Tuberculosis in liver transplant recipients: experience of a South Indian liver transplant center

Safety and outcome of treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in liver transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Liver transplant (LT) recipients have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB), which is associated with higher mortality rates. This retrospective cohort study assessed the outcome and tolerability of screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in LT recipients.

METHODS

Between March 2020 and February 2022, all adult LT candidates at our institution were screened for LTBI. The candidates who tested positive for interferon-γ-releasing assay or met epidemiological or clinical-radiological criteria for LTBI were treated and monitored.

RESULTS

Among the 857 LT recipients, 199 (23.2%) were diagnosed with LTBI, of which 171 (85.9%) initiated LTBI treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 677 days. Adequate LTBI treatment occurred in 141/171 (82.5%) patients and was discontinued prematurely in 30/171 (17.5%) patients. The most common reason for discontinuation was liver enzyme elevation (11/30, 36.7%), although only five discontinued treatment due to suspicion of isoniazid-associated hepatotoxicity. None of the LTBI-treated patients developed active TB during the follow-up period, while 3.6% (1/28) of untreated LTBI patients and 0.6% (4/658) of patients without LTBI developed TB.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that LTBI screening and treatment is a safe and effective strategy to prevent TB in LT recipients. However, monitoring for adverse events and liver enzyme elevation is recommended.

Granulomatous liver diseases

A granuloma is a discrete collection of activated macrophages and other inflammatory cells. Hepatic granulomas can be a manifestation of localized liver disease or be a part of a systemic process, usually infectious or autoimmune. A liver biopsy is required for the detection and evaluation of granulomatous liver diseases. The prevalence of granulomas on liver biopsy varies from 1% to 15%. They may be an incidental finding in an asymptomatic individual, or they may represent granulomatous hepatitis with potential to progress to liver failure, or in chronic disease, to cirrhosis. This review focuses on pathogenesis, histological features of granulomatous liver diseases, and most common etiologies, knowledge that is essential for timely diagnosis and intervention.

The potential liver donor with tuberculosis: A fresh look at international recommendations based on a survey of practice in Indian liver transplant centres

Background The western recommendations for the use of organs from liver donors with tuberculosis (TB) come from an environment where the burden of disease is low and cadaveric organ donation rates are high-in complete contrast to the Indian scenario, where these recommendations may be too restrictive. Methods A questionnaire relating to current practice on the use of organs from liver donors with TB was sent to all liver transplant centres in India. Results Responses were obtained from 94% of centres. Two-thirds accepted organs from deceased donors with TB in the elective setting, especially for recipients with a high MELD (Model for end-stage liver disease) score. The proportion rose by 1.5 times in the setting of acute liver failure. Two-thirds advised anti-TB treatment (ATT) for corresponding recipients, and the remaining advised isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) prophylaxis. Untreated living donors with TB were not accepted. Half the respondents accepted living donors after completion of ATT, and did not treat recipients postoperatively. The remainder accepted them after 8 weeks of treatment and advised INH prophylaxis or ATT for recipients. Conclusions That this practice has not impacted recipient outcomes suggests that the guidelines for management of liver donors and recipients may need to be altered for populations endemic for TB.

A Case Series of Extrapulmonary Mycobacterium in Liver Transplant Recipients

Liver transplant recipients are at increased risk of infection because of the immunosuppression required after transplantation. Infection by Mycobacterium species increases the morbidity and mortality of liver transplant recipients. The prompt recognition and diagnosis of opportunistic infection is necessary for good outcomes, particularly during periods of increased immunosuppression. The balance of immunosuppressive therapies during prolonged treatment with hepatotoxic medications has not been well studied and should be tailored for the unique clinical setting of each patient. The goal of treatment in these patients is to eradicate the disease and preserve allograft function.

Incidence rate of active tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients: Data from a nationwide population cohort in a high-endemic country

BACKGROUND

The management of active tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients is challenging given the pharmacological interaction and the potential delays in diagnosis due to atypical presentation. The incidence rates (IRs) of post-SOT TB from the whole recipients' cohort in a high-endemic country have not been evaluated.

