Predicting outcome after liver transplantation

Post-transplant biliary complications using liver grafts from deceased donors older than 70 years: Retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

The shortage of liver grafts and subsequent waitlist mortality led us to expand the donor pool using liver grafts from older donors.

AIM

To determine the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for biliary complications (BC) in liver transplantation (LT) using liver grafts from donors aged > 70 years.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and December 31, 2019, 297 LTs were performed using donors older than 70 years. After excluding 47 LT for several reasons, we divided 250 LTs into two groups, namely post-LT BC (n = 21) and without BC (n = 229). This retrospective case-control study compared both groups.

RESULTS

Choledocho-choledochostomy without T-tube was the most frequent technique (76.2% in the BC group vs 92.6% in the non-BC group). Twenty-one patients (8.4%) developed BC (13 anastomotic strictures, 7 biliary leakages, and 1 non-anastomotic biliary stricture). Nine patients underwent percutaneous balloon dilation and nine required a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy because of dilation failure. The incidence of post-LT complications (graft dysfunction, rejection, renal failure, and non-BC reoperations) was similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in the patient and graft survival between the groups. Moreover, only three deaths were attributed to BC. While female donors were protective factors for BC, donor cardiac arrest was a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of BC was relatively low on using liver grafts > 70 years. It could be managed in most cases by percutaneous dilation or Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, without significant differences in the patient or graft survival between the groups.

Excellent long-term patient and graft survival are possible with appropriate use of livers from deceased septuagenarian and octogenarian donors

BACKGROUND

Although increasing donor age adversely affects survival after liver transplantation, livers have been used from selected deceased donors older than 70 years. Although there are reports of excellent short-term results, long-term results are unknown. Our experience was reviewed with septuagenarian and octogenarian deceased donors to determine long-term outcomes.

METHODS

All primary deceased donor liver transplants performed at our institution between July 1998 and December 2010 were reviewed. Recipients of livers procured after circulatory arrest, split and reduced-size livers and multiple organ transplants were excluded from the study. Patient and graft survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival comparisons were made with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In total, 780 patients met inclusion criteria, and 109 patients received livers from donors older than 70 years (range = 70-86). There were no differences in long-term patient (P = 0.67) or graft (P = 0.42) survival between hepatitis C negative recipients of livers from older compared with younger donors. In contrast, 7-year survival for HCV-positive recipients of older donor livers was less than half that of HCV-negative recipients.

DISCUSSION

Transplantation of livers from septua- and octogenarian donors can achieve excellent long-term patient and graft survival for selected HCV-negative patients.

Using old liver grafts for liver transplantation: Where are the limits?

The scarcity of ideal liver grafts for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has led transplant teams to investigate other sources of grafts in order to augment the donor liver pool. One way to get more liver grafts is to use marginal donors, a not well-defined group which includes mainly donors > 60 years, donors with hypernatremia or macrosteatosis > 30%, donors with hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus positive serologies, cold ischemia time > 12 h, non-heart-beating donors, and grafts from split-livers or living-related donations. Perhaps the most practical and frequent measure to increase the liver pool, and thus to reduce waiting list mortality, is to use older livers. In the past years the results of OLT with old livers have improved, mainly due to better selection and maintenance of donors, improvements in surgical techniques in donors and recipients, and intra- and post-OLT management. At the present time, sexagenarian livers are generally accepted, but there still exists some controversy regarding the use of septuagenarian and octogenarian liver grafts. The aim of this paper is to briefly review the aging process of the liver and reported experiences using old livers for OLT. Fundamentally, the series of septuagenarian and octogenarian livers will be addressed to see if there is a limit to using these aged grafts.

