Arterial Blood Pressure at Liver Transplant Evaluation Predicts Renal Histology in Candidates With Renal Dysfunction

Improved outcomes of kidney after liver transplantation after the implementation of the safety net policy

The number of kidney after liver transplants (KALT) increased after the implementation of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) safety net policy, but the effects of the policy on KALT outcomes remain unknown. Using the UNOS database, we identified KALT between 60 and 365 days from liver transplant from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. The main outcome was 1- and 3-year patient, liver, and kidney graft survival. Secondary outcomes included 6-month and 1-year acute rejection (AR) of liver and kidney, and 1-year kidney allograft function. Of the 256 KALT, 90 were pre-policy and 166 post-policy. Compared to pre-policy, post-policy 1- and 3-year liver graft survival was higher (54% and 54% vs. 86% and 81%, respectively, p <0.001), while 1- and 3-year kidney graft survival (99% and 75% vs. 92% and 79%, respectively, p =0.19), and 1- and 3-year patient survival (99% and 99% vs. 95% and 89%, respectively, p =0.11) were not significantly different. Subgroup analysis revealed similar trends in patients with and without renal failure at liver transplant. Liver AR at 6 months was lower post-policy (6.3% vs. 18.3%, p =0.006) but was similar (10.5% vs. 13%, p =0.63) at 1 year. Kidney AR was unchanged post-policy at 6 months and 1 year. Creatinine at 1 year did not differ post-policy versus pre-policy (1.4 vs. 1.3 mg/dL, p =0.07) despite a higher proportion of deceased donors, higher Kidney Donor Profile Index, and longer kidney cold ischemia time post-policy ( p <0.05 for all). This 3-year follow-up after the 2017 UNOS policy revision demonstrated that the safety net implementation has resulted in improved liver outcomes for patients who underwent KALT with no increased AR of the liver or the kidney allografts.

Pathophysiology of Hepatorenal Syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1) is a unique form of acute kidney injury that affects individuals with decompensated cirrhosis with ascites. The primary mechanism leading to reduction of kidney function in HRS-1 is hemodynamic in nature. Cumulative evidence points to a cascade of events that led to a profound reduction in kidney perfusion. A state of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance characteristic of advanced cirrhosis and portal hypertension is accompanied by maladaptive peripheral arterial vasodilation and reduction in systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure. As a result of a fall in effective arterial blood volume, there is a compensatory activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system, local renal vasoconstriction, loss of renal autoregulation, decrease in renal blood flow, and ultimately a fall in glomerular filtration rate. Systemic release of nitric oxide stimulated by the fibrotic liver, bacterial translocation, and inflammation constitute key components of the pathogenesis. While angiotensin II and noradrenaline remain the critical mediators of renal arterial and arteriolar vasoconstriction, other novel molecules have been recently implicated. Although the above-described mechanistic pathway remains the backbone of the pathogenesis of HRS-1, other noxious elements may be present in advanced cirrhosis and likely contribute to the renal impairment. Direct liver-kidney crosstalk via the hepatorenal sympathetic reflex can further reduce renal blood flow independently of the systemic derangements. Tense ascites may lead to intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Cardio-hemodynamic processes have also been increasingly recognized. Porto-pulmonary hypertension, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, and abdominal compartment syndrome may lead to renal congestion and complicate the course of HRS-1. In addition, a degree of ischemic or toxic (cholemic) tubular injury may overlap with the underlying circulatory dysfunction and further exacerbate the course of acute kidney injury. Improving our understanding of the pathogenesis of HRS-1 may lead to improvements in therapeutic options for this seriously ill population.

Cholemic Nephropathy: Role in Acute Kidney Injury in Cholestasis and Cirrhosis

The concept of structural kidney damage and renal dysfunction as a result of jaundice attracted attention in the medical community in the early and mid-20th century. The postulated doctrine of the time was that the excretion of elevated concentrations of bile results in bile-stained casts occupying collecting and distal convoluted tubules, degeneration of tubular epithelium, and decreased renal function. Compared to the hepatorenal syndrome, the poster child of hepatology and nephrology collaboration, the notion of structural kidney damage and renal dysfunction as a result of cholemia lost its traction and has almost disappeared from modern textbooks. Today, cholemic nephropathy is experiencing a renaissance, with multiple case reports and case series of jaundiced patients with kidney dysfunction and evidence of bile acid casts upon histologic examination. Published cases include acute hepatitis, chronic liver injury, cirrhosis, and obstructive etiologies. Diagnosis of cholemic nephropathy is based on histological examination, typically showing intraluminal bile casts predominantly located in the distal tubules. In common bile duct-ligated mice, the histomorphological and functional alterations of cholemic nephropathy mimic those seen in humans. Some argue against the concept of cholemic nephropathy and postulate that bile casts are a secondary phenomenon. What we need are carefully designed trials to establish diagnostic criteria and subsequently translate this knowledge into evidence-based therapies.

Incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury including hepatorenal syndrome in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis in the US

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis is common and associated with high morbidity, but the incidence rates of different etiologies of AKI are not well described in the US. We compared incidence rates, practice patterns, and outcomes across etiologies of AKI in cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 11 hospital networks, including consecutive adult patients admitted with AKI and cirrhosis in 2019. The etiology of AKI was adjudicated based on pre-specified clinical definitions (prerenal/hypovolemic AKI, hepatorenal syndrome [HRS-AKI], acute tubular necrosis [ATN], other).

RESULTS

A total of 2,063 patients were included (median age 62 [IQR 54-69] years, 38.3% female, median MELD-Na score 26 [19-31]). The most common etiology was prerenal AKI (44.3%), followed by ATN (30.4%) and HRS-AKI (12.1%); 6.0% had other AKI, and 7.2% could not be classified. In our cohort, 8.1% of patients received a liver transplant and 36.5% died by 90 days. The lowest rate of death was observed in patients with prerenal AKI (22.2%; p <0.001), while death rates were higher but not significantly different from each other in those with HRS-AKI and ATN (49.0% vs. 52.7%; p = 0.42). Using prerenal AKI as a reference, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) for 90-day mortality was higher for HRS-AKI (sHR 2.78; 95% CI 2.18-3.54; p <0.001) and ATN (sHR 2.83; 95% CI 2.36-3.41; p <0.001). In adjusted analysis, higher AKI stage and lack of complete response to treatment were associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality (p <0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

AKI is a severe complication of cirrhosis. HRS-AKI is uncommon and is associated with similar outcomes to ATN. The etiology of AKI, AKI stage/severity, and non-response to treatment were associated with mortality. Further optimization of vasoconstrictors for HRS-AKI and supportive therapies for ATN are needed.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis carries high morbidity, and management is determined by the etiology of injury. However, a large and well-adjudicated multicenter database from US centers that uses updated AKI definitions is lacking. Our findings demonstrate that acute tubular necrosis and hepatorenal syndrome have similar outcomes (∼50% mortality at 90 days), though hepatorenal syndrome is uncommon (12% of all AKI cases). These findings represent practice patterns at US transplant/tertiary centers and can be used as a baseline, presenting the situation prior to the adoption of terlipressin in the US.

Acute Kidney Injury in Liver Cirrhosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in cirrhotic patients affecting almost 20% of these patients. While multiple etiologies can lead to AKI, pre-renal azotemia seems to be the most common cause of AKI. Irrespective of the cause, AKI is associated with worse survival with the poorest outcomes observed in those with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN). In recent years, new definitions, and classifications of AKI in cirrhosis have emerged. More knowledge has also become available regarding the benefits and drawbacks of albumin and terlipressin use in these patients. Diagnostic tools such as urinary biomarkers and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) became available and they will be used in the near future to differentiate between different causes of AKI and direct management of AKI in these patients. In this update, we will review these new classifications, treatment recommendations, and diagnostic tools for AKI in cirrhotic patients.

The Renal Histological Correlates of Refractory Renal Dysfunction After Liver Transplantation

Background

Kidney dysfunction is common after liver transplantation (LT) and is often attributed to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Very few studies have looked at histological causes.

Material and methods

The study is a retrospective analysis of histological findings and diagnosis in all patients who underwent a kidney biopsy after LT from 2010 to 2020. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or medians (25-75 interquartile range).

Results

The study cohort consisted of 26 patients (25 males, 1 female), aged 55 ± 7 years at the time of the kidney biopsy. Kidney biopsies were done at 27.5 (6.7-60.7) months after LT. At the time of the kidney biopsy, the median serum creatinine was 2.10 (1.50-2.86) mg/dl and proteinuria was 3.8 (1.8-5.9) gm/day. Twenty-four (92%) patients were on CNIs. The diagnoses on kidney biopsies were diabetic nephropathy (n = 7), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 4), CNI nephrotoxicity (n = 3), IgA nephropathy (n = 4), chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 3), hypertensive nephropathy (n = 1), membranous glomerulonephritis (n = 1), acute on chronic interstitial nephritis (n = 1), and C1q nephropathy (n = 1), and the sample was inadequate in one patient. A total of sixteen patients had progression of kidney disease. The kidney function remained stable/improved in 6 (23%) patients, follow-up data were not available for 4 patients. Fourteen (53.8%) patients (including one with CNI nephrotoxicity) required hemodialysis at 13.5 (5.7-29) months after the kidney biopsy.

Conclusion

Although the kidney biopsy diagnosed the cause of unexplained renal insufficiency in LT recipients, the majority of patients progressed to end-stage renal disease despite treatment modifications. The use of CNIs was an uncommon cause of renal impairment.

