO-incompatible donors.

METHODS

The immunosuppressive protocol consisted of rituximab and plasmapheresis prior to LDLT. Plasmapheresis was planned for up to 2 weeks after LDLT aiming at maintaining levels of anti-ABO titers below 1:32.

RESULTS

The median age of recipients was 54 years and the median MELD score was 13. The initial range of isoagglutinin IgM and IgG titers were 1:8-1:1024 and 1:2-1:1024, respectively. Preoperative isoagglutinin IgM and IgG titers were achieved less than or equal to 1:8 by performing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). While the median number of TPE was 4 (range, 2-18) in all patients, it was 4 (range, 2-8) in the initial low titer group (<1:256) and 8 (range, 6-18) in the high titer group (≥ 1:256). There were no statistically significant differences for liver function tests in the first 2 weeks after transplantation between the groups having high MELD score (≥ 20) vs. low MELD score (<20), local graft infusion vs. systemic infusion, or high initial isoagglutinin titer (≥ 1:256) vs. low initial isoagglutinin titer (<1:256). Patient and graft survival was 100% and there was no acute humoral rejection in recipients at a mean follow-up of 10months (range, 3-21).

CONCLUSIONS

ABO-incompatible LDLT can be safely performed when rituximab and TPE are used, and may be proposed when ABO-compatible donors are not available.

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation in acute liver failure: a single Portuguese center study

INTRODUCTION

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) is considered to be a rescue option in emergency transplantation. Herein, we have reported our experience with ABOi LT including long-term survival and major complications in these situations.

PATIENT AND METHODS

ABOi LT was performed in cases of severe hepatic failure with imminent death. The standard immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Pretransplantation patients with anti-ABO titers above 16 underwent plasmapheresis. If the titer was above 128, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was added at the end of plasmapheresis. The therapeutic approach was based on the clinical situation, hepatic function, and titer evolution. A rapid increase in titer required five consecutive plasmapheresis sessions followed by administration of IVIG, and at the end of the fifth session, rituximab.

RESULTS

From January 2009 to July 2012, 10 patients, including 4 men and 6 women of mean age 47.8 years (range, 29 to 64 years), underwent ABOi LT. At a mean follow-up of 19.6 months (range, 2 days to 39 months), 5 patients are alive including 4 with their original grafts. One patient was retransplanted at 9 months. Major complications were infections, which were responsible for 3 deaths due to multiorgan septic failure (2 during the first month); rejection episodes (4 biopsy-proven of humoral rejections in 3 patients and 1 cellular rejection) and biliary.

CONCLUSION

The use of ABOi LT as a life-saving procedure is justifiable in emergencies when no other donor is available. With careful recipient selection close monitoring of hemagglutinins and specific immunosuppression we have obtained acceptable outcomes.

Safety of blood group A2-to-O liver transplantation: an analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible organ transplantation typically induces hyperacute rejection. A2-to-O liver transplantations have been successful. This study compared overall and graft survival in O recipients of A2 and O grafts based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data.

METHODS

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were used. The first A2-to-O liver transplantation was entered on March 11, 1990; all previous transplantations were excluded. Between March 11, 1990, and September 3, 2010, 43,335 O recipients underwent transplanation, of whom 358 received A2 grafts.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex, and race between the groups. Recipients of A2 grafts versus O grafts were significantly more likely to be hospitalized at transplantation (45% vs. 38%, P≤0.05) and to have a higher mean (SD) model for end-stage liver disease score (24 [11] vs. 22 [10], P≤0.05). 10% of A2 recipients and 9% of O recipients underwent retransplantation. No significant differences existed in rejection during the transplantation admission and at 12 months: 7% versus 6% and 20% versus 22% for A2 recipients and O recipients, respectively; and there were no significant differences in contributing factors to graft failure or cause of death. At 5 years, overall survival of A2 and O graft recipients was 77% and 74%, respectively (log rank=0.71). At 5 years, graft survival was 66% in both groups (log rank=0.52). Donor blood group was insignificant on Cox regression for overall and graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we present the largest series of A2-to-O liver transplantations and conclude this mismatch option to be safe with similar overall and graft survival. This opens possibilities to further meet the demands of a shrinking organ supply, especially with regard to expanding living-donor options.

