Interventional percutaneous trans-splenic approach in the management of portal venous occlusion after living donor liver transplantation

Transsplenic Portal System Catheterization: Review of Current Indications and Techniques

Multiple diseases of the portal system require effective portal vein access for endovascular management. While percutaneous transhepatic and transjugular approaches remain the standard methods of portal vein access, transsplenic access (TSA) has gained recognition as an effective and safe technique to access the portal system in patients with contraindications to traditional approaches. Recently, the utility of percutaneous TSA has grown, with described treatments including recanalization of chronic portal vein occlusion, placement of stents for portal vein stenosis, portal vein embolization of the liver, embolization of gastric varices, placement of complicated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, and interventions after liver transplant. The authors provide a review of percutaneous TSA, including indications, a summary of related portal vein diseases, and the different techniques used for access and closure. In addition, an imaging-based review of technical considerations of TSA interventions is presented, with a review of potential procedural complications. With technical success rates that mirror or rival the standard methods and reported low rates of major complications, TSA can be a safe and effective option in clinical scenarios where traditional approaches are not feasible. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Small Infants

Liver transplantation (LT) for small infants remains challenging because of the demands related to graft selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term and longterm outcomes of LT regarding vascular/biliary complications, renal function, growth, and patient/graft survival in infants ≤3 months compared with those of an age between >3 and 6 months at a single transplant center. A total of 64 infants ≤6 months underwent LT and were divided into 2 groups according to age at LT: those of age ≤3 months (range, 6-118 days; XS group, n = 37) and those of age >3 to ≤6 months (range, 124-179 days; S group, n = 27) between 1989 and 2014. Acute liver failure was the main indication for LT in the XS group (n = 31, 84%) versus S (n = 7, 26%). The overall incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis/stricture were 5.4% and 10.8% in the XS group and 7.4% and 11.1% in the S group, respectively (not significant). The overall incidence of biliary stricture and leakage were 5.4% and 2.7% in the XS group and 3.7% and 3.7% in the S group, respectively (not significant). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of renal function. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups for each year after LT in terms of height and weight z score. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 70.3%, 70.3%, and 70.3% in the XS group compared with 92.6%, 88.9%, and 88.9% in the S group, respectively (not significant). In conclusion, LT for smaller infants has acceptable outcomes despite the challenges of surgical technique, including vascular reconstruction and graft preparation, and perioperative management.

Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management

Surgical intervention in the pancreas region is complex and carries the risk of complications, also of vascular nature. Bleeding after pancreatic surgery is rare but characterized by high mortality. This review reports epidemiology, classification, diagnosis and treatment strategies of hemorrhage occurring after pancreatic surgery, focusing on the techniques, roles and outcomes of interventional radiology (IR) in this setting. We then describe the roles and techniques of IR in the treatment of other less common types of vascular complications after pancreatic surgery, such as portal vein (PV) stenosis, portal hypertension and bleeding of varices.

Trans-splenic Access for Portal Venous Interventions in Children: Do Benefits Outweigh Risks?

BACKGROUND

The primary concern of trans-splenic access for portal interventions is the risk of life-threatening intraperitoneal bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical indications and efficacy and evaluate the risk factors for intraperitoneal bleeding during trans-splenic portal interventions in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent trans-splenic portal interventions at a tertiary care pediatric institution between March 2011 and April 2017 was performed. Forty-four procedures were performed in 30 children with a median age of 5 (0.3-18) years. Clinical indications, technical success, procedural success, and incidence of complications were recorded. Potential risk factors for intraperitoneal bleeding were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Trans-splenic access was 100% successful. In 35/44 (79%) procedures, the subsequent intervention was successful including recanalization of post-transplant portal vein occlusion in 10/13, embolization of bleeding Roux limb varices in 8/8, recanalization of chronic portal vein thrombosis in native liver in 7/13, splenoportography and manometry in 6/6, and occlusion of portosystemic shunts in 4/4 procedures. Intraperitoneal bleeding occurred during 12/44 (27%) procedures and was managed with analgesics, blood transfusion, and peritoneal drainage without the need for splenectomy or splenic artery embolization. Statistically significant correlation of bleeding was found with intraprocedural anticoagulation, but not with patient age, weight, platelet count, INR, ascites, splenic length, splenic venous pressure, vascular sheath size, or tract embolization technique.

CONCLUSION

Trans-splenic access is a useful technique for successful pediatric portal interventions. Although it entails a substantial risk of intraperitoneal bleeding, this can be managed conservatively.