Short-term induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin and delayed use of calcineurin inhibitors in orthotopic liver transplantation

The appropriate time point for starting immunosuppressive treatment with calcineurin inhibitors after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been a subject of debate. The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy on rejection, renal function, infection, tumor rate, and survival. We retrospectively analyzed 391 patients after OLT who had either received calcineurin inhibitors immediately after OLT (n = 129) or after an initial short-term Thymoglobulin induction therapy (n = 262). The 1-year acute rejection rate was 14.5% vs. 31.8% in favor of ATG (P = 0.0008). Rejection grades and the need for treatment also differed significantly (7.3% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.001). Serum creatinine at transplantation was similar in both groups (1.14 mg/dL vs.1.18 mg/dL; P = NS). Postoperative hemofiltration was less frequently seen after induction therapy (P < 0.05). Reduced renal function at 1 year was commonly observed, but serum creatinine (1.26 mg/dL vs. 1.37mg/dL; P = 0.015) and glomerular filtration rate (81 mL/min vs. 75 mL/min; P = 0.02) were far better in the ATG group. Undesired side effects occurred at a similar rate in both groups. Five-year patient survival was also similar in the 2 groups (70.1% and 74.3%; P > 0.05). Short-term ATG induction therapy with delayed administration of calcineurin inhibitors led to a more favorable rejection rate and an improved clinical course in case of a rejection episode. It has beneficial effects on renal function immediately after OLT as well as later, and no additional harmful effects.

Results of liver transplantation: analysis of 140 cases at a single center

The Shiraz Organ Transplant Center in southern Iran has been performing all liver transplantations in Iran and certain neighboring countries for 12 years. This study evaluated the 140 operations performed from April 1993 through November 2004. Sixty-one percent of the recipients were men and 39% were women. The average recipient age was 29.9 +/- 14.0 years. One hundred twenty-eight patients has a full-size cadaveric transplant. Most frequent causes of cirrhosis were cryptogenic and viral. An acute rejection episode occurred in 47.5% of cases, and two episodes in 8%. Most frequent short-term complications included respiratory, neurologic, and biliary problems. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survival rates were 92%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. The experience that the Shiraz Organ Transplant Center has had with liver transplantation indicated success comparable to that noted in other reports. The calculated trend suggests that a goal of 100 transplantations for 2005 is within reach.

Steroid-free liver transplantation using rabbit antithymocyte globulin and early tacrolimus monotherapy

BACKGROUND

In 2001, we published early results of a prospective randomized trial of 71 patients who received either steroids or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We now report follow-up on these patients and additional patients undergoing steroid-free OLT.

METHODS

A total of 119 adult OLT recipients were prospectively randomized to receive either methylprednisolone 1,000 mg followed by a 3-month steroid taper or a steroid-free regimen of RATG 1.5 mg/kg during the anhepatic phase followed by a 1.5 mg/kg dose on posttransplant day 1. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in both groups. Mycophenolate mofetil was weaned over 3 months in the first 71 patients and over 2 weeks in the last 48 patients, achieving tacrolimus monotherapy by 2 weeks posttransplant. Subsequently, a group of 24 sequential OLT recipients received the steroid-free (RATG) protocol. Endpoints of the study were survival, rejection, infectious complications, posttransplant diabetes, and recurrent hepatitis C virus.

RESULTS

One-year patient survival was 85% in each group of the prospective randomized trial with a mean follow-up of 18.5 months. One-year graft survival was 82% in the RATG group and 80% in the steroid group (P=not significant). Patient and graft survival of the 24 nonrandomized RATG patients was 96% with a mean follow-up of 3 months. The incidence of rejection was not significantly different; however, 50% of the patients in the steroid group required pulse steroids to reverse the rejection compared with only one patient (1.6%) in the RATG group (P=.03). The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection (P<.05) and posttransplant diabetes was higher in the steroid group (P=.03). There was a trend toward decreased severity of hepatitis C virus in the RATG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid-free liver transplantation using RATG and early tacrolimus monotherapy effectively reduces immunosuppression-related complications with excellent survival.

Acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients under cyclosporine immunosuppression: predictive factors of response to antirejection therapy

BACKGROUND

Predictive factors of response to antirejection therapy in acute cellular rejection (ACR) in liver transplantation are not well established.

METHODS

To investigate the possible existence of these factors, we reviewed 111 consecutive episodes of ACR fulfilling the following criteria: histologically confirmed ACR; cyclosporine-based immunosuppression; initial antirejection treatment with high-dose steroid boluses; minimum follow-up of 2 weeks after treatment; and no other graft complication interfering with evaluation of therapeutic response. ACR episodes not responding to initial steroid therapy were given additional treatment (OKT3 and/or repeated steroid boluses). We analyzed the association of the response to the antirejection treatment with different clinical, laboratory, histological, and donor-recipient compatibility variables at two times: after the initial antirejection therapy, and after all the antirejection therapy administered.