Emergency ABO-incompatible liver transplant secondary to fulminant hepatic failure: outcome, role of TPE and review of the literature

The increasing demand for solid organ transplants has brought to light the need to utilize organs in critical situations despite ABO-incompatibility. However, these transplantations are complicated by pre-existing ABO antibodies which may be potentially dangerous and makes the transplantation prone to failure due to rejection with resulting necrosis or intrahepatic biliary complications. We report the clinical outcome of an emergency ABO-incompatible liver transplant (due to fulminant hepatic failure with sudden and rapidly deteriorating mental status) using a modified therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) protocol. The recipient was O-positive with an initial anti-B titer of 64 and the cadaveric organ was from a B-positive donor. The patient underwent initial TPE during the peri-operative period, followed by a series of postoperative daily TPE, and later a third series of TPE for presumptive antibody-mediated rejection. The latter two were performed in conjunction with the use of IVIg and rituximab. The recipient's anti-B titer was reduced and maintained at 8 or less 8 months post-op. However, an elevation of transaminases 3 months post-transplant triggered a biopsy which was consistent with cellular rejection and with weak C4d positive staining suggestive of antibody mediated rejection. Additional plasma exchange procedures were performed. The patient improved rapidly after modification of her immunosuppression regimen and treatment with plasma exchange. This case illustrates that prompt and aggressive plasma exchange, in conjunction with immunosuppression, is a viable approach to prevent and treat antibody mediated transplant rejection in emergency ABO-incompatible liver transplant.

Comparative study on signal transduction in endothelial cells after anti-a/b and human leukocyte antigen antibody reaction: implication of accommodation

BACKGROUND

Recent development of immunosuppressive therapy has provided a platform for clinical human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- and ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. However, the prognosis seems to be different between the two. Accommodation, the condition of no injury even in the presence of antidonor antibody, is one of the key factors for successful transplantation with antidonor antibody. The purpose of this study was to compare signal transduction between anti-A/B and anti-HLA antibody reaction and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying accommodation.

METHODS

Blood type A- or B-transferase gene was transfected into human EA.hy926 endothelial cells. After cell sorting, A- or B-expressing cells at high levels were obtained. The effects of anti-HLA and anti-A/B antibody binding on complement-mediated cytotoxicity and signal transduction were examined.

RESULTS

Preincubation with anti-HLA antibodies only at low levels (<10% of saturation level) or anti-A/B antibodies at high levels (even at near saturation levels) for 24 hr resulted in resistance to complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Anti-A/B antibody ligation inactivated ERK1/2 pathway and increased complement regulatory proteins such as CD55 and CD59, whereas anti-HLA ligation activated PI3K/AKT pathway and increased cytoprotective genes such as hemeoxygenase-1 and ferritin H.

CONCLUSION

Complement inhibition by upregulation of CD55 and CD59 through ERK1/2 inactivation might play a substantial role in accommodation after ABO-incompatible transplantation, which could also explain the intriguing finding of C4d deposition in the graft without rejection.

Segmental ABO-incompatible liver graft from a donor after cardiac death in neonatal acute liver failure

Segmental liver grafts from DCD in pediatric LT have been safely used even in acute liver failure situations. Furthermore, despite the risk of antibody-mediated acute rejection, some studies have also demonstrated the safety of ABO incompatible LT in infants. The use of such grafts can be beneficial by reducing the time on the transplant waiting list but they are more susceptible to initial dysfunction and there is a lack of enthusiasm to consider their use especially for an emergency LT as a life-saving procedure. In this short article, we describe the use and successful outcome in a neonate with fulminant acute liver failure secondary to neonatal hemochromatosis who received an ABO-incompatible reduced-size DCD graft.

