Varghese CT, Chandran B, Gopalakrishnan U, Nair K, Mallick S, Mathew JS, Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma B, Balakrishnan D, Sudheer OV, Sudhindran S. Extended criteria donors for Robotic Right Hepatectomy- A Propensity Score matched Analysis.
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022;
29:874-883. [PMID:
35411725 DOI:
10.1002/jhbp.1145]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Robotic right donor hepatectomy (RDH) has been reported from experienced centers with reduced morbidity when compared to open RDH. However, outcomes in donors with large grafts/ complex biliovascular anatomy are unknown.
METHODS
Out of 170 robotic RDH, 100 had one or more of the following: graft weight ≥ 800gms, type 2/3 portal vein, >1 bile duct or hepatic artery and inferior hepatic veins >5mm requiring reconstruction (extended criteria donors- ExRDH), while the remaining 70 had standard anatomy (SRDH). After propensity score matching, 66 ExRDH were compared with 66 SRDH. Additionally, all robotic RDH performed were analysed in 3 temporal phases (60, 60 and 50).
RESULTS
Peak AST and ALT were higher among donors and recipients in the ExRDH arm compared to SRDH. Other intraoperative parameters and post-operative complications were similar between the two groups. During the last phase, donors demonstrated reduction in duration of surgery, postoperative complications and hospital stay while recipients showed decreased blood loss and hospital stay.
CONCLUSION
Robotic right hepatectomy performed in donors with extended criteria have similar perioperative outcomes as standard donors. However, a significant learning curve needs to be traversed. Further studies are required before safely recommending robotic RDH for all donors.
Collapse