Identification of inhibitors of the transmembrane protease FlaK of Methanococcus maripaludis

A comprehensive history of motility and Archaellation in Archaea

Each of the three Domains of life, Eukarya, Bacteria and Archaea, have swimming structures that were all originally called flagella, despite the fact that none were evolutionarily related to either of the other two. Surprisingly, this was true even in the two prokaryotic Domains of Bacteria and Archaea. Beginning in the 1980s, evidence gradually accumulated that convincingly demonstrated that the motility organelle in Archaea was unrelated to that found in Bacteria, but surprisingly shared significant similarities to type IV pili. This information culminated in the proposal, in 2012, that the 'archaeal flagellum' be assigned a new name, the archaellum. In this review, we provide a historical overview on archaella and motility research in Archaea, beginning with the first simple observations of motile extreme halophilic archaea a century ago up to state-of-the-art cryo-tomography of the archaellum motor complex and filament observed today. In addition to structural and biochemical data which revealed the archaellum to be a type IV pilus-like structure repurposed as a rotating nanomachine (Beeby et al. 2020), we also review the initial discoveries and subsequent advances using a wide variety of approaches to reveal: complex regulatory events that lead to the assembly of the archaellum filaments (archaellation); the roles of the various archaellum proteins; key post-translational modifications of the archaellum structural subunits; evolutionary relationships; functions of archaella other than motility and the biotechnological potential of this fascinating structure. The progress made in understanding the structure and assembly of the archaellum is highlighted by comparing early models to what is known today.

Effect of changes at the conserved + 3 position of mature archaellins on in vitro cleavage by the pre-archaellin peptidase FlaK of Methanococcus maripaludis

Archaea swim using archaella that are domain-specific rotary type IV pilus-like appendages. The structural components of the archaellum filament are archaellins, initially made as preproteins with type IV pilin-like signal peptides which are removed by signal peptidases that are homologues of prepilin peptidases that remove signal peptides from type IV pilins. N-terminal sequences of archaellins, including the signal peptide cleavage site, are conserved and various positions have been previously shown to be critical for signal peptide removal. Archaellins have an absolute conservation of glycine at the + 3 position from the signal peptide cleavage site. To investigate its role in signal peptide cleavage, I used archaellin variants in which the + 3 glycine was mutated to all other possibilities in in vitro cleavage reactions. Cleavage was observed with ten different amino acids at the + 3 position, indicating that the observed glycine conservation is not required for this essential processing step.

Identification of inhibitors of the transmembrane protease FlaK of Methanococcus maripaludis

GxGD‐type intramembrane cleaving proteases (I‐CLiPs) form a family of proteolytic enzymes that feature an aspartate‐based catalytic mechanism. Yet, they structurally and functionally largely differ from the classical pepsin‐like aspartic proteases. Among them are the archaeal enzyme FlaK, processing its substrate FlaB2 during the formation of flagella and γ‐secretase, which is centrally involved in the etiology of the neurodegenerative Alzheimer's disease. We developed an optimized activity assay for FlaK and based on screening of a small in‐house library and chemical synthesis, we identified compound 9 as the first inhibitor of this enzyme. Our results show that this intramembrane protease differs from classical pepsin‐like aspartic proteases and give insights into the substrate recognition of this enzyme. By providing the needed tools to further study the enzymatic cycle of FlaK, our results also enable further studies towards a functional understanding of other GxGD‐type I‐CLiPs.