METHODS

We established a SOT cohort (n = 15 598) and confirmed cases of TB between 2011 and 2015 from the Korean National Health Insurance Database using ICD-10 codes. After excluding 1302 and 180 SOT-recipients due to age (<18 years) and presence of pre-SOT TB and/or treatment for latent TB during wash-out period between 2006 and cohort entry, we analyzed 14 116 SOT recipients and 70 580 individuals with no history of SOT matched by age and sex. The hazard ratios (HRs) of IRs were adjusted for age, sex, low-income status, diabetes mellitus, chronic co-morbidities, and anti-TNF-α therapy.

RESULTS

The IR of TB was significantly higher (adjusted HR [aHR]: 6.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6) in SOT recipients (4.9/1000 person-years) than in non-SOT individuals (0.8/1000 person-years). Of the transplanted organs, the pancreas (pancreas alone and simultaneous pancreas-kidney) and lung had the highest IR (aHR: 16.3 [6.1-42.2] and 16.1 [5.9-43.8], respectively). The use of anti-thymocyte globulin and azathioprine was associated with a higher IR (aHR: 1.53 [1.01-2.43] and 3.92 [1.21-12.47], respectively), but basiliximab was associated with a lower IR (aHR: 0.67 [0.48-0.98]).

CONCLUSION

The IR of TB in SOT recipients, especially in the pancreas and lung, was significantly higher than that in the non-SOT population.

Primary tuberculosis of the graft masquerading pyogenic liver abscess in a pediatric liver recipient

Primary tuberculosis (TB) of the graft presenting as multiple liver abscesses is previously unreported. A 14-month-old male child in the early post liver transplant (LT) period presented with high-grade fever spikes and on evaluation was found to have multiple pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA) in the CT abdomen. His fever was not responding to intravenous antibiotics and liver biopsy was done which showed numerous acid fast bacilli. Genetic analysis confirmed the bacilli as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). Timely diagnosis and prompt introduction of antituberculosis therapy were lifesaving.

High prevalence of latent tuberculosis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A First Report

TB is an increasing health problem, and patients undergoing HSCT are more prone to develop tuberculosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate prevalence of latent tuberculosis in HSCT recipients. In this study, 84 patients (2 months to 18 years) who were candidates for HSCT at the referral hospital of Tehran Children's Medical Center were enrolled. The TST and the QFT-GIT test were performed in all 84 patients, simultaneously. LTBI was considered when one of the tests was positive. Overall, the prevalence of LTBI in HSCT recipients in our study was 12% (10 cases). TST induration ≥5 mm was seen in only three patients (3.5%). Eight patients (9.5%) had a positive result for IGRA test, and 11 of them (13%) had indeterminate QFT-GIT result. The agreement between the TST results (induration size ≥5 mm) and the QFT-GIT results was poor (kappa = 0.14). In conclusion, there was a high rate of discordance between TST and IGRA results with many more positive QFT-GIT tests. However, more studies are needed in this population to determine whether this discordance reflects true infection.

Prevention and treatment of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Its management in transplant recipients is difficult and highly complex, given the underlying immunosuppression and the risks of drug-drug interactions imposed by immunosuppressive drugs that are needed to maintain the transplant allograft.Areas covered: We provide a brief review of TB in SOT and discuss the clinical indications, mechanisms of action and drug resistance, drug-drug interactions, and adverse effects of anti-TB drugs. We provide a summary of recent clinical trials, which serve as the foundation for current recommendations. We further include relevant updates on new agents being evaluated for clinical use in TB management.Expert commentary: TB causes significant morbidity in SOT recipients. The drugs used in the treatment for latent TB and active disease in SOT are similar to the regimens used in the general population. However, TB disease in transplant recipients is more difficult to manage because of the potential for hepatotoxicity and the complex drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs. We believe that alternative regimens suited for the vulnerable transplant population, and more therapeutic drug options are needed given the adverse toxicities associated with currently approved anti-TB drugs.

Treatment of latent TB Infection and the risk of tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation: Comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease may occur after treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI). Prompted by a case of reactivation TB disease in a solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient who received LTBI treatment, we reviewed the literature to examine outcomes, adverse effects, resistance, and treatment choices of tuberculosis after LTBI therapy.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to 5/2019 were reviewed using key words "latent tuberculosis infection" and "SOT" or "transplantation." The search yielded nine cases, 41 cohort studies and six randomized controlled trials (RCT).