RESULTS

Eighty episodes of ACR (72%) resolved after the initial therapy with high-dose steroid boluses, and another 18 (16%), initially steroid-resistant, resolved with additional antirejection treatment. Thirteen episodes (12%) were refractory to all antirejection treatment administered. Variables with independent predictive value of nonresponse to initial therapy with steroid boluses were late-onset ACR (>2 months after transplantation), high serum bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase, low blood cyclosporine concentration in the week before antirejection treatment, and severe histological endothelialitis. Late-onset ACR and high serum bilirubin were also independent predictors of refractoriness to all the treatment administered.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to antirejection treatment in ACR in liver transplantation can be predicted by several clinical and laboratory data. ACR episodes with factors predictive of therapeutic unresponsiveness could benefit from more aggressive antirejection treatment.

Options for induction immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients

Immunosuppression administered in the early postoperative period following liver transplantation plays a crucial role in the survival of the graft and the patient. The introduction of cyclosporin was an important landmark in transplantation, and to this day, calcineurin inhibitors form the basis of most induction immunosuppression regimens. New drugs are being developed which are more specifically targeted to prevention of rejection, and multiple drug combinations have been proposed as a means of reducing the adverse effects of individual drugs. Azathioprine and the newer antimetabolite mycophenolate mofetil have been added to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens with varying amounts of success. Antibody induction has evolved as a potent form of immunosuppression as well as a means of avoiding certain adverse effects, particularly nephrotoxicity. The numerous adverse effects encountered with polyclonal preparations have been reduced with the development of more specific monoclonal antibodies such as muromonab CD3 (OKT3) or interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists. The anti-IL-2R antibody preparations basiliximab and daclizumab have shown excellent early results due to their potent yet highly targeted immunosuppressive effect and minimal adverse effects. Further study is needed to determine the most appropriate dosage, timing and patient population for these new drugs in the setting of liver transplantation. Although a number of different induction regimens have been described, no single protocol is suitable for all liver transplant recipients. Rather, certain regimens have advantages that could favour their use in a specific subgroup of patients. A number of clinical trials are underway to identify new, more specific drugs and combinations which could be useful in induction immunosuppression.

Use of daclizumab as initial immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients with impaired renal function

The addition of daclizumab (a human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukin-2 receptors on T lymphocytes) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids is a new option for initial immunosuppression in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) with impaired renal function. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daclizumab in preventing rejection in 25 patients with impaired kidney function undergoing LT. Patients with serum creatinine (Cr) levels greater than 2 mg/dL immediately before LT were administered initial immunosuppression with daclizumab, 1 mg/kg, in addition to MMF, 2 g/d, and methylprednisolone. Tacrolimus was added after kidney function improved (when Cr levels improved by >25% of initial value). Daclizumab-treated patients were compared retrospectively with 2 other groups of patients who underwent LT with kidney impairment (Cr > 2 mg/dL): 56 patients were administered OKT3 induction, and 48 patients were administered low-dose tacrolimus. The incidence of rejection and infection (bacterial, fungal, and viral), need for preoperative and postoperative dialysis, Cr level immediately post-LT and at 3 months, and graft and patient survival were analyzed. There was no difference among the groups in 3-month Cr levels or the incidence of rejection or fungal or viral infection. The daclizumab group had fewer bacterial infections (n = 13) than the tacrolimus group (n = 28) and significantly fewer than the OKT3 group (n = 58; P =.006). Only 1 patient (4%) in the daclizumab group required dialysis post-LT versus 13 patients in each of the other groups (OKT3, 23.21%; P <.05; tacrolimus, 27%). In the daclizumab group, 2-year patient and graft survival rates were statistically significant compared with the low-dose tacrolimus group (89% and 81% v 73% and 69%, respectively; P =.06). There were no side effects related to daclizumab use, and all patients tolerated the drug well. In patients with impaired renal function before LT, daclizumab-based initial immunosuppression can be used safely to reduce the risk for infection and need for dialysis post-LT, with improved long-term graft and patient survival.