Living donor liver transplantation in Taiwan-challenges beyond surgery

Taiwan has a high prevalence of hepatitis B and C viral infections, and consequently a high burden of chronic liver diseases. Liver transplantation (LT) began in Taiwan in 1984, and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in 1994. Education and collaboration between physicians on a national and international scale were important factors in the development of transplantation in East Asia. Technical innovations in donor hepatectomy, vascular and biliary reconstruction, and interventional radiology, perioperative management of transplant patients and development of associated specialties have enabled achievement of excellent results after both adult and pediatric LDLT. The establishment of rigorous protocols to withstand strict medico-legal scrutiny, combined with technical excellence has contributed to excellent surgical outcomes. The socioeconomic development of Taiwan and the first nationwide hepatitis B vaccination program in the world have also contributed to the decrease in disease burden and improvement of quality of healthcare. This article examines the factors enabling the development of LT in Taiwan, the innovations that have contributed to excellent outcomes, and indicates the future prospects of LDLT in Taiwan.

Interventional treatment for portal venous occlusion after liver transplantation: long-term follow-up results

Portal vein (PV) occlusion after liver transplant is an uncommon clinical situation, and percutaneous interventional treatment for this condition has not been widely described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term treatment effect of interventional treatment for PV occlusion after liver transplantation (LT). Follow-up data of 13 patients who received interventional treatment for PV occlusion after LT between July 2007 and April 2013 were analyzed. Of these, 10 patients had portal hypertension-related signs and symptoms. Percutaneous balloon angioplasty and stent placement were performed, with percutaneous thrombolysis treatment as appropriate. Embolization therapy was required for significant collateral circulation. Technical and clinical success, complications, and patency of PV were analyzed. Both technical and clinical success was achieved in 11 of the 13 patients (84.6%). Direct portogram showed limited PV occlusion in 7 patients and extensive PV occlusion in 4 patients. The former underwent balloon angioplasty followed by stent placement, while the latter underwent balloon angioplasty followed by stent placement and additional percutaneous thrombolysis treatment. Embolization therapy for collateral circulation was performed in all 4 patients with extensive PV occlusion and 1 patient with limited PV occlusion. All stents remained patency during the follow-up (28.5 ± 6.8 months). No portal hypertension-related symptoms reoccurred during follow-up. In conclusion, interventional treatment for PV occlusion after LT showed a high success rate and good long-term results. Comprehensive interventional treatment should be used for extensive PV occlusion.

Percutaneous transsplenic portal vein catheterization: technical procedures, safety, and clinical applications

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of percutaneous transsplenic portal vein catheterization (PTSPC) by retrospective review of its use in patients with portal vein (PV) occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2004 to December 2010, 46 patients with a history of uncontrolled gastroesophageal variceal bleeding secondary to portal hypertension underwent endovascular PV interventions via a percutaneous transsplenic approach. All patients had occlusion of the main PV or central intrahepatic PV branches, which prevented the performance of a transhepatic approach. A vein within the splenic parenchyma was punctured under fluoroscopic guidance by referencing preoperative computed tomography images. PTSPC-related complications and clinical applications were analyzed.

RESULTS

PTSPC was successfully performed in 44 of 46 patients (96%); two failures were caused by inaccessible small intrasplenic veins. PTSPC-related major bleeding complications occurred in three patients (6.5%), including large intraperitoneal hemorrhage in one patient and large splenic subcapsular hemorrhage in two patients. Two of the three patients developed hypotension, and one developed severe anemia. All three of the patients required blood transfusions. PTSPC-related minor bleeding complications occurred in six patients (13%) as a result of a small splenic subcapsular hemorrhage. In addition, three patients exhibited mild left pleural effusion, which subsided spontaneously 1 week later. All 44 patients successfully treated via PTSPC received gastroesophageal variceal embolization. Eight patients received PV stents, five for treatment of PV occlusion and three during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement.

CONCLUSIONS

PTSPC is a safe and effective access for endovascular PV interventions in patients without a transhepatic window.

Portal interventions in liver transplant recipients

Portal vein interventions in liver transplant recipients represent a group of interventions in the management of several disease entities including portal vein stenosis, portal vein thrombosis, and recurrent liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension with and without gastric varices. The procedures performed in these patient populations include portal vein angioplasty with or without stent placement for portal vein stenosis, portal vein thrombolysis with or without stent placement for portal vein thrombosis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts or splenic embolization for cirrhosis, and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices. This article discusses these disease entities and the minimal invasive procedures used in their management.