RESULTS

Cohort and RCT demonstrated significant reduction in TB disease among transplanted patients who received LTBI therapy; only 56/2651 (2.1%) SOT patients developed TB after LTBI therapy. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 149/1148 (12.9%) and 73/641 (11.4%) of cohort and RCT patients, respectively. Among liver recipients, 56/266 (21%) developed side effects, of which half (29/56, 51.8%) was INH-related. There was no reported INH resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Latent TB infection treatment is efficacious in SOT recipients at risk of TB disease. However, tuberculosis may still occur despite LTBI treatment. Hepatotoxicity associated with LTBI therapy is infrequent, although more commonly observed among liver recipients.

Explant liver evaluation decodes the mystery of cryptogenic cirrhosis!

Background and Aim

To determine the concordance of liver explants with the pretransplant diagnosis.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 251 liver explants. Patient information included demography, comorbidity, and etiological diagnosis. Final diagnosis was based on morphological and histological findings. For non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cryptogenic cirrhosis, we investigated comorbid states such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Chi square test and Cohen's Kappa value were used. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 192 patients (76.5%) were males. A significant concordance of explant diagnosis with pretransplant diagnosis was present in 225 (89.6%) patients. It was 100% for alcohol‐related disease, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, autoimmune (AI) liver disease, biliary cirrhosis, and Budd–Chiari syndrome. Of 37 patients with a pretransplant diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis, major discordance was observed in 23 (62.1%). On explant, seven patients each had hemochromatosis 5 (13.5%), AI hepatitis, and NASH (18.9%); two had noncirrhotic fibrosis (5.4%); and one each had Wilson's disease and congenital hepatic fibrosis (2.7%). Of the 20 explants, 3 with pretransplant diagnosis of NASH had a diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis on explant specimens. Cohen's Kappa for the concordance of pretransplant diagnosis and explant diagnosis in NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis patients was 0.75 and 0.47, respectively. An incidental hepatocellular carcinoma was picked up in 16 explants, and 18 had granulomas.

Conclusion

Concordance between pretransplant and explant diagnosis is lower for NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis. The true prevalence of cryptogenic cirrhosis in our study was 5.6%.

A practical approach to tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in liver transplant recipients in a low-prevalence area

Solid organ transplant candidates/recipients are at risk of mycobacterial infections. Although guidelines on the management of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis are available for solid organ transplant recipients, limited guidance focuses on end-stage liver disease or liver transplant recipients who require management in a referral center. Therapeutic challenges arise from direct antituberculosis drug-related hepatotoxicity, and substantial metabolic interactions between immunosuppressive and antituberculosis drugs. Another issue is the optimal timing of therapy with regards to the time of transplantation. This review focuses on the importance of tuberculosis screening with immunological tests, challenges in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis, as well as risk assessment for active tuberculosis in the critical peri-liver transplantation period. We detail therapeutic adjustments required for the management of antituberculosis drugs in latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis, particularly when concomitantly using rifampicin and immunosuppressive drugs.

Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in transplant candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is considered as a serious complication for organ transplant recipients; therefore, the detection and appropriate treatment of latent infection are recommended for preventing active TB infections in the future. The objective of this review is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the prevalence of latent TB infection (LTBI) in transplant candidates.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS were searched until 30 June 2017. The prevalence of LTBI was estimated using the random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated by subgroup analysis. Data were analyzed by STATA version 14.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of LTBI based on tuberculin skin test (TST) in different transplant types was as follows: liver 24% (14%-33%, 95% CI), lung 22% (18%-26%), renal 21% (16%-27%, 95% CI) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) 14% (9%-19%). The prevalence of LTBI based on Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) tests in renal transplant candidates was 31% (95% CI; 25-37%), which was much higher than the prevalence of LTBI in liver transplant candidates (25%, 95% CI; 17-33%) and HCT transplant candidates (13%, 95% CI; 10-16%) and there was statistically significant differences between them. The pooled prevalence of indeterminate results based on IGRAs test in different transplant types was as follows: renal 6% (4%-8%, 95% CI) and liver 12% (2%-21%, 95% CI). Subgroup analysis revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the overall prevalence of indeterminate results by using IGRA tests in liver transplant candidates (12%, 95% CI; 2-21%) and renal transplant candidates (6%, 95% CI; 4-8%). The pooled prevalence of post-transplant TB was 2% (1%-2%, 95% CI) and its occurrence was more common in renal recipients (4% (2%-7%, 95% CI)) than in the liver transplant patients (1% (0%-2%, 95% CI)). The prevalence of LTBI in the subgroup (i.e. the patients' mean age was <50 years) was significantly higher than the prevalence of LTBI by using TST/IGRAs in the other subgroup (i.e. the patients' mean age was ≥50 years).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests fair overall agreement between IGRAs and TST in patients requiring liver and HCT transplantation, while a superiority of IGRAs over TST in patients requiring renal transplantation was seen.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation: A review of more than 2000 cases

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) is a common pathogen worldwide, and it may cause significant infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). We reviewed all reported TB cases to provide an update on its epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcome after SOT.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID were reviewed from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2016, using keywords tuberculosis and solid organ transplant or transplantation.