ABO-incompatible pediatric liver transplantation in very small recipients: Birmingham's experience

Liver transplantation (LT) for very small recipients is challenging but in experienced centres, good results can be achieved. Despite the risk of antibody-mediated acute rejection, some studies have demonstrated the safety of ABO incompatible liver transplantation (ILT) in children and particularly in infants. The aim of our study was to describe the outcome of liver transplantation in infants <5 kg and the safety of using ILT in this group. All LT performed between 1991 and 2010 in children <5 kg were reviewed. Twenty-nine patients were included, five of whom had an ILT. Acute liver failure was encountered in 20 cases. The recipient age and weight at transplantation were respectively 63 days (range: 14-268 days) and 4 kg (range: 2.4-5 kg). The graft-to-recipient ratio was 6.1% (range 2.3-9%). An aortic conduit and delayed abdominal closure were used respectively in 76% and 81% of the procedures. The ABO compatible liver transplantation (CLT) and ILT groups were similar regarding recipient's demographics, graft types or technical transplantation data. The one- and five-yr patient and graft survival were respectively 62%, 62% and 62%, 57.9% with a median follow-up of 95 months. Vascular complications occurred in six cases (21.4%) and biliary complications were encountered in five patients (17%). Acute and chronic rejection developed respectively in 37% and 26% of the recipients. The five patients undergoing ILT are all alive without graft lost after a median follow-up of 34 months (range 7-55 months). When compared with the CLT group, no significant differences were found regarding patient or graft survival, vascular or biliary complications and rejection rates. In our experience, ILT in small infants has short and long term outcomes comparable to ABO-compatible grafts and excellent results can be achieved with a standard immunosuppressive protocol. To avoid mortality on the waiting list for neonatal recipients, ABO-incompatible liver grafts can be used safely.

Extended donors in liver transplantation

Several criteria are used to differentiate between standard and extended allograft donors. These criteria include deceased after cardiac death, advanced donor age, steatosis, previous malignancy in the donor, hepatitis C virus-positive allografts, human T-cell lymphotropic virus-positive allografts, active infections in the donor, high-risk donors, split liver transplantations, and living donor liver transplantations. Review of the literature can lead each practitioner to incorporate extended criteria donors into their transplant program, thereby individualizing the use of these allografts, increasing the donor pool, and decreasing overall waitlist mortality.

Recipient outcomes after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

ABO-incompatible live transplantation (ILT) is not occasionally performed due to a relative high risk of graft failure. Knowledge of both graft and patient survival rate after ILT is essential for donor selection and therapeutic strategy. We systematically reviewed studies containing outcomes after ILT compared to that after ABO-compatible liver transplantation (CLT).

Methodology/Principal Findings

We carried out a comprehensive search strategy on MEDLINE (1966–July 2010), EMBASE (1980–July 2010), Biosis Preview (1969–July 2010), Science Citation Index (1981–July 2010), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library, issue 7, 2010) and the National Institute of Health (July 2010). Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each study and abstracted outcome data. Fourteen eligible studies were included which came from various medical centers all over the world. Meta-analysis results showed that no significantly statistical difference was found in pediatric graft survival rate, pediatric and adult patient survival rate between ILT and CLT group. In adult subgroup, the graft survival rate after ILT was significantly lower than that after CLT. The value of totally pooled OR was 0.64 (0.55, 0.74), 0.92 (0.62, 1.38) for graft survival rate and patient survival rate respectively. The whole complication incidence (including acute rejection and biliary complication) after ILT was higher than that after CLT, as the value of totally pooled OR was 3.02 (1.33, 6.85). Similarly, in acute rejection subgroup, the value of OR was 2.02 (1.01, 4.02). However, it was 4.08 (0.90, 18.51) in biliary complication subgroup.

Conclusions/Significance

In our view, pediatric ILT has not been a contraindication anymore due to a similar graft and patient survival rate between ILT and CLT group. Though adult graft survival rate is not so satisfactory, ILT is undoubtedly life-saving under exigent condition. Most studies included in our analysis are observational researches. Larger scale of researches and Randomized-Control Studies are still needed.