Essentials of Liver Transplantation in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease

Kidney dysfunction is common among liver transplant candidates with decompensated cirrhosis and has a major impact on pre- and post-liver transplant survival. Updated definitions of acute kidney injury and criteria for the diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome allow for early recognition and intervention, including early initiation of vasoconstrictor therapy for hepatorenal syndrome. The rise of the metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as a cause of cirrhosis has coincided with an increase in intrinsic chronic kidney disease recognized in transplant candidates and recipients. Ultimately, the ability to accurately assess kidney function and associated risk is essential to decision-making in the context of transplantation, including selection of candidates for simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation.

Post-Liver Transplant Early Allograft Dysfunction Modifies the Effect of Pre-Liver Transplant Renal Dysfunction on Post-Liver Transplant Survival

Pre-liver transplantation (LT) renal dysfunction is associated with poor post-LT survival. We studied whether early allograft dysfunction (EAD) modifies this association. Data on 2,856 primary LT recipients who received a transplant between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who died within the first post-LT week or received multiorgan transplants and previous LT recipients were excluded. EAD was defined as (1) total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL on postoperative day (POD) 7, (2) international normalized ratio ≥1.6 on POD 7, and/or (3) alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase ≥2000 IU/mL in the first postoperative week. Pre-LT renal dysfunction was defined as serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL or on renal replacement therapy at LT. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to pre-LT renal dysfunction and post-LT EAD development. Recipients who had both pre-LT renal dysfunction and post-LT EAD had the worst unadjusted 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year post-LT patient and graft survival, whereas patients who had neither renal dysfunction nor EAD had the best survival (P < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple factors, the risk of death was significantly higher only in those with both pre-LT renal dysfunction and post-LT EAD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-3.03; P < 0.001), whereas those with renal dysfunction and no EAD had a comparable risk of death to those with normal kidney function at LT (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.86-1.45; P = 0.41). Results remained unchanged when pre-LT renal dysfunction was redefined using different glomerular filtration rate cutoffs. Pre-LT renal dysfunction negatively impacts post-LT survival only in patients who develop EAD. Livers at higher risk of post-LT EAD should be used with caution in recipients with pre-LT renal dysfunction.

Chronic severe hepatitis and preoperative creatinine are independent risk factors for acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) offers the highest chance of cure in comparison with all other treatment for liver tumors and other end stage liver disease. However, the complications caused by liver transplantation significantly affect its therapeutic effect, and acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common of these. It is, therefore, necessary to identify the risk factors of AKI after liver transplantation.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective study of patients receiving liver transplantation at the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital between January 2015 to January 2019 was conducted.

Patients were divided into a normal control group and AKI group based on their previous medical history. Preoperative and intraoperative indicators including preoperative creatinine, uric acid, and the intraoperative input of protein were then recorded.

Results

A total of 419 patients were enrolled into the study. The control group consisted of 336 patients while 83 patients formed an AKI group based on the grading criteria of AKI. There were significant differences in chronic severe hepatitis (P=0.001), liver cancer (P=0.044), intraoperative input of sodium bicarbonate (P=0.019), input of red blood cell suspension (P=0.004), the input of blood plasma (P=0.043), intraoperative urine output (P=0.006), and preoperative creatinine (P=0.041) between the control and AKI group. Multivariate analysis indicated that chronic severe hepatitis (OR: 2.872; P=0.003) and preoperative creatinine (OR: 1.083; P=0.011) were independent risk factors for AKI in patients receiving liver transplantation.

Conclusions

Chronic severe hepatitis and preoperative creatinine may be potential risk factors for the occurrence of AKI after liver transplantation.

Clinical Relevance of Kidney Biopsy in Patients Qualified for Liver Transplantation and After This Procedure in the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) Era: Where Are We Today?

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been recognized as an increasingly common complication of liver transplantation (OLTx). Post-transplant renal dysfunction contributes to long-term morbidity and mortality following OLTx and is a very important issue in the management of liver transplant recipients. Its etiology is multifactorial and can be determined by kidney biopsy, which is too rarely done in this patient group. In the clinical context of patients with liver cirrhosis, accurate and reliable evaluation of the renal injury is crucial. We performed a review of kidney biopsies in patients with symptoms of CKD (proteinuria/hematuria/elevated creatinine) before and after liver transplantation in the published literature. Kidney biopsies were performed either before or after liver transplantation using percutaneous technique. There are few reports on transjugular kidney biopsy. Biopsy results prevented unnecessary modification of immunosuppressive therapy or selection of candidates for liver transplantation. In our opinion, kidney biopsy is a clinically relevant diagnostic approach to recognize kidney disease before and after liver transplantation, it also helps with the management of kidney disease in this population, and it is safe. Kidney biopsy should be offered more often in liver transplant patients to ensure appropriate therapy in concomitant CKD in this population. Our decisions today will impact clinical outcomes in the future.