Percutaneous portal vein access and transhepatic tract hemostasis

Percutaneous portal vein interventions require minimally invasive access to the portal venous system. Common approaches to the portal vein include transjugular hepatic vein to portal vein access and direct transhepatic portal vein access. A major concern of the transhepatic route is the risk of postprocedural bleeding, which is increased when patients are anticoagulated or receiving pharmaceutical thrombolytic therapy. Thus percutaneous portal vein access and subsequent closure are important technical parts of percutaneous portal vein procedures. At present, various techniques have been used for either portal access or subsequent transhepatic tract closure and hemostasis. Regardless of the method used, meticulous technique is required to achieve the overall safety and effectiveness of portal venous procedures. This article reviews the various techniques of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein access and the various closure and hemostatic methods used to reduce the risk of postprocedural bleeding.

Recanalization of post-transplant late-onset long segmental portal vein thrombosis with bidirectional transhepatic and transmesenteric approach

PV complications are the most frequent vascular complications in pediatric LT. We have experienced a case with chronic postoperative PVT that necessitates combined transhepatic and transmesenteric approach and have confirmed mid-term patency. An eight-yr-old boy had successful LDLT with a left lateral segment graft at the age of two months for HBV-related acute liver failure. Seven years after transplantation, the patient suddenly showed a melena with hypovolemic shock. Doppler ultrasound and CT revealed intrahepatic bile duct dilatation and main PVT with collateral formation at hepatic hilus and mesenterium of the Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. Urgent splenic artery embolization was performed to control the bleeding and was temporarily effective. Therefore, recanalization of PVO was attempted. Because of long segmental PVO and steep angle between the intrahepatic PV and the portal trunk, bidirectional transhepatic and transmesenteric approach was selected and resulted in deploying three metallic stents necessitating additional infusion thrombolytic therapy. The patient is now followed as an outpatient with patent stents for two yr since the procedure. For the rescue of these patients, recanalization of obstructed PV trunk with bidirectional approach would be feasible with better graft survival and less invasiveness than conventional surgical interventions.

Portal vein stenosis: a rare yet clinically important cause of delayed-onset ascites after adult deceased donor liver transplantation: two case reports

Vascular complications following liver transplantation are well documented. While complications involving the portal vein are less common than the hepatic artery, portal vein complications can lead to potentially life-threatening sequelae including graft loss. Portal vein stenosis is an infrequent complication following liver transplant. The majority of these complications are seen in living donor liver transplants and pediatric liver transplants. We present 2 cases of delayed onset portal vein stenosis in adult deceased donor liver transplantation (ADDLT). The first patient presented with refractory ascites twelve months after ADDLT. He was diagnosed and successfully treated with percutaneous transhepatic portovenography and venoplasty. The second patient had a history of irradiation to his portal bed in the setting of cholangiocarcinoma. He developed refractory ascites and esophageal variceal bleeding>2 years after ADDLT. He underwent percutaneous transhepatic portovenoplasty, but eventually required placement of a portal stent due to continued problems with recurrent ascites. These 2 cases highlight the importance of considering portal vein stenosis in the differential diagnosis of late-onset ascites following liver transplantation, especially if there have been any predisposing risk factors such as portal bed irradiation or prior splenectomy.

Vascular stents in the management of portal venous complications in living donor liver transplantation

To evaluate the efficacy of stent placement in the treatment of portal vein (PV) stenosis or occlusion in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients, 468 LDLT records were reviewed. Sixteen (10 PV occlusions and 6 stenoses) recipients (age range, 8 months-59 years) were referred for possible interventional angioplasty (dilatation and/or stent) procedures. Stent placement was attempted in all. The approaches used were percutaneous transhepatic (n = 10), percutaneous transsplenic (n = 4), and intraoperative (n = 2). Technical success was achieved in 11 of 16 patients (68.8%). The sizes of the stents used varied from 7 mm to 10 mm in diameter. In the five unsuccessful patients, long-term complete occlusion of the PV with cavernous transformation precluded catherterization. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range, 3-24). The PV stent patency rate was 90.9% (10/11). Rethrombosis and occlusion of the stent and PV occurred in a single recipient who had a cryoperserved vascular graft to reconstruct the PV during the LDLT operation. PV occlusion of >1 year with cavernous transformation seemed to be a factor causing technical failure. In conclusion, early treatment of PV stenosis and occlusion by stenting is an effective treatment in LDLT. Percutaneous transhepatic and transsplenic, and intraoperative techniques are effective approaches depending on the situation.