RESULTS

There were 187 publications reporting 2082 cases of TB among kidney (n = 1719), liver (n = 253), heart (n = 77), lung (n = 25), and kidney-pancreas (n = 8) recipients. Among cohort studies, the median incidence was 2.37% (range, 0.05%-13.27%) overall. Most TB disease was considered reactivation of latent infection, occurring beyond the first year after SOT. Early-onset cases were seen among donor-derived TB cases. Fever was the most common symptom. Radiologic findings were highly variable. Extrapulmonary and disseminated TB occurred 29.84% and 15.96%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant TB was rare. Treatment using 4 or 5 drugs was commonly associated with hepatotoxicity and graft dysfunction. All-cause mortality was 18.84%.

CONCLUSIONS

This large review highlights the complexity of TB after SOT. Reactivation TB, donor-transmitted infection, extrapulmonary involvement, and disseminated disease are common occurrences. Treatment of TB is commonly associated with hepatotoxicity and graft dysfunction.

Living donor liver transplantation in India

Liver transplantation is currently in its golden period in India. The number of transplants being performed and the steady increase in the new programs that have emerged over the last decade is a testimony to it. The growth was not smooth, especially in the early years. But a multipronged approach in developing infrastructure and the involvement of multidisciplinary teams in the management of transplant patients has had a major positive impact on the outcome and as a result a positive impetus to the growth of this specialty in India. To date, the majority of transplants performed in India are live donor liver transplants. Deceased donation is more sporadic and concentrated in a couple of regions. With phenomenal increase in transplant activity in India, there is huge potential for streamlining data sharing among programs in India and with the rest of the world to ultimately benefit the transplant community.

Detecting latent tuberculosis in compromised patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in different categories of compromised patients is reviewed with focus on the role of strategies incorporating immunodiagnostic tests and analysis of epidemiological and clinical risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The development of active tuberculosis (TB) is increased in compromised patients and is closely related to determinants for disease reactivation or newly acquired TB infection. A targeted detection of LTBI in these high-risk groups should be performed especially if preventive treatment is planned. The performance of immunodiagnostic tests is highly variable among different groups of immunocompromised individuals. Findings of cross-sectional studies indicate a better diagnostic accuracy of interferon-γ release assays over the tuberculin skin test. The critical issue is that in low-incidence countries, the positive and negative predictive values of any of immunodiagnostic tests were very poor. A targeted testing process involving analysis of TB risk factors increases the predictive positive values of immunodiagnostic tests and may improve LTBI detection.

SUMMARY

The LTBI detection in immunocompromised patients is a challenge. The development of new immunological biomarkers and integrated clinical and epidemiological strategies are needed to identify LTBI in compromised individuals and to plan preventive chemotherapies in those at risk of developing active TB.

Liver Transplantation in India: At the Crossroads

As the liver transplant journey in India reaches substantial numbers and suggests quality technical expertise, it is time to dispassionately look at the big picture, identify problems, and consider corrective measures for the future. Several features characterize the current scenario. Although the proportion of deceased donor liver transplants is increasing, besides major regional imbalances, the activity is heavily loaded in favor of the private sector and live donor transplants. The high costs of the procedure, the poor participation of public hospitals, the lack of a national registry, and outcomes reporting are issues of concern. Organ sharing protocols currently based on chronology or institutional rotation need to move to a more justiciable severity-based system. Several measures can expand the deceased donor pool. The safety of the living donor continues to need close scrutiny and focus. Multiple medical challenges unique to the Indian situation are also being thrown up. Although many of the deficits demand state intervention and policy changes the transplant community needs to take notice and highlight them. The future of liver transplantation in India should move toward a more accountable, equitable, and accessible form. We owe this to our citizens who have shown tremendous faith in us by volunteering to be living donors as well as consenting for deceased donation.